pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.01008 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-01 · 💻 cs.RO

DexWrist: A Robotic Wrist for Constrained and Dynamic Manipulation

Martin Peticco , Gabriella Ulloa , John Marangola , Nitish Dashora , Pulkit Agrawal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords robotic wristdexterous manipulationquasi-direct driveparallel kinematicscontact-rich tasksconstrained environmentsbackdrivable actuation
0
0 comments X

The pith

DexWrist combines quasi-direct drive with decoupled parallel kinematics to deliver high torque and low backdrive in a compact wrist.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents DexWrist as a robotic wrist that pairs quasi-direct drive actuation with a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism. It seeks to overcome the bulk and stiffness of typical wrists that limit robots in human settings. The design targets 3.75 Nm rated torque, 0.33 Nm backdrive torque, 10.15 Hz bandwidth, 40 degree range of motion, and direct motor-to-DOF mapping inside a 0.97 kg package. These traits are meant to expand workspace in clutter and stabilize contact forces without precise admittance tuning. Real-robot tests on constrained and contact-rich tasks show 50-76 percent relative success gains and three-to-five times shorter completion times.

Core claim

DexWrist achieves 3.75 Nm rated torque, 0.33 Nm backdrive torque, 10.15 Hz torque bandwidth, plus or minus 40 degrees range of motion in both axes, and one-to-one motor mapping in a 0.97 kg unit. It reaches these values by combining quasi-direct drive actuation with a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism. The outcome is larger workspace in cluttered environments and stable contact without finely tuned admittance control. When used as a drop-in upgrade on two robot arms, it produces 50-76 percent relative success rate improvements and reduces task times by factors of three to five.

What carries the argument

Quasi-direct drive actuation combined with a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism that keeps the two rotational degrees of freedom independent with low inertia.

If this is right

  • Workspace expands in cluttered environments due to low inertia and wide motion range.
  • Contact remains stable without the need for finely tuned admittance controllers.
  • Learned policies reach 50-76 percent relative success rate gains on constrained tasks.
  • Autonomous task completion times fall by a factor of three to five.
  • The wrist installs directly on existing robot arms as a drop-in replacement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same actuation and kinematic approach could apply to other arm joints to reduce total system inertia.
  • Low backdrive torque could support safer interactions when robots work near humans.
  • Extending the decoupled layout to three degrees of freedom might enable more complex reorientation.
  • Extended field trials would test whether bandwidth and backdrive stay consistent after prolonged use.

Load-bearing premise

The parallel kinematic mechanism stays fully decoupled and the quasi-direct drive torque and bandwidth values remain stable under dynamic loads and contact forces.

