Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremFuture Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:06 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The FCC feasibility study describes how a staged electron-positron and hadron collider could deliver precision measurements on the Higgs, electroweak bosons, and top quark while searching for physics beyond the Standard Model.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
FCC would address some of the most profound open questions in particle physics, from precision studies of the Higgs and EW bosons and of the top quark, to the exploration of physics beyond the Standard Model.
Load-bearing premise
The proposed staged implementation beginning with FCC-ee followed by FCC-hh is technically and financially feasible with technologies that can be developed in the coming decades.
read the original abstract
Volume 1 of the FCC Feasibility Report presents an overview of the physics case, experimental programme, and detector concepts for the Future Circular Collider (FCC). This volume outlines how FCC would address some of the most profound open questions in particle physics, from precision studies of the Higgs and EW bosons and of the top quark, to the exploration of physics beyond the Standard Model. The report reviews the experimental opportunities offered by the staged implementation of FCC, beginning with an electron-positron collider (FCC-ee), operating at several centre-of-mass energies, followed by a hadron collider (FCC-hh). Benchmark examples are given of the expected physics performance, in terms of precision and sensitivity to new phenomena, of each collider stage. Detector requirements and conceptual designs for FCC-ee experiments are discussed, as are the specific demands that the physics programme imposes on the accelerator in the domains of the calibration of the collision energy, and the interface region between the accelerator and the detector. The report also highlights advances in detector, software and computing technologies, as well as the theoretical tools /reconstruction techniques that will enable the precision measurements and discovery potential of the FCC experimental programme. This volume reflects the outcome of a global collaborative effort involving hundreds of scientists and institutions, aided by a dedicated community-building coordination, and provides a targeted assessment of the scientific opportunities and experimental foundations of the FCC programme.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript is Volume 1 of the FCC Feasibility Study Report. It presents an overview of the physics case, experimental programme, and detector concepts for the Future Circular Collider, describing a staged implementation beginning with FCC-ee operating at multiple centre-of-mass energies for precision measurements of the Higgs, electroweak bosons and top quark, followed by FCC-hh. Benchmark examples of expected physics performance, detector requirements, accelerator calibration demands, and advances in detector, software and computing technologies are provided, reflecting a global collaborative effort.
Significance. If the performance targets are achieved, the report would be significant in consolidating the scientific justification for a next-generation collider facility capable of addressing key open questions in particle physics with unprecedented precision and discovery potential. It draws on established simulation frameworks and expert consensus studies, and the community-wide coordination is a clear strength.
major comments (1)
- Benchmark performance sections: The central physics projections (e.g., precision on Higgs couplings, EW observables, and BSM sensitivity) rest on specific assumptions for integrated luminosity, energy calibration precision, detector resolution and efficiency. No quantitative sensitivity analysis is provided showing how these figures degrade under realistic shortfalls (such as 20-30% lower luminosity or resolution), which is load-bearing for assessing the robustness of the claimed physics reach.
minor comments (2)
- The discussion of detector concepts would benefit from clearer cross-references to the specific performance targets used in the benchmark calculations.
- Some sections on technological advances could include more explicit timelines or milestones for the required R&D to strengthen the feasibility narrative.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive review of Volume 1 of the FCC Feasibility Study Report and for highlighting the importance of assessing the robustness of the benchmark physics projections. We address the major comment in detail below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Benchmark performance sections: The central physics projections (e.g., precision on Higgs couplings, EW observables, and BSM sensitivity) rest on specific assumptions for integrated luminosity, energy calibration precision, detector resolution and efficiency. No quantitative sensitivity analysis is provided showing how these figures degrade under realistic shortfalls (such as 20-30% lower luminosity or resolution), which is load-bearing for assessing the robustness of the claimed physics reach.
