Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Mastering Full-Pipeline Financial Workflows with LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13533 v1 pith:37DZ4I2P submitted 2025-05-18 cs.AI cs.LGq-fin.GN

FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Mastering Full-Pipeline Financial Workflows with LLMs

classification cs.AI cs.LGq-fin.GN
keywords financialtasksfinmasterllmsaccuracybenchmarkdatareasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Financial tasks are pivotal to global economic stability; however, their execution faces challenges including labor intensive processes, low error tolerance, data fragmentation, and tool limitations. Although large language models (LLMs) have succeeded in various natural language processing tasks and have shown potential in automating workflows through reasoning and contextual understanding, current benchmarks for evaluating LLMs in finance lack sufficient domain-specific data, have simplistic task design, and incomplete evaluation frameworks. To address these gaps, this article presents FinMaster, a comprehensive financial benchmark designed to systematically assess the capabilities of LLM in financial literacy, accounting, auditing, and consulting. Specifically, FinMaster comprises three main modules: i) FinSim, which builds simulators that generate synthetic, privacy-compliant financial data for companies to replicate market dynamics; ii) FinSuite, which provides tasks in core financial domains, spanning 183 tasks of various types and difficulty levels; and iii) FinEval, which develops a unified interface for evaluation. Extensive experiments over state-of-the-art LLMs reveal critical capability gaps in financial reasoning, with accuracy dropping from over 90% on basic tasks to merely 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning. This degradation exhibits the propagation of computational errors, where single-metric calculations initially demonstrating 58% accuracy decreased to 37% in multimetric scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, FinMaster is the first benchmark that covers full-pipeline financial workflows with challenging tasks. We hope that FinMaster can bridge the gap between research and industry practitioners, driving the adoption of LLMs in real-world financial practices to enhance efficiency and accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AuditFraudBench: Benchmarking Audit Judgment in Detecting Fraudulent Misstatements

    cs.CE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AuditFraudBench is a new enforcement-grounded benchmark with three tasks for testing whether LLMs can detect fraudulent misstatements by reasoning over financial figures, disclosure framing, and known manipulation patterns.

  2. FinReasoning: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Reliable Financial Research Reporting

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FinReasoning is a hierarchical benchmark that decomposes LLM financial research capabilities into semantic consistency, data alignment, and deep insight, revealing model-type differences in auditing versus insight generation.