REVIEW 15 cited by
LiFT: Leveraging Human Feedback for Text-to-Video Model Alignment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LiFT: Leveraging Human Feedback for Text-to-Video Model Alignment
read the original abstract
Recent advances in text-to-video (T2V) generative models have shown impressive capabilities. However, these models are still inadequate in aligning synthesized videos with human preferences (e.g., accurately reflecting text descriptions), which is particularly difficult to address, as human preferences are subjective and challenging to formalize as objective functions. Existing studies train video quality assessment models that rely on human-annotated ratings for video evaluation but overlook the reasoning behind evaluations, limiting their ability to capture nuanced human criteria. Moreover, aligning T2V model using video-based human feedback remains unexplored. Therefore, this paper proposes LiFT, the first method designed to leverage human feedback for T2V model alignment. Specifically, we first construct a Human Rating Annotation dataset, LiFT-HRA, consisting of approximately 10k human annotations, each including a score and its corresponding rationale. Based on this, we train a reward model LiFT-Critic to learn reward function effectively, which serves as a proxy for human judgment, measuring the alignment between given videos and human expectations. Lastly, we leverage the learned reward function to align the T2V model by maximizing the reward-weighted likelihood. As a case study, we apply our pipeline to CogVideoX-2B, showing that the fine-tuned model outperforms the CogVideoX-5B across all 16 metrics, highlighting the potential of human feedback in improving the alignment and quality of synthesized videos.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
Through the PRISM: Preference Representation in Intermediate States of Video Diffusion Models
PRISM shows video diffusion models inherently encode preference information in noisy latents, achieving SOTA accuracy and enabling noise-robust early-stage sampling with a correlation to generative performance.
-
DRM: Diffusion-based Reward Model With Step-wise Guidance
DRM turns a pre-trained diffusion model into a step-wise reward model and uses it for dense RL training (Step-wise GRPO) and guided sampling to improve final image quality.
-
CaC: Advancing Video Reward Models via Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Concentrating
CaC is a hierarchical spatiotemporal concentrating reward model for video anomalies that reports 25.7% accuracy gains on fine-grained benchmarks and 11.7% anomaly reduction in generated videos via a new dataset and GR...
-
CaC: Advancing Video Reward Models via Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Concentrating
CaC presents a new spatiotemporal concentrating reward model for video anomalies, built on a novel large-scale dataset and three-stage training with RL and IoU rewards, claiming 25.7% accuracy gains and 11.7% anomaly ...
-
Mind the Generative Details: Direct Localized Detail Preference Optimization for Video Diffusion Models
LocalDPO creates localized preference pairs from real videos by applying random spatio-temporal masks and restoring masked regions with the frozen base model, then applies region-restricted DPO loss to improve fidelit...
-
Mind the Generative Details: Direct Localized Detail Preference Optimization for Video Diffusion Models
LocalDPO aligns text-to-video diffusion models with human preferences at the spatio-temporal region level by automatically generating localized preference pairs from corrupted real videos and applying a region-aware DPO loss.
-
Unified Reward Model for Multimodal Understanding and Generation
UnifiedReward is the first unified reward model that jointly assesses multimodal understanding and generation to provide better preference signals for aligning vision models via DPO.
-
Temporal Concentration from Rollout Errors: Implicit Preference Optimization for Text-to-Video Diffusion
Implicit DPO pairs from real-vs-reconstruction rollouts plus concentration on high latent-error temporal windows improve video authenticity and coherence without annotations or reward models.
-
Reward Lightning: Fast Video Generation via Homologous Preference Distillation
Homologous preference distillation evaluates adversarial distillation and latent reward alignment on identical latent features, yielding 1–4-step video generators that improve VBench by 2.1% while leading text, motion...
-
Think, then Score: Decoupled Reasoning and Scoring for Video Reward Modeling
DeScore decouples CoT reasoning from reward scoring in video reward models using a two-stage training process to improve generalization and avoid optimization bottlenecks of coupled generative RMs.
-
PhyDetEx: Detecting and Explaining the Physical Plausibility of T2V Models
A new dataset and fine-tuned VLM detector/explainer called PhyDetEx shows that current T2V models still struggle to generate videos that obey physical laws, with open-source models performing worse.
-
RAPO++: Cross-Stage Prompt Optimization for Text-to-Video Generation via Data Alignment and Test-Time Scaling
RAPO++ is a three-stage prompt optimization framework combining retrieval-augmented refinement, closed-loop test-time scaling, and LLM fine-tuning to enhance text-to-video generation quality.
-
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback
A human preference dataset and VideoReward model enable Flow-DPO and Flow-NRG to produce smoother, better-aligned videos from text prompts in flow-based generators.
-
Think, then Score: Decoupled Reasoning and Scoring for Video Reward Modeling
DeScore decouples explicit CoT reasoning from reward regression in video reward models via a two-stage cold-start plus dual-objective RL training pipeline.
-
Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation
A taxonomy-driven survey arguing that reward design is the central mechanism shaping reliable LLM reasoning, with maps of reward paradigms, reward-hacking failure modes, and benchmark pitfalls.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.