Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Partitioning Law of Polymer Chains into Flexible Polymer Networks

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The equilibrium partition constant for linear polymer chains entering a flexible polymer network is governed by one dimensionless ratio, $K_0 = \exp[-4(R_g/l_{\mathrm{cycle}})^2]$.

desk verdict A clever osmotic method and a plausible scaling idea, but most K0 values are measured above the paper's own dilute limit, so the universal law is not yet demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05254 v1 pith:S7XEHVJE submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph

Haruki Takarai , Takashi Yasuda , Naoyuki Sakumichi , Takamasa Sakai This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph PACS 82.70.Gg82.35.Lr
keywords polymerpartitioninghydrogelspartitionconstantgyrationradiuscyclelengthosmoticpressuresemidilutescalingmesh-sizeprobe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the equilibrium partition constant $K_0$ for linear polymer chains entering a flexible polymer network is set entirely by the network's elastically effective cycle length $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$ and the chain's gyration radius $R_g$, through $K_0 = \exp[-4(R_g/l_{\mathrm{cycle}})^2]$. To test this, the authors develop a label-free, contactless osmotic method: the extra osmotic pressure from partitioned chains makes the gel swell measurably, and from that swelling they read the internal concentration. They validate the underlying osmotic description by direct drying on a subset of gels, then show that all measured $K_0$ values, spanning three chain sizes and many network densities and topologies, collapse onto the single exponential law. If right, the law replaces the old rigid-rod picture of gel sieving and gives a simple one-length-scale description of partitioning that could be used to estimate mesh sizes from swelling alone.

What carries the argument

The central object is $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$, the mean distance between the centroids of elastically effective cycles in the network, computed from a recursive branching calculation on the star-polymer precursors. It carries the argument because plotting $-\ln K_0$ against $(R_g/l_{\mathrm{cycle}})^2$ collapses all data onto a line of slope 4, while plotting against $R_g/l_{\mathrm{branch}}$ or $R_g/l_{\mathrm{cross}}$ does not. The measurement machinery is osmotic: the gel's swelling equilibrium, plus the semidilute scaling of mixing pressure with total polymer concentration, converts weight changes into internal concentrations.

What would settle it

Direct dry-weight measurements, already performed for a subset of samples, should be extended to every network architecture used in the universal-law plot; if for any architecture the internal concentration inferred from swelling disagrees with direct drying under Eq. (2), the extracted $K_0$ shifts and the collapse in Fig. 5 would be violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Eq. (5): $K_0 = \exp[-4(R_g/l_{\mathrm{cycle}})^2]$, where $R_g$ is the solute gyration radius and $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$ is the mean distance between centroids of elastically effective cycles in the network. The paper shows experimentally, on end-linked star-polymer PEG hydrogels, that this single ratio organizes every measured partition constant, for three solute molar masses and networks differing in precursor mass, polymer concentration, branching number $f$, and connectivity $p$. It also shows that the dilute-regime law holds ($K$ is constant at low $c_{\mathrm{ext}}$) and that the conventional rigid-rod excluded-volume model badly underpredicts $K_0$ and misses its topology dependence. The implied physical picture is that flexible networks restrict chain entry through the conformational cost of threading elastically effective cycles, not through static excluded volume.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the mixing osmotic pressure inside a gel that has absorbed partitioned chains is the same function of the total polymer concentration as in a chain-free solution, so that the internal concentration can be read off from swelling alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Given $R_g$ of a solute and $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$ of a network, $K_0$ can be predicted with no adjustable parameters.
  • Swelling a gel in a dilute solution of chains with known $R_g$ becomes a contactless probe of $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$, that is, of the elastically effective mesh size.
  • Dilute-regime partition measurements can be summarized by a single constant $K_0$ rather than a concentration-dependent ratio.
  • The rod-obstacle picture, which predicts $K_0$ from excluded volume alone, is inadequate for flexible networks because it ignores the topology-dependent cycle structure.
  • Because $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$ depends on connectivity $p$ and functionality $f$, the law predicts that defects that break elastically effective cycles will raise $K_0$ (less exclusion) at fixed polymer concentration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the numerical prefactor 4 is universal across polymer chemistries and solvents, or specific to PEG-water; measuring $K_0$ in another good-solvent flexible network would settle it.
  • Equation (5) suggests a reciprocal molecular-ruler application: with a calibrated set of chain sizes, a single swelling experiment maps $l_{\mathrm{cycle}}$, so partitioning data could serve as a non-invasive structural assay for gels whose topology is unknown.
  • If the law extends to chemically distinct solutes, the prefactor would encode the solute-network interaction alone, providing a clean separation of size exclusion from interaction effects in membrane and chromatography design.
  • Because the collapse uses one universal curve, systematic deviations in a new dataset would flag either a breakdown of the osmotic scaling relation or a network defect population that the recursive branching cycle count misses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study of the equilibrium partitioning of linear poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains into model PEG hydrogels with controlled network architecture. A label-free, osmotic-pressure-based method is introduced: the gel swelling ratio is used to infer the internal partitioned polymer concentration c_int through Eqs. (1) and (2), after validating Eq. (2) against an alternative additive decomposition by direct drying measurements. The paper then argues that the Nernst partition law holds in the dilute regime, that the conventional Ogston model is inadequate, and that the dilute partition constant follows the universal law K_0 = exp[-4(R_g/l_cycle)^2], where R_g is the solute gyration radius and l_cycle is the elastically effective cycle length computed from the Bethe approximation.