Authors: We agree that a quantitative sensitivity analysis to shortfalls in the nominal assumptions would strengthen the evaluation of the physics reach. The benchmark performances reported in the manuscript are calculated for the target design values of integrated luminosity, beam energy calibration, and detector resolution/efficiency, as these define the FCC programme goals. While the volume presents an overview and does not contain a dedicated, systematic study of degradation under 20-30% variations, selected physics working groups have performed indicative scaling studies for specific observables. To address the referee's point, we will add a concise new subsection in the benchmark performance chapters that provides example estimates of how key precisions (Higgs couplings, electroweak observables, and selected BSM sensitivities) would degrade under the cited shortfalls, drawing on existing internal studies and noting the dominant scaling behaviours. This addition will be included in the revised version. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: projections rest on external assumptions and prior studies
full rationale
The FCC Feasibility Study Report is an overview document outlining physics opportunities, detector concepts, and staged collider performance under stated luminosity, energy, and resolution targets drawn from external accelerator R&D and simulation frameworks. No load-bearing step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to an input quantity defined inside the report itself; benchmark sensitivities are explicitly conditional on those external performance assumptions rather than derived by construction from quantities internal to the volume. Self-citations to prior FCC notes exist but are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or to close a definitional loop. The document therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- Integrated luminosity targets for FCC-ee runs
- Detector efficiency and resolution assumptions
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Standard Model remains valid at the precision and energy scales probed by FCC-ee and FCC-hh
- domain assumption Accelerator and detector technologies can be scaled from current designs within the stated timeline
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
DimensionForcingdimension_forced unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Volume 1 outlines how FCC would address some of the most profound open questions in particle physics, from precision studies of the Higgs and EW bosons and of the top quark, to the exploration of physics beyond the Standard Model.
-
Cost.FunctionalEquationwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Benchmark examples are given of the expected physics performance, in terms of precision and sensitivity to new phenomena, of each collider stage.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 18 Pith papers
-
A theoretical account of tiny multi-Higgs vacuum expectation values from non-invertible symmetry
Non-invertible symmetry from the minimal Fibonacci fusion rule forbids tree-level VEVs for multi-Higgs fields H4 and H5, generating them radiatively at one-loop with naturally small values of 10^{-3}-10^{-2} GeV that ...
-
Micron-sized Extra Dimensions and Primordial Black Holes: Charged, Rotating, and Memory Burdened
Six-dimensional primordial black holes with memory burden effects can survive as light dark matter in a two-extra-dimension model at the 10 TeV scale, producing high-multiplicity thermal events at future colliders.
-
A new approach to long-lived particle detection at hadron colliders: the $\textsf{DELIGHT-SHIELD}$ concept
DELIGHT-SHIELD uses a dedicated shield followed by tracking to suppress hadronic and electromagnetic backgrounds by up to seven orders of magnitude, reaching branching ratio sensitivity of O(10^{-9}) for h to phi phi ...
-
Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders
Energetic radiation induces decoherence that significantly reduces entanglement in fermion pairs at colliders, with statistically significant signals observable in ttbar(g) at the LHC and tau pairs at Belle II.
-
Resonance- and Width-aware Parton Shower Evolution and NLO Matching
A resonance- and width-aware parton shower with NLO matching is developed for e+e- to W+W- bbbar, extending beyond standard Breit-Wigner approximations, with a public SHERPA-based simulator.
-
Probing Higgs and Top Interactions through the Muon Lens at multi-TeV Muon Colliders
A 10 TeV muon collider could improve existing bounds on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude over current limits and FCC-ee projections.
-
Probing $\tau$ lepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders
Future lepton colliders can improve existing constraints on the tau lepton's dipole moments by several orders of magnitude through complementary channels.
-
All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective
The authors construct and publicly release the TQ4Q2.0 fragmentation functions for all-heavy S-wave tetraquarks via NRQCD factorization, extending prior work with nonconstituent contributions and replica-based uncertainties.
-
Searching for apparent baryon number violation in $\Lambda_c^+$ decays at the Super Tau-Charm Facility
STCF with 1 ab^{-1} can probe several-TeV new-physics scales in sterile-neutrino EFT and constrain an RPV SUSY parameter to ~0.1 TeV^{-2} for apparent BNV in unexplored Lambda_c+ channels.
-
Radiative corrections to decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in the complex Higgs triplet model
One-loop corrections in the complex Higgs triplet model shift the 125 GeV Higgs decay rates to WW* and ZZ* upward by a few percent relative to the SM, while allowing up to -20% deviation in gamma gamma and 100% in the...
-
Top-quark pair production in electron-positron collisions within the minimal noncommutative Standard Model
Noncommutative effects up to second order in Θ induce measurable deviations in the e+e− → tt̄ total cross section, polar and azimuthal distributions, and forward-backward asymmetry at ILC and CLIC energies.
-
Probing invisible particles with charm
Rare charm hadron decays offer clean null tests of the standard model that can reach branching ratios up to 10^{-3} for dark photons and 10^{-4} for ALPs in unconstrained parameter spaces.
-
Phenomenology of electroweak spin-1 resonances
Composite Higgs models with SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R predict spin-1 resonances mixing with electroweak bosons that remain viable at the LHC down to masses of about 1.5 TeV.
