Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

FVP pre-trains 3D robot policies by predicting the next frame's point cloud, boosting DP3's real-world success rate by 28% on average across twelve tasks.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A next-frame point-cloud diffusion pre-training method (FVP) improves DP3 and RDT-1B manipulation success rates on the paper's own tasks.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Useful pre-training idea with plausible real-world gains, but the paper's own equations contradict the claimed action conditioning and the 'out-of-domain' sim split includes the tested tasks—fixable, but currently unreproducible from the text. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.17230 v2 pith:MP6FU326 submitted 2025-08-24 cs.CV

4D Visual Pre-training for Robot Learning

Chengkai Hou , Yanjie Ze , Yankai Fu , Zeyu Gao , Songbo Hu , Yue Yu , Shanghang Zhang , Huazhe Xu This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 4D visual pre-trainingnext point cloud predictiondiffusion modelpoint cloud representation learningrobot manipulationimitation learningvision-language-action modelself-supervised learning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

FVP is a self-supervised pre-training method for 3D robot manipulation policies. Instead of contrastive learning or masked reconstruction, FVP trains a visual encoder by taking the previous frame's point cloud, compressing it into a latent representation, and forcing a diffusion model to denoise that latent into the next frame's point cloud. The authors claim this next-point-cloud-prediction objective teaches representations that capture the temporal and spatial structure of robotic scenes, and that plugging the pre-trained encoder into existing 3D imitation policies (DP3 and RISE) improves their real-world success rates by 15 to 55 percentage points, with an average 28% gain over vanilla DP3 across twelve tasks. They further claim that FVP improves the RDT-1B vision-language-action model on spatial understanding, knowledge transfer, and long-horizon tasks. The promise is a dataset-agnostic '4D' pre-training module that can be dropped into any 3D policy without relying on scarce web-scale 3D data.

Core claim

FVP frames visual pre-training for robots as a generative forecasting problem in 4D: 3D space plus time. Given a trajectory of point-cloud observations, the encoder must map the previous frame's point cloud into a latent representation; a diffusion network conditioned on that latent must then denoise Gaussian noise into the next frame's point cloud. The pre-training loss is the standard diffusion noise-prediction error, with the latent concatenated as extra per-point features. The paper reports that this objective yields visual representations that transfer to downstream imitation policies: across twelve real-world tasks, DP3 with an FVP-pretrained encoder improves by 28 percentage points on

What carries the argument

The central machinery is next-point-cloud prediction as conditional diffusion. A standard point-cloud encoder (PointNet++, Point Transformer, or DP3's encoder) maps the previous frame's point cloud o_{t-1} into per-point latent features z; those features are concatenated onto the noisy target point cloud at the diffusion model's input; a Point-Voxel diffusion network then predicts the noise, so the model must infer where each point will move. The same latent is later used as the visual representation for downstream action prediction. The historical frame is the '4D' cue: the model learns dynamics by forecasting where points go next, and the authors' ablations show that removing the history f

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the next frame's point cloud is predictable from the previous frame's point cloud alone through the learned latent, even though the introduction says robot actions also enter the diffusion process, so if the model merely learns a static or blurred copy of the current scene the claimed gains would disappear.