Significance. If the universal partition law were established, this would be a substantial contribution: it would replace the rod-based Ogston picture with a network-architecture-dependent length scale, and the osmotic method would be a useful label-free route to partition coefficients. The paper has notable strengths: the model networks are systematically varied in density, functionality, and connectivity; the central osmotic-pressure assumption Eq. (2) is directly cross-checked by drying for a subset of samples; and the collapse in Fig. 5 onto a single curve in R_g/l_cycle is a striking empirical observation. However, as detailed below, the evidence currently does not support the claimed dilute-limit universality: most K_0 values plotted in Fig. 5 are single-point measurements taken above the paper's own dilute threshold, the numerical prefactor and the choice of l_cycle are selected from the same data, and Eq. (2) is validated on only a subset of the architectures used in the universal-law fit.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 'Nernst distribution law for polymer chain partitioning into polymer networks'; Tables S1, S3, S4] Most K_0 values in Fig. 5 are not dilute-limit partition constants. For all samples except the M_pre = 20 kg/mol, c_net,0 = 60 g/L, f = 4 series, the plotted K_0 is a single measured K at c_ext = 80 g/L for M_sol = 5 kg/mol, c_ext = 45 g/L for M_sol = 10 kg/mol, or c_ext = 30 g/L for M_sol = 20 kg/mol. Table S1 gives c*_ext = 74.5, 43.9, and 25.8 g/L for these solutes, so these measurements are at c_ext/c*_ext = 1.07, 1.03, and 1.16, all above the dilute limit that the paper itself identifies. The text and Fig. 3 state that K > K_0 when c_ext/c*_ext > 1. The one system with multiple sub-c* points (M_pre = 20, c_net,0 = 60, f = 4, Table S3) shows a large bias for M_sol = 20: K rises from 0.03 at c_ext = 20 g/L (c/c* = 0.78) to 0.08 at c_ext = 30 g/L (c/c* = 1.16), so -ln K changes from 3.51 to 2.53. Using the single 30 g/L point as K_0 substantially overestimates -ln K_0 relative to the dilute value. Consequently, the 'various density' and 'various topology' datasets in Fig. 5 are largely concentration-dependent partition ratios, and the collapse and fitted prefactor 4 do not by themselves demonstrate a dilute-limit universal law.
  2. [Eq. (5) and Fig. 5; End Matter and Fig. 6] The coefficient 4 in Eq. (5) is not derived from the theory; it is calibrated on the same data that are then shown as agreement, and l_cycle is selected among three candidate length scales (l_branch, l_cross, l_cycle) as the one that gives collapse in Fig. 5 while Fig. 6 shows that the other two fail. This is a model-selection procedure on the same dataset, not an independent test. The manuscript should state explicitly how the prefactor was obtained, report its uncertainty, and provide an out-of-sample test or a closed-form derivation; otherwise the 'universality' of Eq. (5) is a fitted empirical collapse with a selected axis rather than a validated prediction.
  3. [Eq. (2), Fig. 2, and Table S5] The validation of Eq. (2) over the additive decomposition Eq. (3) is performed on only eight dried-gel samples (Table S5), all with f = 4, s = 0.5, c_net,0 = 60 g/L, and M_pre = 20 or 40 kg/mol. For all other densities and topologies in Fig. 5, c_int and hence K_0 are extracted from swelling measurements assuming Eq. (2) with the same prefactor A. If Eq. (3) or a different prefactor applied for f = 3, f = 8, s = 0.4, or c_net,0 = 30/90 g/L, every extracted K_0 would shift and the collapse could change. The authors should extend the direct drying check to at least one sample per topology class or provide a quantitative argument for transferability.
  4. [Tables S3 and S4; Fig. 5] No replicate counts or error bars are reported for any K or K_0 value, and several entries are K_0 = 0 (e.g., M_pre = 10, M_sol = 20 rows in Table S3; M_pre = 40, f = 8, M_sol = 20 in Table S4). These zero values are excluded from the log-log inset without discussion, yet they are not small positive values as Eq. (5) would predict; they instead suggest a detection limit or a different regime. Without replicate measurements and a stated uncertainty propagation from the weights, osmotic pressures, and modulus data, the collapse in Fig. 5 cannot be distinguished from scatter of single-point measurements.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The term 'contactless' is used for a method that ultimately relies on weighing gels; the intended meaning appears to be 'label-free' or 'requiring no chemical modification.' Please clarify to avoid confusion.
  2. [Fig. 3(b)] The solid lines for K_0 are drawn through data that include points near or above c*_ext; for M_sol = 20, the c_ext = 20 g/L point is at c_ext/c*_ext = 0.78, and the c_ext = 30 g/L point is above c*_ext. A statement of which points are included in each fit would make the determination of K_0 transparent.
  3. [Eq. (S2) and Table S1] Since the dilute threshold c*_ext is central to the interpretation, it would be helpful to state the experimental basis for Ψ* ≈ 0.24 and to mention how much c*_ext would vary with a reasonable uncertainty in Ψ*.
  4. [End Matter, Table I] The table reports ν_0, μ_0, and ξ_0 without uncertainties; given that these feed directly into l_cycle and hence into the x-axis of Fig. 5, a sensitivity estimate would be useful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Most 'K0' values in Fig. 5 are single-point K measured above the paper's stated dilute threshold, so Eq. (5) is fitted to K rather than to the dilute-limit partition constant.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Fig. 5; Tables S3–S4; SM Sec. S2 caption; Fig. 3 caption; Table S1]
    "We determine the partition constant K0 = cint/cext (black solid line) using data from the dilute concentration regime (cext/c∗ext < 1; see SM, Sec. S1 for c∗ext). ... Notably, when cext exceeds a critical threshold (cext/c∗ext > 1), this relationship breaks down ... (K > K0) ... All samples in (d)–(i) were immersed in linear-PEG solutions of Msol = 5 kg/mol at cext = 80 g/L (squares), Msol = 10 kg/mol at cext = 45 g/L (circles), or Msol = 20 kg/mol at cext = 30 g/L (diamonds)."