-
Micron-sized Extra Dimensions and Primordial Black Holes: Charged, Rotating, and Memory Burdened
In a six-dimensional theory with micron-sized extra dimensions, memory-burdened primordial black holes can survive as dark matter down to sub-gram masses while producing detectable high-multiplicity events at future c...
-
Three loop QCD corrections to electroweak radiative parameters
Three-loop QCD corrections to electroweak radiative parameters Δρ, Δr, and Δκ are computed, yielding an updated W boson mass prediction relevant for FCC precision targets.
-
Projections of H$\to\tau\tau$ cross-section at FCC-ee
FCC-ee projections indicate at least 10 times better precision on the H to tau tau cross-section than the LHC through ZH and VBF channels plus improved tau reconstruction methods.
-
Adapting ILC detector concepts to other facilities
The paper summarizes adaptations needed to apply ILC detector concepts to other Higgs Factory projects like FCC-ee.
-
Beam Loss Consequences
Reviews beam loss mechanisms in high-energy accelerators and their risks to equipment, electronics, and personnel.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC
CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012
-
[2]
ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012
-
[3]
Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale
P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran, “Cosmological relaxation of the electroweak scale”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 221801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.221801, arXiv:1504.07551
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.221801 2015
-
[4]
Cosmological Higgs-Axion Interplay for a Naturally Small Electroweak Scale
J. R. Espinosa et al., “Cosmological Higgs-axion interplay for a naturally small electroweak scale”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 251803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.251803, arXiv:1506.09217
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.251803 2015
-
[5]
N. Arkani-Hamed, R. T. D’Agnolo, and H. D. Kim, “Weak scale as a trigger”, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.095014, arXiv:2012.04652
-
[6]
2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics (brochure)
European Strategy Group, “2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics (brochure)”, 2020. doi:10.17181/CERN.JSC6.W89E
-
[7]
Report of the 2021 U.S. community study on the future of particle physics (Snowmass 2021)
J. N. Butler et al., “Report of the 2021 U.S. community study on the future of particle physics (Snowmass 2021)”, 2023. doi:10.2172/1922503
-
[8]
Exploring the quantum universe: Pathways to innovation and discovery in particle physics
P5 Collaboration, “Exploring the quantum universe: Pathways to innovation and discovery in particle physics”, doi:10.2172/2368847, arXiv:2407.19176
-
[9]
First Look at the Physics Case of TLEP
TLEP design study working group, “First look at the physics case of TLEP”, JHEP 01 (2014) 164, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)164, arXiv:1308.6176. Presented at the 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013): Minneapolis, MN, USA, July 2013
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)164 2014
-
[10]
FCC physics opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 1
FCC Collaboration, “FCC physics opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 1”,Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 474, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6904-3
-
[11]
FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 2
FCC Collaboration, “FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 2”,Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228 (2019) 261, doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4
-
[12]
FCC-hh: The hadron collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 3
FCC Collaboration, “FCC-hh: The hadron collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report, V olume 3”,Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228 (2019) 755, doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900087-0
-
[13]
The carbon footprint of proposed e+e− Higgs factories
P. Janot and A. Blondel, “The carbon footprint of proposed e+e− Higgs factories”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 1122, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03319-w , arXiv:2208.10466
-
[14]
Higgs factory options for CERN: A comparative study
A. Blondel, C. Grojean, P. Janot, and G. Wilkinson, “Higgs factory options for CERN: A comparative study”, arXiv:2412.13130
-
[15]
Machine Parameters and Projected Luminosity Performance of Proposed Future Colliders at CERN
F. Bordry et al., “Machine parameters and projected luminosity performance of proposed future colliders at CERN”, arXiv:1810.13022
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[16]
FCC Note: Integrated luminosities and sequence of events for the FCC Feasibility Study Report
P. Janot, C. Grojean, F. Zimmermann, and M. Benedikt, “FCC Note: Integrated luminosities and sequence of events for the FCC Feasibility Study Report”, doi:10.17181/8ey0h-84j86
-
[17]
FCC Note: Particle physics considerations for the FCC-ee choice and sequence of running energies
A. Blondel, C. Grojean, P. Janot, and G. Wilkinson, “FCC Note: Particle physics considerations for the FCC-ee choice and sequence of running energies”, doi:10.17181/224fq-qtf30
-
[18]