What would settle it

Shuffle the order of frames within each pre-training trajectory so 'next frame' becomes a random frame, retrain FVP with identical hyperparameters, then evaluate DP3+FVP on the same real-world tasks; if the success-rate gain over vanilla DP3 remains near 28%, the temporal next-point-cloud objective is not what is driving the improvement, while a large drop would confirm the mechanism.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • FVP can be pre-trained on in-domain or out-of-domain datasets and boosts both DP3 and RISE, suggesting a single pre-training objective can serve different 3D imitation policies.
  • FVP works across multiple point-cloud encoders, indicating the forecasting objective, not a specific architecture, drives the gains.
  • Adding a point-cloud input pre-trained by FVP to RDT-1B improves success on single-arm and dual-arm real-world tasks and improves spatial, transfer, and long-horizon generalization.
  • In the same DP3 policy, 2D pre-trained representations (R3M, MVP, MAE) underperform FVP, supporting the claim that 3D pre-training captures information 2D features miss.
  • The authors note they could not pre-train on Open-X-Embodiment because it lacks camera parameters and depth data, so richer public 3D robot datasets could further test and extend FVP.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive open question is whether FVP's gain comes from true temporal dynamics or from a static reconstruction: the paper says actions are incorporated into the diffusion process, yet the training loss in Eq. 4 conditions only on the previous point cloud, so an action-conditional variant might be a stricter test of the mechanism.
  • If the next-frame objective is what matters, then FVP should also transfer to other 3D policy families and could be combined with action forecasting in a single objective, potentially improving VLA models further.
  • The same pre-training recipe could be applied to other temporally structured 3D observations, such as multi-view RGB-D or depth-video streams, without needing new robot-specific data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FVP, a self-supervised 4D visual pre-training framework for 3D point-cloud-based robot learning. FVP encodes the previous frame's point cloud with a standard 3D encoder and trains a point-cloud diffusion model to predict the next frame's point cloud, using the resulting encoder as initialization for downstream imitation-learning policies. Experiments cover simulation benchmarks (Adroit, MetaWorld) and real robots (single-arm gripper, dexterous hand, dual-arm, humanoid), plus a VLA model (RDT-1B). The headline result is that FVP pre-training improves the average success rate of DP3 by 28% across twelve real-world tasks and yields state-of-the-art performance among the compared imitation-learning methods.

Significance. If the results are robust, the paper would make a useful contribution: it proposes a simple, encoder-agnostic pre-training objective for point clouds, which are underrepresented in robot visual pre-training compared with 2D images. The breadth of real-robot evaluation (single-arm, dexterous hand, dual-arm, humanoid, and VLA) is a genuine strength, as is the attempt to pre-train on an out-of-domain public dataset (RoboMind). However, several load-bearing issues reduce confidence in the claims as currently written: the objective in Eq. (4) does not include the action conditioning promised in the text, the simulation 'out-of-domain' setting includes the tested tasks, and the real-world numbers are 20-trial counts without error bars or significance tests. The central idea is defensible and likely fixable, but the evidence needs strengthening and the claims need to be made consistent with the actual method.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (4); §1; §6] The Introduction and Conclusion state that FVP incorporates robot action information into the diffusion process, but Eq. (4) defines the conditioning latent z solely as the encoding of o_{t-1}; no action term appears in the loss or conditioning. Since robot-induced motion between frames is action-driven, the method as written cannot learn the claimed 'motion characteristics' from actions and may instead learn static structure. Please either add action conditioning or revise the text. Fig. 2 should also be supplemented with a quantitative comparison to a static-copy baseline (e.g., Chamfer distance) to show dynamics are learned.
  2. [§4.2; §4.3] The 'out-of-domain' pre-training setting is not out-of-domain: §4.2 says the dataset contains all tasks within the current benchmark, including the tested tasks. The reported gains from 'out-of-domain' pre-training therefore include pre-training on demonstrations of the evaluated tasks, confounding generalization claims. Please relabel this condition as multi-task/in-domain aggregate, or better, add a held-out-task evaluation where pre-training and testing use disjoint tasks, to support the general pre-training claim.
