Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Equal-weight competing anyon condensates in string-net models place a lattice model exactly on a critical surface and fix the critical couplings from fusion-category data, producing known minimal models and new Haagerup-symmetric CFT…

desk verdict The recipe works on every known test, but the new Haagerup CFTs are still unproven, and the paper's own diagnostics flag the exact failure mode the novel claims must rule out. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05324 v2 pith:64RJURI6 submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MP

Ling-Yan Hung , Kaixin Ji , Ce Shen , Yidun Wan , Yu Zhao This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords conformalfieldtheorystring-netmodelsanyoncondensationstrangecorrelatorfusioncategoriesHaagerupcategorytensornetworkrenormalizationKramers-Wannierduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to turn the search for two-dimensional conformal field theories (CFTs) into a systematic construction: pick a unitary fusion category, build the associated string-net model in 2+1 dimensions, and put equal amounts of two non-commuting anyon condensates into each unit cell of its boundary. The resulting strange-correlator lattice model is claimed to sit exactly on a critical surface and flow to a CFT, with critical couplings fixed by categorical data—the Frobenius algebras and their quantum dimensions—rather than by integrability tricks. A refined condensation tree organizes the possible condensates, predicts whole phase boundaries, and gives a criterion for excluding first-order transitions, while a generalized Kramers-Wannier duality locates self-dual critical points and tricritical points. The paper verifies the recipe by recovering the A-series minimal models, including Ising, and the 8-vertex/Ashkin-Teller phase diagram, and it reports numerical candidates for previously unknown Haagerup-symmetric CFTs with $c\approx 1.3$, $1.8$, and $2.5$. If the construction survives closer scrutiny, it offers a UV-complete, non-perturbative route to discovering and potentially classifying CFTs from symmetry data alone.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unit-cell competition state (2.12): an equal-weight sum of normalized condensate puddles $\langle \hat{A}_i|_M$ for Frobenius algebras $A_i$ that share a module $M$, equivalently the largest-eigenvalue state of the sum of the corresponding anyon-condensation projectors. A Frobenius algebra is a composite object in the input unitary fusion category equipped with an associative multiplication and a trace; a module is the object it acts on, and requiring the competing algebras to share one module keeps the competition local so neighboring unit cells do not entangle. Two auxiliary constructions carry the argument: the refined condensation tree, whose nodes include Morita-equivalent Frobenius algebras as physically distinct condensates and whose first common ancestor fixes the minimal preserved symmetry, and the generalized Kramers-Wannier duality, which maps the square-octagon lattice to its dual and identifies self-dual critical states such as (2.15). The tree also supplies the counting condition (3.7): when more condensates share a module than there are independent couplings in a unit cell, all transitions are forced to be second order.

