Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Dissecting Representation Misalignment in Contrastive Learning via Influence Function

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11667 v2 pith:ZKEAIJGQ submitted 2024-11-18 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords contrastiveinfluencelearningmodelsdataeciffunctionloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contrastive learning, commonly applied in large-scale multimodal models, often relies on data from diverse and often unreliable sources, which can include misaligned or mislabeled text-image pairs. This frequently leads to robustness issues and hallucinations, ultimately causing performance degradation. Data valuation is an efficient way to detect and trace these misalignments. Nevertheless, existing methods are computationally expensive for large-scale models. Although computationally efficient, classical influence functions are inadequate for contrastive learning models, as they were initially designed for pointwise loss. Furthermore, contrastive learning involves minimizing the distance between positive sample modalities while maximizing the distance between negative sample modalities. This necessitates evaluating the influence of samples from both perspectives. To tackle these challenges, we introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss. ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models, eliminating the need for retraining. Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks. Experimental results demonstrate our ECIF advances the transparency and interpretability of CLIP-style embedding models by offering a more accurate assessment of data impact and model alignment compared to traditional baseline methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. In-Run Data Shapley for Adam Optimizer

    cs.LG 2026-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    An 'Adam-aware' approximation for In-Run Data Shapley is proposed, but its central theorem is not proven and the fidelity test uses a proxy that is not the true Shapley value.

  2. Attributing Data for Sharpness-Aware Minimization

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAM-HIF and SAM-GIF are proposed as data attribution scores for SAM-trained models, but SAM-GIF is TracIn with SAM gradients and SAM-HIF's derivation contains a load-bearing error.

  3. Stable Vision Concept Transformers for Medical Diagnosis

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A vision transformer with a concept bottleneck and denoised diffusion smoothing is claimed to give stable concept explanations under input perturbations while keeping diagnostic accuracy.

Pith tools