  3. [§5.1; §5.2; Tables 1-2] Real-world results are reported as raw success counts out of 20 trials with no error bars, multiple seeds, or significance tests. Notable differences are small: Table 1 FlipCup 16/20 vs 15/20, Assembly 13/20 vs 11/20; Table 2 WipePlate 5/20 vs 4/20. The headline 28% average improvement is a point estimate with no uncertainty. Please provide confidence intervals or additional trials, and note ceiling effects in Table 4.
  4. [§5.4, Table 3; §5.7; Abstract; §6] Language understanding is claimed in the abstract and conclusion, but Table 3 shows 6/20 (2D), 6/20 (3D), 7/20 (FVP), a one-trial difference; §5.7 itself says the improvement is small. Long Horizon 2/20 -> 3/20 is similarly weak. Please provide stronger evidence for these claims or substantially soften them.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3)] The symbol T is used both for the number of diffusion steps and for the trajectory length in §3.2; please use distinct symbols.
  2. [§4.2, §4.3] Typographical errors: 'Adorit' for 'Adroit' and 'testing pipline' for 'testing pipeline'.
  3. [Table 2 caption] RDT-1B is cited as [27], but [27] is PointNet++; should be [17]. Also 'section' should be 'setting' or 'condition'.
  4. [Figure 6 caption] The caption's comma-separated numbers are not visible in the figure; please make the two pre-training conditions legible.
  5. [§5.9, Table 5] Table 5 shows one frame outperforms multi-frame history, but this is not discussed; please interpret why history hurts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: FVP's pre-training objective is self-supervised and not fitted to downstream success; the only self-citation (RoboMind) is an external dataset, not a load-bearing unverified result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: define a self-supervised next-point-cloud prediction objective (Eq. 4), pre-train a 3D encoder on robot trajectories, then plug the encoder into DP3/RISE/RDT-1B and measure downstream success. The pre-training loss is a diffusion denoising loss on point clouds conditioned on a latent encoding of the previous point cloud; it does not use downstream success labels or action labels, and no equation in the paper reduces the downstream gains to the pre-training objective by construction. The reported improvements are empirical measurements, not analytic consequences of the loss. The only self-citation is the RoboMind dataset [47], which shares an author with the present paper; however, it is a publicly released dataset, externally falsifiable, and used as pre-training data rather than as an unverified theorem. Thus it does not constitute load-bearing circularity. Separately, there is a consistency gap: the Introduction and Conclusion claim robot actions are incorporated into the diffusion process, but Eq. 4 conditions only on the latent z from the previous point cloud, with no action term. This is a correctness/reproducibility concern, not a circularity. Likewise, Section 4.2 defines the 'out-of-domain' pre-training set as including the tested tasks, which is an evaluation confound but not a circular derivation. Overall, the central method and evaluation are not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper depends on the premise that next-frame point-cloud prediction is a useful pre-training signal for manipulation, that the encoder must be fine-tuned end-to-end, and that the RoboMind dataset is compatible. No new physical entities or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Number of historical frames (default 1) = 1
    Table 5 shows 1 frame is best for PickSquare and PlaceBottle; this hyperparameter is chosen by ablating on the target tasks, i.e., tuned on evaluation data.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Next-frame point-cloud prediction is a useful self-supervised pre-training objective for manipulation encoders.
    The entire method in Section 3.2 assumes that predicting o_t from o_{t-1} forces the encoder to learn dynamics and spatial features relevant to control.
  • domain assumption The downstream policy can be fine-tuned end-to-end from the pre-trained encoder without losing the pre-training benefit.
    Section 3.2, downstream tasks: the encoder is replaced and fine-tuned; the ablation 'Freeze Visual Encoder' in Table 4 shows freezing hurts, confirming that fine-tuning is required.
  • domain assumption RoboMind point clouds are compatible with the DP3 encoder and the diffusion model.
    Section 5.3 uses RoboMind as out-of-domain pre-training data; compatibility is assumed without reported preprocessing details.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 4D Visual Pre-training for Robot Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MP6FU326

