Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 133 references

Connecting Gravity and Quantum Physics: Primordial Black Holes and Accelerated Evolution of the Universe

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that primordial black holes are two-dimensional photon Bose-Einstein condensates whose Compton wavelength equals the horizon circumference, and that this single identity explains dark matter, dark energy, baryogenesis…

desk verdict The paper's central ansatz equating the condensate wavelength to the horizon circumference fails a 2π consistency check against black hole thermodynamics, and the later cosmological numbers are built on that mismatch. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11047 v3 pith:OYW322VQ submitted 2024-11-17 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

Victor Borsevici , Samit Ganguly , Goutam Manna This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thquant-ph MSC 83C5783F05 PACS 98.80.-k04.70.Dy95.35.+d
keywords primordialblackholesphotonBose-Einsteincondensatequantizedholemassesdarkmatterenergybaryogenesisearlygalaxyformationquantumgravity
topics Dark EnergyDark MatterQuantum GravityMatter-Antimatter Asymmetry
open problems Dark MatterDark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a primordial black hole is not a vacuum singularity but a two-dimensional spherical cloud of condensed light, a photon Bose-Einstein condensate, whose Compton wavelength equals the horizon circumference. From that single geometric identity the authors derive a discrete mass spectrum, $M_s = M_p \sqrt{n_s}$, for black holes, and then use it to explain dark matter, dark energy, baryogenesis, and the early assembly of supermassive black holes and galaxies. The payoff would be a quantum description of gravity's most extreme objects that also accounts for the accelerated expansion of the universe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-dimensional spherical photon Bose-Einstein condensate with an effective rest mass, treated as a membrane stretched horizon. Identifying its Compton wavelength with the Schwarzschild circumference, Eq. (1), is the step that carries the whole derivation: every quantized black-hole quantity and every later cosmological density is built from it. A secondary mechanism is the statistical model of the Planck era as a face-centered cubic lattice of Planck photons, whose escape probability $\aleph$ solves $\aleph = (1-\aleph)^{12}$, and whose remaining bound energy is split evenly between dark matter and dark energy.

What would settle it

Search the unresolved cosmic X-ray background for the hard component peaking near 30 to 40 keV that evaporating $10^{18}$-gram primordial black holes would produce; its absence, or a measured spectrum with a different peak and cutoff, would rule out the claimed dark-matter population.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that setting the Compton wavelength of condensed light equal to the horizon circumference, $\lambda_{\mathrm{sm}} = 2\pi R_s$, turns every black hole attribute, including mass, radius, entropy, temperature, lifetime, luminosity, and information content, into a quantized function of a single integer $n_s$. The mass ladder $M_s = M_p\sqrt{n_s}$ follows immediately, and it reproduces the known entropy-temperature relations of black holes up to numerical factors. The paper then extends this to cosmology: a Planck-era lattice of photons gives probabilities for forming free light and Planck black holes, yielding initial densities $\Omega_L \approx 0.14745$ and $\Omega_{\mathrm{DM}} \approx \Omega_{\mathrm{DE}} \approx 0.42628$, which evolve through successive primordial-black-hole generations into today's dark matter, understood as asteroid-mass black holes, and dark energy, understood as gravitational radiation. On this basis it claims to resolve the cosmological constant problem, the horizon problem, and the information-loss paradox while explaining the early massive galaxies seen by JWST.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Planck-era universe is a dense lattice of Planck photons with twelve nearest neighbors, that the probability of a photon breaking free is set by $\aleph = (1-\aleph)^{12}$, and that the remaining bound energy splits equally between dark matter and dark energy; if the lattice or the split is wrong, the later density predictions lose their anchor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Primordial black hole masses should form a discrete ladder $M_s = M_p\sqrt{n_s}$, so any observed population of such black holes should cluster at those mass values.
  • Dark matter would consist of asteroid-mass primordial black holes around $10^{17}$ to $10^{18}$ grams, with hard X-ray emission peaking near 30 to 40 keV from their quantum evaporation.
  • Dark energy would be the accumulated gravitational radiation from generations of primordial black hole mergers and decays, making its density grow as dark matter is converted into radiation.
  • The first protogalaxies and supermassive black holes would form before recombination, matching the high-redshift galaxies and quasars observed by JWST.
  • Baryon asymmetry would arise from neutron-pair emission by primordial black holes in a narrow mass window, producing the observed baryon-to-dark-matter ratio.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equal split of bound energy between dark matter and dark energy is more than a modeling choice, the framework predicts $\Omega_{\mathrm{DM}} \approx \Omega_{\mathrm{DE}}$ as a near-exact ratio, a tighter statement than current cosmological fits require.
  • The discrete mass spectrum could be probed statistically with gravitational-wave catalogs or microlensing surveys: a primordial black hole population should show an excess of events at masses $\sqrt{n}\,M_p$ rather than a smooth distribution.
  • The baryogenesis window between 1.02 and 1.25 GeV suggests a specific time interval for neutron production, roughly 87,000 to 190,000 years after the Big Bang; future measurements of primordial element abundances or cosmic microwave background spectral distortions could bracket that window.
  • Because the model replaces continuous blackbody evaporation with discrete two-particle jumps, it predicts a distinctive burst signature from individual evaporating black holes; searching for such bursts in X-ray or gamma-ray archives would be a direct test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that primordial black holes (PBHs) are two-dimensional spherical photon Bose-Einstein condensates and that the condensate's Compton wavelength equals the Schwarzschild circumference, Eq. (1). From this identification the authors derive a quantized PBH spectrum M_s = M_p sqrt(n_s), Eq. (7), with quantized entropy, temperature, information content, lifetime, and luminosity. These ingredients are then used to construct a cosmology: a Planck-era FCC lattice of photons, Eq. (53), an equal split of bound energy into dark matter and dark energy, Eqs. (58)–(59), successive generations of PBHs, baryogenesis from PBH decay, Eq. (93), and a dark-matter mass fixed by a temperature threshold, Eqs. (95)–(96). The paper claims to solve the dark matter and dark energy problems, the cosmological constant problem, the information-loss paradox, early galaxy and SMBH formation, and the JWST-implied accelerated early growth of structure.

