Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Quantum-Corrected Holographic Wilson Loop Expectation Values and Super-Yang-Mills Confinement

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum gravitational fluctuations near a black brane horizon generate a linear, confining quark-antiquark potential in large-$N$ super-Yang-Mills theory.

desk verdict Genuinely new and checkable, but the confining linear law is derived for L ≪ C and then claimed at large L where the expansion is uncontrolled — an instructive overclaim, not a demonstration of confinement. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11107 v2 pith:EFEQIH45 submitted 2024-12-15 hep-th gr-qchep-phmath-phmath.MPnucl-th

Xiao-Long Liu , Cong-Yuan Yue , Jun Nian , Wenni Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-phmath-phmath.MPnucl-th
keywords AdS/CFTcorrespondenceholographicWilsonloopconfinementJackiw-TeitelboimgravitySchwarzianmodesnear-horizonquantumN=4super-Yang-Millstheoryarealaw
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that quark confinement in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory at zero temperature but finite chemical potential can be derived from quantum gravitational fluctuations near a black-brane horizon. On the holographic side, those fluctuations are the Schwarzian modes of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity in the near-horizon $\mathrm{AdS}_2 \times T^3$ throat of an extremal AdS$_5$ Reissner-Nordström brane. Once these modes are averaged, the spacetime metric receives a correction factor $h(U)$, and evaluating the Nambu-Goto string action on the corrected metric produces a quark-antiquark potential $E(L)$ with a Coulomb term plus a linear, confining term, together with an area law for the spatial Wilson loop. If this is right, the confining potential emerges from near-horizon quantum gravity rather than from hand-modified metrics or from finite temperature.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quantum-averaged metric factor $h(U)=1+R^4/(96\pi^4 C^2 (U-U_T)^2)-\cdots$, obtained from the exact boundary-boundary propagator of the Schwarzian mode in near-extremal JT gravity. It encodes the clocks-and-rods correction to the AdS$_2$ geometry, and the paper's matching ansatz attaches it to the $g_{tt}$ and $g_{UU}$ components of the full AdS$_5$ black-brane metric. Every subsequent result follows from evaluating the Nambu-Goto action on this corrected metric, with the string embedding governed by a conserved-charge integral that is expanded for small $U_T/U_0$ and large $C$.