@misc{pith2026250817230,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 4D Visual Pre-training for Robot Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MP6FU326}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17230}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

General visual representations learned from web-scale datasets for robotics have achieved great success in recent years, enabling data-efficient robot learning on manipulation tasks; yet these pre-trained representations are mostly on 2D images, neglecting the inherent 3D nature of the world. However, due to the scarcity of large-scale 3D data, it is still hard to extract a universal 3D representation from web datasets. Instead, we are seeking a general visual pre-training framework that could improve all 3D representations as an alternative. Our framework, called FVP, is a novel 4D Visual Pre-training framework for real-world robot learning. FVP frames the visual pre-training objective as a next-point-cloud-prediction problem, models the prediction model as a diffusion model, and pre-trains the model on the larger public datasets directly. Across twelve real-world manipulation tasks, FVP boosts the average success rate of 3D Diffusion Policy (DP3) for these tasks by 28%. The FVP pre-trained DP3 achieves state-of-the-art performance across imitation learning methods. Moreover, the efficacy of FVP adapts across various point cloud encoders and datasets. Finally, we apply FVP to the RDT-1B, a larger Vision-Language-Action robotic model, enhancing its performance on various robot tasks. Our project page is available at: https://4d-visual-pretraining.github.io/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.17230 by Chengkai Hou, Huazhe Xu, Shanghang Zhang, Songbo Hu, Yanjie Ze, Yankai Fu, Yue Yu, Zeyu Gao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FVP is a novel 3D point cloud representation learning pipeline for robotic manipulation. Different from prior works in Contrastive Learning and Masked Signal Modeling, FVP trains 3D visual representations by leveraging the preceding frame point cloud and employing a diffusion model to predict the point cloud of the current frame. Abstract General visual representations learned from web-scale datasets for r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization of the next-point-cloud prediction. We present a comparison between predictions and conditions along the timeline of the “Assembly” task [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparing FVP with more baselines in simulation. We include various 3D pre-training methods, various 2D pre-training methods, and variants of Diffusion Policy such as EquiBot [51] and EquiDiff [45] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of our real-world tasks. For each task, we show several steps to understand the task process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Collecting data methods for different types of robots. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Success rate (%) of imitation learning on real-world robotic tasks and 2D & 3D visual representations pre-trained by different approaches. “DP3+FVP” and “RISE+FVP” denote the application of FVP to pretrain the visual models from DP3 and RISE, respectively. “DP3” indicates that the visual model within DP3 has not undergone pretraining. “DP3+PointMAE”, “DP3+STRL”, and “DP3+C2P” signify the utilization of Poi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization of the different generalization tasks on RDT-1B. We visualize the tasks designed to evaluate various capabilities and generalization of the RDT-1B model. 5.5. Q4: Can pre-trained VLA exhibit stronger spa￾tial understanding abilities? We mainly examine if using 3D point cloud inputs and FVP pre-training can improve the VLA model’s spatial percep￾tion capabilities. We design a pick-and-place ta… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HAT-4D: Lifting Monocular Video for 4D Multi-Object Interactions via Human-Agent Collaboration

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HAT-4D presents an agentic VLM-plus-human-in-the-loop pipeline for monocular 4D multi-object interaction reconstruction and releases the MVOIK-4D benchmark.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Diffusion-based representa- tion learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14257, 2021

    Korbinian Abstreiter, Sarthak Mittal, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Sch¨olkopf, and Arash Mehrjou. Diffusion-based representa- tion learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14257, 2021. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Cobot magic: An open-source robotic system.https://global.agilex.ai/products/ cobot-magic, 2025

    AgileX Robotics. Cobot magic: An open-source robotic system.https://global.agilex.ai/products/ cobot-magic, 2025. Accessed: 2025-02-22. 5

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Is conditional gen- erative modeling all you need for decision-making?, 2023

    Anurag Ajay, Yilun Du, Abhi Gupta, Joshua Tenenbaum, Tommi Jaakkola, and Pulkit Agrawal. Is conditional gen- erative modeling all you need for decision-making?, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Diffu- sion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion

    Cheng Chi, Siyuan Feng, Yilun Du, Zhenjia Xu, Eric Cousineau, Benjamin Burchfiel, and Shuran Song. Diffu- sion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04137, 2023. 2, 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    An unbiased look at datasets for visuo-motor pre-training

    Sudeep Dasari, Mohan Kumar Srirama, Unnat Jain, and Ab- hinav Gupta. An unbiased look at datasets for visuo-motor pre-training. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 1183–

    work page

  6. [6]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009. 2

    2009

  7. [7]

    Implicit behavioral cloning, 2021

    Pete Florence, Corey Lynch, Andy Zeng, Oscar Ramirez, Ayzaan Wahid, Laura Downs, Adrian Wong, Johnny Lee, Igor Mordatch, and Jonathan Tompson. Implicit behavioral cloning, 2021. 3

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation using low-cost whole-body teleoperation

    Z Fu, T Z Zhao, and C Finn. Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation using low-cost whole-body teleoperation. In8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2024. 5

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Act3d: Infinite resolution action detec- tion transformer for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17817, 2023

    Theophile Gervet, Zhou Xian, Nikolaos Gkanatsios, and Ka- terina Fragkiadaki. Act3d: Infinite resolution action detec- tion transformer for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17817, 2023. 2, 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Rvt: Robotic view transformer for 3d object manipulation

    Ankit Goyal, Jie Xu, Yijie Guo, Valts Blukis, Yu-Wei Chao, and Dieter Fox. Rvt: Robotic view transformer for 3d object manipulation. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 694–

  11. [11]

    Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18995–19012, 2022. 2

    2022

  12. [12]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 3

    2020

  13. [13]

    Spatio-temporal self-supervised representation learning for 3d point clouds

    Siyuan Huang, Yichen Xie, Song-Chun Zhu, and Yixin Zhu. Spatio-temporal self-supervised representation learning for 3d point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6535–6545,

    work page

  14. [14]

    Dif- fusion reward: Learning rewards via conditional video diffu- sion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14134, 2023

    Tao Huang, Guangqi Jiang, Yanjie Ze, and Huazhe Xu. Dif- fusion reward: Learning rewards via conditional video diffu- sion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14134, 2023. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Soda: Bottleneck diffusion models for representation learning

    Drew A Hudson, Daniel Zoran, Mateusz Malinowski, An- drew K Lampinen, Andrew Jaegle, James L McClelland, Loic Matthey, Felix Hill, and Alexander Lerchner. Soda: Bottleneck diffusion models for representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17901, 2023. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation ap- proach.Physical Review E, 56(5):5018, 1997

    Christopher Jarzynski. Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation ap- proach.Physical Review E, 56(5):5018, 1997. 3

    work page 1997

  17. [17]

    Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipu- lation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipu- lation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024. 2, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Point- voxel cnn for efficient 3d deep learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    Zhijian Liu, Haotian Tang, Yujun Lin, and Song Han. Point- voxel cnn for efficient 3d deep learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019. 2

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Where are we in the search for an artificial visual cortex for embodied intelli- gence?Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    Arjun Majumdar, Karmesh Yadav, Sergio Arnaud, Jason Ma, Claire Chen, Sneha Silwal, Aryan Jain, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Tingfan Wu, Jay Vakil, et al. Where are we in the search for an artificial visual cortex for embodied intelli- gence?Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 1, 2

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    What mat- ters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation, 2021

    Ajay Mandlekar, Danfei Xu, Josiah Wong, Soroush Nasiri- any, Chen Wang, Rohun Kulkarni, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese, Yuke Zhu, and Roberto Mart´ın-Mart´ın. What mat- ters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation, 2021. 3

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Self-supervised point cloud prediction using 3d spatio-temporal convolutional networks

    Benedikt Mersch, Xieyuanli Chen, Jens Behley, and Cyrill Stachniss. Self-supervised point cloud prediction using 3d spatio-temporal convolutional networks. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 1444–1454. PMLR, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12601, 2022

    Suraj Nair, Aravind Rajeswaran, Vikash Kumar, Chelsea Finn, and Abhinav Gupta. R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12601, 2022. 1, 2, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Henriques

    Felipe Nuti, Tim Franzmeyer, and Jo ˜ao F. Henriques. Ex- tracting reward functions from diffusion models, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08864, 2023

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhinav Gupta, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, et al. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08864, 2023. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Masked autoencoders for point cloud self-supervised learning

    Yatian Pang, Wenxiao Wang, Francis EH Tay, Wei Liu, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan. Masked autoencoders for point cloud self-supervised learning. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 604–621. Springer, 2022. 2, 7

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Recon- structing hands in 3d with transformers

    Georgios Pavlakos, Dandan Shan, Ilija Radosavovic, Angjoo Kanazawa, David Fouhey, and Jitendra Malik. Recon- structing hands in 3d with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9826–9836, 2024. 5

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 2, 3, 7

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Dexmv: Imita- tion learning for dexterous manipulation from human videos,

    Yuzhe Qin, Yueh-Hua Wu, Shaowei Liu, Hanwen Jiang, Rui- han Yang, Yang Fu, and Xiaolong Wang. Dexmv: Imita- tion learning for dexterous manipulation from human videos,

    work page

  29. [29]

    Anyteleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04577, 2023

    Yuzhe Qin, Wei Yang, Binghao Huang, Karl Van Wyk, Hao Su, Xiaolong Wang, Yu-Wei Chao, and Dieter Fox. Anyteleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04577, 2023. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Robot learning with sen- sorimotor pre-training

    Ilija Radosavovic, Baifeng Shi, Letian Fu, Ken Goldberg, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. Robot learning with sen- sorimotor pre-training. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 683–693. PMLR, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Real-world robot learn- ing with masked visual pre-training