Significance. If correct, the framework would constitute a major unification of quantum mechanics and gravity and would simultaneously resolve several long-standing cosmological problems. The paper is commendably explicit: it writes down concrete formulas, gives numerical values, and attempts quantitative comparisons with Hawking thermodynamics and Planck data. These virtues make the central assumptions falsifiable in principle. However, the load-bearing steps are asserted rather than derived: Eq. (1) is an ansatz that fails a basic consistency check against Bekenstein-Hawking thermodynamics, Eq. (36) is an unjustified transition-time postulate, the initial cosmological densities are fixed by ad hoc equations (53) and (58)–(59), and the baryogenesis calculation in Eq. (93) is circular because it inserts the observed baryon-to-dark-matter ratio as an input. The manuscript ships no machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, and several claims of being 'parameter-free' are contradicted by the free choices described above. The central physical claims therefore do not survive scrutiny at the level required for a serious journal.

major comments (5)
  1. [§II and §IV, Eqs. (1), (7), (8)] The foundational identification λ_sm = 2πR_s is asserted without derivation, and it fails a basic thermodynamic consistency test. Using the model's own mass quantization M_s = M_p sqrt(n_s), the standard entropy is S_BH = k_B c^3 A/(4Gℏ) = 4π k_B n_s, whereas the paper obtains S_s = 2 k_B n_s = S_BH/(2π). Likewise Eq. (8) gives T_s = 2π T_H rather than T_s = T_H. The text states these results are 'closely matched' with Bekenstein and Hawking, but a factor of 2π is not a close match. This discrepancy means the proposed microstate counting is not consistent with the area law of black hole thermodynamics, and because Eq. (7) feeds into the lifetimes, luminosities, and all subsequent cosmological energy budgets, this is a load-bearing internal inconsistency, not a presentation issue.
  2. [§V, Eqs. (36)–(38)] The transition time between quantum states is introduced as Δt_s = πR_s/c without derivation; the text says it is 'readily calculated' from causality and spherical geometry, but no calculation is shown. This postulate determines the lifetime τ_s = (4π/3) t_p n_s^{3/2} and luminosity L_s = L_p/(4π n_s), which differ from Hawking evaporation by a factor of 3840, as the authors themselves note. Because this factor is then used to obtain the 190,000-year baryogenesis timescale and the PBH lifetimes quoted in Sections X and XI, the entire chronology of the model rests on an unjustified assumption that changes the predicted rates by three orders of magnitude.
  3. [§VIII, Eqs. (53)–(59)] The initial cosmological energy densities are set by the equation ℵ=(1−ℵ)^12 and by the equal split of bound energy between dark matter and dark energy. The FCC-lattice structure with twelve neighbors is an ad hoc modeling choice, and the equation ℵ=(1−ℵ)^12 is not derived from any physical principle. The equal split in Eqs. (58)–(59) is likewise presented as a postulate. These choices directly fix Ω_DM and Ω_DE at the Planck epoch, and all later comparisons with the observed Ω_DE ≈ 0.6847 (e.g., Eqs. (75)–(77)) inherit this input. The claimed agreement with Planck data is therefore not an independent test of the model.
  4. [§X, Eqs. (93)–(95)] The baryogenesis calculation is circular. Equation (93) uses the observed ratio Ω_b/Ω_DM as an input to solve for the quantum number n*_s(n0), and the subsequent 'prediction' of baryonic matter production is obtained by feeding this same ratio back into the model. In addition, the contemporary dark-matter particle mass in Eqs. (95)–(96) is fixed by choosing a temperature threshold of 80 keV, with no independent derivation of this threshold. Thus the agreement with the observed baryon abundance and the claimed dark-matter mass are consequences of the input assumptions rather than falsifiable predictions.
  5. [§IX, Eqs. (80)–(82)] The scale-factor relation a(t) ∝ sqrt(n_s) is introduced as an assumption motivated by the entropy-area correspondence, but no dynamical equation is derived. The subsequent Hubble law H(t)=1/(3t), the Hubble radius R_H(t)=3ct, and the claimed 10% consistency with the present cosmic radius all follow from this assumed proportionality. Since this relation is used to support the model's early-universe expansion history, it constitutes another load-bearing postulate rather than a result derived from the framework.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo, 'Black H oles', which should be corrected.
  2. [§II, Eq. (51)] Equation (51) contains malformed radical notation (\radicaltp, \radicalvertex) and should be typeset properly; as printed, the expression is difficult to read.
  3. [§X, Eq. (93)] The placeholder '[ ? ]' appears in the text near the charm-quark discussion; the missing reference should be supplied.
  4. [Throughout] The manuscript repeatedly uses 'it's' where 'its' is intended, and several other grammatical infelicities; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [§VIII and §XII] The biblical 'days of creation' language and the quote from Genesis are not standard scientific exposition and should be removed or clearly identified as rhetorical, especially in a physics journal.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The paper's baryogenesis 'prediction' inserts the observed Ω_b/Ω_DM into Eq. (93) and solves for the threshold, the dark matter mass is obtained from a hand-chosen 80 keV temperature, and the foundational λ_sm = 2πR_s identification is imported from the first author's own prior work [44]; these are calibrated inputs presented as derived results.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section II, Eq. (1) (citing [44])]
    "The model of PBHs we present in this work is framed as 2D spherical photon condensates contained within their own gravitational fields [44]. Such a model naturally leads to a geometrical equation that directly connects the Compton wavelength, λ sm, of condensed light (quantum theory) with the geodesic length (general relativity) [44]: λ sm = 2πR s, (1)"

    Equation (1) is the single non-derived input from which the entire quantized spectrum M_s = M_p√n_s, S_s = 2k_B n_s, T_s = T_p/(4√n_s), etc. in Eq. (7) follows algebraically. The paper does not derive this identification here; it attributes it to the first author's own prior conference paper [44]. The later claim that the findings follow 'from clear and exact physical principles' is undercut by the fact that the central quantitative postulate is a self-cited ansatz. All subsequent PBH thermodynamic, lifetime, luminosity, and cosmological results reduce to this imported identification, so the foundational content of the paper is load-bearing self-citation rather than an independently derived first-principles result.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section X, Eq. (93) and following text]
    "Using a simple equation [ ? ] [2n∗_s(n0) − 2n_s(cq)] E(n0)/(E_p√n∗_s(n0)) = Ω_b/Ω_DM (93) ... We equate this to the energy density of baryon Ω_b=0.0496 divided by the energy density of the producing dark matter Ω_DM=0.32228 (Eq. (74))."

