Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CAMEL-Bench: A Comprehensive Arabic LMM Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.18976 v1 pith:D2UMORX2 submitted 2024-10-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords understandingbenchmarkcamel-benchevaluationlmmsarabicbenchmarksclosed-source
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed a significant interest in developing large multimodal models (LMMs) capable of performing various visual reasoning and understanding tasks. This has led to the introduction of multiple LMM benchmarks to evaluate LMMs on different tasks. However, most existing LMM evaluation benchmarks are predominantly English-centric. In this work, we develop a comprehensive LMM evaluation benchmark for the Arabic language to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. The proposed benchmark, named CAMEL-Bench, comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains including, multi-image understanding, complex visual perception, handwritten document understanding, video understanding, medical imaging, plant diseases, and remote sensing-based land use understanding to evaluate broad scenario generalizability. Our CAMEL-Bench comprises around 29,036 questions that are filtered from a larger pool of samples, where the quality is manually verified by native speakers to ensure reliable model assessment. We conduct evaluations of both closed-source, including GPT-4 series, and open-source LMMs. Our analysis reveals the need for substantial improvement, especially among the best open-source models, with even the closed-source GPT-4o achieving an overall score of 62%. Our benchmark and evaluation scripts are open-sourced.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A-SEA3L-QA: A Fully Automated Self-Evolving, Adversarial Workflow for Arabic Long-Context Question-Answer Generation

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An AI-driven, self-refining loop generates multi-page Arabic QA pairs and a new benchmark, but the claimed gains over static pipelines are not demonstrated.

  2. Multi-Agent Interactive Question Generation Framework for Long Document Understanding

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent question generation pipeline produces long-context English and Arabic QA pairs (AraEngLongBench), and top LVLMs score below 50% on the resulting benchmark.

Pith tools