What would settle it

Measure the entanglement entropy $S_{LR}$ against correlation length $\xi$ at the new Haagerup candidate points, increasing the bond dimension $\chi$ of the symmetry-preserving tensor-network RG; if $S_{LR}$ saturates rather than following $(c/6)\log\xi$, those points are gapped weak first-order transitions, not CFTs. The paper itself uses exactly this saturation test at the Ashkin-Teller tricritical point in Appendix F.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the boundary state (2.12), an equal-weight sum of normalized condensate puddles $\langle \hat{A}_i|_M$ built from two non-commuting Frobenius algebras $A_i$ in the input fusion category that share a common module $M$, is a critical boundary condition for the 3D string-net topological order. The normalization $N^2(A_i,M)=d_M^2 d_{A_i}$ converts “equal amount of condensate” into a categorical statement, and the same rule reproduces the known critical couplings, such as $\beta_c=\frac{1}{2}\ln(\sqrt{2}+1)$ for Ising and the full Andrews-Baxter-Forrester A-series, when the condensates tie. Applied to the Haagerup category $H_3$, the rule yields at least three previously unknown critical points with $c\approx 1.3$, $1.8$, and $2.5$, preserving the Haagerup symmetry, in addition to recovering the earlier Haagerup candidate near $c\approx 2.0$. The refined condensation tree then predicts the minimal symmetries preserved and the location of phase boundaries, and the generalized KW duality fixes self-dual manifolds, including a tricritical point in the $A_5$ 8-vertex example.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the equal-weight Haagerup competition points are genuine continuous conformal fixed points rather than weak first-order transitions; the paper's own criterion for excluding first-order transitions is not met at the A0-versus-A1 point, where the central charge fluctuates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every unitary fusion category with non-commuting Frobenius algebras sharing a module gives a candidate critical boundary state, so the recipe generates an infinite family of lattice models rather than isolated examples.
  • Critical couplings are no longer accidental: the tuning ratio is fixed by quantum dimensions and algebra/module data, so the same rule works in categories where no integrable solution is known.
  • The refined condensation tree acts as a sieve: when the number of competing condensates sharing a module exceeds the number of independent couplings in the unit cell, all transitions in that reduced phase space are second order, and the first common ancestor fixes the minimal symmetry preserved.
  • The generalized KW duality locates self-dual critical manifolds and tricritical points, reproducing the $A_5$ phase diagram as the 8-vertex/Ashkin-Teller structure and predicting most of the phase boundaries analytically.
  • The Haagerup competition states provide concrete, UV-complete lattice models that numerically flow to new CFT candidates with $c\approx 1.3$, $1.8$, and $2.5$, extending the known landscape of exotic non-invertibly symmetric critical points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three Haagerup candidates survive higher-precision RG, they would be the first lattice regularizations of CFTs with genuinely exotic non-invertible symmetry, strengthening the case that exotic fusion categories host new rational CFTs; this is the editor's extrapolation, not something the numerics shown here establish.
  • The paper's fluctuating-central-charge diagnostic could be used as a cheap discriminator for weak first-order transitions near complex CFTs in other settings, such as Potts models with $Q>4$; the paper only conjectures this link for its own examples.
  • The same algebra/module unit-cell scheme could be run on other exotic fusion categories, such as near-group or higher-index subfactor categories, to produce a systematic catalog of candidate CFTs; the paper does not attempt this.
  • The equal-weight normalization by quantum dimension hints at a general principle—criticality as a categorical tie—that may extend to other lattices by replacing the vertex/plaquette ratio with a categorical weight; the paper explicitly leaves this as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a systematic method, called a "CFT factory", for constructing 2D critical lattice models by sandwiching 3D string-net/symTO models with boundary states made of competing anyon condensates. The construction uses Frobenius algebras and shared modules in the input UFC; the critical state is the equal-weight sum of normalized condensate puddles, Eq. (2.12). The authors show that this reproduces the critical Ising and ABF A_{k+1} lattice models, they reproduce and organize the A5/Ashkin-Teller phase diagram, and they report new critical points with Haagerup H3 symmetry at c≈1.3, 1.8, and 2.5, together with a refined condensation tree and generalized KW duality.

