Pith. sign in

REVIEW 25 cited by

LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websites

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.06664 v3 pith:TVCQ4CW3 submitted 2024-02-06 cs.CR cs.AI

LLM Agents can Autonomously Hack Websites

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords agentsautonomouslycapablellmsmodelswebsitescallcapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable and can now interact with tools (i.e., call functions), read documents, and recursively call themselves. As a result, these LLMs can now function autonomously as agents. With the rise in capabilities of these agents, recent work has speculated on how LLM agents would affect cybersecurity. However, not much is known about the offensive capabilities of LLM agents. In this work, we show that LLM agents can autonomously hack websites, performing tasks as complex as blind database schema extraction and SQL injections without human feedback. Importantly, the agent does not need to know the vulnerability beforehand. This capability is uniquely enabled by frontier models that are highly capable of tool use and leveraging extended context. Namely, we show that GPT-4 is capable of such hacks, but existing open-source models are not. Finally, we show that GPT-4 is capable of autonomously finding vulnerabilities in websites in the wild. Our findings raise questions about the widespread deployment of LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 25 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first SoK on LLM-based AutoPT frameworks provides a six-dimension taxonomy of agent designs and a unified empirical benchmark evaluating 15 frameworks via over 10 billion tokens and 1,500 manually reviewed logs.

  2. Decoupling Reconnaissance and Exploitation: Measuring the Capability Boundaries of LLM-Based Web Penetration Testing

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A decoupled evaluation framework shows LLM penetration agents reach 90% exploitation success with ground-truth context but only 50% reconnaissance recall due to telemetry parsing failures across 50 vulnerabilities.

  3. How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Empirical study of 400 LLM attack runs finds exploitation success rates of 25-85% across four models against a fixed multi-service honeypot, with model-distinctive failure modes and p<0.001 differences.

  4. Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discovery

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AgentFlow uses a typed graph DSL covering roles, prompts, tools, topology and protocol plus a runtime-signal feedback loop to optimize multi-agent harnesses, reaching 84.3% on TerminalBench-2 and discovering ten new z...

  5. Improving LLM Unlearning Robustness via Random Perturbations

    cs.CL 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLM unlearning is reframed as inadvertently installing backdoor triggers on forget-tokens; Random Noise Augmentation is introduced as a defense that improves robustness with theoretical guarantees.

  6. APT-Agent: Automated Penetration Testing using Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    APT-Agent automates penetration testing with LLMs using rectification and memory modules, achieving 84.29% end-to-end success on Metasploitable 2 versus lower rates for baselines.

  7. Towards Optimal Agentic Architectures for Offensive Security Tasks

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Empirical comparison of agentic topologies for offensive security shows MAS-Indep reaching 64.2% validated detection while simpler baselines remain competitive on efficiency, with whitebox and web targets outperformin...

  8. Organizational Security Resource Estimation via Vulnerability Queueing

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A queueing framework segments vulnerability data with Gaussian mixture models, fits arrival/service/resource parameters by KL-divergence minimization, and reports 91-96% accuracy in estimating organizational cyber res...

  9. Scale-free congestion clusters in large-scale traffic networks: a continuum modeling study

    physics.soc-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The Aw–Rascle–Zhang continuum model on directed lattice networks yields power-law spatiotemporal congestion clusters with finite-size scaling by linear system size.

  10. The 2025 AI Agent Index: Documenting Technical and Safety Features of Deployed Agentic AI Systems

    cs.CY 2026-02 accept novelty 6.0

    The 2025 AI Agent Index catalogs technical and safety details for 30 deployed AI agents and finds low developer transparency on safety, evaluations, and societal impacts.

  11. From Rookie to Expert: Manipulating LLMs for Automated Vulnerability Exploitation in Enterprise Software

    cs.SE 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RSA prompting enables LLMs to automatically create functional exploits for CVEs in Odoo ERP, succeeding on all tested cases in 3-5 rounds and removing the need for manual effort.

  12. A Survey of LLM-Driven Penetration Testing: Taxonomy, Co-Evolution, and Open Challenges

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5

    LLM pentest agents co-evolved through four bottleneck-driven phases into RLVR systems, while CTF platforms became dual evaluation/training infrastructure and three linked reliability gaps remain.

  13. Poisoned Playbooks: Demystifying Knowledge Poisoning Effects on AI Security Agents

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Injecting one poisoned playbook into security knowledge sources causes systematic behavior changes in RAG AI agents across multiple LLMs and tasks, explained by a Verification Boundary classification.

  14. OpenAnt: LLM-Powered Vulnerability Discovery Through Code Decomposition, Adversarial Verification, and Dynamic Testing

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    OpenAnt is an open-source pipeline that uses code decomposition, LLM-based adversarial verification, and automated dynamic testing to find vulnerabilities in large projects like OpenSSL and WordPress while claiming lo...

  15. ClawHub Security Signals: When VirusTotal, Static Analysis, and SkillSpector Disagree

    cs.CR 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    Analysis of 67,453 OpenClaw skills shows three scanners overlap on at most 10.4% of combined positives, with 81.9% flagged by only one scanner and distinct profiles for malicious versus suspicious skills.

  16. Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces DTF, a proof-derived authorization architecture using justification proofs, consensus evaluation, ephemeral identities, and evidence chains to govern AI agent actions on mutation substrates.

  17. SHM-Agents: A Generalist-Specialist Integrated Agent System for Structural Health Monitoring

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SHM-Agents is an LLM-plus-specialist-agent framework that claims to execute a wide range of SHM tasks end-to-end via natural language on data from a long-span cable-stayed bridge.

  18. Systematic Capability Benchmarking of Frontier Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Tasks

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Claude 4.5 Opus reaches 59% solve rate on offensive cyber CTF tasks, with a Kali Linux environment adding 9.5 percentage points over Ubuntu while prompt engineering often hurts performance in equipped setups.

  19. LanG -- A Governance-Aware Agentic AI Platform for Unified Security Operations

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LanG presents a governance-aware agentic AI platform for unified security operations that reports strong performance on incident correlation, rule generation, attack reconstruction, and AI safety guardrails in an open...

  20. Scale-free congestion clusters in large-scale traffic networks: a continuum modeling study

    physics.soc-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations of the Aw-Rascle-Zhang model on lattice networks produce scale-free congestion clusters with power-law size distributions and finite-size scaling.

  21. Benchmarking Mythos-Linked Bug Rediscovery

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A benchmarking experiment finds low rediscovery rates for three models on six Mythos-linked bug tasks, with only six target matches across 54 attempts under controlled prompting.

  22. Agentic AI and the Industrialization of Cyber Offense: Forecast, Consequences, and Defensive Priorities for Enterprises and the Mittelstand

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Agentic AI lowers the cost and speed of cyber attacks, requiring immediate improvements in identity management, phishing-resistant authentication, patching, and agent governance for large enterprises and the Mittelstand.

  23. Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.

  24. Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A synthesis of 247 papers on LLM agent security identifies prompt injection and tool hijacking as dominant threats, notes weakly compositional defenses, and argues for trust boundaries and realistic evaluations.

  25. AI-Driven Security Alert Screening and Alert Fatigue Mitigation in Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A literature survey synthesizes 119 studies on AI-driven alert screening into a four-stage taxonomy of filtering, triage, correlation, and generative augmentation while identifying gaps in deployment realism and robustness.