REVIEW 3 cited by
RePOPE: Impact of Annotation Errors on the POPE Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
RePOPE: Impact of Annotation Errors on the POPE Benchmark
read the original abstract
Since data annotation is costly, benchmark datasets often incorporate labels from established image datasets. In this work, we assess the impact of label errors in MSCOCO on the frequently used object hallucination benchmark POPE. We re-annotate the benchmark images and identify an imbalance in annotation errors across different subsets. Evaluating multiple models on the revised labels, which we denote as RePOPE, we observe notable shifts in model rankings, highlighting the impact of label quality. Code and data are available at https://github.com/YanNeu/RePOPE .
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Measuring Cross-Modal Synergy: A Benchmark for VLM Explainability
Introduces Synergistic Faithfulness metric based on Shapley Interaction Index to evaluate cross-modal synergy in VLM explainers, revealing over-reliance on visual salience in existing methods.
-
A Good Initialization is All You Need for Faithful Visual Attribution
TRACE’s fixed-k cross-entropy mask search and COPAIR’s coarse-pair warm-start raise search-based visual attribution faithfulness and enable high single-point RePOPE repair rates.
-
Diagnosing Visual Ignorance in Vision-Language Models
VLMs show language-prior reliance via multi-stage bottlenecks in visual retrieval and suppression, with many benchmark examples remaining answerable under severe visual obfuscation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.