    Equation (93) is written with the observed ratio Ω_b/Ω_DM on the right-hand side, and the paper then solves for the quantum number n*_s(n0) that characterizes the PBH generation producing ordinary matter. The subsequent claim that PBHs produce baryonic matter in the observed proportion is therefore guaranteed by construction: the equation was calibrated to that ratio. The derived energy window 1.02–1.25 GeV, the 87-thousand-year baryogenesis interval, and the claimed correspondence to the recombination epoch all inherit this fitted input, so the baryogenesis section is a restatement of the observed baryon-to-dark-matter ratio rather than an independent prediction.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section XI, Eqs. (95)-(96)]
    "The formation process ended when the temperature inside the dense clumps dropped below the threshold level of 511 KeV /k_B, which is the electron rest energy, and then cooled to a lower equilibrium value of 80 KeV /k_B [98]. ... By applying the Eqs. (7), (23) and (27) that relate the threshold accretion temperature to the mass of a black hole and its associated parameters, we derive the following typical characteristics of contemporary dark matter: √n_s = E_p/(2 × 80KeV) = 7.625 × 10^22 (typical), M_s = 1.659 × 10^18g (typical);"

    The 'derived' contemporary dark matter mass is obtained by inserting a hand-chosen 80 keV equilibrium temperature into the model relations. The mass M_s = M_p × E_p/(2 × 80 keV) is simply the algebraic image of that input temperature; nothing inside the model fixes 80 keV independently. Presenting the resulting M_s as a prediction of dark matter properties, and later comparing it to PBH dark-matter expectations, tests the assumed temperature rather than a prediction of the framework. The same structure applies to the 'minimal' mass from the 511 keV electron-positron threshold in Eq. (96).

full rationale

Step 2 is the clearest fitted-input case: Eq. (93) contains the observed ratio Ω_b/Ω_DM on the right-hand side, and the paper solves for the very quantity later presented as the baryogenesis threshold. The baryon-to-dark-matter outcome is therefore a restatement of the input. Step 3 is analogous: the contemporary dark matter mass is the algebraic image of an assumed 80 keV equilibrium temperature, so comparing that mass to PBH dark-matter expectations tests the assumption, not a model prediction. Step 1 identifies the root of the chain: λ_sm = 2πR_s, from which M_s = M_p√n_s and all subsequent thermodynamics and cosmology follow, is not derived in this paper; it is attributed to the first author's own prior conference contribution [44]. The paper's later assertion that its findings follow 'from clear and exact physical principles' does not remove the fact that the central quantitative postulate is a self-cited ansatz. The remaining cosmological machinery—the FCC lattice probability ℵ = (1−ℵ)^12 and the equal split of bound energy into dark matter and dark energy in Eqs. (53)–(59)—is ad hoc rather than circular: those equations are assumptions, not derivations from the target conclusions. Likewise, the factor-2π mismatch with Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and temperature in Eq. (8) is a correctness/falsification concern rather than a circularity. The score is 8 rather than 10 because substantial portions of the paper (the quantized spectrum, the baryon asymmetry, and the dark-matter mass) are forced by construction or by self-citation, but the whole framework is not a single tautology; it contains additional arbitrary assumptions and algebraic developments that are not themselves circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 4 invented entities

The central claims rest on a large number of ad hoc assumptions and fitted parameters. The paper introduces a new physical model with no derivation, fits several thresholds to observations, and postulates a baryon asymmetry input. This makes the supposedly predictive results largely circular.

free parameters (4)
  • Probability ℵ = 0.1474492855
    Introduced via the ad hoc equation ℵ=(1-ℵ)^12 (Eq. 53) with no physical derivation. It sets the initial energy fractions Ω_L, Ω_DM, Ω_DE and effectively controls the fit to observed densities.
  • Dark matter formation temperature threshold = 80 keV/k_B
    Hand-chosen threshold temperature in Eq. (95). It determines the typical PBH mass M_s=1.659×10^18 g that the paper identifies as contemporary dark matter.
  • Baryon asymmetry = Ω_b/Ω_DM = 0.0496/0.32228
    The paper postulates the observed baryon asymmetry as a fundamental input (Section X) and uses the observed ratio to solve for the baryogenesis energy threshold.
  • Energy splitting factor between DM and DE = 1/2
    Eqs. (58)-(59) divide the bound energy equally between dark matter and dark energy without justification. This factor directly sets the initial Ω_DM and Ω_DE.
assumptions (8)
  • ad hoc to paper The Compton wavelength of the photon condensate equals the Schwarzschild circumference: λ_sm = 2πR_s (Eq. 1).
    This is the central postulate connecting quantum mechanics to gravity. No derivation is provided; it is asserted as a 'natural geometrical equation'.
  • ad hoc to paper The condensate photon number is even: N_s = 2n_s (Eq. 6).
    Assumes N_s cannot be less than two and that all states are even, which yields the quantization n_s=1,2,...
  • ad hoc to paper The transition time between PBH quantum states is half the geodesic length divided by c: Δt_s = πR_s/c (Eq. 36).
    No physical justification is given for this timescale, yet it controls the luminosity and lifetime (Eqs. 37-38) and hence the universe's evolution.
  • ad hoc to paper The Planck-era universe is an FCC lattice of Planck photons with twelve nearest neighbors, giving ℵ=(1-ℵ)^12 (Eq. 53).
    A made-up probability equation with no derivation. It determines all later cosmological energy densities.
  • ad hoc to paper The bound Planck energy is split equally between dark matter and dark energy (Eqs. 58-59).
    The 1/2 split is assumed without justification and sets the initial DM/DE densities.
  • domain assumption The baryon asymmetry is taken as a fundamental postulate (Section X).
    The paper explicitly states 'We propose to treat the observed baryon asymmetry as a fundamental postulate', so it does not derive the asymmetry.
  • ad hoc to paper The scale factor is proportional to √n_s (Eq. 81).
    Assumed to connect PBH quantum states to cosmological expansion, yielding a(t)∝t^{1/3} without derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Each emitted particle carries one bit of quantum information (Sections V and VII).
    The resolution of the information loss paradox relies on this assertion, but no physical mechanism or information-theoretic derivation is given.
invented entities (4)
  • Self-gravitating 2D photon Bose-Einstein condensate as the substance of black holes
    purpose: To give black holes a quantum substructure with quantized mass, entropy, temperature, and information. It is the central object that connects gravity and quantum mechanics.
    The paper identifies the experimentally realized photon BEC in microcavities (Klaers et al.) with black hole interiors. No evidence links lab photon condensates to astrophysical black holes.
  • Planck-scale 3D photon condensate as the initial state of the observable universe
    purpose: To provide the pre-Big Bang state whose explosion seeds PBHs, dark matter, and dark energy.
    This is a postulated initial condition with no observational support; it is inferred by reversing cosmic time.
  • Dark energy as gravitational radiation from PBH decay and mergers
    purpose: To explain accelerated expansion and the dark energy density.
    The identification is attributed to Anderson's conjecture, but the paper provides no direct evidence. The predicted gravitational wave background is not computed.
  • Asteroid-mass PBH population (typical mass 1.659×10^18 g) as all of dark matter
    purpose: To explain dark matter, the cosmic X-ray background, and dark matter structure.
    No direct detection. The paper claims agreement with the unresolved CXRB, but does not compare with existing PBH abundance constraints (e.g., gamma-ray, microlensing, CMB).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Connecting Gravity and Quantum Physics: Primordial Black Holes and Accelerated Evolution of the Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OYW322VQ