    Table S1 gives c*ext = 74.5, 43.9, and 25.8 g/L for Msol = 5, 10, and 20 kg/mol, so the single cext values used for the 'various density' and 'various topology' series (80, 45, 30 g/L) give cext/c*ext = 1.07, 1.03, and 1.16, all above the paper's own dilute criterion. Since the paper states K > K0 for cext/c*ext > 1, the values plotted as K0 in Fig. 5 are actually K, not K0. Thus Eq. (5) is calibrated to non-dilute K; the prefactor 4 is a fit to concentration-dependent data rather than an independent dilute-limit prediction. The only series with sub-c* points (Mpre = 20 kg/mol, cnet,0 = 60 g/L) shows strong cext dependence (Msol = 20: K = 0.03, 0.08, 0.16 at 20, 30, 60 g/L), confirming that single-point 'K0' values are biased and cannot test the universal law.

full rationale

The osmotic-pressure measurement platform is not circular: Eq. (2) is validated by direct drying measurements (Fig. 2, Table S5), the elastic modulus G0 comes from prior mechanical measurements [44], and the semidilute scaling with prefactor A is taken from earlier work [26,27] and re-verified here. The Bethe-approximation lcycle is computed independently from network stoichiometry, not from K0, and the choice of lcycle among three candidate lengths is post-hoc model selection, which weakens the claim but is not definitional circularity. The main circularity is the K0 labeling: most Fig. 5 points are single measurements at cext/c* > 1, which the paper itself excludes from the dilute regime and where K > K0. Consequently, the universal law is fitted to K rather than to K0, and the numerical prefactor 4 is not an independent dilute-limit result. Self-citations are present but not load-bearing in a circular way, since the cited osmotic equation of state is independently validated here. The score reflects partial circularity in the central 'universal constant' claim, not in the measurement method itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central universal law rests on a fitted coefficient (4), an adopted prefactor A from prior work, and a graph-theoretic definition of lcycle. No new physical entity is postulated; the assumptions collect the osmotic-pressure conversion and the network-modeling steps that the reader must accept.

