Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VIALM: A Survey and Benchmark of Visually Impaired Assistance with Large Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01735 v2 pith:I2CU5E2Q submitted 2024-01-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

VIALM: A Survey and Benchmark of Visually Impaired Assistance with Large Models

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV
keywords impairedvialmvisuallyaimsassistancebenchmarkcapabilitiesgpt-4
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visually Impaired Assistance (VIA) aims to automatically help the visually impaired (VI) handle daily activities. The advancement of VIA primarily depends on developments in Computer Vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), both of which exhibit cutting-edge paradigms with large models (LMs). Furthermore, LMs have shown exceptional multimodal abilities to tackle challenging physically-grounded tasks such as embodied robots. To investigate the potential and limitations of state-of-the-art (SOTA) LMs' capabilities in VIA applications, we present an extensive study for the task of VIA with LMs (VIALM). In this task, given an image illustrating the physical environments and a linguistic request from a VI user, VIALM aims to output step-by-step guidance to assist the VI user in fulfilling the request grounded in the environment. The study consists of a survey reviewing recent LM research and benchmark experiments examining selected LMs' capabilities in VIA. The results indicate that while LMs can potentially benefit VIA, their output cannot be well environment-grounded (i.e., 25.7% GPT-4's responses) and lacks fine-grained guidance (i.e., 32.1% GPT-4's responses).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Urban Risk-Aware Navigation via VQA-Based Event Maps for People with Low Vision

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A hierarchical VQA system aggregates model answers into weighted risk scores that produce four-category safety event maps for urban navigation, backed by a new 20-city dataset where generative MLLMs like Qwen-VL outpe...

  2. GuideDog: A Real-World Egocentric Multimodal Dataset for Blind and Low-Vision Accessibility-Aware Guidance

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GuideDog supplies 22K egocentric image-description pairs from 46 countries and an 818-sample QA benchmark showing that current multimodal models still struggle with depth perception and BLV-specific guidance rules.