@misc{pith2026241111047,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Connecting Gravity and Quantum Physics: Primordial Black Holes and Accelerated Evolution of the Universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OYW322VQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11047}
}
read the original abstract

This study presents a new framework to explore the fundamental relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics, with particular emphasis on the fundamental role of primordial black holes (PBHs) in cosmology. Through the concept of self-gravitating condensed light in the form of the experimentally discovered quantum photon Bose-Einstein condensate, this work examines the quantized gravitational, informational, thermodynamical, traditional, and other attributes of PBHs and their implications for early universe dynamics, baryogenesis, the very early formation of galaxies, supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and large-scale structures. Precise calculations have shown that primordial protogalaxies with supermassive black holes at their centers of gravity were formed before the recombination epoch. By solving issues like the cosmological constant problem and the information loss paradox, dark matter and dark energy, this work provides insights into Planck-scale physics and it's impact to cosmology. In such a way PBHs serve as a bridge between quantum theory and general relativity. This study ultimately posits that presented PBH physics is essential to resolving major cosmological and astrophysical issues, paradoxes and "mysteries", such as the accelerated evolution of the Universe established by JWST and other observations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In these instances, nearly all the mass and energy of the tiny PBHs is converted into gravi- tational wave energy during the merger phase

    When the mass of an SMBH at the center of a galaxy greatly exceeds the asteroid-like mass of PBHs situated in the SMBH’s “corona,” the dy- namics of their mergers yield an interesting out- come. In these instances, nearly all the mass and energy of the tiny PBHs is converted into gravi- tational wave energy during the merger phase. This process demonstrat...

  2. [2]

    explodes,

    In contrast, Eqs. ( 51) and ( 52) suggest that the formation of an SMBH is unlikely during multiple collisions and mergers of PBHs with nearly equal masses, as most of their total en- ergy would be dissipated as gravitational radia- tion. It can be inferred that SMBHs primarily originated from the significant light energy asso- ciated with radiative proces...

  3. [3]

    The careful analysis of the Planck Era, last- ing no more than 50 π tp, clearly shows the absense of baryonic matter and that the thermodynamics of this epoch is determined exclusively by the thermo- dynamics of primordial black holes, which completely resolves so-called ”horizon problem”. The absence of baryonic matter clearly indicate that primordial bl...

  4. [4]

    lighter,

    It becomes clear that each dying generation of PBHs, through radiative transfer, ensures the growth of a new, less numerous generation of heavier ones, and that this process acquires a cyclical and syn- chronous character. IX. FORMATION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THE UNIVERSE’S PRIMORDIAL CLUMPING This section addresses the challenge of understand- i...

  5. [5]

    PBHs as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

    B. Carr, and F. K¨ uhnel, “PBHs as Dark Matter: Recent Developments”, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 70, 355-394, (2020), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-050520-125911

    doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-050520-125911 2020

  6. [6]

    Khlopov, ‘Primordial Black Holes’, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 10, 6 , 495–528, (2010), https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/10/6/001

    M. Khlopov, ‘Primordial Black Holes’, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 10, 6 , 495–528, (2010), https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/10/6/001

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/10/6/001 2010

  7. [7]

    Khlopov, ‘Primordial Black Hole Messenger of Dark Universe’, Symmetry, 16, 11, 1487, (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111487

    M. Khlopov, ‘Primordial Black Hole Messenger of Dark Universe’, Symmetry, 16, 11, 1487, (2024), https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111487

    work page doi:10.3390/sym16111487 2024

  8. [8]

    K. M. Belotsky et al. ‘Signatures of Pri- mordial Black Hole Dark Matter’. Mod. Phys. Letters A, 29, 37, 1440005, (2014) , https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732314400057

    doi:10.1142/s0217732314400057 2014

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    With probability ℵ, condensed Planck photons convert to free ones: (γp) → γp (f ree), (54) the average energy density of free Planck light is Ω L = ℵ = 0. 14745. (55)

  2. [10]

    and the Creator separated Light from Darkness, and there was the First Day ( ℵ)

    Planck binaries ( γp, γ p) are transformed into Planck black holes ( BHp) with probability 1- ℵ, followed by Planck gravitational waves [44]: (γp, γ p) = BHp + Γ p (56) 12 where the energy of gravitational radiation (Γ p) is caused by Planck work Wp. E(Γ p) = Wp = Fplp = G MpM...

  3. [11]

    Note on BEC of pho- tons

    E. E. M¨ uller, “Note on BEC of pho- tons”, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053837, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.053837

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    ( 24) and ( 57), and correspondingly Ms = Mp √ 4 = 2 Mp, (62) and average (typical) dark matter mass/energy density Ω DM = 2ℵ ≈ 0

    With a probability ℵ the next generation of black holes is formed by the following scheme: γp + BHp → BHs (ns = 4) (61) Here, to calculate ns, we have to use Eqs. ( 24) and ( 57), and correspondingly Ms = Mp √ 4 = 2 Mp, (62) and average (typical) dark matter mass/energy densit...

  5. [13]

    the second day of creation

    With a probability 1−ℵ 2 − ℵ = 1− 3ℵ 2 the Planck blackhole decay occures: BHp → 2γp, 0 + Γ p, 0 (64) with 2E(γp, 0) = 2 × Ep 4 , E(Γ p, 0) = Ep 2 (65) where we have used Eqs. ( 27) and ( 64), and average incremented dark energy: ∆Ω DE = 1 − 3ℵ 2 × 1 2 = 0. 13941, (66) and the...

  6. [14]

    Analog Hawk- ing effect: BEC and surface waves

    F. Belgiorno et al., “Analog Hawk- ing effect: BEC and surface waves”, Phys. Rev. D 102, 105004, (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.105004

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Moving backwards along the ”arrow of time” we find our observable Universe as a ”granular” spherical lump sized as an atom of gold, consisting of Planck 3D photon condensate, in a state with extremely high energy and mass density, temperature and pressure, as well extremely low...

  8. [16]

    As a result of which, during the time 2 π tp, the ”grainy” space-time became con- tinuous, Planck free photons, Planck black holes and Planck gravitational waves were formed

    According to Planck-Heisenberg law, the greatest explosion was occured. As a result of which, during the time 2 π tp, the ”grainy” space-time became con- tinuous, Planck free photons, Planck black holes and Planck gravitational waves were formed. It is this mo- ment of the Beg...

  9. [17]

    Is Planckian discreteness observable in cosmology?

