Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Vision Language Models in Medicine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.01863 v1 pith:MY44SCGG submitted 2025-02-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYeess.IV

Vision Language Models in Medicine

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYeess.IV
keywords healthcaremed-vlmsmodelsmedicalclinicaldataethicalgeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advent of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), medical artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced significant technological progress and paradigm shifts. This survey provides an extensive review of recent advancements in Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs), which integrate visual and textual data to enhance healthcare outcomes. We discuss the foundational technology behind Med-VLMs, illustrating how general models are adapted for complex medical tasks, and examine their applications in healthcare. The transformative impact of Med-VLMs on clinical practice, education, and patient care is highlighted, alongside challenges such as data scarcity, narrow task generalization, interpretability issues, and ethical concerns like fairness, accountability, and privacy. These limitations are exacerbated by uneven dataset distribution, computational demands, and regulatory hurdles. Rigorous evaluation methods and robust regulatory frameworks are essential for safe integration into healthcare workflows. Future directions include leveraging large-scale, diverse datasets, improving cross-modal generalization, and enhancing interpretability. Innovations like federated learning, lightweight architectures, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration are explored as pathways to democratize access and improve clinical relevance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Med-VLMs' strengths and limitations, fostering their ethical and balanced adoption in healthcare.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multilingual Hematology Visual Question Answering Dataset

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces WBCMor VQA benchmark with 110K bilingual QA pairs for hematology VQA on 20K cell images using existing annotations and a new Urdu dictionary.

  2. FADA: Accessible fetal ultrasound interpretation and annotation with a selectively distilled unified vision-language model

    cs.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    FADA is a selectively distilled unified vision-language model for fetal ultrasound that performs interpretation, classification, detection, and segmentation in one pipeline, achieves strong metrics, and deploys offlin...

  3. AgentRx: A Benchmark Study of LLM Agents for Multimodal Clinical Prediction Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Single-agent LLM frameworks outperform naive multi-agent systems in multimodal clinical risk prediction tasks and are better calibrated.

  4. CURE: Curriculum-guided Multi-task Training for Reliable Anatomy Grounded Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0

    CURE's curriculum-guided multi-task training improves bounding-box grounding for chest X-ray report generation, but its claimed hallucination reduction is not confirmed by the paper's full evaluation.

  5. Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Context alignment in medical VLMs raises AUC from 0.918 to 0.925, cuts hallucinated keywords from 1.14 to 0.25, shortens explanations to 15.3 words, and maintains calibrated uncertainty without raising model confidence.