Significance. If the new Haagerup critical points are genuine, this would be a significant step toward a systematic, categorical construction of previously unknown CFTs. The paper's clear strengths are the exact reproduction of the critical Ising and ABF couplings from categorical data, the analytic prediction of phase boundaries in the A5 example, and the organizing framework of the refined condensation tree. The Haagerup claims, however, are not yet backed by the same standard of evidence: the central charges are approximate, no convergence/saturation analysis is reported, and the paper itself provides diagnostics showing how apparent criticality can be a gapped mimic or a weak first-order transition. The framework is promising, but the headline novelty requires additional numerical substantiation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2.1, Eq. (2.12)] The criticality ansatz (2.12) is proposed rather than derived. For the Ising and ABF examples it is validated by known results, but in §4 it is applied to Haagerup H3, where there is no independent analytic prediction. The central claim that new CFTs are produced therefore rests on the unproven ansatz and on numerical identification. The paper should either derive the condition for equal weights to coincide with a critical point, or supply stronger validation for the novel cases.
  2. [§3.2.1 and §4.1] The distinction between a genuine continuous transition and a weak first-order transition is not established for the H3 claims. In §3.2.1 the authors state that a fluctuating central charge near a critical point is a manifestation of weak first-order transitions near a complex CFT, citing the 5-state Potts model. In §4.1, the A0 vs A1 competition produces a fluctuating central charge with an estimate c≈2 and violates the sufficient condition (3.7) (nM=2, Dc=3). The same diagnostic is therefore present at a point claimed to be a continuous Haagerup transition. The text asserts a continuous transition, but the presented evidence does not distinguish it from a weak first-order transition.
  3. [Appendix F and §4.1] The claimed new H3 central charges (c≈1.3, 1.8, 2.5, 2.1) are approximate, with no error bars and no bond-dimension convergence analysis. Appendix F shows that an Ashkin-Teller gapped phase can masquerade as c≈1 at modest bond dimension and saturate at larger χ; the same check is not reported for any H3 point. Since residual nonzero central charges at first-order boundaries in Figs. 14–16 are attributed to numerical artifacts, the same caveat applies to the positive claims. The paper needs an explicit χ-convergence and saturation analysis, analogous to the Ashkin-Teller check, before these points can be called novel CFTs.
  4. [§4.1 and Appendix C] The numerical RG algorithm assumes tetrahedral-symmetric F-symbols, and the text states that the authors found 'plenty of gauge choices' for the H3 6j symbols and 'picked an arbitrary one' for their numerics. Since all H3 numerical results depend on this gauge choice, the paper should check explicitly that phase boundaries and central charges are independent of the F-symbol gauge, or the reported results cannot yet be considered representative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1] The sentence 'The unit cell in this construction takes the shape of .' is incomplete; the shape is missing from the text.
  2. [§2.2.2 and §2.3] The naming of Frobenius algebras is inconsistent: §2.2.2 uses A0/A1 while §2.3 and the tables use A1/A2; please unify the notation.
  3. [Throughout] There are multiple typos, including 'Frobneius algberas' in §4, 'Haggerup' in §5, and 'previousely' in §3.2.3; the manuscript would benefit from a careful proofread.
  4. [§3.2.1] In the N≥5 discussion, the count of independent degrees of freedom in the unit cell should be N−1, not '5−1=4'; using the general expression N−1 would make the comparison with the number of competing condensates clearer for N=5 and beyond.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the equal-weight ansatz (2.12) is an explicit, non-fitted rule cross-checked against known ABF/A5 results, and the Haagerup numerical claims are independent of the cited prior machinery.

full rationale

The paper's central 'CFT factory' rests on the explicit proposal (2.12) that the equal-weight sum of normalized condensate puddles sits at a phase transition. This is an ansatz, not a derived consequence; however, it is not fitted to the new Haagerup data. The paper validates the ansatz by recovering the exact critical couplings of the Ising model (Sec. 2.2.2), the full ABF A-series (2.15), and the A5/8-vertex phase diagram, all against previously known results. The Haagerup critical points (c≈1.3, 1.8, 2.5, 2.1) are numerical outputs from a symmetry-preserving tensor-network RG; they are not obtained by tuning the ansatz to those central charges. Self-citations to [24], [28], and [54] supply the HGW model, the strange-correlator RG, and the Landau-Ginzburg interpretation; these are methodological tools with independent published support and do not smuggle in the target results. The paper itself flags the weak-first-order risk in Sec. 3.2.1 and Appendix F, and reports fluctuating central charges for H3 A0 vs A1 in Sec. 4.1; this is a correctness/interpretation concern, not a circularity. No equation reduces to its inputs by construction; the equal-weight coefficients are derived from normalization (2.9) and then tested, not used to define criticality in the numerical checks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction relies on the strange-correlator framework, the HGW model's dyon picture, Levin's gaplessness argument for non-commuting defects, and the proposed equal-weight criticality ansatz. No numerical parameters are fitted to data; the interpolation weights are fixed by normalization. The shared module choice is a hand-chosen structural parameter. The tetrahedral-symmetric gauge choice for H3 is an unstated computational assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • Shared module M on slanted edges = chosen per example (sigma for Ising, 1 for A-series, 2 for A5, rho+alpha rho+alpha^2 rho for H3)
    The construction requires a common module object shared by the competing Frobenius algebras; the choice restricts which gapped phases are accessible under RG and changes the resulting model. It is selected by hand, not derived.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Non-commuting uncondensed defects force gaplessness or degeneracy (Levin's theorem).
    Cited as argued in [30,31] and proved for the 2D Ising case [32]; assumed for general categories including H3. Invoked in Section 1 to justify the competing-condensate mechanism.
  • domain assumption The strange correlator / sandwich construction realizes a 2D lattice model with the categorical symmetries of the input UFC.
    Foundational framework from [5-8], assumed throughout the paper as the starting point for the construction.
  • ad hoc to paper The equal-weight normalized competition state (2.12) is the critical point.
    Proposed in Section 2.2.1 without derivation; validated by matching known Ising/ABF critical points and by numerics, but not derived from the category data.
  • ad hoc to paper The H3 F-symbols admit a tetrahedral-symmetric gauge, and the chosen gauge is representative.
    Needed for the symmetry-preserving RG; the paper states such gauges exist and that an arbitrary one was picked, but the specific gauge is not provided. Section 4.1 and Appendix C.
  • domain assumption The HGW model's internal dyon degrees of freedom become the physical local degrees of freedom at the boundary.
    Central to the construction; see Section 2.1 and Appendix A. Assumes the dyon splitting correctly captures the condensate dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64RJURI6