What would settle it

Measuring kinematic coupling above five percent or torque bandwidth below five hertz during repeated high-speed contact tasks would show the performance claims fail under load.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01008 by Gabriella Ulloa, John Marangola, Martin Peticco, Nitish Dashora, Pulkit Agrawal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We present DexWrist, a robotic wrist that allows for constrained (purple) and dynamic manipulation that makes teleoperation more intuitive and speeds up data collection. Blue: The design of DexWrist with an AgileX gripper attached. Purple: An example of a learned constrained space task: picking from a cluttered fridge. Red: A highly dynamic bottle flip (pre-programmed). Green: An example of a learned dynam… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Human wrists have 3 degrees of freedom: flex￾ion/extension (F/E), radial/ulnar (R/U) deviation, and prona￾tion/supination (P/S). Kinematically, the F/E and R/U are in parallel and preceded by P/S in series. Right: DexWrist DOFs mirroring human wrist. B. Speed, Bandwidth, Kinematics, and Precision Human studies revealed peak wrist movement speeds are between 10 and 53.3 RPM [20]. Conscious and involun… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Overview of the 2-(R, RR) PKM showing the axes of the two DOFs. Middle: Side view highlighting the RR kinematic chain in dark blue. Right: Front view highlighting the R kinematic chain in gray. V. TELEOPERATION FRAMEWORK AND SYSTEM INTEGRATION A. Integration Setup We integrated DexWrist onto two representative robot plat￾forms to demonstrate its compatibility with multiple robotic arms. The first pla… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Demonstrations recorded from successful trajectories. Robot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: DexWrist. Middle: Serial wrist baseline (AgileX). Right: Workspace comparison showing reachability through the narrow opening of a kitchen cabinet, with DexWrist achieving an 88% improvement over the AgileX. TABLE II: Our proposed DexWrist significantly decreases the average time taken by teleoperators to provide demonstrations and reduces the number of resets required to obtain successful demonstrat… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Task success rates comparisons between the baseline robots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Development of dexterous manipulation hardware has primarily focused on hands and grippers. However, these end-effectors are often paired with bulky and highly stiff wrists that limit performance in human environments. More designs have adopted backdrivable actuation, but are still difficult to model and control due to coupled kinematics or high mechanical inertia from heavy links. We present DexWrist, a robotic wrist that advances manipulation in highly constrained environments and enables dynamic, contact-rich tasks. We achieve this by combining quasi-direct drive actuation with a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism in a compact design. It delivers 3.75 +/- 0.05 Nm rated torque, 0.33 +/- 0.06 Nm backdrive torque, 10.15 +/- 1.34 Hz torque bandwidth, +/- 40 degrees ROM in both DOFs, and a one-to-one motor-to-DOF mapping in a 0.97 kg package. In practice, these properties increase workspace in cluttered environments and stabilize contact without the need for finely tuned admittance control. We evaluate DexWrist as a drop-in wrist upgrade in simulation and on two robot arms performing representative constrained and contact-rich tasks. In learned policy evaluations, DexWrist achieved 50-76% relative improvements in success rate, and reduced autonomous task completion times by 3-5x. More details about DexWrist can be found at https://dexwrist.csail.mit.edu.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents DexWrist, a compact 0.97 kg robotic wrist using quasi-direct drive actuation and a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism. It reports measured performance of 3.75 ± 0.05 Nm rated torque, 0.33 ± 0.06 Nm backdrive torque, 10.15 ± 1.34 Hz torque bandwidth, ±40° ROM in both DOFs, and one-to-one motor-to-DOF mapping. These properties are claimed to increase workspace in cluttered environments and stabilize contact without finely tuned admittance control. The wrist is evaluated as a drop-in upgrade in simulation and on two physical robot arms for constrained and contact-rich tasks, yielding 50-76% relative success-rate improvements and 3-5× reductions in autonomous task completion times for learned policies.

Significance. If the reported specifications and decoupling hold under dynamic contact, the design offers a practical advance for dexterous manipulation hardware by delivering low-inertia, backdrivable performance in a lightweight package that improves real-world task outcomes. The inclusion of error bars on hardware metrics and relative task improvements are strengths; the work provides concrete, falsifiable performance numbers rather than purely simulated results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Evaluation] Evaluation sections: task success rates and completion times are reported, yet no direct measurements of cross-axis torque, unintended motion, or effective backdrive are shown while the wrist experiences external contact forces or during learned-policy rollouts. This leaves the central assumption that the parallel kinematic mechanism remains fully decoupled and quasi-direct-drive properties hold under load unverified, which is load-bearing for the claimed advantage over conventional wrists.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Evaluation] Limited detail is given on the exact procedure for measuring contact forces and the total number of trials performed across the two robot arms; adding this information would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript references a project website for additional details; a brief summary of key experimental parameters should be included in the main text for self-containment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address the major comment on evaluation below, providing clarification on the evidence for decoupling under load while acknowledging where additional data would strengthen the claims. We have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate new supporting analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation sections: task success rates and completion times are reported, yet no direct measurements of cross-axis torque, unintended motion, or effective backdrive are shown while the wrist experiences external contact forces or during learned-policy rollouts. This leaves the central assumption that the parallel kinematic mechanism remains fully decoupled and quasi-direct-drive properties hold under load unverified, which is load-bearing for the claimed advantage over conventional wrists.

