REVIEW 17 cited by
Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning
read the original abstract
Large language models trained with reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards tend to trade accuracy for length--inflating response lengths to achieve gains in accuracy. While longer answers may be warranted for harder problems, many tokens are merely "filler": repetitive, verbose text that makes no real progress. We introduce GFPO (Group Filtered Policy Optimization), which curbs this length explosion by sampling larger groups per problem during training and filtering responses to train on based on two key metrics: (1) response length and (2) token efficiency: reward per token ratio. By sampling more at training time, we teach models to think less at inference time. On the Phi-4-reasoning model, GFPO cuts GRPO's length inflation by 46-71% across challenging STEM and coding benchmarks (AIME 24/25, GPQA, Omni-MATH, LiveCodeBench) while maintaining accuracy. Optimizing for reward per token further increases reductions in length inflation to 71-85%. We also propose Adaptive Difficulty GFPO, which dynamically allocates more training resources to harder problems based on real-time difficulty estimates, improving the balance between computational efficiency and accuracy especially on difficult questions. GFPO demonstrates that increased training-time compute directly translates to reduced test-time compute--a simple yet effective trade-off for efficient reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 17 Pith papers
-
Cross-Epoch Adaptive Rollout Optimization for RL Post-Training
CERO uses Beta posteriors and Fenchel-dual online optimization to adaptively allocate a fixed rollout budget across prompts and epochs in LLM RL, outperforming fixed-allocation GRPO on math reasoning benchmarks.
-
LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models
LEAD uses online adaptive mechanisms including Potential-Scaled Instability and symmetric efficiency rewards based on correct rollouts to achieve higher accuracy-efficiency scores with substantially shorter reasoning ...
-
CoDistill-GRPO: A Co-Distillation Recipe for Efficient Group Relative Policy Optimization
CoDistill-GRPO lets small and large models mutually improve via co-distillation in GRPO, raising small-model math accuracy by over 11 points while cutting large-model training time by about 18%.
-
Post Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost
Post-Reasoning boosts LLM accuracy by reversing the usual answer-after-reasoning order, delivering mean relative gains of 17.37% across 117 model-benchmark pairs with zero extra cost.
-
Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning
This survey introduces the Generate-Filter-Control-Replay (GFCR) taxonomy to structure rollout pipelines for RL-based post-training of reasoning LLMs.
-
Right Makes Might: Aligning Verified Hidden States Empowers RL Reasoning
Hidden-Align adds an auxiliary loss to align hidden states of correct reasoning paths at the pre-answer token in RLVR, improving pass@1 by 3.8-6.2 points over DAPO on eight math benchmarks for Qwen3 models of 1.7B-14B scale.
-
Spend Your Rollouts Where It Counts: Rollout Allocation for Group-Based RL Post-Training
Pilot-Commit estimates per-prompt informativeness via a pilot stage and skips low-variance prompts, matching baseline accuracy with up to 4.0x fewer cumulative rollouts than DAPO on math reasoning tasks.
-
MEMENTO: Teaching LLMs to Manage Their Own Context
MEMENTO trains LLMs to segment reasoning into blocks, generate mementos as dense summaries, and reason forward using only mementos and KV states, cutting peak KV cache by ~2.5x while preserving benchmark accuracy.
-
Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks
RTT bridges response-level rubrics to token-level rewards via a relevance discriminator and intra-sample group normalization, yielding higher instruction and rubric accuracy than baselines.
-
GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization
GDPO decouples per-reward normalization in multi-reward RL to avoid advantage collapse and improve convergence over GRPO on tool-calling, math, and coding tasks.
-
Entropy After </Think> for reasoning model early exiting
Entropy After </Think> (EAT) enables early exiting in reasoning LLMs by tracking entropy stabilization after a </think> token, cutting token use 12-22% on MATH500 and AIME2025 with no accuracy loss.
-
Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning
Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.
-
Trust Region On-Policy Distillation
TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.
-
On the Implicit Reward Overfitting and the Low-rank Dynamics in RLVR
RLVR exhibits implicit reward overfitting to training data and optimizes heavy-tailed singular spectra with rank-1 focus on reasoning capability.
-
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
A survey organizing techniques to achieve efficient reasoning in LLMs by shortening chain-of-thought outputs.
-
Knowledge Graph-Driven Expert-Level Reasoning for Neuroscience
A textbook-derived neuroscience knowledge graph supplies synthetic multi-hop QA supervision and RL rewards to fine-tune a small LM claimed to exceed larger general models on expert reasoning.
-
N-GRPO: Embedding-Level Neighbor Mixing for Enhanced Policy Optimization
N-GRPO enhances GRPO via Semantic Neighbor Mixing of token embeddings to improve diversity and consistency in LLM math reasoning rollouts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.