FCC Collaboration, M. Benedikt et al., “Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report V olume 2: Accelerators, technical infrastructure and safety”,doi:10.17181/CERN.EBAY.7W4X. CERN-FCC-ACC-2025-0004. Submitted to the 2025 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. 216
-
[19]
A High Luminosity e+e- Collider in the LHC tunnel to study the Higgs Boson
A. Blondel and F. Zimmermann, “A high luminosity e+e− collider in the LHC tunnel to study the Higgs boson”, arXiv:1112.2518
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[20]
A High Luminosity e+e- Collider to study the Higgs Boson
A. Blondel et al., “A high luminosity e+e− collider to study the Higgs boson”, arXiv:1208.0504
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[21]
Prospective Studies for LEP3 with the CMS Detector
P. Azzi et al., “Prospective studies for LEP3 with the CMS detector”, arXiv:1208.1662
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[22]
Polarization and centre-of-mass energy calibration at FCC-ee
A. Blondel et al., “Polarization and centre-of-mass energy calibration at FCC-ee”, arXiv:1909.12245
-
[23]
The challenges of beam polarization and keV-scale centre-of-mass energy calibration at the FCC-ee
A. Blondel and E. Gianfelice, “The challenges of beam polarization and keV-scale centre-of-mass energy calibration at the FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 1103, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02038-y
-
[24]
The Z lineshape challenge: ppm and keV measurements
J. Alcaraz Maestre, A. Blondel, M. Dam, and P. Janot, “The Z lineshape challenge: ppm and keV measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 848, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01760-x , arXiv:2107.00616
-
[25]
Direct measurement of alpha_QED(mZ) at the FCC-ee
P. Janot, “Direct measurement of αQED(m2 Z) at the FCC-ee”, JHEP 02 (2016) 053, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)053, arXiv:1512.05544. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 164 (2017)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)053 2016
-
[26]
On the extraction of αem(m2 Z) at Tera-Z
M. Riembau, “On the extraction of αem(m2 Z) at Tera-Z”, arXiv:2501.05508
-
[27]
New physics at Tera-Z: Precision renormalised
L. Allwicher, M. McCullough, and S. Renner, “New physics at Tera-Z: Precision renormalised”, JHEP 02 (2025) 164, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)164, arXiv:2408.03992
-
[28]
Linear Standard Model extensions in the SMEFT at one loop and Tera-Z
J. Gargalionis, J. Quevillon, P. N. H. Vuong, and T. You, “Linear Standard Model extensions in the SMEFT at one loop and Tera-Z”, arXiv:2412.01759
-
[29]
Is the Higgs Mechanism of Fermion Mass Generation a Fact? A Yukawa-less First-Two-Generation Model
D. Ghosh, R. S. Gupta, and G. Perez, “Is the Higgs mechanism of fermion mass generation a fact? a Yukawa-less first-two-generation model”, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 504, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.059, arXiv:1508.01501
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.059 2016
-
[30]
Large Higgs-electron Yukawa coupling in 2HDM
A. Dery, C. Frugiuele, and Y . Nir, “Large Higgs-electron Yukawa coupling in 2HDM”,JHEP 04 (2018) 044, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)044, arXiv:1712.04514
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2018)044 2018
-
[31]
Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons
W. Altmannshofer, J. Brod, and M. Schmaltz, “Experimental constraints on the coupling of the Higgs boson to electrons”, JHEP 05 (2015) 125, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)125, arXiv:1503.04830
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2015)125 2015
-
[32]
Measuring the electron Yukawa coupling via resonant s-channel Higgs production at FCC-ee
D. d’Enterria, A. Poldaru, and G. Wojcik, “Measuring the electron Yukawa coupling via resonant s-channel Higgs production at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 201, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02204-2 , arXiv:2107.02686
-
[33]
The challenge of monochromatization
A. Faus-Golfe, M. A. Valdivia Garcia, and F. Zimmermann, “The challenge of monochromatization”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2021) 31, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02151-y
-
[34]
P. Azzurri et al., “A special Higgs challenge: Measuring the mass and production cross section with ultimate precision at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2021) 23, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02202-4 , arXiv:2106.15438
-
[35]
Particle Data Group, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics”, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001
-
[36]
FCC-ee overview: new opportunities create new challenges
A. Blondel and P. Janot, “FCC-ee overview: new opportunities create new challenges”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 92, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02154-9 , arXiv:2106.13885
-
[37]
Theory requirements for SM Higgs and EW precision physics at the FCC-ee
S. Heinemeyer, S. Jadach, and J. Reuter, “Theory requirements for SM Higgs and EW precision physics at the FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 911, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01875-1 , arXiv:2106.11802
-
[38]
Standard Model theory for the FCC-ee Tera-Z stage