    G. R. Bengochea, G. Leon and A. Perez, “Is Planckian discreteness observable in cosmology?”, arXiv:2405.12534, (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.12534

    2024 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Black Holes and En- tropy

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black Holes and En- tropy”, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333, (1973), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    1973 doi

  11. [19]

    Particle creation by black holes

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes”, Commun. Math. Phys. , 43, 3, 199-220, (1975), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020

    1975 doi

  12. [20]

    and ( 38) describe this cyclic mecha- nism, which results in significant increases in luminos- ity with each cycle while the SMBH’s accretion area expands at an even faster rate, enhancing its grav- itational pull. The gravitational bonding promoted by the growth of SMBHs, acti...

  13. [21]

    As these cycles end, the universe cools, leading to a significant reduction in the growth of SMBHs and signaling a shift to a less active cosmological phase

    of each subsequent cycle increases significantly, thereby improving the formation efficiency of early galactic precursors and SMBHs of different sizes. As these cycles end, the universe cools, leading to a significant reduction in the growth of SMBHs and signaling a shift to a less...

  14. [22]

    Gravita- tional Condensate Stars: An Alternative to Black Holes

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, “Gravita- tional Condensate Stars: An Alternative to Black Holes”, Universe, 9, 88, (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020088

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Cosmic Web

    should be written in the following general form: BHs → BHs− 1 + Xs + ¯Xs + Γ s (89) where Xs and ¯Xs represents particle and antiparticle, Γ s represents gravitational wave. Since photons are their own antiparticles, we can replace this pair with term 2 γs and obtain previousl...

  16. [24]

    During the intermediate period, from 87 to 190 thousand years, PBHs may continue decaying and emitting radiation, even though baryonic matter pro- duction has largely ceased

    the formation of baryonic matter takes place over roughly 87 thousand years, while the complete cycle of PBH evaporation and sub- sequent extinction lasts approximately 190 thousand years. During the intermediate period, from 87 to 190 thousand years, PBHs may continue decayin...

  17. [25]

    core-cusp prob- lem

    44×1018 and √nsf = 2. 9902 ×1018 (Eq.(91)), where nsi and nsf stand for the initial and final quantum number for the generation of baryonic matter. This duration corresponds exactly to half of the cos- mic interval from the Big Bang to the Recombination epoch, around 378 thousa...

  18. [26]

    can be easily rewritten in the following forms: ∆ Es,s − 1(rad) = Ts∆ Ss,s − 1; ∆ Es,s − 1(rad) = Fs∆ Rs,s − 1; ∆ Es,s − 1(rad) = Fs 2π ∆ λ s,s − 1; ∆ Es,s − 1(rad) = psVs,s − 1. (34) where ∆ Ss,s − 1 is referred to ( 29), ∆ Rs,s − 1 = 2lp(√ns−√ns− 1), ∆ λ s,s − 1 = 2π ∆ Rs,s ...

  19. [27]

    (39) Using Eq

    that the energy of each emitted particle is: Eγ (rad) = ∆ Es,s − 1qu(rad) 2 = Ep 4√ns . (39) Using Eq. ( 39), one can easily find that their emitted wavelength is much more than Rs : λ γ (rad) = 2π ℏc Eγ (rad) = 4πR s > R s. (40) Because the wavelength of the emitted particles ...

  20. [28]

    ) 2πt p √ ns = h 2 ( 1 + 1 4ns + 1 8n2 s +

    and ( 34), it is evident that this comprehensive physical description of the most important cosmic processes is governed by spe- cial form of the fundamental Heisenberg uncertainty principle: ∆ Es,s − 1∆ ts = Ep 2√ns ( 1 + 1 4ns + 1 8n2 s + ... ) 2πt p √ ns = h 2 ( 1 + 1 4ns +...

  21. [29]

    PBHs as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview

    A. M. Green, “PBHs as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview”, Nucl. Phys. B, 1003, 116494, (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116494

    2024

  22. [30]

    funnel” and “slingshot

    as follows: Is(rad) = ∑ ns n=1 ∆ Ss,s − 1qu(rad) kB = 2ns = Is (41) VI. QUANTUM ABSORPTION OF FREE LIGHT: ORIGINS OF COSMIC DISKS AND JETS Considering the quantum characteristics of con- densed light in PBHs, it is evident that only free light photons with a wavelength not exc...

  23. [31]

    Large fluctu- ations and PBHs

    S. Choudhury and M. Sami, “Large fluctu- ations and PBHs”, arXiv:2407.17006, (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.17006

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    PBHs as a cosmological test of grand unifica- tion

    M. Y. Khlopov and A. G. Polnarev, “PBHs as a cosmological test of grand unifica- tion”, Phys. Lett. B, 97, 3, 383-387, (1980), https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90624-3 20

    1980 doi

  25. [33]

    B. J. Carr et al. ‘Observational Evidence for Primordial Black Holes: A Positivist Per- spective’. Phys. Rep. , 1054, 1–68, (2024) , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.005

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    K. M. Belotsky et al. ‘Clusters of Primordial Black Holes’. The Eur. Phys. J. C, 79, 3, 246, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6741-4

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Black Holes in the Early Universe

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black Holes in the Early Universe”, Month. Not. Royal Astro. Soc., 168, 2, 399–415, (1974) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/168.2.399

    1974 doi

  28. [36]

    Mag- netic fields in the early Universe

    D. Grasso and H. R. Rubinstein, “Mag- netic fields in the early Universe”, Phys. Rep., 348, 3, 163-266, (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00110-1

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    (79) Hence, it is easy to observe a direct relationship be- tween the √ ns and the time as: √ns ∝ t 1 3

    we can write, ∆ tsj,sj − 1 = 4π 3 tp(√nsj− 1)3. (79) Hence, it is easy to observe a direct relationship be- tween the √ ns and the time as: √ns ∝ t 1 3 . (80) Taking into account that the cosmological scale factor a(t) is proportional to √ns, we find that, a(t) ∝ √ns ∝ t 1 3 , ...

  30. [38]

    Systems of self-gravitating particles in general rela- tivity and the concept of an equation of state

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, “Systems of self-gravitating particles in general rela- tivity and the concept of an equation of state.” Phys. Rev., 187, 5, 1767-1783, (1969) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.1767

    1969 doi

  31. [39]

    BEC of photons in an opti- cal microcavity

    J. Klaers et al., “BEC of photons in an opti- cal microcavity”, Nature, 468, 545–548, (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09567

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    vacuum energy

    is twice that of a Planck condensed photon ( 1), which is equivalent to the Planck length. Naturally, the implementation of such a wavelength necessitates a duration equivalent to 2πt p ( 36). The second analogous solution arises from the epoch of the formation of Planck black...