What would settle it

Compute the Wilson loop expectation value directly from the path integral over the string embedding together with the Schwarzian fluctuations, instead of inserting the averaged metric into the classical Nambu-Goto action; if the linear term in $E(L)$ and the $L^2/C^2$ term in $S_{NG}$ vanish at next order, the central claim is refuted. A lattice or exact calculation of the zero-temperature Wilson loop in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory at finite chemical potential that yields a purely Coulomb potential would also falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from an extremal AdS$_5$ Reissner-Nordström black brane, whose near-horizon geometry is $\mathrm{AdS}_2 \times T^3$, the paper promotes the Schwarzian boundary mode of JT gravity to a bilocal operator and quantum-averages it, following the clocks-and-rods construction. The resulting AdS$_2$ metric carries a correction factor $h(\zeta)$ that approaches 1 at the boundary; by continuity and smoothness in the overlap between the near-horizon and far regions, the factor is lifted to a global factor $h(U)$ multiplying $g_{tt}$ and $g_{UU}$ of the extremal RN-AdS$_5$ metric. The Nambu-Goto action for a rectangular temporal Wilson loop then yields the static potential $E = -\frac{4\pi^2}{\Gamma(1/4)^4}\frac{R^2}{L} + \frac{5\Gamma(1/4)^2}{4608\pi^5\Gamma(3/4)^2}\frac{R^2}{C^2}L$, whose linear term signals confinement, and the circular spatial Wilson loop gives $S_{NG}\propto L^2/C^2$, i.e. an area law for $\log\langle W\rangle$. The paper reads this as evidence that near-horizon quantum gravity fluctuations, characterized by the scale $C^{-1}$, break conformal symmetry and generate the confining potential in the boundary super-Yang-Mills theory.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that a quantum correction computed only near the horizon can be safely attached to the whole black-brane geometry by a matching condition; if that attachment is wrong, the linear confining term and the area law disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Heavy quark-antiquark pairs in large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory at zero temperature and finite chemical potential experience a linearly rising potential at large separation, so the theory confines in this regime.
  • The spatial Wilson loop obeys the area law $S_{NG}\propto L^2/C^2$, making confinement visible directly in $\log\langle W\rangle$.
  • The confining scale is set by the quantum gravity scale $C^{-1}$ of the Schwarzian fluctuations, so confinement is tied to conformal symmetry breaking by near-horizon quantum effects rather than by temperature.
  • Fitting the linear-plus-Coulomb potential to phenomenological quark-potential data fixes $C\approx 0.09986$ fm and $R\approx 1.50863$, placing the holographic mechanism in the range of observed quark potentials.
  • Increasing the chemical potential makes the extremal brane grow until the horizon meets the string worldsheet, which the paper interprets as a quantum-gravity-induced deconfinement transition consistent with the super-Yang-Mills phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper evaluates the string action on the quantum-averaged metric, effectively replacing $\langle e^{-S}\rangle$ by $e^{-\langle S\rangle}$; a direct path integral over Schwarzian modes together with the string embedding would test whether this approximation is what produces the linear term, and that calculation is not in the paper.
  • The matching step is a gluing ansatz rather than a derivation from full AdS$_5$ quantum gravity; one could try to construct the quantum-corrected geometry from an explicit higher-dimensional path integral or from double-holography and see whether the $L$-linear coefficient survives.
  • The same near-horizon Schwarzian mechanism may produce confining linear potentials in other holographic settings with an AdS$_2$ throat, such as non-supersymmetric or higher-dimensional models, which would make the result a general signature of near-extremal quantum gravity.
  • A direct lattice or integrability-based computation of the large-$N$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ Wilson loop at zero temperature and finite chemical potential would be a sharp test, since the paper's mechanism predicts a linear term that a purely Coulomb result would rule out.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that quantum gravitational fluctuations in the near-horizon AdS2 region of an extremal AdS5-Reissner-Nordström black brane modify the holographic Wilson loop expectation values of large-N N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory at finite chemical potential. The authors construct a quantum-corrected AdS5 metric by gluing a JT-gravity correction factor h(U) onto the classical extremal RN metric, then use the Nambu-Goto action to compute the temporal quark-antiquark potential [Eq. (24)] and the spatial circular Wilson loop action [Eqs. (31)-(33)]. They find a Coulomb term plus a linear term in the temporal potential and an area-law term in the spatial loop, and interpret these as evidence of confinement induced by near-horizon quantum gravity. The appendices contain explicit integral manipulations, including a detailed regularization of the spatial loop action.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would provide a notable new mechanism for zero-temperature confinement in holographic gauge theory: confinement arising from near-horizon quantum gravity fluctuations rather than from an ad hoc deformed bulk metric. The paper also contains useful and reasonably explicit computations: the leading Coulomb term reproduces the Maldacena result, and the integral evaluations in Appendices A-D are presented in detail, with the spatial-loop regularization carried out term by term. However, the claimed large-distance confining behavior is derived in the opposite kinematic regime, and the global gluing of the quantum correction is asserted rather than derived. The qualitative idea is interesting, but the specific quantitative claims are not supported by the calculation as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Temporal Wilson Loop, Eqs. (20)-(24)] The linear confining term in Eq. (24) is obtained by expanding the integrands in Eqs. (21) and (23) for small U_T/U0 and large C. From the leading-order relation in Eq. (20), U0 ~ R^2/L, so the correction parameter is R^4/(C^2 U0^2) ~ L^2/C^2. Therefore Eq. (24) is a short-distance expansion valid only for L << C, not for the large-L regime in which confinement is claimed. The same issue afflicts the spatial loop: the L^2/C^2 term in Eq. (32) comes from the same expansion, and the numerical plots in Figs. 3 and 5 use the truncated h(U) series (13), whose validity requires (U-U_T) >> R^2/C, equivalently U0 >> R^2/C, again L << C. The manuscript thus establishes at most a short-distance correction to the Coulomb potential, not an infrared confining potential.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B15)-(B16)] The full quantum-corrected AdS5 metric (B16) is obtained by imposing continuity and smoothness in the overlap region and then stated with 'we take (B16) as the quantum-corrected AdS5 metric in the main text.' This is an ansatz: the near-horizon JT correction h(U), derived only in the AdS2 throat, is promoted to a global factor multiplying g_tt and g_UU of the full RN metric. No derivation from the JT path integral or from the dimensional reduction shows that the correction factorizes this way away from the throat. Since every Wilson loop result in the paper follows from this metric, the central claim is conditional on an unproven gluing step.
  3. [Introduction and Temporal Wilson Loop, Eq. (1) vs Eq. (15)] The holographic Wilson loop is defined as <W(C)> ≃ e^{-S_NG} in Eq. (1), i.e. the expectation value of the exponential of the Nambu-Goto action. The computation instead plugs the quantum-averaged metric (12) into the classical Nambu-Goto action (15), effectively assuming <e^{-S}> ≈ e^{-<S>}. This replacement is not justified in the text, and it is not the standard JT result; fluctuations around the averaged metric could contribute at the same order as the linear term in Eq. (24). This assumption is load-bearing for the interpretation of Eq. (24) as the quantum expectation value of the Wilson loop.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (13)] The cubic and quartic terms in the expansion of h(U) are difficult to read as printed; the notation as typeset obscures the powers of pi and C and should be cleaned up.
  2. [Appendix A] The phrase 'It is should be noted' is a grammatical error; it should read 'It should be noted.'
  3. [Discussion, Eq. (34)] The Cornell-potential fit C ≈ 0.09986 fm is presented as a phenomenological check, but this value forces the validity condition L << C to be sub-femtometer, whereas the confining potential is meant to apply at hadronic scales; the fit should be discussed in light of the expansion-validity restriction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the confining linear term is a derived consequence of an independent JT-gravity input, not of the paper's own Wilson-loop output.