    Authors: We agree that direct measurements of cross-axis torque, unintended motion, and effective backdrive specifically during external contact or policy rollouts would provide stronger verification of the parallel mechanism's decoupling and quasi-direct-drive behavior under dynamic loads. The original manuscript reports these properties from benchtop characterization (rated torque, backdrive torque, bandwidth, and one-to-one mapping) and demonstrates their practical benefit through improved task outcomes on physical hardware in contact-rich scenarios. While the significant success-rate gains (50-76%) and time reductions (3-5x) in constrained and dynamic tasks offer indirect evidence that the properties hold under load—otherwise such consistent improvements over baseline wrists would be unlikely—we recognize this is not a direct measurement. To address the concern, we have added a new subsection with hardware experiments that apply external contact forces and record cross-axis torques and motion during both manual and policy-driven interactions, confirming low coupling and preserved backdrivability. These results are now included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hardware metrics and task results rest on direct measurements

full rationale

The paper presents DexWrist as a hardware design combining quasi-direct drive actuation with a decoupled parallel kinematic mechanism. All headline specifications (rated torque, backdrive torque, bandwidth, ROM, mass, and 1:1 mapping) are stated as measured quantities obtained from physical testing. Task performance gains are reported via success rates and completion times in simulation and real-robot experiments. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are introduced that reduce by construction to the inputs; self-citations to prior mechanism work are not invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems for the current results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design relies on standard assumptions about motor performance and kinematic decoupling that are common in robotics hardware papers; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Link lengths and motor selection
    Chosen to achieve the target torque and ROM while keeping mass at 0.97 kg; these are design decisions fitted to performance goals.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasi-direct drive motors provide the stated backdrive torque and bandwidth under load
    Invoked when claiming contact stabilization without admittance tuning.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5798 in / 1238 out tokens · 44460 ms · 2026-05-19T06:21:56.723972+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    State of the Art in Artificial Wrists: A Review of Prosthetic and Robotic Wrist Design,

    N. M. Bajaj, A. J. Spiers, and A. M. Dollar, “State of the Art in Artificial Wrists: A Review of Prosthetic and Robotic Wrist Design,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 261–277, Feb. 2019, conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Robotics. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8624352/?arnumber=8624352

    work page arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale

    A. Brohan,et al., “Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale,” inarXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

    O. X.-E. Collaboration,et al., “Open X-Embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08864, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale,

    H. Walke,et al., “Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale,” inConference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipula- tion dataset,

    A. Khazatsky,et al., “Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipula- tion dataset,” 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation with Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperation

    “Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation with Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperation.” [Online]. Available: https: //mobile-aloha.github.io/

    work page

  7. [7]

    Franka Emika Panda robot - RoboDK

    “Franka Emika Panda robot - RoboDK.” [Online]. Available: https://robodk.com/robot/Franka/Emika-Panda

    work page

  8. [8]

    UR3e Lightweight, versatile cobot

    “UR3e Lightweight, versatile cobot.” [Online]. Available: https: //www.universal-robots.com/products/ur3e/

    work page

  9. [9]

    Human-Like Posture Correction for Seven-Degree-of-Freedom Robotic Arm,

    Y .-H. Deng and J.-Y . J. Chang, “Human-Like Posture Correction for Seven-Degree-of-Freedom Robotic Arm,”Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 14, no. 024501, Sept. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051842

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4051842 2021

  10. [10]

    An analytical solution for inverse kinematic of 7-DOF redundant manipulators with offset-wrist,

    C. Yu, M. Jin, and H. Liu, “An analytical solution for inverse kinematic of 7-DOF redundant manipulators with offset-wrist,” in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Aug. 2012, pp. 92–97, iSSN: 2152-744X. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6282813

    work page arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song, “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Available: https://global.agilex.ai/products/piper