free parameters (4)
  • Prefactor A in Eq. (2) = ~1.9
    Adopted from prior osmotic-pressure studies of PEG gels (Refs. 26, 27) and used to convert swelling measurements into cint. No uncertainty is given in this work.
  • Coefficient 4 in the universal law, Eq. (5) = 4
    Empirical coefficient chosen to collapse K0 versus Rg/lcycle data. No derivation or fitting procedure is reported.
  • Rg scaling prefactor 1.0685 = 1.0685
    Taken from static light-scattering calibration (Ref. 45) to compute Rg for each Msol; enters directly in the scaling variable.
  • Psi* = 0.24 in Eq. (S2) = ~0.24
    Adopted from Ref. 43 to define c*ext, which determines which data are classified as dilute and used for K0.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Semi-dilute mixing osmotic pressure in a gel with partitioned chains follows Eq. (2), a single power law in cnet + cint with exponent 3ν/(3ν-1).
    This is the central conversion rule that allows cint to be extracted from swelling data; it is validated only on a subset of samples.
  • domain assumption The Bethe approximation correctly counts elastically effective chains, crosslinks, and cycles for the star-polymer networks.
    lcycle is derived from ξ0 computed with the Bethe approximation; if this graph-theoretic model misrepresents real network topology, the scaling variable is miscalibrated.
  • domain assumption External linear-PEG osmotic pressure follows the universal equation of state Eq. (S3) with the stated constants.
    Used for every swelling equilibrium calculation to infer cint; taken from prior PEG solution data rather than measured in this work.
  • domain assumption The Nernst distribution law applies in the dilute regime cext < c*ext, allowing K0 to be defined as a constant.
    Several data points used for K0 are at or above c*ext (Table S4), so this assumption is not fully met in the varied-topology subset.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partitioning Law of Polymer Chains into Flexible Polymer Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7XEHVJE

@misc{pith2026250505254,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partitioning Law of Polymer Chains into Flexible Polymer Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7XEHVJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05254}
}
abstract

The equilibrium partitioning of linear polymer chains into flexible polymer networks is governed by intricate entropic constraints arising from configurational degrees of freedom of both chains and network, yet a quantitative understanding remains elusive. Using model hydrogels with precisely defined network structures, we experimentally reveal a universal law governing linear polymer partitioning into flexible polymer networks. We establish a novel label-free, contactless method to measure partition ratio, based on the increase in osmotic pressure induced by external polymer chains partitioning into the network. Moreover, we find a universal law in which the partition constant is solely determined by the squared ratio $(R_g / l_\mathrm{cycle})^2$, where $R_g$ is the gyration radius of the polymer chain and $l_\mathrm{cycle}$ is the characteristic mesh size of the network, as defined by the cycle length.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05254 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Evaluation of partition ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evaluation of partition constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Comparison of measured partition constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Partition constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Ogston, The spaces in a uniform random suspen- sion of fibres, Trans. Faraday Soc. 54, 1754 (1958)

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    T. C. Laurent and J. Killander, A theory of gel filtration and its exeperimental verification, J. Chromatogr. A 14, 317 (1964)

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    J. C. Williams, L. A. Mark, and S. Eichholtz, Partition and Permeation of Dextran in Polyacrylamide Gel, Bio- phys. J. 75, 493 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Hagel, T

    V. Hagel, T. Haraszti, and H. Boehm, Diffusion and in- teraction in PEG-DA hydrogels, Biointerphases 8, 36 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    J. E. Schnitzer, Analysis of steric partition behavior of molecules in membranes using statistical physics. Appli- cation to gel chromatography and electrophoresis, Bio- phys. J. 54, 1065 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Kotsmar, T

    C. Kotsmar, T. Sells, N. Taylor, D. E. Liu, J. M. Praus- nitz, and C. J. Radke, Aqueous Solute Partitioning and Mesh Size in HEMA/MAA Hydrogels, Macromolecules 45, 9177 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Tong and J

    J. Tong and J. L. Anderson, Partitioning and diffusion of proteins and linear polymers in polyacrylamide gels, Biophys. J. 70, 1505 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    N. R. Richbourg and N. A. Peppas, Solute diffusion and partitioning in multi-arm poly(ethylene glycol) hydro- gels, J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 377 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    E. M. Johnson, D. A. Berk, R. K. Jain, and W. M. Deen, Diffusion and partitioning of proteins in charged agarose gels, Biophys. J. 68, 1561 (1995)