  33. [41]

    The Large N Limit of Super- conformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. Maldacena, “The Large N Limit of Super- conformal Field Theories and Supergravity” Int. Jour. Theor. Phys, 38, 4, 1113–1133, (1999), https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026654312961

    1999 doi

  34. [42]

    The Planck distribu- tion of phonons in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate

    R. Schley et al., “The Planck distribu- tion of phonons in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 055301 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.055301

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    Quasi- normal modes of analog rotating black holes in a two-dimensional photon-fluid model

    H. Liu, H. Guo, and R. Ling, “Quasi- normal modes of analog rotating black holes in a two-dimensional photon-fluid model”, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024035, (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024035

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Condensed light, quantum black holes and L-CDM cosmology: Experimen- tally suggested and tested unified approach to dark matter, dark energy, cosmogenesis and two-stage inflation

    V. Borsevici, “Condensed light, quantum black holes and L-CDM cosmology: Experimen- tally suggested and tested unified approach to dark matter, dark energy, cosmogenesis and two-stage inflation”, The Sixteenth Mar- cel Grossmann Meeting , pp. 2672-2691 (2023), https://doi.org/10...

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    Mod- ified BEC in an optical quantum gas

    M. Vretenar, C. Toebes and J. Klaers, “Mod- ified BEC in an optical quantum gas”, Na- ture Communications, 12, 5749, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26087-0

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Introduction to the Dicke model: from equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa

    P. Kirton et al., “Introduction to the Dicke model: from equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa”, Adv. Quant. Techno., 2, 1, 1800043, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.201800043

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a Hologram”, Jour. Math. Phys., 36, 11, 6377–6396, (1995), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531249

    1995 doi

  40. [48]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion and Virgo Collaboration , “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 6, 061102, (2016), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Multi-messenger Observa- tions of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Multi-messenger Observa- tions of a Binary Neutron Star Merger”, As- trophys. Jour. Lett., 848, 2, L12, (2017), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Com- pact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observ- ing Runs

    B. P. Abbott et al., LIGO Scientific Collabo- ration and Virgo Collaboration , “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Com- pact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observ- ing Runs”, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040, (2019), https://doi.org/1...

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coa- lescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo dur- ing the Second Part of the Third Observ- ing Run

    R. Abbott et al., LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Col- laboration, “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coa- lescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo dur- ing the Second Part of the Third Observ- ing Run”, Phys. Rev. X, 13, 041039, (2023), https://doi.org/10.1103...

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z ≃ 10–12 Revealed by JWST

    R. P. Naidu et al., “Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z ≃ 10–12 Revealed by JWST”, Astrophys. Jour. Lett., 940, L14, (2022), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    1474492855

    we get the desired probability as: ℵ = 0. 1474492855... ≈ 0. 14745. Our focus here is on Planck binaries, as their merg- ers during the Big Bang would give rise to primordial Planck-scale black holes accompanied by Planck-scale gravitational waves. By the energy conservation l...

  46. [54]

    Seven wonders of Cos- mic Dawn: JWST confirms a high abun- dance of galaxies and AGNs at z ≃ 9 − 11 in the GLASS field

    L. Napolitano et al., “Seven wonders of Cos- mic Dawn: JWST confirms a high abun- dance of galaxies and AGNs at z ≃ 9 − 11 in the GLASS field”, arXiv:2410.10967, (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.10967

    2024 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    A population of red candi- date massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang

    I. Labbe et al., “A population of red candi- date massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang”, Nature, 616, 266–269, (2023), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    ordinary

    to 0 . 29489 ( 63). From this point onward, the gravitational mass of the universe, represented solely by dark matter, will continually decrease, acting as an inexhaustible reservoir of energy for all future generations, leading to the formation of contemporary dark matter, as...

    2020

  49. [57]

    ringdown

    and Leonard Susskind [58], each emitted particle acts as a carrier of one bit of quantum information, consistent with the principles of Shannon entropy [59]. This information is encoded in two possible spin states, |0 > and |1 >, as per the notation established by Paul Dirac [...

  50. [58]

    A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642

    F. Wang et al., “A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642”, Astrophys. Jour. Lett., 907, L1, (2021), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity (Relativistic Theory of the non-symmetric Field) , 5th edn

    A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity (Relativistic Theory of the non-symmetric Field) , 5th edn. Prince- ton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, (1956), chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https:/

    1956

  52. [60]

    Membrane view- point on black holes: Properties and evolution of the stretched horizon

    R. H. Price and K. S. Thorne, “Membrane view- point on black holes: Properties and evolution of the stretched horizon”, Phys. Rev. D 33, 915, (1986), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.33.915

    1986 doi

  53. [61]

    The electric and magnetic conductivity of a Kerr hole

    R. L. Znajek, “The electric and magnetic conductivity of a Kerr hole”, Month. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 185, 4, 833–840, (1978), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/185.4.833

    1978 doi

  54. [62]

    Black-hole eddy cur- rents

    T. Damour, “Black-hole eddy cur- rents”, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3598, (1978), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3598

    1978 doi

  55. [63]

    Damour, in Proceedings of the Second Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R

    T. Damour, in Proceedings of the Second Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R. Ruffini (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, p. 587, https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?record

    1982

  56. [64]

    Condensate cosmol- ogy: Dark energy from dark mat- ter

    A. Bruce et al., “Condensate cosmol- ogy: Dark energy from dark mat- ter”, Phys. Rev. D 68, 043504, (2003), 21 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.043504

    2003 doi

  57. [65]

    Thermaliza- tion of a two-dimensional photonic gas in a ‘white wall’ photon box

    J. Klaers, F. Vewinger and M. Weitz, “Thermaliza- tion of a two-dimensional photonic gas in a ‘white wall’ photon box”, Nature Phys., 6, 512–515, (2010), https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1680

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    High power extreme ultra-violet (EUV) light sources for future lithography

    J. Jonkers, “High power extreme ultra-violet (EUV) light sources for future lithography”, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 15, S8–S16, (2006), https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/15/2/S02

    2006 doi

  59. [67]

    Primordial Universe with radiation and Bose-Einstein conden- sate

    R.C. Freitas et al., “Primordial Universe with radiation and Bose-Einstein conden- sate”, Phys. Dark Univ., 25, 100325, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2019.100325

    2019

  60. [68]

    Rotating Black Hole Ge- ometries in a Two-Dimensional Photon Superfluid

    D. Vocke et al., “Rotating Black Hole Ge- ometries in a Two-Dimensional Photon Superfluid”, Optica, 5, 9, 1099, (2018), https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.001099

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    Proposal for an analog Schwarzschild black hole in condensates of light

    L. Liao et al., “Proposal for an analog Schwarzschild black hole in condensates of light”, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023850, (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.023850