A. Blondel et al., “Standard Model theory for the FCC-ee Tera-Z stage”, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, CERN-2019-003 (2019) doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-003, arXiv:1809.01830. Presented at the Mini Workshop on Precision EW and QCD Calculations for the FCC Studies: 217 Methods and Tools
-
[39]
A. Blondel et al., “Theory requirements and possibilities for the FCC-ee and other future high energy and precision frontier lepton colliders”, arXiv:1901.02648
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901
-
[40]
Theoretical uncertainties for electroweak and Higgs-boson precision measurements at FCC-ee
A. Freitas et al., “Theoretical uncertainties for electroweak and Higgs-boson precision measurements at FCC-ee”, arXiv:1906.05379
-
[41]
M. Aleksa et al., “Calorimetry at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 1066, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02034-2 , arXiv:2109.00391
-
[42]
Tracking and vertex detectors at FCC-ee
N. Bacchetta, P. Collins, and P. Riedler, “Tracking and vertex detectors at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 231, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02323-w , arXiv:2112.13019
-
[43]
S. Braibant and P. Giacomelli, “Muon detection at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 1143, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02115-2
-
[44]
Challenges for FCC-ee luminosity monitor design
M. Dam, “Challenges for FCC-ee luminosity monitor design”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 81, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02265-3 , arXiv:2107.12837
-
[45]
Particle identification at FCC-ee
G. Wilkinson, “Particle identification at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 835, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01810-4 , arXiv:2106.01253
-
[46]
Higgs and top physics reconstruction challenges and opportunities at FCC-ee
P. Azzi, L. Gouskos, M. Selvaggi, and F. Simon, “Higgs and top physics reconstruction challenges and opportunities at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2021) 39, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02223-z , arXiv:2107.05003
-
[47]
FCC Note: Collision-energy calibration and monochromatisation studies at FCC-ee
J. Bauche et al., “FCC Note: Collision-energy calibration and monochromatisation studies at FCC-ee ”, doi:10.17181/jsyy3-2a421
-
[48]
The W mass and width measurement challenge at FCC-ee
P. Azzurri, “The W mass and width measurement challenge at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 1203, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02211-3 , arXiv:2107.04444
-
[49]
G. Wilkinson, “Particle identification”. Presented at the Third FCC Physics and Experiments Workshop, 13-17 January 2020, https://indico.cern.ch/event/838435/, 2020
work page 2020
-
[50]
Use cases for an extreme electromagnetic resolution
R. Aleksan, “Use cases for an extreme electromagnetic resolution”. Presented at the Fourth FCC Physics and Experiments Workshop, 9-13 November 2020, https://indico.cern.ch/event/932973/, 2020
work page 2020
-
[51]
M. Dam, “The τ challenges at FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 963, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01894-y , arXiv:2107.12832
-
[52]
HECATE: A long-lived particle detector concept for the FCC-ee or CEPC
M. Chrz ˛ aszcz, M. Drewes, and J. Hajer, “HECATE: A long-lived particle detector concept for the FCC-ee or CEPC”, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 546, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09253-y , arXiv:2011.01005
-
[53]
FCC note: A selection of benchmark studies at FCC-ee; contribution to Snowmass 2021
The FCC PED Coordination group, “FCC note: A selection of benchmark studies at FCC-ee; contribution to Snowmass 2021”, 2021. doi:10.17181/2gfvb-1rw11
-
[54]
Exploring requirements and detector solutions for FCC-ee
P. Azzi and E. Perez, “Exploring requirements and detector solutions for FCC-ee”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 1195, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02141-0 , arXiv:2107.04509
-
[55]
Machine detector interface for the $e^+e^-$ future circular collider
M. Boscolo et al., “Machine detector interface for the e +e− future circular collider”, doi:10.18429/JACoW-eeFACT2018-WEXBA02, arXiv:1905.03528
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.18429/jacow-eefact2018-wexba02 1905
-
[56]
Physics Opportunities of a 100 TeV Proton-Proton Collider
N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Han, M. Mangano, and L.-T. Wang, “Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton-proton collider”, Phys. Rept. 652 (2016) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.004, arXiv:1511.06495
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.004 2016
-
[57]
Physics at the FCC-hh, a 100 TeV pp collider
M. Mangano, “Physics at the FCC-hh, a 100 TeV pp collider”, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, CERN-2017-003 (2017) doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-003, arXiv:1710.06353
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-003 2017
-
[58]
Heavy ions at the Future Circular Collider
A. Dainese et al., “Heavy ions at the Future Circular Collider”, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, CERN-2017-003 (2016) doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-003.635, arXiv:1605.01389
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-003.635 2017
-
[59]
Higgs boson studies at future particle colliders
