Pith. sign in

REVIEW 30 cited by

DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00836 v2 pith:CPBAEWDT submitted 2024-10-29 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Models

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords vlmsreasoningmathematicaldynamathvisualmodelsquestionsrobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown great potential in tackling mathematical reasoning tasks that involve visual context. Unlike humans who can reliably apply solution steps to similar problems with minor modifications, we found that SOTA VLMs like GPT-4o can consistently fail in these scenarios, revealing limitations in their mathematical reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we investigate the mathematical reasoning robustness in VLMs and evaluate how well these models perform under different variants of the same question, such as changes in visual numerical values or function graphs. While several vision-based math benchmarks have been developed to assess VLMs' problem-solving capabilities, these benchmarks contain only static sets of problems and cannot easily evaluate mathematical reasoning robustness. To fill this gap, we introduce DynaMath, a dynamic visual math benchmark designed for in-depth assessment of VLMs. DynaMath includes 501 high-quality, multi-topic seed questions, each represented as a Python program. Those programs are carefully designed and annotated to enable the automatic generation of a much larger set of concrete questions, including many different types of visual and textual variations. DynaMath allows us to evaluate the generalization ability of VLMs, by assessing their performance under varying input conditions of a seed question. We evaluated 14 SOTA VLMs with 5,010 generated concrete questions. Our results show that the worst-case model accuracy, defined as the percentage of correctly answered seed questions in all 10 variants, is significantly lower than the average-case accuracy. Our analysis emphasizes the need to study the robustness of VLMs' reasoning abilities, and DynaMath provides valuable insights to guide the development of more reliable models for mathematical reasoning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 30 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ZPPO improves distillation to small vision-language models by using binary and negative candidate prompts plus a replay buffer for hard questions, outperforming standard distillation and GRPO on a 31-benchmark suite w...

  2. Sci-Rho: A Multilingual Visually-Grounded Symbolic Benchmark for STEM Problems

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Sci-Rho is a dynamic multilingual visually-grounded symbolic benchmark for STEM problems that reveals robustness gaps in current VLMs between average and worst-case performance.

  3. Are Tools Always Beneficial? Learning to Invoke Tools Adaptively for Dual-Mode Multimodal LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    AutoTool uses reinforcement learning with dual-mode rewards to train multimodal LLMs to adaptively choose between tool-assisted and text-centric reasoning, yielding accuracy and efficiency gains on V* and POPE benchmarks.

  4. CEPO: RLVR Self-Distillation using Contrastive Evidence Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    CEPO sharpens token credit in RLVR by requiring tokens to be favored by the correct answer and disfavored by wrong answers drawn from rejected rollouts, delivering accuracy gains on five multimodal math benchmarks.

  5. ReaLB: Real-Time Load Balancing for Multimodal MoE Inference

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReaLB balances multimodal MoE inference loads by switching vision-heavy experts to lower FP4 precision per device rank, hiding the change in the dispatch phase to deliver 1.10-1.32x speedup with <1% accuracy degradation.

  6. Why and When Visual Token Pruning Fails? A Study on Relevant Visual Information Shift in MLLMs Decoding

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Visual token pruning in MLLMs fails on complex reasoning due to Relevant Visual Information Shift during decoding, but the DSTP framework fixes it training-free across models.

  7. Addressing Overthinking in Large Vision-Language Models via Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization

    cs.CV 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GPRO trains a meta-controller on 790k failure-labeled samples to dynamically select fast, perception, or reasoning paths in LVLMs, yielding higher accuracy and shorter responses than prior slow-thinking methods.

  8. DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DeepEyes uses reinforcement learning to teach vision-language models active perception and image-based thinking, yielding gains on perception, reasoning, grounding, and hallucination benchmarks.

  9. R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization

    cs.AI 2025-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    R1-VL uses StepGRPO with rule-based StepRAR and StepRVR rewards to let MLLMs learn step-by-step reasoning beyond imitation of positive paths.

  10. Model Guides You How to Draw: Adaptive Visual Gating for Unified Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Early Generation Intent and Visual Fidelity signals let AdaViG abort low-utility intermediate image generations in UMM math CoT, improving accuracy up to 5.7% and cutting visual FLOPs 25–91%.