full rationale

The central derivation starts from the quantum-averaged AdS2 metric h(ζ) of Eqs. (3)-(8), an external JT-gravity result from Blommaert-Mertens-Verschelde [20], not from the authors' own work. Appendix B glues this factor to the extremal RN AdS5 metric via continuity and smoothness, Eqs. (B15)-(B16); this is a stated matching ansatz, not a circular use of the target result. The Wilson loop computation is then a standard Nambu-Goto evaluation on that metric: Eq. (15) uses the corrected metric, Eqs. (20)-(23) expand in the stated regime, and Eq. (24) follows by algebraically eliminating U0. The linear term and area law are analytic consequences of the positive (ζ/C)^2 term in h, so they are not defined in terms of the Wilson loop expectation values. The Cornell comparison in Eq. (34) explicitly 'fix[es] the parameters' C and R; it is a fit, not a prediction made from previously fitted Wilson-loop data, so it is not a fitted input called a prediction. Self-citations (refs. 27 and 29) are not load-bearing: ref. 27 is listed among applications and ref. 29 is a placeholder for future mass-gap work. The skeptic's concern about the expansion regime (L << C) is a correctness or validity objection to the matching and perturbative expansions, not a circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no invented entities; its quantitative claims are carried by the imported JT correction factor h and two fitted parameters. C fixes the strength of the quantum correction and hence the string tension σ ~ R²/C²; R sets the overall curvature scale; both are fixed in Eq. (34) by fitting the Cornell potential, so the advertised 'comparison' is a parameter determination. The gluing ansatz and the classical-string-on-averaged-metric step are assumed, not derived. The JT input h(ζ) is external (ref 20) and independent of the authors.

free parameters (2)
  • C (JT/Schwarzian quantum scale) = C ≈ 0.09986 fm (from Cornell fit, Eq. 34)
    Controls the size of the quantum correction h(ζ); the string tension σ ~ R²/C² is fixed by comparing Eq. (24) with the Cornell potential.
  • R = L_AdS/√α' (AdS5 radius in string units) = R ≈ 1.50863 (from Cornell fit, Eq. 34)
    Sets the overall scale of the Coulomb and linear terms; fitted together with C to the Cornell potential. Equivalently fixes the 't Hooft coupling λ = R⁴.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary and the holographic Wilson loop prescription ⟨W⟩ ≈ exp(-S_NG) (Eqs. 1-3)
    Standard background the entire computation relies on; cited to refs 1-3.
  • domain assumption The quantum-averaged AdS2 metric (Eqs. 3-8) from JT gravity, including h(ζ) = 1 + (3/2π⁴)(ζ/C)² - ..., is the correct near-horizon quantum correction
    Imported from ref 20 (external, published). The linear potential ultimately comes from this h(ζ).
  • domain assumption Only Schwarzian modes contribute; U(1) gauge modes are frozen (T ≪ M_U(1))
    Invoked in the Temporal Wilson Loop section, citing refs 23-24.
  • ad hoc to paper The matching/gluing ansatz (B15)-(B16): h(U) multiplies g_tt and g_UU of the full AdS5-RN metric
    The paper's own step; stated as 'we take (B16)' without a full derivation. All Wilson loop results depend on it.
  • domain assumption The classical NG string action on the quantum-averaged metric approximates ⟨W⟩
    Unstated; used implicitly when evaluating Eq. (15) on the corrected metric. ⟨e^{-S}⟩ ≠ e^{-⟨S}⟩ in general.
  • domain assumption The small-U_T/U0 and large-C expansion is valid where the linear term is extracted (Eqs. 21-23)
    The analytic result Eq. (24) uses this expansion; consistency with the large-L regime is checked only numerically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum-Corrected Holographic Wilson Loop Expectation Values and Super-Yang-Mills Confinement." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EFEQIH45

