Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guide

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14837 v1 pith:6DMHAABB submitted 2024-02-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

An Empirical Categorization of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models: A Practitioner's Guide

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords techniquesllmspromptpromptingcategorizationeffectivemodelspractitioners
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to rapid advancements in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), programming these models with prompts has recently gained significant attention. However, the sheer number of available prompt engineering techniques creates an overwhelming landscape for practitioners looking to utilize these tools. For the most efficient and effective use of LLMs, it is important to compile a comprehensive list of prompting techniques and establish a standardized, interdisciplinary categorization framework. In this survey, we examine some of the most well-known prompting techniques from both academic and practical viewpoints and classify them into seven distinct categories. We present an overview of each category, aiming to clarify their unique contributions and showcase their practical applications in real-world examples in order to equip fellow practitioners with a structured framework for understanding and categorizing prompting techniques tailored to their specific domains. We believe that this approach will help simplify the complex landscape of prompt engineering and enable more effective utilization of LLMs in various applications. By providing practitioners with a systematic approach to prompt categorization, we aim to assist in navigating the intricacies of effective prompt design for conversational pre-trained LLMs and inspire new possibilities in their respective fields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Agentic Workflow for Detecting Personally Identifiable Information in Crash Narratives

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hybrid agentic workflow using Presidio for structured PII and fine-tuned LLMs plus verification for names, addresses, and identifiers detects PII in crash narratives at 0.82 precision and 0.94 recall.

  2. A Taxonomy of Single-Turn Textual Prompt Patterns

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A taxonomy that consolidates prompt patterns from prior surveys into 30 unique canonical forms organized by two dimensions.

  3. Modularizing Educational LLM-Agency for Fostering Responsible Learning Assistance

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a modular agentic architecture for educational LLMs with stage-specific modules to incorporate pedagogical advice and improve controllability over monolithic chatbots.