REVIEW 8 cited by
AI Risk Atlas: Taxonomy and Tooling for Navigating AI Risks and Resources
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AI Risk Atlas: Taxonomy and Tooling for Navigating AI Risks and Resources
read the original abstract
The rapid evolution of generative AI has expanded the breadth of risks associated with AI systems. While various taxonomies and frameworks exist to classify these risks, the lack of interoperability between them creates challenges for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to operationalise AI governance. To address this gap, we introduce the AI Risk Atlas, a structured taxonomy that consolidates AI risks from diverse sources and aligns them with governance frameworks. Additionally, we present the Risk Atlas Nexus, a collection of open-source tools designed to bridge the divide between risk definitions, benchmarks, datasets, and mitigation strategies. This knowledge-driven approach leverages ontologies and knowledge graphs to facilitate risk identification, prioritization, and mitigation. By integrating AI-assisted compliance workflows and automation strategies, our framework lowers the barrier to responsible AI adoption. We invite the broader research and open-source community to contribute to this evolving initiative, fostering cross-domain collaboration and ensuring AI governance keeps pace with technological advancements.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy: Open Infrastructure for Operationalizing AI Audits
Eticas publishes an open-core AI risk taxonomy with a four-layer audit methodology and demonstrates the full grading chain on PII leakage using DecodingTrust numbers for GPT-4-0314.
-
Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting
EvalCards is a composable reporting schema and monitoring tool for AI evaluations, derived from 52 papers and 10 interviews, and applied to 5,816 models and 101,843 results to surface reporting gaps.
-
When and How AI Should Assist Brainstorming for AI Impact Assessment
AI improves brainstorming quality for general-purpose impact assessment but not specialized applications when it offers hints early and structures ideas later, based on workshop evaluations with 54 participants.
-
PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation
PASTA is a model-card-based LLM pipeline that evaluates an AI system against five regulations in minutes for about $3, with expert-aligned violation and relevance scores.
-
Rethinking Query Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems [Vision]
Agentic data pipelines are built by hand today; this paper sets a research agenda for automatically optimizing their structure, model choices, and execution engines jointly as a new query-optimization problem.
-
The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy: Open Infrastructure for Operationalizing AI Audits
The Eticas AI Risk Taxonomy v2.0.0 organizes 76 risk subcategories across 10 categories and demonstrates operationalization by measuring PII disclosure in GPT-4-0314 at 0%, 51%, and 84% under increasing adversarial co...
-
From Control Boundary to Insurance Claim: Reconstructing AI-Mediated Losses Through the CER Framework
Introduces the CER framework to reconstruct AI-mediated losses for insurance claim support by assessing control boundaries, evidence availability, and coverage.
-
Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond
The paper surveys worldwide AI regulations, risk categories, and assessment methodologies, highlighting best practices and research gaps.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.