Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13640 v2 pith:65QU7C43 submitted 2024-10-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmscorrectnesslatentresponseself-evaluationchain-of-embeddinghiddenoutput-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

LLM self-evaluation relies on the LLM's own ability to estimate response correctness, which can greatly improve its deployment reliability. In this research track, we propose the Chain-of-Embedding (CoE) in the latent space to enable LLMs to perform output-free self-evaluation. CoE consists of all progressive hidden states produced during the inference time, which can be treated as the latent thinking path of LLMs. We find that when LLMs respond correctly and incorrectly, their CoE features differ, these discrepancies assist us in estimating LLM response correctness. Experiments in four diverse domains and seven LLMs fully demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Meanwhile, its label-free design intent without any training and millisecond-level computational cost ensures real-time feedback in large-scale scenarios. More importantly, we provide interesting insights into LLM response correctness from the perspective of hidden state changes inside LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantic Step Prediction: Multi-Step Latent Forecasting in LLM Reasoning Trajectories via Step Sampling

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Applying STP at consecutive semantic reasoning steps achieves 168x more accurate multi-step latent prediction on ProcessBench than frozen baselines, with trajectories forming smooth curves best captured by non-linear ...

  2. On the Overscaling Curse of Parallel Thinking: System Efficacy Contradicts Sample Efficiency

    cs.LG 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Parallel thinking in LLMs suffers from overscaling where fixed global budgets waste samples; LanBo predicts per-sample budgets from latent states to raise utilization without hurting accuracy.

  3. Consensus Entropy: Harnessing Multi-VLM Agreement for Self-Verifying and Self-Improving OCR

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Consensus Entropy measures inter-VLM output agreement to verify OCR reliability and enable self-improving ensembles, yielding 42.1% F1 gains over single-model judging.

  4. DyCo-RL: Dynamic Cross-Modal Coordination for Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DyCo-RL improves four RLVR algorithms on seven visual and math reasoning benchmarks by assigning tokens visual or text roles via Fisher-Rao geodesic distance on attention and reweighting advantages by role-alignment score.

  5. PAIR: Prefix-Aware Internal Reward Model for Multi-Turn Agent Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PAIR combines a hidden-state probe with an attention correction to deliver robust step-level rewards for GRPO-based optimization of multi-turn LLM agents, achieving high AUROC on contaminated trajectories at low cost.

  6. PAIR: Prefix-Aware Internal Reward Model for Multi-Turn Agent Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A two-stage probe (hidden-state estimate plus attention-based correction) yields per-step GRPO rewards that survive prefix contamination and beat external-judge and tree-search rewards in the reported benchmarks.

  7. Is Your Model Thinking or Just Stagnating? PUMA: Diagnosing Reasoning Pathology via Phase-Momentum Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    PUMA detects when a reasoning model's entropy drop aligns with hidden-state momentum, truncates at that point, and reports improved accuracy-efficiency on 1.5B-32B reasoning models.

  8. Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SIVR detects LLM hallucinations by learning from token-wise and layer-wise variance patterns in internal hidden states, outperforming baselines with better generalization and less training data.