Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Self-Alignment of Large Language Models via Monopolylogue-based Social Scene Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05699 v3 pith:UW3A7WTB submitted 2024-02-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

Self-Alignment of Large Language Models via Monopolylogue-based Social Scene Simulation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY
keywords humanmatrixsocialvaluesscenealigninglanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values is imperative to mitigate potential adverse effects resulting from their misuse. Drawing from the sociological insight that acknowledging all parties' concerns is a key factor in shaping human values, this paper proposes a novel direction to align LLMs by themselves: social scene simulation. To achieve this, we present MATRIX, a novel social scene simulator that emulates realistic scenes around a user's input query, enabling the LLM to take social consequences into account before responding. MATRIX serves as a virtual rehearsal space, akin to a Monopolylogue, where the LLM performs diverse roles related to the query and practice by itself. To inject this alignment, we fine-tune the LLM with MATRIX-simulated data, ensuring adherence to human values without compromising inference speed. We theoretically show that the LLM with MATRIX outperforms Constitutional AI under mild assumptions. Finally, extensive experiments validate that our method outperforms over 10 baselines across 4 benchmarks. As evidenced by 875 user ratings, our tuned 13B-size LLM exceeds GPT-4 in aligning with human values. See our project page at https://shuotang123.github.io/MATRIX.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow

    cs.HC 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DoubleAgents shows that a distributed-cognition design with coordination agent, dashboard, and policy module increases user comfort and reliance on AI agents for coordination tasks over time.

  2. Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A comprehensive survey that taxonomizes safety threats to large models and agents, reviews defenses and benchmarks, and outlines open challenges.