Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

The Evolution of Multimodal Model Architectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17927 v1 pith:YQJRKA5L submitted 2024-05-28 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGeess.AS

The Evolution of Multimodal Model Architectures

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.LGeess.AS
keywords multimodalmodelarchitecturetypestypeany-to-anyarchitecturallayers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work uniquely identifies and characterizes four prevalent multimodal model architectural patterns in the contemporary multimodal landscape. Systematically categorizing models by architecture type facilitates monitoring of developments in the multimodal domain. Distinct from recent survey papers that present general information on multimodal architectures, this research conducts a comprehensive exploration of architectural details and identifies four specific architectural types. The types are distinguished by their respective methodologies for integrating multimodal inputs into the deep neural network model. The first two types (Type A and B) deeply fuses multimodal inputs within the internal layers of the model, whereas the following two types (Type C and D) facilitate early fusion at the input stage. Type-A employs standard cross-attention, whereas Type-B utilizes custom-designed layers for modality fusion within the internal layers. On the other hand, Type-C utilizes modality-specific encoders, while Type-D leverages tokenizers to process the modalities at the model's input stage. The identified architecture types aid the monitoring of any-to-any multimodal model development. Notably, Type-C and Type-D are currently favored in the construction of any-to-any multimodal models. Type-C, distinguished by its non-tokenizing multimodal model architecture, is emerging as a viable alternative to Type-D, which utilizes input-tokenizing techniques. To assist in model selection, this work highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each architecture type based on data and compute requirements, architecture complexity, scalability, simplification of adding modalities, training objectives, and any-to-any multimodal generation capability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Decoder-based VLMs over-align visual features to a universal text subspace, injecting linguistic bias; projecting out its top principal components reduces hallucinations on POPE, CHAIR, AMBER and improves long-form ca...

  2. When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Decoder-based VLMs hallucinate due to geometric over-alignment of visual embeddings with the text manifold in a universal dataset-agnostic subspace, mitigated by projecting out the linguistic bias.

  3. When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Decoder-based VLMs hallucinate because visual embeddings are over-aligned to a text manifold; projecting out the top principal components of a universal linguistic subspace reduces this bias and improves benchmark per...

  4. When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Decoder-based VLMs over-align visual embeddings to text manifold causing linguistic bias in top PCs of a universal text subspace; projecting out this subspace reduces hallucinations on POPE/CHAIR/AMBER and improves CLAIR.

  5. V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning

    cs.AI 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    V-JEPA 2 pre-trained on massive unlabeled video achieves strong results on motion understanding and action anticipation, SOTA video QA at 8B scale, and enables zero-shot robotic planning on Franka arms using only 62 h...