@misc{pith2026250605324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A 2D-CFT Factory: Critical Lattice Models from Competing Anyon Condensation Processes in SymTO/SymTFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64RJURI6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05324}
}
abstract

In this paper, we introduce a ``CFT factory'' : a novel algorithm of methodically generating 2D lattice models that would flow to 2D conformal fixed points in the infrared. These 2D models are realised by giving critical boundary conditions to 3D topological orders (symTOs/symTFTs) described by string-net models, often called the strange correlators. We engineer these critical boundary conditions by introducing a commensurate amount of non-commuting anyon condensates. The non-invertible symmetries preserved at the critical point can be controlled by studying a novel ``refined condensation tree''. Our structured method generates an infinite family of critical lattice models, including the A-series minimal models, and uncovers previously unknown critical points. Notably, we find at least three novel critical points (c$\approx 1.3$, $1.8$, and $2.5$ respectively) preserving the Haagerup symmetries, in addition to recovering previously reported ones. The condensation tree, together with a generalised Kramers-Wannier duality, predicts precisely large swathes of phase boundaries, fixes almost completely the global phase diagram, and sieves out second order phase transitions. This is not only illustrated in well-known examples (such as the 8-vertex model related to the $A_5$ category) but also further verified with precision numerics, using our improved (non-invertible) symmetry-preserving tensor-network RG, in novel examples involving the Haagerup symmetries. We show that critical couplings can be precisely encoded in the categorical data (Frobenius algebras and quantum dimensions in unitary fusion categories), thus establishing a powerful, systematic route to discovering and potentially classifying new conformal field theories.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gapped phases dual to massless RG flows in 2D CFTs exhibit unusual ordering via spontaneous breaking of non-group-like symmetries and are characterized using smeared boundary CFTs applied to smeared Ishibashi states.

  2. Systematic Construction of Kramers-Wannier-like Dualities in Quantum Lattice Models from Integrability

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Lax matrices built from a fermionic R-matrix yield a family of lattice Hamiltonians with explicitly constructed non-invertible Kramers-Wannier-like symmetry operators and spectrum-preserving dualities.

  3. Irrational CFTs from coupled anyon chains with non-invertible symmetries?

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DMRG evidence from three coupled Fibonacci anyon chains points to a conformal phase with c=2.10±0.03, proposed as a candidate irrational CFT, though small system sizes leave a weakly first-order alternative open.

  4. Landau-Ginzburg Paradigm of Topological Phases

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A modified string-net model turns anyon condensation into a lattice version of the Higgs mechanism, putting some topological phase transitions into the Landau-Ginzburg symmetry-breaking framework.

  5. Entropic order parameters and topological holography

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using SymTFT, the entropic order parameter for a symmetry-breaking vacuum labelled by a equals log(dim C / d_a^2), making the distinguishability of non-invertible vacua manifest.

  6. Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A well-organized five-lecture review of tensor networks (MPS/PEPS/MPO) covering algorithms, phase classification, string-nets, strange correlators, and dualities; it contains no new research results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum group symmetries in 2-D lattice quantum field theory,

    D. Bernard and G. Felder, “Quantum group symmetries in 2-D lattice quantum field theory,”Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 98–120

    1991

  2. [2]

    Discretely Holomorphic Parafermions in Lattice Z(N) Models

    M. A. Rajabpour and J. Cardy, “Discretely Holomorphic Parafermions in LatticeZN Models,”J. Phys. A40(2008) 14703–14713,arXiv:0708.3772 [math-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Discrete Holomorphicity in the Chiral Potts Model

    Y. Ikhlef and R. Weston, “Discrete Holomorphicity in the Chiral Potts Model,”J. Phys. A 48no. 29, (2015) 294001,arXiv:1502.04944 [math-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Integrability and braided tensor categories

