Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Disentangling Logic: The Role of Context in Large Language Model Reasoning Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02787 v1 pith:MG6FPBP6 submitted 2024-06-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Disentangling Logic: The Role of Context in Large Language Model Reasoning Capabilities

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoninglogiclogicalabstractcapabilitiesdomainsllmsproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study intends to systematically disentangle pure logic reasoning and text understanding by investigating the contrast across abstract and contextualized logical problems from a comprehensive set of domains. We explore whether LLMs demonstrate genuine reasoning capabilities across various domains when the underlying logical structure remains constant. We focus on two main questions (1) Can abstract logical problems alone accurately benchmark an LLM's reasoning ability in real-world scenarios, disentangled from contextual support in practical settings? (2) Does fine-tuning LLMs on abstract logic problem generalize to contextualized logic problems and vice versa? To investigate these questions, we focus on standard propositional logic, specifically propositional deductive and abductive logic reasoning. In particular, we construct instantiated datasets for deductive and abductive reasoning with 4 levels of difficulty, encompassing 12 distinct categories or domains based on the categorization of Wikipedia. Our experiments aim to provide insights into disentangling context in logical reasoning and the true reasoning capabilities of LLMs and their generalization potential. The code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/agiresearch/ContextHub.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    AgentReview is the first LLM-based simulation framework for peer review that quantifies a 37.1% decision variation attributable to reviewer biases.

  2. From Pixels to Places: A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Image Geolocalization Ability in Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IMAGEO-Bench evaluates 10 LLMs on image geolocalization across global street scenes, US POIs, and private images, revealing closed-source model advantages and biases favoring high-resource regions.

  3. Do VLMs See What Sensors Feel? A Scalable Expert-Guided Design for Wheelchair Accessibility Assessment from Street View

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Expert-guided VLMs produce accessibility ratings from street-view images that show negative correlation and distributional similarity with GPS-derived wheelchair dwell times as a mobility-friction proxy.