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    Jacob D.Bekenstein, Quantum Black Holes as Atoms. (1997). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.GR-QC/9710076

    1997 doi

  63. [71]

    A planar diagram theory for strong interactions

    G. ’t Hooft, “A planar diagram theory for strong interactions”, Nucl Phys. B 72, 461, (1974), https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    1974 doi

  64. [72]

    Kiefer, Quantum Gravity , 3rd Ed., Int

    C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity , 3rd Ed., Int. Series Monog. Phys., Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, (2012), https://global.oup.com/academic/product/quantum-gravity-97

    2012

  65. [73]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti De Sitter Space And Holography”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 2, 253–291, (1998), https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2

    1998 doi

  66. [74]

    Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole

    J. D. Bekenstein and V. F. Mukhanov, “Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole”, Phys. Lett. B 360, 7-12, (1995), https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(95)01148-J

    1995 doi

  67. [75]

    Notes on black-hole evap- oration

    W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black-hole evap- oration”, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870, (1976), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870

    1976 doi

  68. [76]

    Thermodynamics of Space- time: The Einstein Equation of State

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of Space- time: The Einstein Equation of State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260, (1995), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.09596 [52] S. W. Hawking, “Black hole ex- plosions?”, Nature, 248, 30–31, (1974), ht...

    1995 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Some Simple Black Hole Ther- modynamics

    M. C. LoPresto, “Some Simple Black Hole Ther- modynamics”, Phys. Teach. 41, 299–301 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571268

    2003 doi

  70. [78]

    Formation and evaporation of PBHs in scalar-tensor gravity the- ories

    J. D. Barrow and B. J. Carr, “Formation and evaporation of PBHs in scalar-tensor gravity the- ories”, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 6, 3920, (1996), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.54.3920

    1996 doi

  71. [79]

    PBHs: the asteroid mass window

    P. Tinyakov, “PBHs: the asteroid mass window”, arXiv:2406.03114, (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.03114

    2024 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    The Primordial Black Hole Mass Spectrum

    B. J. Carr, “The Primordial Black Hole Mass Spectrum” Astrophys. Jour., 201, 1–19, (1975), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1975ApJ...201

    1975

  73. [81]

    Do Black Holes Destroy In- formation?

    J. Preskill, “Do Black Holes Destroy In- formation?”, arXiv:hep-th/9209058, (1992), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9209058

    1992 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    Susskind, The Cosmic Landscape: String The- ory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , Hachette Book Group 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, (2006)

    L. Susskind, The Cosmic Landscape: String The- ory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , Hachette Book Group 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    A Mathematical Theory of Commu- nication

    C.E. Shannon, “A Mathematical Theory of Commu- nication”, Bell Sys. Tech. Jour., 27, 379-423, (1948), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

    1948

  76. [84]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Me- chanics, 3rd Edition, Oxford, The Clarendon Press, (1948)

    1948

  77. [85]

    Hawking, S. W. ‘Gravitational Radia- tion from Colliding Black Holes’. Phys- ical Review Letters, 26, 21, (1971), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1344

    1971 doi

  78. [86]

    Maximiliano et al

    I. Maximiliano et al. “Testing the Black-Hole Area Law with GW150914’. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 1, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.011103

    2021 doi

  79. [87]

    Four Last Con- jectures

    P. W. Anderson, “Four Last Con- jectures”, arXiv:1804.11186, (2018), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.11186

    2018 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    J. A. Wheeler, Geometrodynamics and the Issue of the Final State , Gordon and Breach, (1964)

    1964

  81. [89]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quan- tum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional Reduction in Quan- tum Gravity”, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026, (1993), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9310026

    1993 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity”, Nucl.Phys. B 442, 593-622, (1995); Erratum-ibid. B 456, 753, (1995), https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213%2895%2900150-Q

    1995 doi

  83. [91]

    Loop Quantum Cosmol- ogy

    M. Bojowald, “Loop Quantum Cosmol- ogy”, Living Rev. Relativ. 8, 11, (2005), https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2005-11

    2005 doi

  84. [92]

    Schroeder, Genesis and the Big Bang Theory , Bantam Books, New York, (1990)

    G. Schroeder, Genesis and the Big Bang Theory , Bantam Books, New York, (1990)

    1990

  85. [93]

    We equate this to the energy density of baryon Ω b=0.0496 divided by the energy density of the producing dark matter Ω DM =0.32228 (Eq

    de- notes the productivity of one typical PBH, expressed as the difference between the number of neutrons and the number of annihilated charm quarks it produces (square brackets) multiplied by the rest of the energy of the neutron and divided by the rest energy of typi- cal pro...

  86. [94]

    The cosmological constant problem

    S. Weinberg, “The cosmological constant problem”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1, (1989), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1

    1989 doi

  87. [95]

    The cosmological constant and dark en- ergy

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, “The cosmological constant and dark en- ergy”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559, (2003), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559

    2003 doi

  88. [96]

    Cosmological con- stant—the weight of the vacuum

    T. Padmanabhan, “Cosmological con- stant—the weight of the vacuum”, Phys. Rep. 380, 5–6, 235-320, (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00120-0

    2003 doi

  89. [97]

    The Cosmological Con- stant

    S. M. Carroll, “The Cosmological Con- stant” Living Rev. Relativ. 4, 1 (2001), https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2001-1

    2001 doi

  90. [98]

    Theoret- ical models of dark energy

    J. Yoo and Y. Watanabe, “Theoret- ical models of dark energy”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 21, 1230002, (2012), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271812300029

    2012 doi

  91. [99]

    Cosmological effects on f (R, T) gravity through a non-standard theory

    A. Panda et al., “ Cosmological effects on f (R, T) gravity through a non-standard theory”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 33, 3 & 4, 2450015, (2024), https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271824500159 22

    2024 doi

  92. [100]

    Planck 2018 re- sults. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al., “Planck 2018 re- sults. VI. Cosmological parameters”, As- tron. & Astrophys., 641, A6, 67, (2020), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020A&A...641A...6P/doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2020 doi

  93. [101]

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM

    A. G. Riess et al., “Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM”, Astrophys. Jour., 876, 85, (2019), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    Weinberg, Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    Dodelson, Modern Cosmology , Academic Press, (2003)

    S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology , Academic Press, (2003)

    2003

  96. [104]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe , Addison-Wesley, (1990)

    1990

  97. [105]

    S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Intro- duction to General Relativity , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2019)

    2019

  98. [106]

    The gravitational field of a radiating star

    P.C. Vaidya, “The gravitational field of a radiating star” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A, 33, 264, (1951), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173260

    1951 doi

  99. [107]

