REVIEW 7 cited by
UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving complex reasoning tasks, particularly in mathematics. However, the domain of physics reasoning presents unique challenges that have received significantly less attention. Existing benchmarks often fall short in evaluating LLMs' abilities on the breadth and depth of undergraduate-level physics, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce UGPhysics, a large-scale and comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate UnderGraduate-level Physics (UGPhysics) reasoning with LLMs. UGPhysics includes 5,520 undergraduate-level physics problems in both English and Chinese, covering 13 subjects with seven different answer types and four distinct physics reasoning skills, all rigorously screened for data leakage. Additionally, we develop a Model-Assistant Rule-based Judgment (MARJ) pipeline specifically tailored for assessing answer correctness of physics problems, ensuring accurate evaluation. Our evaluation of 31 leading LLMs shows that the highest overall accuracy, 49.8% (achieved by OpenAI-o1-mini), emphasizes the necessity for models with stronger physics reasoning skills, beyond math abilities. We hope UGPhysics, along with MARJ, will drive future advancements in AI for physics reasoning. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/UGPhysics .
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?
ChronoPhyBench is a new benchmark and dataset for chronological physical dynamics reasoning that combines video-conditioned next-state prediction with VQA to reduce language bias in MLLM evaluation.
-
Fine-Tuning Small Reasoning Models for Quantum Field Theory
Small 7B reasoning models were fine-tuned on synthetic and curated QFT problems using RL and SFT, yielding performance gains, error analysis, and public release of data and traces.
-
SPM-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Scanning Probe Microscopy
A new benchmark of 2,703 automatically generated multimodal questions for scanning probe microscopy, plus a modified F1 metric that penalizes over-selection and labels model 'personalities'.
-
DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoning
A unified visual benchmark of six physics environments shows current VLMs, including frontier models, mostly fail at interactive physical reasoning and cannot convert descriptive physics knowledge into reliable control.
-
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning
Entropy minimization on self-generated outputs elicits strong reasoning in pretrained LLMs, matching or exceeding supervised RL methods on benchmarks.
-
Hidden in Plain Sight: Visual-to-Symbolic Analytical Solution Inference from Field Visualizations
ViSA-R2 recovers single executable SymPy expressions for linear steady-state fields from visualizations using a self-verifying chain-of-thought that recognizes patterns, hypothesizes solution families, derives paramet...
-
Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI
A survey of physical AI that distinguishes theoretical physics reasoning from applied understanding and synthesizes advances in symbolic reasoning, embodied systems, and generative models to advocate for physics-groun...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.