    P. Fendley, “Integrability and braided tensor categories,”J. Statist. Phys.182(2021) 43, arXiv:2008.02292 [math-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, “Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,”Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 160409,arXiv:cond-mat/0612341

    arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, “Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,”J. Phys. A49no. 35, (2016) 354001,arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,”arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators,

    R. Vanhove, M. Bal, D. J. Williamson, N. Bultinck, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, “Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 17, (2018) 177203,arXiv:1801.05959 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Wave function and strange correlator of short-range entangled states,

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle, and C. Xu, “Wave function and strange correlator of short-range entangled states,”Physical Review Letters112no. 24, (June, 2014) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.247202

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 3, (2020) 033417,arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Res. 2no. 4, (2020) 043086,arXiv:2005.14178 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions,

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions,”JHEP09(2020) 093, arXiv:2003.08898 [math-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132,arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 1, (2023) 895–949, arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle,”Phys. Rev. B107no. 15, (2023) 155136, arXiv:2203.03596 [cond-mat.str-el]. – 68 –

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Topological dualities in the Ising model,

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Topological dualities in the Ising model,”Geom. Topol.26 (2022) 1907–1984,arXiv:1806.00008 [math.AT]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. Part I,

    L. Kong and H. Zheng, “A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. Part I,”JHEP02(2020) 150,arXiv:1905.04924 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,” JHEP03(2018) 189,arXiv:1704.02330 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Critical Lattice Model for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,

    R. Vanhove, L. Lootens, M. Van Damme, R. Wolf, T. J. Osborne, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, “Critical Lattice Model for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 23, (2022) 231602,arXiv:2110.03532 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Numerical Evidence for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,

    T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Tezuka, “Numerical Evidence for a Haagerup Conformal Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 23, (2022) 231603, arXiv:2110.03008 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    String net condensation: A Physical mechanism for topological phases,

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, “String net condensation: A Physical mechanism for topological phases,”Phys. Rev. B71(2005) 045110,arXiv:cond-mat/0404617

    2005 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Full dyon excitation spectrum in extended Levin-Wen models,

    Y. Hu, N. Geer, and Y.-S. Wu, “Full dyon excitation spectrum in extended Levin-Wen models,”Phys. Rev. B97no. 19, (2018) 195154,arXiv:1502.03433 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Nonabelian anyon condensation in 2+1d topological orders: A string-net model realization,

    Y. Zhao and Y. Wan, “Nonabelian anyon condensation in 2+1d topological orders: A string-net model realization,”JHEP05(2025) 156,arXiv:2409.05852 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Eight-Vertex Model in Lattice Statistics,

    R. J. Baxter, “Eight-Vertex Model in Lattice Statistics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.26(1971) 832–833

    1971

  18. [26]

    Duality relation between the ashkin-teller and the eight-vertex model,

    F. J. Wegner, “Duality relation between the ashkin-teller and the eight-vertex model,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics5no. 11, (Jun, 1972) L131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/5/11/004

    1972 doi

  19. [27]

    Anyonic quantum spin chains: Spin-1 generalizations and topological stability,

    C. Gils, E. Ardonne, S. Trebst, D. A. Huse, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, and Z. Wang, “Anyonic quantum spin chains: Spin-1 generalizations and topological stability,”Physical Review B87no. 23, (June, 2013) .http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235120

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    CFTD from TQFTD+1 via Holographic Tensor Network, and Precision Discretization of CFT2 ,

    L. Chen, K. Ji, H. Zhang, C. Shen, R. Wang, X. Zeng, and L.-Y. Hung, “CFTD from TQFTD+1 via Holographic Tensor Network, and Precision Discretization of CFT2 ,”Phys. Rev. X14no. 4, (2024) 041033,arXiv:2210.12127 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    QG from SymQRG: AdS3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,

    N. Bao, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang, and Z. Liu, “QG from SymQRG: AdS3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,”arXiv:2412.12045 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases,

    M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, “Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases,”Physical Review B86no. 11, (Sept., 2012) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115109

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    Constraints on order and disorder parameters in quantum spin chains,

    M. Levin, “Constraints on order and disorder parameters in quantum spin chains,”Commun. Math. Phys.378no. 2, (2020) 1081–1106,arXiv:1903.09028 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Protected Edge Modes without Symmetry,

