REVIEW 5 cited by
Vision Language Models in Medicine
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Vision Language Models in Medicine
read the original abstract
With the advent of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), medical artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced significant technological progress and paradigm shifts. This survey provides an extensive review of recent advancements in Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs), which integrate visual and textual data to enhance healthcare outcomes. We discuss the foundational technology behind Med-VLMs, illustrating how general models are adapted for complex medical tasks, and examine their applications in healthcare. The transformative impact of Med-VLMs on clinical practice, education, and patient care is highlighted, alongside challenges such as data scarcity, narrow task generalization, interpretability issues, and ethical concerns like fairness, accountability, and privacy. These limitations are exacerbated by uneven dataset distribution, computational demands, and regulatory hurdles. Rigorous evaluation methods and robust regulatory frameworks are essential for safe integration into healthcare workflows. Future directions include leveraging large-scale, diverse datasets, improving cross-modal generalization, and enhancing interpretability. Innovations like federated learning, lightweight architectures, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration are explored as pathways to democratize access and improve clinical relevance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Med-VLMs' strengths and limitations, fostering their ethical and balanced adoption in healthcare.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Multilingual Hematology Visual Question Answering Dataset
Introduces WBCMor VQA benchmark with 110K bilingual QA pairs for hematology VQA on 20K cell images using existing annotations and a new Urdu dictionary.
-
FADA: Accessible fetal ultrasound interpretation and annotation with a selectively distilled unified vision-language model
FADA is a selectively distilled unified vision-language model for fetal ultrasound that performs interpretation, classification, detection, and segmentation in one pipeline, achieves strong metrics, and deploys offlin...
-
AgentRx: A Benchmark Study of LLM Agents for Multimodal Clinical Prediction Tasks
Single-agent LLM frameworks outperform naive multi-agent systems in multimodal clinical risk prediction tasks and are better calibrated.
-
CURE: Curriculum-guided Multi-task Training for Reliable Anatomy Grounded Report Generation
CURE's curriculum-guided multi-task training improves bounding-box grounding for chest X-ray report generation, but its claimed hallucination reduction is not confirmed by the paper's full evaluation.
-
Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models
Context alignment in medical VLMs raises AUC from 0.918 to 0.925, cuts hallucinated keywords from 1.14 to 0.25, shortens explanations to 15.3 words, and maintains calibrated uncertainty without raising model confidence.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.