@misc{pith2026241211107,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum-Corrected Holographic Wilson Loop Expectation Values and Super-Yang-Mills Confinement},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EFEQIH45}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11107}
}
abstract

Confinement is a well-known phenomenon in the infrared regime of (supersymmetric) Yang-Mills theory. While both experimental observations and numerical simulations have robustly confirmed its existence, the underlying physical mechanism remains elusive. Unraveling the theoretical origin of confinement continues to be a profound and longstanding challenge in both physics and mathematics. Motivated by recent advances in quantum Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, we investigate the Wilson loop expectation values in the large-$N$ limit of $\mathscr{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory at finite chemical potential, employing a holographic approach within the background of an extremal AdS$_5$ Reissner-Nordstr\"om black brane. Our results reveal that quantum gravitational fluctuations in the near-horizon region significantly modify the holographic Wilson loop expectation values. These values exhibit an area-law behavior, indicative of a confining quark-antiquark potential. Within this framework, our findings suggest that confinement in the super-Yang-Mills theory arises as a consequence of near-horizon quantum gravity fluctuations in the bulk extremal AdS$_5$ black brane geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11107 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The schematic phase diagram of SYM theory (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The minimal surface anchored to the rectangular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The numerical result of the quark-antiquark potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The minimal surface anchored to the circular spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The numerical result of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exact Schwarzian Metric Factor and Holographic Wilson-Loop Screening

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Exact Schwarzian averaging yields a completely monotone metric factor with no confining minimum, so the Wilson-loop potential screens as E(L) ~ -κ_IR/L² rather than confining.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,

    S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, “Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379–394, arXiv:hep-th/9803001

    arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    We use the quantum-corrected AdS5 metric (12) and drop the subscript of tE for simplicity

    to calculate the expectation value of a rectangular tempo- ral Wilson loop, whose temporal and spatial sides have the lengths T and L, respectively. We use the quantum-corrected AdS5 metric (12) and drop the subscript of tE for simplicity. This metric works well when the worldsheet is far from the horizon. In the presence of an U(1) gauge field, besides t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Wilson loops in large N field theories,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Wilson loops in large N field theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859–4862, arXiv:hep-th/9803002

    arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 505–532, arXiv:hep-th/9803131

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Wilson-Polyakov loop at finite temperature in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,

    S.-J. Rey, S. Theisen, and J.-T. Yee, “Wilson-Polyakov loop at finite temperature in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 171–186, arXiv:hep-th/9803135

    arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature,

    A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature,” Phys. Lett. B 434 (1998) 36–40, arXiv:hep-th/9803137

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Worldsheet Fluctuations and the Heavy Quark Potential in the AdS/CFT Approach

    J. Greensite and P. Olesen, “World sheet fluctuations and the heavy quark potential in the AdS / CFT approach,” JHEP 04 (1999) 001, arXiv:hep-th/9901057

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,” Phys. Lett. B 72 (1978) 477–480

    1978

  2. [10]

    Lattice Models of Quark Confinement at High Temperature,

    L. Susskind, “Lattice Models of Quark Confinement at High Temperature,”Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2610–2618

    1979

  3. [11]

    Quantum fluctuations of Wilson loops from string models,

    Y . Kinar, E. Schreiber, J. Sonnenschein, and N. Weiss, “Quantum fluctuations of Wilson loops from string models,” Nucl. Phys. B 583 (2000) 76–104, arXiv:hep-th/9911123

    2000 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Wilson loop, Regge trajectory and hadron masses in a Yang-Mills theory from semiclassical strings,

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, L. Martucci, and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Wilson loop, Regge trajectory and hadron masses in a Yang-Mills theory from semiclassical strings,”Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 066002, arXiv:hep-th/0409205

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Heavy-quark potentials and AdS/QCD,

    O. Andreev and V . I. Zakharov, “Heavy-quark potentials and AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025023, arXiv:hep-ph/0604204

    2006 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015005, arXiv:hep-ph/0602229

    2006 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gluon Condensate, Wilson Loops and Gauge/String Duality,