    M. Levin, “Protected Edge Modes without Symmetry,”Physical Review X3no. 2, (Apr.,

  25. [33]

    Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, “Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,”Phys. Rev. B108no. 7, (2023) 075105, arXiv:2205.06244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hasse Diagrams for Gapless – 69 – SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Warman, “Hasse Diagrams for Gapless – 69 – SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2403.00905 [cond-mat.str-el]

  27. [35]

    Condensate-induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,

    F. A. Bais and J. Slingerland, “Condensate-induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,”Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79no. 4, (2009) 045316

    2009

  28. [36]

    Symmetry-enriched phases obtained via pseudo anyon condensation,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Symmetry-enriched phases obtained via pseudo anyon condensation,”International Journal of Modern Physics B28no. 24, (2014) 1450172

    2014

  29. [37]

    Generalized ade classification of topological boundaries and anyon condensation,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Generalized ade classification of topological boundaries and anyon condensation,”Journal of High Energy Physics2015no. 7, (2015) 1–29

    2015

  30. [38]

    Anyon condensation: coherent states, symmetry enriched topological phases, goldstone theorem, and dynamical rearrangement of symmetry,

    Y. Hu, Z. Huang, L.-Y. Hung, and Y. Wan, “Anyon condensation: coherent states, symmetry enriched topological phases, goldstone theorem, and dynamical rearrangement of symmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics2022no. 3, (2022) 1–45

    2022

  31. [39]

    Characteristic properties of a composite system of topological phases separated by gapped domain walls via an exactly solvable hamiltonian model,

    Y. Zhao, S. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan, “Characteristic properties of a composite system of topological phases separated by gapped domain walls via an exactly solvable hamiltonian model,”SciPost Physics Core6no. 4, (2023) 076

    2023

  32. [40]

    A lattice model for condensation in levin-wen systems,

    J. Christian, D. Green, P. Huston, and D. Penneys, “A lattice model for condensation in levin-wen systems,”Journal of High Energy Physics2023no. 9, (2023) 1–56

    2023

  33. [41]

    Anyon condensation in string-net models,

    C.-H. Lin and F. J. Burnell, “Anyon condensation in string-net models,”Physical Review B 110no. 11, (2024) 115127

    2024

  34. [42]

    Full dyon excitation spectrum in extended levin-wen models,

    Y. Hu, N. Geer, and Y.-S. Wu, “Full dyon excitation spectrum in extended levin-wen models,”Physical Review B97no. 19, (2018) 195154

    2018

  35. [43]

    Noninvertible gauge symmetry in (2+ 1) d topological orders: A string-net model realization,

    Y. Zhao and Y. Wan, “Noninvertible gauge symmetry in (2+ 1) d topological orders: A string-net model realization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02664(2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases,

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, “String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases,”Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics71no. 4, (2005) 045110

    2005

  37. [45]

    Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological orders,

    Y. Hu, Y. Wan, and Y.-S. Wu, “Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological orders,”Chin. Phys. Lett.34no. 7, (2017) 077103,arXiv:1706.00650 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Eight vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan type identities,

    G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, and P. J. Forrester, “Eight vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan type identities,”J. Statist. Phys.35(1984) 193–266

    1984

  39. [47]

    The Phases of Two-dimensional Spin and Four-dimensional Gauge Systems WithZ(N)Symmetry,

    F. C. Alcaraz and R. Koberle, “The Phases of Two-dimensional Spin and Four-dimensional Gauge Systems WithZ(N)Symmetry,”J. Phys. A14(1981) 1169

    1981

  40. [48]

    Block maps and Fourier analysis,

    C. Jiang, Z. Liu, and J. Wu, “Block maps and Fourier analysis,”1706.03551 [math]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Classification of exchange relation planar algebras through sieving forest fusion graphs,

    F. Lu and Z. Liu, “Classification of exchange relation planar algebras through sieving forest fusion graphs,”2412.17790 [math]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Functional Integral Construction of Topological Quantum Field Theory,

    Z. Liu, “Functional Integral Construction of Topological Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:2409.17103 [math-ph, physics:quant-ph]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Alterfold Topological Quantum Field Theory,

    Z. Liu, S. Ming, Y. Wang, and J. Wu, “Alterfold Topological Quantum Field Theory,” 2312.06477 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    3-Alterfolds and Quantum Invariants,