    Ilija Radosavovic, Tete Xiao, Stephen James, Pieter Abbeel, Jitendra Malik, and Trevor Darrell. Real-world robot learn- ing with masked visual pre-training. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 416–426. PMLR, 2023. 1, 2

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Learning complex dexterous manipulation with deep reinforcement learning and demonstrations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10087, 2017

    Aravind Rajeswaran, Vikash Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Giu- lia Vezzani, John Schulman, Emanuel Todorov, and Sergey Levine. Learning complex dexterous manipulation with deep reinforcement learning and demonstrations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10087, 2017. 2, 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Learning complex dexterous manipulation with deep reinforcement learning and demonstrations, 2018

    Aravind Rajeswaran, Vikash Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Giu- lia Vezzani, John Schulman, Emanuel Todorov, and Sergey Levine. Learning complex dexterous manipulation with deep reinforcement learning and demonstrations, 2018. 3

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 3

    2022

  35. [35]

    On bringing robots home, 2023

    Nur Muhammad Mahi Shafiullah, Anant Rai, Haritheja Etukuru, Yiqian Liu, Ishan Misra, Soumith Chintala, and Lerrel Pinto. On bringing robots home, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Rrl: Resnet as rep- resentation for reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03380, 2021

    Rutav Shah and Vikash Kumar. Rrl: Resnet as rep- resentation for reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03380, 2021. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Perceiver- actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation

    Mohit Shridhar, Lucas Manuelli, and Dieter Fox. Perceiver- actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 785–799. PMLR,

  38. [38]

    Shelving, stacking, hanging: Relational pose diffusion for multi-modal rearrangement, 2023

    Anthony Simeonov, Ankit Goyal, Lucas Manuelli, Lin Yen- Chen, Alina Sarmiento, Alberto Rodriguez, Pulkit Agrawal, and Dieter Fox. Shelving, stacking, hanging: Relational pose diffusion for multi-modal rearrangement, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Ab- hishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Memory-consistent neural networks for imitation learning, 2024

    Kaustubh Sridhar, Souradeep Dutta, Dinesh Jayaraman, James Weimer, and Insup Lee. Memory-consistent neural networks for imitation learning, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control

    Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5026–5033, 2012. 3

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Se(3)-diffusionfields: Learning smooth cost func- tions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffu- sion, 2023

    Julen Urain, Niklas Funk, Jan Peters, and Georgia Chal- vatzaki. Se(3)-diffusionfields: Learning smooth cost func- tions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffu- sion, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Rise: 3d perception makes real-world robot imitation simple and effective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12281, 2024

    Chenxi Wang, Hongjie Fang, Hao-Shu Fang, and Cewu Lu. Rise: 3d perception makes real-world robot imitation simple and effective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12281, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Equivariant diffusion pol- icy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01812, 2024

    Dian Wang, Stephen Hart, David Surovik, Tarik Kelestemur, Haojie Huang, Haibo Zhao, Mark Yeatman, Jiuguang Wang, Robin Walters, and Robert Platt. Equivariant diffusion pol- icy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01812, 2024. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Diffusion models as masked autoencoders

    Chen Wei, Karttikeya Mangalam, Po-Yao Huang, Yanghao Li, Haoqi Fan, Hu Xu, Huiyu Wang, Cihang Xie, Alan Yuille, and Christoph Feichtenhofer. Diffusion models as masked autoencoders. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision, pages 16284– 16294, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Robomind: Benchmark on multi- embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manipula- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877, 2024

    Kun Wu, Chengkai Hou, Jiaming Liu, Zhengping Che, Xi- aozhu Ju, Zhuqin Yang, Meng Li, Yinuo Zhao, Zhiyuan Xu, Guang Yang, et al. Robomind: Benchmark on multi- embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manipula- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877, 2024. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Tiangong.https://x-humanoid.com/ bt.html, 2025

    X-Humanoid. Tiangong.https://x-humanoid.com/ bt.html, 2025. Accessed: 2025-03-07. 5

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Masked visual pre-training for motor control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06173, 2022

    Tete Xiao, Ilija Radosavovic, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. Masked visual pre-training for motor control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06173, 2022. 1, 2, 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    NeRFuser: Dif- fusion guided multi-task 3d policy learning, 2024