    Exact solutions for null fluid col- lapse

    V. Husain, “Exact solutions for null fluid col- lapse” Phys. Rev. D, 53, R1759(R), (1996), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.R1759

    1996 doi

  100. [108]

    Gravitational collapse for the K-essence emergent Vaidya space- time

    G. Manna, “Gravitational collapse for the K-essence emergent Vaidya space- time”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 80, 813, (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8383-y

    2020 doi

  101. [109]

    B. J. Carr et al., ‘New Cosmological Constraints on PBHs’. Physical Review D, 81, 10, (2010), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.104019

    2010 doi

  102. [110]

    L. Zu, L. Feng, Q. Yuan, Y. Fan, “Strin- gent constraints on the light boson model with supermassive black hole spin measure- ments“. Euro. Phys. J. Plus, 135, 9, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00734-9

    2020 doi

  103. [111]

    Tracing the Mass Growth and Star Formation Rate Evolution of Massive Galax- ies from z ∼ 6 to z ∼ 1 in the Hubble Ultra- Deep Field

    B. F. Lundgren et al., “Tracing the Mass Growth and Star Formation Rate Evolution of Massive Galax- ies from z ∼ 6 to z ∼ 1 in the Hubble Ultra- Deep Field”, Astrophys. Jour., 780, 34, (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/34

    2014 doi

  104. [112]

    Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford (Jr.), “Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions”, Astrophys. Jour., 159, 379-403, (1970), https://doi.org/10.1086/150317

    1970 doi

  105. [113]

    Planck 2013 re- sults. XVI. Cosmological parameters

    P. A. R. Ade et al., “Planck 2013 re- sults. XVI. Cosmological parameters”, Astrophys. Astron., 571, A16, (2014), https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321591

    2014 doi

  106. [114]

    X-Ray–Cosmic- Shear Cross-Correlations: First Detec- tion and Constraints on Baryonic Effects

    T. Ferreira et al., “X-Ray–Cosmic- Shear Cross-Correlations: First Detec- tion and Constraints on Baryonic Effects”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051001, (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051001

    2024 doi

  107. [115]

    Ori- gin of the matter-antimatter asymme- try

    M. Dine and A. Kusenko, “Ori- gin of the matter-antimatter asymme- try”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1, (2003), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1

    2003 doi

  108. [116]

    Matter and antimatter in the uni- verse

    L. Canetti, M. Drewes and M. Shaposh- nikov, “Matter and antimatter in the uni- verse”, New J. Phys. 14, 095012, (2012), https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/095012

    2012 doi

  109. [117]

    Lepto- genesis

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi and Y. Nir, “Lepto- genesis”, Phys. Rept. 466, 105-177, (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.06.002

    2008 doi

  110. [118]

    Physical Foundations of Cos- mology

    V. Mukhanov, “Physical Foundations of Cos- mology”, Cambridge University Press; 2005, https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_

    2005

  111. [119]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , Wiley Student Edition, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , Wiley Student Edition, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd., (2004)

    2004

  112. [120]

    Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures

    B. Carr and J. Silk, “Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures”, Month. N. R. Astron. Soc., 478, 3, 3756–3775, (2018), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1204

    2018 doi

  113. [121]

    Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Ob- servations: Final Maps and Results

    C. L. Bennett et al., “Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Ob- servations: Final Maps and Results”, As- trophys. J. Suppl. Series, 208, 2, 20, (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20

    2013 doi

  114. [122]

    Primordial black holes as a probe of cosmology and high energy physics

    B. J. Carr, “Primordial black holes as a probe of cosmology and high energy physics” Lec- ture Notes in Physics, 631, 301–321, (2003), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45230-0_7

    2003 doi

  115. [123]

    Bambi and A

    C. Bambi and A. Santangelo edi- tors, ”Handbook of X-ray and Gamma- ray Astrophysics”, Springer, 2024, https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-981-19

    2024 doi

  116. [124]

    Kahn, ”The cosmic X-Ray Back- groung”, Kalvi Institute for Particle Astro- physics and Cosmology, Stanford University https://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0307282/lec_notes/kahn

    Steven M. Kahn, ”The cosmic X-Ray Back- groung”, Kalvi Institute for Particle Astro- physics and Cosmology, Stanford University https://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0307282/lec_notes/kahn

  117. [125]

    Absolute Measurement of the Unresolved Cosmic X-Ray Background in the 0.5-8 keV Band with Chan- dra

    R. C. Hickox and M. Markevitch, “Absolute Measurement of the Unresolved Cosmic X-Ray Background in the 0.5-8 keV Band with Chan- dra”, Astrophys. Jour., 645, 95-114, (2006), https://doi.org/10.1086/504070

    2006 doi

  118. [126]

    Primor- dial black holes as a dark matter candidate

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primor- dial black holes as a dark matter candidate”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 043001, (2021), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abc534

    2021 doi

  119. [127]

    Cos- mic rays from primordial black holes

    J. H. MacGibbon and B. J. Carr, “Cos- mic rays from primordial black holes”, Astrophys. Jour., 371, 447-469, (1991), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1991ApJ...371..4

    1991

  120. [128]

    Gamma rays from primordial black holes

    D. N. Page and S. W. Hawking, “Gamma rays from primordial black holes”, As- trophys. Jour., 206, 1-7, (1976), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1976ApJ...206

    1976

  121. [129]

    The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-Ray Background and Constraints on Undetected Populations

    N. Cappelluti et al., “The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Energy Spectrum of the Cosmic X-Ray Background and Constraints on Undetected Populations”, Astrophys. Jour., 837, 19, (2017), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ea4

    2017 doi

  122. [130]

    The Core-Cusp Prob- lem

    W. J. G. de Blok, “The Core-Cusp Prob- lem”, Advan. Astron., 2010, 789293, (2009), https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/789293

    2009 doi

  123. [131]

    On the stunning abundance of super-early, lumi- nous galaxies revealed by JWST

    A. Ferrara, A. Pallottini and P. Dayal, , “On the stunning abundance of super-early, lumi- nous galaxies revealed by JWST” Month. N. R. Astron. Soc., 522, 3, 3986–3991, (2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1095

    2023 doi

  124. [132]

    Markevitch et al., ‘A Textbook Example of a Bow Shock in the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657-56’, Astrophys

    M. Markevitch et al., ‘A Textbook Example of a Bow Shock in the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657-56’, Astrophys. Jour., 567, 1, L27, (2002) , https://doi.org/10.1086/339619

    2002 doi

  125. [133]

    Alcubierre and B

    M. Alcubierre and B. Bruegmann, ”Simple ex- cision of a black hole in 3+1 numerical rel- ativity”, Phys. Rev. D 63, 104006, (2001), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.104006

    2001 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.