    O. Andreev and V . I. Zakharov, “Gluon Condensate, Wilson Loops and Gauge/String Duality,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 047705, arXiv:hep-ph/0703010

    2007 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Strong Equivalence of the AdS-Metric and the QCD Running Coupling,

    H. J. Pirner and B. Galow, “Strong Equivalence of the AdS-Metric and the QCD Running Coupling,” Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 51–55, arXiv:0903.2701 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Wilson Loop-Loop Correlators in AdS/QCD,

    J. Nian and H. J. Pirner, “Wilson Loop-Loop Correlators in AdS/QCD,” Nucl. Phys. A 833 (2010) 119–137, arXiv:0908.1330 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Effective confining potentials for QCD,

    A. P. Trawi´nski, S. D. Głazek, S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de T´eramond, and H. G. Dosch, “Effective confining potentials for QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 7, (2014) 074017, arXiv:1403.5651 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,” JHEP 11 (2015) 014, arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,” PTEP 2016 no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verschelde, “Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,”JHEP 09 (2019) 060, arXiv:1902.11194 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Phase diagram of N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory with R-symmetry chemical potentials,

    D. Yamada and L. G. Yaffe, “Phase diagram of N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory with R-symmetry chemical potentials,” JHEP 09 (2006) 027, arXiv:hep-th/0602074

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Holographic Description of the Phase Diagram of a Chiral Symmetry Breaking Gauge Theory,

    N. Evans, A. Gebauer, K.-Y . Kim, and M. Magou, “Holographic Description of the Phase Diagram of a Chiral Symmetry Breaking Gauge Theory,” JHEP 03 (2010) 132, arXiv:1002.1885 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,

    R. A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y . Gu, K. Jensen, and S. Sachdev, “Thermoelectric transport in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and holography,” Phys. Rev. B 95 no. 15, (2017) 155131, arXiv:1612.00849 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

    L. V . Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, “The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,” JHEP 05 (2021) 145, arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    The Operator product expansion for Wilson loops and surfaces in the large N limit,

    D. E. Berenstein, R. Corrado, W. Fischler, and J. M. Maldacena, “The Operator product expansion for Wilson loops and surfaces in the large N limit,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 105023, arXiv:hep-th/9809188

    1999 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,

    H. T. Lam, T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, “Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,” JHEP 11 (2018) 182, arXiv:1804.09834 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum Corrections to Holographic Strange Metal at Low Temperature,

    X.-L. Liu, J. Nian, and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Quantum Corrections to Holographic Strange Metal at Low Temperature,” arXiv:2410.11487 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    The evaporation of charged black holes,

    A. R. Brown, L. V . Iliesiu, G. Penington, and M. Usatyuk, “The evaporation of charged black holes,” arXiv:2411.03447 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    to appear soon,

    X.-L. Liu, C.-Y . Yue, J. Nian, W. Zheng, and M. Huang, “to appear soon,”

  23. [31]

    Spectrum of charmed quark-antiquark bound 6 states,

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, “Spectrum of charmed quark-antiquark bound 6 states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (Feb, 1975) 369–372

    1975

  24. [32]

    Charmonium: The model,

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, “Charmonium: The model,” Phys. Rev. D 17 (Jun, 1978) 3090–3117

    1978

  25. [33]

    Quark confinement and the hadron spectrum,

    N. Brambilla and A. Vairo, “Quark confinement and the hadron spectrum,” in 13th Annual HUGS AT CEBAF, pp. 151–220. 5, 1999. arXiv:hep-ph/9904330

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,

    T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci, and H. L. Verlinde, “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,” JHEP 08 (2017) 136, arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th] . Appendix A: Quantum-Corrected AdS2 Metric in Euclidean JT Gravity In this appendix, we generalize the formalism introduced in...

    2017 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Separate the original AdS 5 black brane metric into a near-horizon region (NHR) and a far-away region (FAR)

  28. [36]

    Since the NHR metric becomes AdS2× T3, by perform- ing a dimensional reduction [24], we obtain a JT grav- ity sector, which controls the low-temperature quantum fluctuation behavior of the black brane

  29. [37]

    By transforming into the NHR boundary coordinates [20], we can rewrite the NHR metric in terms of the Schwarzian mode, which is the zero mode that emerge in the NHR boundary when doing the JT path integral

  30. [38]

    Finally, by integrating all Schwarzian modes in the NHR metric, we obtain the quantum-corrected NHR metic. Since the quantum-corrected metric should be continuous and smooth in the overlap region of NHR and FAR, we obtain the quantum-corrected FAR metric by matching the asympt...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.