    1995

  2. [10]

    Kremer, E

    M. Kremer, E. Pothmann, T. Roessler, J. Baker, A. Yee, H. Blanch, and J. M. Prausnitz, Pore-Size Distributions of Cationic Polyacrylamide Hydrogels Varying in Initial Monomer Concentration and Cross-Linker/Monomer Ra- tio, Macromolecules 27, 2965 (1994)

    1994

  3. [11]

    L. Liu, P. Li, and S. A. Asher, Entropic trapping of macromolecules by mesoscopic periodic voids in a poly- mer hydrogel, Nature 397, 141 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Tsonchev, R

    S. Tsonchev, R. D. Coalson, and A. Duncan, Partitioning of a polymer chain between a confining cavity and a gel, Phys. Rev. E 76, 041804 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    J. J. F. Sleeboom, P. Voudouris, M. T. J. J. M. Punter, F. J. Aangenendt, D. Florea, P. van der Schoot, and H. M. Wyss, Compression and Reswelling of Microgel Particles after an Osmotic Shock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 098001 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    S. H. Gehrke, J. P. Fisher, M. Palasis, and M. E. Lund, Factors Determining Hydrogel Permeability, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 831, 179 (1997)

    1997

  7. [15]

    E. F. Casassa, Equilibrium distribution of flexible poly- mer chains between a macroscopic solution phase and small voids, J. polym. sci., B, Polym. lett. 5, 773 (1967)

    1967

  8. [16]

    J. C. Giddings, E. Kucera, C. P. Russell, and M. N. My- ers, Statistical theory for the equilibrium distribution of 6 rigid molecules in inert porous networks. Exclusion chro- matography, J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4397 (1968)

    1968

  9. [17]

    Doi, Equilibrium partition coefficient of macro- molecules between random porous network and bulk liq- uid, J

    M. Doi, Equilibrium partition coefficient of macro- molecules between random porous network and bulk liq- uid, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 71, 1720 (1975)

    1975

  10. [18]

    Teraoka, Polymer solutions in confining geometries, Prog

    I. Teraoka, Polymer solutions in confining geometries, Prog. Polym. Sci. 21, 89 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    Despite its importance, the microscopic mechanism governing network-dependent variations in K remains elusive

    to regulation of solute distribution in biological sys- tems such as membrane-bound organelles and biomolec- ular condensates [20, 21]. Despite its importance, the microscopic mechanism governing network-dependent variations in K remains elusive. According to the Nernst distri...

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A. A. Gorbunov, L. Ya. Solovyova, and V. A. Pasechnik,, Fundamentals of the theory and practice of polymer gel- permeation chromatography as a method of chromato- graphic porosimetry, J. Chromatogr. A 448, 307 (1988)

    1988

  13. [21]

    Sugano et al., Coexistence of passive and carrier- mediated processes in drug transport, Nat

    K. Sugano et al., Coexistence of passive and carrier- mediated processes in drug transport, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 597 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    M. T. Wei, S. Elbaum-Garfinkle, A. S. Holehouse, C. C. H. Chen, M. Feric, C. B. Arnold, R. D. Priestley, R. V. Pappu, and C. P. Brangwynne, Phase behaviour of disordered proteins underlying low density and high permeability of liquid organelles, Nature Chem. 9, 1118 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Berthelot, and E

    M. Berthelot, and E. Jungfleisch, On the law which gov- erns the distribution of a substance between two solvents, Ann. Chim. Phys 26, 396 (1872)

  16. [24]

    Nernst, Distribution of a substance between two sol- vents and between solvent and vapor, Z

    W. Nernst, Distribution of a substance between two sol- vents and between solvent and vapor, Z. Phys. Chem. 8, 110 (1891)

  17. [25]

    Atkins, and J

    P. Atkins, and J. De. Paula, Elements of physical chem- istry (Oxford University Press, USA, 2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Shibayama, Spatial inhomogeneity and dynamic fluc- tuations of polymer gels, Macromol

    M. Shibayama, Spatial inhomogeneity and dynamic fluc- tuations of polymer gels, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 199, 1 (1998)

    1998

  19. [27]

    Yasuda, N

    T. Yasuda, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Uni- versal Equation of State Describes Osmotic Pressure throughout Gelation Process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267801 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Sakumichi, T

    N. Sakumichi, T. Yasuda, and T. Sakai, Semidilute prin- ciple for gels, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.15275 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Sakai, T