J. de Blas et al., “Higgs boson studies at future particle colliders”, JHEP 01 (2020) 139, 218 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)139, arXiv:1905.03764
-
[60]
On the future of Higgs, electroweak and diboson measurements at lepton colliders
J. de Blas et al., “On the future of Higgs, electroweak and diboson measurements at lepton colliders”, JHEP 12 (2019) 117, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)117, arXiv:1907.04311
-
[61]
Global SMEFT fits at future colliders; contribution to Snowmass 2021
J. de Blas et al., “Global SMEFT fits at future colliders; contribution to Snowmass 2021”, arXiv:2206.08326
-
[62]
Improved Formalism for Precision Higgs Coupling Fits
T. Barklow et al., “Improved formalism for precision Higgs coupling fits”, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 053003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.053003, arXiv:1708.08912
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.053003 2018
-
[63]
J. Eysermans, A. Li, and G. Bernardi, “FCC note: Higgs boson mass and model-independent ZH cross-section at FCC-ee in the di-electron and di-muon final states”, 2023. doi:10.17181/jfb44-s0d81
-
[64]
A. D. Vecchio, L. Gouskos, G. Marchiori, and M. Selvaggi, “FCC note: Measurement of Higgs boson hadronic decays with Z(→ ν¯ν /ℓℓ)H events at FCC-ee at √s = 240 GeV”, 2023. doi:10.17181/9pr7y-3v657
-
[65]
FCC note: Higgs to invisible at FCC-ee
A. Mehta and N. Rompotis, “FCC note: Higgs to invisible at FCC-ee ”, 2023. doi:10.17181/7hbn8-3d233
-
[66]
R. S. Gupta, A. Pomarol, and F. Riva, “BSM primary effects”, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.035001, arXiv:1405.0181
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.035001 2015
-
[67]
Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation
W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, “Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation”, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90262-2
-
[68]
Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian”, JHEP 10 (2010) 085, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085, arXiv:1008.4884
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010
-
[69]
Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: from LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee
E. Celada et al., “Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: from LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee”, JHEP 09 (2024) 091, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)091, arXiv:2404.12809
-
[70]
Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach
A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, and D. Marzocca, “Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.011801, arXiv:1508.00581
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.011801 2016
-
[71]
Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP1 and LEP2
R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, “Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2”, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.10.014, arXiv:hep-ph/0405040
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.10.014 2004
-
[72]
Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z
V . Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You, “Accuracy complements energy: electroweak precision tests at Tera-Z”, arXiv:2412.14241
-
[73]
New physics through flavor tagging at FCC-ee
A. Greljo, H. Tiblom, and A. Valenti, “New physics through flavor tagging at FCC-ee”, arXiv:2411.02485
-
[74]
Top-quark electroweak couplings at the FCC-ee
P. Janot, “Top-quark electroweak couplings at the FCC-ee”, JHEP 04 (2015) 182, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)182, arXiv:1503.01325
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)182 2015
-
[75]
A detailed study on the prospects for a tt threshold scan in e+e− collisions
M. M. Defranchis et al., “A detailed study on the prospects for a tt threshold scan in e+e− collisions”, arXiv:2503.18713
-
[76]
Measuring the Top Yukawa Coupling at 100 TeV
M. L. Mangano et al., “Measuring the Top Yukawa coupling at 100 TeV”, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 035001, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/3/035001, arXiv:1507.08169
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/3/035001 2016
-
[77]
Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs production via gluon fusion
A. Azatov, R. Contino, G. Panico, and M. Son, “Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs boson production via gluon fusion”, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.035001, arXiv:1502.00539
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.035001 2015
-
[78]
Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS
ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, “Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS”. Submitted to the 2025 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2025-018, CMS-HIG-25-002
work page 2025
-
[79]
An Indirect Model-Dependent Probe of the Higgs Self-Coupling
M. McCullough, “An indirect model-dependent probe of the Higgs self-coupling”, Phys. Rev. D 219 90 (2014) 015001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.015001, arXiv:1312.3322. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 92, 039903 (2015)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.015001 2014
-
[80]
F. Zimmermann, “Towards More Luminosity”. Presented at the 7th FCC Physics Workshop, LAPP, Annecy-le-Vieux, France,https://indico.cern.ch/event/1307378, 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.