Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Large Language Models for Education: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.13001 v1 pith:2BIP4FI5 submitted 2024-05-12 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

Large Language Models for Education: A Survey

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY
keywords educationllmsllmedutechnologiesbeenchallengeslanguagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a profound impact on traditional education. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used in various applications such as natural language processing, computer vision, speech recognition, and autonomous driving. LLMs have also been applied in many fields, including recommendation, finance, government, education, legal affairs, and finance. As powerful auxiliary tools, LLMs incorporate various technologies such as deep learning, pre-training, fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. The use of LLMs for smart education (LLMEdu) has been a significant strategic direction for countries worldwide. While LLMs have shown great promise in improving teaching quality, changing education models, and modifying teacher roles, the technologies are still facing several challenges. In this paper, we conduct a systematic review of LLMEdu, focusing on current technologies, challenges, and future developments. We first summarize the current state of LLMEdu and then introduce the characteristics of LLMs and education, as well as the benefits of integrating LLMs into education. We also review the process of integrating LLMs into the education industry, as well as the introduction of related technologies. Finally, we discuss the challenges and problems faced by LLMEdu, as well as prospects for future optimization of LLMEdu.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polar: A Benchmark for Evaluating Political Bias in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Polar is a new cross-context benchmark showing LLM political bias measurements are not fixed but vary with country, issue, model, and language.

  2. BRIDGE the Gap: Mitigating Bias Amplification in Automated Scoring of English Language Learners via Inter-group Data Augmentation

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BRIDGE reduces bias against high-scoring ELL students in automated scoring by generating synthetic samples via inter-group content pasting and quality discrimination, achieving fairness gains comparable to additional ...

  3. Bridging Textual Profiles and Latent User Embeddings for Personalization

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BLUE aligns LLM-generated textual user profiles with embedding-based recommendation objectives via reinforcement learning and next-item text supervision, yielding better zero-shot performance and cross-domain transfer...

  4. ELEVATE: Designing Human-Centered GenAI Virtual Tutors for Scalable and Inclusive Education

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    ELEVATE is a framework and prototype for deploying LLM-powered 3D avatar tutors locally on consumer hardware with a three-stratum design separating interaction, execution, and governance layers.