Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01104 v3 pith:7OB6TWNU submitted 2024-10-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.IT

Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation)

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.IT
keywords softmaxsharpcircuitsfunctioninputsperformsizesystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key property of reasoning systems is the ability to make sharp decisions on their input data. For contemporary AI systems, a key carrier of sharp behaviour is the softmax function, with its capability to perform differentiable query-key lookups. It is a common belief that the predictive power of networks leveraging softmax arises from "circuits" which sharply perform certain kinds of computations consistently across many diverse inputs. However, for these circuits to be robust, they would need to generalise well to arbitrary valid inputs. In this paper, we dispel this myth: even for tasks as simple as finding the maximum key, any learned circuitry must disperse as the number of items grows at test time. We attribute this to a fundamental limitation of the softmax function to robustly approximate sharp functions with increasing problem size, prove this phenomenon theoretically, and propose adaptive temperature as an ad-hoc technique for improving the sharpness of softmax at inference time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can Language Models Actually Retrieve In-Context? Drowning in Documents at Million Token Scale

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A 0.6B LM with length-aware attention adjustments performs competitive in-context retrieval at million-token scale on MS MARCO, NQ, and LIMIT benchmarks.

  2. MAST: Mask-Guided Attention Mass Allocation for Training-Free Multi-Style Transfer

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MAST is a mask-guided attention allocation method that enables artifact-free multi-style transfer in diffusion models by anchoring layout, distributing attention mass, scaling sharpness, and injecting details.

  3. A Mechanistic Analysis of Looped Reasoning Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Looped LLMs converge to distinct cyclic fixed points per layer, repeating feedforward-style inference stages across recurrences.

  4. Remember to Forget: Gated Adaptive Positional Encoding

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GAPE augments RoPE with query- and key-dependent gates to stabilize attention and improve long-context performance in language models.