    Z. Liu, S. Ming, Y. Wang, and J. Wu, “3-Alterfolds and Quantum Invariants,”2307.12284 [math-ph]. – 70 –

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Alterfold Theory and Topological Modular Invariance,

    Z. Liu, S. Ming, Y. Wang, and J. Wu, “Alterfold Theory and Topological Modular Invariance,”2412.12702 [math]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Landau-ginzburg paradigm of topological phases,

    Y. Zhao and Y. Wan, “Landau-ginzburg paradigm of topological phases,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05319(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,

    F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland, “Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,”Phys. Rev. B79(2009) 045316,arXiv:0808.0627 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2009 arXiv

  48. [56]

    K matrix Construction of Symmetry-Enriched Phases of Matter,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “K matrix Construction of Symmetry-Enriched Phases of Matter,” Phys. Rev. B87no. 19, (2013) 195103,arXiv:1302.2951 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Classification and properties of symmetry-enriched topological phases: Chern-Simons approach with applications to Z2 spin liquids,

    Y.-M. Lu and A. Vishwanath, “Classification and properties of symmetry-enriched topological phases: Chern-Simons approach with applications to Z2 spin liquids,”Phys. Rev. B93no. 15, (2016) 155121,arXiv:1302.2634 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Symmetry Enriched Phases via Pseudo Anyon Condensation,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan, “Symmetry Enriched Phases via Pseudo Anyon Condensation,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. B28(2014) 0172,arXiv:1308.4673 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,

    M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,”Phys. Rev. B100no. 11, (2019) 115147, arXiv:1410.4540 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Electric-magnetic duality in the quantum double models of topological orders with gapped boundaries,

    H. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan, “Electric-magnetic duality in the quantum double models of topological orders with gapped boundaries,”Journal of High Energy Physics2020 no. 2, (2020) 1–43

    2020

  53. [61]

    Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,

    Y. Hu, Z.-X. Luo, R. Pankovich, Y. Wan, and Y.-S. Wu, “Boundary Hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,”JHEP01(2018) 134,arXiv:1706.03329 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    The ADE classification of minimal and A 1 (1) conformal invariant theories,

    A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson, and J.-B. Zuber, “The ADE classification of minimal and A 1 (1) conformal invariant theories,”Communications in Mathematical Physics113(1987) 1–26

    1987

  55. [63]

    Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group,

    V. Ostrik, “Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group,”arXiv preprint math/0202130(2002)

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models,

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models,”Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 485

    1989

  57. [65]

    The Critical Behavior of SelfdualZ(N) Spin Systems: Finite Size Scaling and Conformal Invariance,

    F. C. Alcaraz, “The Critical Behavior of SelfdualZ(N) Spin Systems: Finite Size Scaling and Conformal Invariance,”J. Phys. A20(1987) 2511

    1987

  58. [66]

    Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,”Sov. Phys. JETP62(1985) 215–225

    1985

  59. [67]

    Lectures on RCFT,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Lectures on RCFT,” in1989 Banff NATO ASI: Physics, Geometry and Topology, pp. 1–129. 9, 1989

    1989

  60. [68]

    Conformality lost,

    D. B. Kaplan, J. W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Conformality lost,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 422–432

    2010

  61. [69]

    Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,”JHEP10(2018) 108,arXiv:1807.11512 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ>4,

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ>4,”SciPost Phys.5no. 5, (2018) 050, arXiv:1808.04380 [hep-th]. – 71 –

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Hamiltonian studies of the d = 2 Ashkin-Teller model,

    M. Kohmoto, M. Den Nijs, and L. P. Kadanoff, “Hamiltonian studies of the d = 2 Ashkin-Teller model,”Physical Review B24no. 9, (Nov., 1981) 5229–5241

    1981

  64. [72]

    Z(4) model: Criticality and break-collapse method,

    A. M. Mariz, C. Tsallis, and P. Fulco, “Z(4) model: Criticality and break-collapse method,” Physical Review B32no. 9, (Nov., 1985) 6055–6057

    1985

  65. [73]

    Exploring the phase diagram ofSU(2)4 strange correlator,

    C. Shen, “Exploring the phase diagram ofSU(2)4 strange correlator,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14556(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Symmetry fractionalized (irrationalized) fusion rules and two domain-wall verlinde formulae,