    “PiPER.” [Online]. Available: https://global.agilex.ai/products/piper

    work page

  13. [13]

    Omni-Wrist III - a new generation of pointing devices. Part II. Gimbals systems - control,

    J. Sofka, V . Skormin, V . Nikulin, and D. Nicholson, “Omni-Wrist III - a new generation of pointing devices. Part II. Gimbals systems - control,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 726–734, Apr. 2006. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1642585

    work page arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Design and Development of a Carpal Wrist Robotic Manipulator,

    J. B. R. Alvarez, M. Antonio G. Apolinar, G. L. Augusto, and L. A. Gan Lim, “Design and Development of a Carpal Wrist Robotic Manipulator,” in2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management ( HNICEM ), Nov. 2019, pp. 1–5. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexp...

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Design and Testing of a Novel, High-Performance Two DoF Prosthetic Wrist,

    R. Damerla,et al., “Design and Testing of a Novel, High-Performance Two DoF Prosthetic Wrist,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 502–519, May 2022, conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9722901/?arnumber=9722901

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    On the development of the Agile Eye,

    C. Gosselin, E. St. Pierre, and M. Gagne, “On the development of the Agile Eye,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 29–37, Dec. 1996. [Online]. Available: https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/556480

    work page 1996

  17. [17]

    A Compact Soft Articulated Parallel Wrist for Grasping in Narrow Spaces,

    F. Negrello, S. Mghames, G. Grioli, M. Garabini, and M. G. Catalano, “A Compact Soft Articulated Parallel Wrist for Grasping in Narrow Spaces,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 3161–3168, Oct. 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8746558

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Characterization of Wrist Kinetics during Activities of Daily Living,

    A. Pando and D. S. Charles, “Characterization of Wrist Kinetics during Activities of Daily Living,”Journal of Undergraduate Research, vol. 2013, no. 1, Sept. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jur/vol2013/iss1/1966

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Movement preferences of the wrist and forearm during activities of daily living,

    W. Anderton, S. Tew, S. Ferguson, J. Hernandez, and S. K. Charles, “Movement preferences of the wrist and forearm during activities of daily living,”Journal of Hand Therapy: Official Journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 580–592, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    A Comparative Analysis of Speed Profile Models for Wrist Pointing Movements,

    L. Vaisman, L. Dipietro, and H. I. Krebs, “A Comparative Analysis of Speed Profile Models for Wrist Pointing Movements,”IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 756–766, Sept. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Visually-updated hand state estimates modulate the proprioceptive reflex independently of motor task requirements,

    S. Ito and H. Gomi, “Visually-updated hand state estimates modulate the proprioceptive reflex independently of motor task requirements,”eLife, vol. 9, p. e52380. [Online]. Available: https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108863/

    work page

  22. [22]

    V oluntary reaction time and long-latency reflex modulation,

    C. J. Forgaard, I. M. Franks, D. Maslovat, L. Chin, and R. Chua, “V oluntary reaction time and long-latency reflex modulation,”Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 3386–3399, Dec. 2015, publisher: American Physiological Society. [Online]. Available: https: //journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.00648.2015

    work page doi:10.1152/jn.00648.2015 2015

  23. [23]

    Evaluating angular accuracy of wrist-based haptic directional guidance for hand movement

    J. Hong, L. Stearns, J. Froehlich, D. Ross, and L. Findlater, “Evaluating angular accuracy of wrist-based haptic directional guidance for hand movement.” inGraphics Interface, 2016, pp. 195–200. [Online]. Available: https://graphicsinterface.org/wp-content/uploads/ gi2016-25.pdf

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Accuracy and precision of a wrist movement when vibrotactile prompts inform movement speed,

    M. E. Holman, G. Goldberg, and B. J. Darter, “Accuracy and precision of a wrist movement when vibrotactile prompts inform movement speed,”Somatosensory & Motor Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 165–171, July 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ 10.1080/08990220.2020.1765766

    work page doi:10.1080/08990220.2020.1765766 2020

  25. [25]

    Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint,

    J. Ryu, W. P. Cooney, L. J. Askew, K.-N. An, and E. Y . S. Chao, “Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint,”The Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 409–419, May 1991. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036350239190006W

    work page arXiv 1991

  26. [26]

    ANTHROPOMETRY AND BIOMECHANICS

    “ANTHROPOMETRY AND BIOMECHANICS.” [Online]. Available: https://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/section03.htm

    work page

  27. [27]

    2F-85 and 2F-140 Robot Grippers from Robotiq| Electromate Inc

    “2F-85 and 2F-140 Robot Grippers from Robotiq| Electromate Inc.” [Online]. Available: https://www.electromate.com/ 2f-85-and-2f-140-grippers/

    work page

  28. [28]

    Proprioceptive actuator design in the mit cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots,

    P. M. Wensing, A. Wang, S. Seok, D. Otten, J. Lang, and S. Kim, “Proprioceptive actuator design in the mit cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 509–522, 2017

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Compact Drives, Motors, Gears, Sensors|maxon group

    “Compact Drives, Motors, Gears, Sensors|maxon group.” [Online]. Available: https://www.maxongroup.us/maxon/view/category/gear? etcc cu=onsite&etcc med onsite=Product&etcc cmp onsite=GPX+ Planetengetriebe&etcc plc=Overview-Page-Gears&etcc var=%5bch% 5d%23de%23 d &target=filter&filterCategory=planetary&q=GPX

    work page

  30. [30]

    Design of a Quasi-Direct Drive Actuator with Embedded Pulley for a Compact, Lightweight, and High-Bandwidth Exosuit,

    J. Yang, J. Moon, J. Ryu, J. Kim, K. Nam, S. Park, Y . Kim, and G. Lee, “Design of a Quasi-Direct Drive Actuator with Embedded Pulley for a Compact, Lightweight, and High-Bandwidth Exosuit,” Actuators, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 21, Jan. 2023, number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/12/1/21

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    AS5047P ADAPTERBOARD

    “AS5047P ADAPTERBOARD.” [Online]. Available: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/ams-osram-usa-inc/ AS5047P-ADAPTERBOARD/5452344

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    moteus-n1

    “moteus-n1.” [Online]. Available: https://mjbots.com/products/ moteus-n1

    work page

  33. [33]

    Two degree-of-freedom spherical orienting device,

    C. M. Gosselin and F. Caron, “Two degree-of-freedom spherical orienting device,” US Patent US5 966 991A, Oct., 1999. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5966991A/en

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,”CoRR, vol. abs/2010.02502, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02502

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [36]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07035

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07035

    work page arXiv

  36. [37]

    Universal Manipulation Interface: In-The-Wild Robot Teaching Without In-The-Wild Robots

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, C. Pan, E. Cousineau, B. Burchfiel, S. Feng, R. Tedrake, and S. Song, “Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10329

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    Using apple vision pro to train and control robots,

    Y . Park and P. Agrawal, “Using apple vision pro to train and control robots,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Improbable-AI/ VisionProTeleop

    work page 2024

  38. [39]

    Lerobot: State-of-the-art machine learning for real-world robotics in pytorch,

    R. Cadene, S. Alibert, A. Soare, Q. Gallouedec, A. Zouitine, and T. Wolf, “Lerobot: State-of-the-art machine learning for real-world robotics in pytorch,” https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot, 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [40]

    Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,”CoRR, vol. abs/1512.03385, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [41]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D. P. Kingma, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. APPENDIXA CONTROL ANDPIPELINEDETAILS Given a pose target generated either from a teleoperation controller or a policyπ θ(at:t+Tp−1|ot−To+1:t), a differen- tial inverse kinematics problem, formulated as a constrained quadratic program (QP) is solved to obtain t...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014