    Ge Yan, Yueh-Hua Wu, and Xiaolong Wang. NeRFuser: Dif- fusion guided multi-task 3d policy learning, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Equibot: Sim (3)- equivariant diffusion policy for generalizable and data effi- cient learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01479, 2024

    Jingyun Yang, Zi-ang Cao, Congyue Deng, Rika Antonova, Shuran Song, and Jeannette Bohg. Equibot: Sim (3)- equivariant diffusion policy for generalizable and data effi- cient learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01479, 2024. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Visual point cloud forecasting enables scalable autonomous driving

    Zetong Yang, Li Chen, Yanan Sun, and Hongyang Li. Visual point cloud forecasting enables scalable autonomous driving. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14673–14684, 2024. 3

    2024

  53. [53]

    Meta- world: A benchmark and evaluation for multi-task and meta reinforcement learning

    Tianhe Yu, Deirdre Quillen, Zhanpeng He, Ryan Julian, Karol Hausman, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Meta- world: A benchmark and evaluation for multi-task and meta reinforcement learning. InConference on robot learning, pages 1094–1100. PMLR, 2020. 2, 4

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Visual reinforcement learning with self- supervised 3d representations.IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, 8(5):2890–2897, 2023

    Yanjie Ze, Nicklas Hansen, Yinbo Chen, Mohit Jain, and Xiaolong Wang. Visual reinforcement learning with self- supervised 3d representations.IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, 8(5):2890–2897, 2023. 1, 2

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Gnfactor: Multi-task real robot learning with generalizable neural feature fields

    Yanjie Ze, Ge Yan, Yueh-Hua Wu, Annabella Macaluso, Yuying Ge, Jianglong Ye, Nicklas Hansen, Li Erran Li, and Xiaolong Wang. Gnfactor: Multi-task real robot learning with generalizable neural feature fields. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 284–301. PMLR, 2023. 2

    2023

  56. [56]

    Generalizable humanoid manipulation with improved 3d diffusion policies

    Yanjie Ze, Zixuan Chen, Wenhao Wang, Tianyi Chen, Xialin He, Ying Yuan, Xue Bin Peng, and Jiajun Wu. Generalizable humanoid manipulation with improved 3d diffusion policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10803, 2024. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    3d diffusion policy: Gen- eralizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d repre- sentations

    Yanjie Ze, Gu Zhang, Kangning Zhang, Chenyuan Hu, Muhan Wang, and Huazhe Xu. 3d diffusion policy: Gen- eralizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d repre- sentations. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2024. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training.Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 35:27061–27074, 2022

    Renrui Zhang, Ziyu Guo, Peng Gao, Rongyao Fang, Bin Zhao, Dong Wang, Yu Qiao, and Hongsheng Li. Point-m2ae: multi-scale masked autoencoders for hierarchical point cloud pre-training.Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 35:27061–27074, 2022. 2

    2022

  59. [59]

    Vlabench: A large-scale benchmark for language-conditioned robotics manipulation with long- horizon reasoning tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18194,

    Shiduo Zhang, Zhe Xu, Peiju Liu, Xiaopeng Yu, Yuan Li, Qinghui Gao, Zhaoye Fei, Zhangyue Yin, Zuxuan Wu, Yu- Gang Jiang, et al. Vlabench: A large-scale benchmark for language-conditioned robotics manipulation with long- horizon reasoning tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18194,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Complete-to-partial 4d distillation for self-supervised point cloud sequence representation learning

    Zhuoyang Zhang, Yuhao Dong, Yunze Liu, and Li Yi. Complete-to-partial 4d distillation for self-supervised point cloud sequence representation learning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17661–17670, 2023. 2, 7

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 16259–16268, 2021. 2, 3

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023

    Tony Z Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705, 2023. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Point Cloud Pre-training with Diffusion Models

    Xiao Zheng, Xiaoshui Huang, Guofeng Mei, Yuenan Hou, Zhaoyang Lyu, Bo Dai, Wanli Ouyang, and Yongshun Gong. Point cloud pre-training with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14960, 2023. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    3d shape generation and completion through point-voxel diffusion

    Linqi Zhou, Yilun Du, and Jiajun Wu. 3d shape generation and completion through point-voxel diffusion. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 5826–5835, 2021. 2, 3

    work page 2021

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.