    Y. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan, “Symmetry fractionalized (irrationalized) fusion rules and two domain-wall verlinde formulae,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024no. 4, (2024) 1–26

    2024

  67. [75]

    Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d,”SciPost Phys.18no. 1, (2025) 032,arXiv:2310.03784 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,”SciPost Phys.18(2025) 156,arXiv:2312.17322 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Matrix product operator symmetries and intertwiners in string-nets with domain walls,

    L. Lootens, J. Fuchs, J. Haegeman, C. Schweigert, and F. Verstraete, “Matrix product operator symmetries and intertwiners in string-nets with domain walls,”SciPost Phys.10 no. 3, (2021) 053,arXiv:2008.11187 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Topological aspects of the critical three-state Potts model,

    R. Vanhove, L. Lootens, H.-H. Tu, and F. Verstraete, “Topological aspects of the critical three-state Potts model,”J. Phys. A55no. 23, (2022) 235002,arXiv:2107.11177 [math-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Quantum subgroups of the haagerup fusion categories,

    P. Grossman and N. Snyder, “Quantum subgroups of the haagerup fusion categories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics311(2012) 617–643

    2012

  72. [80]

    Exotic subfactors of finite depth with jones indices (5 + √ 13)/2and(5 + √ 17)/2,

    M. Asaeda and U. Haagerup, “Exotic subfactors of finite depth with jones indices (5 + √ 13)/2and(5 + √ 17)/2,”Communications in mathematical physics202no. 1, (1999) 1–63

    1999

  73. [81]

    Generalized string-net model for unitary fusion categories without tetrahedral symmetry,

    A. Hahn and R. Wolf, “Generalized string-net model for unitary fusion categories without tetrahedral symmetry,”Phys. Rev. B102no. 11, (2020) 115154,arXiv:2004.07045 [quant-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    TheF-Symbols for Transparent Haagerup-Izumi Categories withG=Z 2n+1,

    T.-C. Huang and Y.-H. Lin, “TheF-Symbols for Transparent Haagerup-Izumi Categories withG=Z 2n+1,”arXiv:2007.00670 [math.CT]

    2007 arXiv

  75. [83]

    A Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,

    L. E. Bottini and S. Schafer-Nameki, “A Gapless Phase with Haagerup Symmetry,” arXiv:2410.19040 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Illustrating the categorical Landau paradigm in lattice models,

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, “Illustrating the categorical Landau paradigm in lattice models,”Phys. Rev. B111no. 5, (2025) 054432, arXiv:2405.05302 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Boundary hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,

    Y. Hu, Z.-X. Luo, R. Pankovich, Y. Wan, and Y.-S. Wu, “Boundary hamiltonian theory for gapped topological phases on an open surface,”Journal of High Energy Physics2018no. 1, (2018) 1–41

    2018

  78. [86]

    Building 1D lattice models withG-graded fusion category,

    S.-Q. Ning, B.-B. Mao, and C. Wang, “Building 1D lattice models withG-graded fusion category,”SciPost Phys.17(2024) 125. https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.5.125. – 72 –

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    Tensor network approach to phase transitions of a non-abelian topological phase,

    W.-T. Xu, Q. Zhang, and G.-M. Zhang, “Tensor network approach to phase transitions of a non-abelian topological phase,”Physical Review Letters124no. 13, (2020) 130603

    2020

  80. [88]

    Higher-Order Cellular Automata Generated Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases and Detection Through Multi Point Strange Correlators,

    J.-Y. Zhang, M.-Y. Li, and P. Ye, “Higher-Order Cellular Automata Generated Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases and Detection Through Multi Point Strange Correlators,”PRX Quantum5no. 3, (2024) 030342,arXiv:2401.00505 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Strange correlator and string order parameter for non-invertible symmetry protected topological phases in 1+1d,

    D.-C. Lu, F. Xu, and Y.-Z. You, “Strange correlator and string order parameter for non-invertible symmetry protected topological phases in 1+1d,”arXiv:2505.00673 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Loop optimization for tensor network renormalization,

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, “Loop optimization for tensor network renormalization,” Physical Review Letters118no. 11, (Mar., 2017) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.110504

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order,

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, “Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order,”Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80no. 15, (2009) 155131. – 73 –

    2009

  84. [2013]

    021009,arXiv:1301.7355 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.