    T. Sakai, T. Matsunaga, Y. Yamamoto, C. Ito, R. Yoshida, S. Suzuki, N. Sasaki, M. Shibayama, and U. Chung, Design and fabrication of a high-strength hy- drogel with ideally homogeneous network structure from tetrahedron-like macromonomers, Macromolecules 41, 5379 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    X. Li, K. Khairulina, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Migration Behavior of Rodlike dsDNA under Electric Field in Ho- mogeneous Polymer Networks, Macromolecules 46, 8657 (2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    X. Li, K. Khairulina, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Elec- trophoretic Mobility of Double-Stranded DNA in Poly- mer Solutions and Gels with Tuned Structures, Macro- molecules 47, 3582 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Fujiyabu, X

    T. Fujiyabu, X. Li, M. Shibayama, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Permeation of Water through Hydrogels with Controlled Network Structure, Macromolecules 50, 9411 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Fujiyabu, X

    T. Fujiyabu, X. Li, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Diffusion Be- havior of Water Molecules in Hydrogels with Controlled Network Structure, Macromolecules 52, 1923 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    P. J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1953)

    1953

  27. [35]

    Horkay and M

    F. Horkay and M. Zrinyi, Studies on mechanical and swelling behavior of polymer networks on the basis of the scaling concept. 6. Gels immersed in polymer solutions, J. Macromol. Sci., Phys. 25, 307–334 (1986)

    1986

  28. [36]

    des Cloizeaux, The Lagrangian theory of polymer so- lutions at intermediate concentrations, J

    J. des Cloizeaux, The Lagrangian theory of polymer so- lutions at intermediate concentrations, J. Phys. (Paris) 36, 281 (1975)

    1975

  29. [37]

    P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979)

    1979

  30. [38]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory. Phys. Rep. 368, 549 (2002)

    2002

  31. [39]

    H. M. James and E. Guth, Simple Presentation of Net- work Theory of Rubber, with a Discussion of Other The- ories. J. Polym. Sci. 4, 153 (1949)

    1949

  32. [40]

    Horkay, I

    F. Horkay, I. Tasaki, and P. J. Basser, Osmotic Swelling of Polyacrylate Hydrogels in Physiological Salt Solutions. Biomacromolecules 1, 84 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Yoshikawa, N

    Y. Yoshikawa, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Connectivity dependence of gelation and elasticity in AB- type polymerization: an experimental comparison of the dynamic process and stoichiometrically imbalanced mix- ing, Soft Matter 15, 5017 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    I. Noda, N. Kato, T. Kitano, and M. Nagasawa, Thermo- dynamic properties of moderately concentrated solutions of linear polymers, Macromolecules 14, 668 (1981)

    1981

  35. [43]

    Y. Higo, N. Ueno, and I. Noda, Osmotic pressure of semidilute solutions of branched polymers, Polym. J. 15, 367 (1983)

    1983

  36. [44]

    Yasuda, M

    T. Yasuda, M. Ino, T. Sakai, and N. Sakumichi, Uni- versality of Osmotic Equation of State in Star Polymer Solutions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13669 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Yoshikawa, N

    Y. Yoshikawa, N. Sakumichi, U. I. Chung, and T. Sakai, Negative Energy Elasticity in a Rubberlike Gel, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011045 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Kawaguchi, G

    S. Kawaguchi, G. Imai, J. Suzuki, A. Miyahara, T. Ki- tano, and K. Ito, Aqueous solution properties of oligo- and poly(ethylene oxide) by static light scattering and intrinsic viscosity, Polymer 38, 2885 (1997)

    1997

  39. [47]

    C. W. Macosko and D. R. Miller, A new derivation of average molecular weights of nonlinear polymers, Macro- molecules 9, 199 (1976)

    1976

  40. [48]

    D. R. Miller and C. W. Macosko, A new derivation of post gel properties of network polymers, Macromolecules 9, 206 (1976)

    1976

  41. [49]

    Yao and A

    Y. Yao and A. M. Lenhoff, Determination of pore size distributions of porous chromatographic adsorbents by inverse size-exclusion chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A 1037, 273 (2004)

    2004

  42. [50]

    Partitioning Law of Polymer Chains into Flexible Polymer Networks

    J. Li and D. J. Mooneyn, Designing hydrogels for con- trolled drug delivery, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1 (2016). 7 End Matter We calculate characteristic length scales between branching points lbranch, elastically effective crosslinking points lcross, and centroids of elastically ef...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.