  11. CodePercept: Code-Grounded Visual STEM Perception for MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.5

    Perception, not reasoning, is the main bottleneck for MLLM STEM visual reasoning, and training on executable reconstruction code measurably fixes it.

  12. TRON: Targeted Rule-Verifiable Online Environments for Visual Reasoning RL

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TRON supplies 520 rule-verifiable online visual reasoning environments across five ability buckets that generate unlimited training instances for RL post-training, yielding consistent gains on ten external multimodal ...

  13. Are Tools Always Beneficial? Learning to Invoke Tools Adaptively for Dual-Mode Multimodal LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AutoTool uses dual-mode RL to let MLLMs adaptively choose tool use or text-only reasoning, reporting 21.8% accuracy gain on V* and 44.9% efficiency gain on POPE versus baselines.

  14. Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipe

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Uni-OPD improves on-policy distillation via student-side data balancing for informative rollouts and teacher-side outcome-guided margin calibration that restores order consistency with rewards.

  15. Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipe

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Uni-OPD unifies on-policy distillation across LLMs and MLLMs with dual-perspective strategies that promote student exploration and enforce order-consistent teacher supervision based on outcome rewards.

  16. Segment-Aligned Policy Optimization for Multi-Modal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SAPO introduces segment-level policy optimization using a step-wise MDP abstraction to better align RL updates with reasoning structure in multi-modal LLM tasks.

  17. ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    ChartVerse uses Rollout Posterior Entropy and truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis to produce 640K high-quality chart reasoning samples, training an 8B model that surpasses its 30B teacher.

  18. Boosting Reasoning in Large Multimodal Models via Activation Replay

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Activation Replay boosts multimodal reasoning in post-trained LMMs by replaying low-entropy activations from base models to RLVR counterparts at test time via visual token manipulation.

  19. InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    InternVL3.5 advances open-source multimodal models with Cascade RL for +16% reasoning gains and ViR for 4x inference speedup, with the 241B model reaching SOTA among open-source MLLMs on multimodal, reasoning, and age...

  20. GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GLM-4.5V reaches state-of-the-art results on 42 multimodal benchmarks among open-source models of similar size by applying reinforcement learning with curriculum sampling to a strong vision foundation model.

  21. InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    InternVL3-78B sets a new open-source SOTA of 72.2 on MMMU via native joint multimodal pre-training, V2PE, MPO, and test-time scaling while remaining competitive with proprietary models.

  22. TuringViT: Making SOTA Vision Transformers Accessible to All

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TuringViT uses Turing Linear Attention, VISTA-Curation, and dynamic-resolution pretraining to outperform open ViT baselines with 10% data while improving VLM performance and high-resolution latency.

  23. TuringViT: Making SOTA Vision Transformers Accessible to All

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TuringViT claims a new ViT design with linear attention and curated data that matches SOTA performance using 10% of typical pretraining data while supporting dynamic resolutions and improving VLM integration.

  24. Test-Time Scaling in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Generation and Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey of test-time scaling for multimodal foundation models that introduces a three-way taxonomy of sampling, feedback, and search approaches along with applications and benchmarks.

  25. ReaLB: Real-Time Load Balancing for Multimodal MoE Inference

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ReaLB achieves 1.29x layer-level speedup in multimodal MoE inference by per-rank dynamic precision adjustment to FP4 for vision-dominated experts, with accuracy loss limited to 1.2%.

  26. Act Wisely: Cultivating Meta-Cognitive Tool Use in Agentic Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    HDPO reframes tool efficiency as a conditional objective within accurate trajectories, enabling Metis to reduce tool invocations by orders of magnitude while raising reasoning accuracy.

  27. Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Seed1.8 is a new foundation model that adds unified agentic capabilities for search, code execution, and GUI interaction to existing LLM and vision strengths.

  28. Kwai Keye-VL-2.0 Technical Report

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Kwai Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B is a 30B MoE model with 3B active parameters using DSA adaptation and MOPD distillation that reports SOTA results on video understanding and agent benchmarks.

  29. R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    R1-Onevision turns images into structured text for multimodal reasoning, trains on a custom dataset with RL, and claims SOTA results on an educational benchmark.

  30. Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Seed2.0 model series reports gains in reasoning, visual understanding, search, and reliability on intricate long-horizon tasks via an internal evaluation system.