Pith. sign in

REVIEW 27 cited by

Benchmarking Optimizers for Large Language Model Pretraining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.01440 v1 pith:ONWCAFRN submitted 2025-09-01 cs.LG

Benchmarking Optimizers for Large Language Model Pretraining

classification cs.LG
keywords methodsbenchmarkingclaimsdevelopmentfuturelanguagelargemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been accompanied by an effervescence of novel ideas and methods to better optimize the loss of deep learning models. Claims from those methods are myriad: from faster convergence to removing reliance on certain hyperparameters. However, the diverse experimental protocols used to validate these claims make direct comparisons between methods challenging. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of recent optimization techniques across standardized LLM pretraining scenarios, systematically varying model size, batch size, and training duration. Through careful tuning of each method, we provide guidance to practitioners on which optimizer is best suited for each scenario. For researchers, our work highlights promising directions for future optimization research. Finally, by releasing our code and making all experiments fully reproducible, we hope our efforts can help the development and rigorous benchmarking of future methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on $\ell_1$-norm Lower Bounds

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    SignSGD provably beats SGD by a factor of d under sparse noise via matched ℓ1-norm upper and lower bounds, with an equivalent result for Muon on matrices, and this predicts faster GPT-2 pretraining.

  2. Symmetry-Compatible Principle for Optimizer Design: Embeddings, LM Heads, SwiGLU MLPs, and MoE Routers

    math.OC 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Proposes equivariant optimizers matched to the symmetry groups of embeddings, SwiGLU projections and MoE routers, with experiments showing consistent gains over AdamW on language model pre-training.

  3. Sharp Capacity Scaling of Spectral Optimizers in Learning Associative Memory

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Muon achieves higher storage capacity than SGD and matches Newton's method in one-step recovery rates for associative memory under power-law distributions, while saturating at larger critical batch sizes and showing f...

  4. Optimal Sample Complexity for Single Time-Scale Actor-Critic with Momentum

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Single-timescale actor-critic with STORM momentum and a recent-sample buffer achieves optimal O(ε^{-2}) sample complexity for ε-optimal policies in finite discounted MDPs.

  5. PoLoRA: A Preconditioned Orthogonalized LoRA Optimizer

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A preconditioned, product-aware spectral optimizer for LoRA reaches Adam's final loss in 1.2–1.7x fewer steps on instruction-tuning, with ~3% per-step overhead.

  6. (A)iSpy: Parasitic Trojans for Machine Learning Infrastructure

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A runtime-extension Trojan turns a single poisoned sample into a 97%+ backdoor via replay/amplification and leaks training hyperparameters through watermarked weights or innocuous text codewords.

  7. OmniOpt: Taxonomy, Geometry, and Benchmarking of Modern Optimizers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A meta-pipeline plus LMO four-axis view yields a dual taxonomy of 108 optimizers, and a multi-objective LLM/vision benchmark shows no single family dominates the quality–cost–memory frontier.

  8. Denoise First, Orthogonalize Later: Understanding Momentum in Muon via Spectral Filtering

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Momentum in Muon functions as a spectral filter on signal-plus-perturbation gradients, enlarging the gap to stabilize singular subspaces before orthogonalization and outperforming the reverse order.

  9. Why SGD is not Brownian Motion: A New Perspective on Stochastic Dynamics

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SGD is reformulated via a master equation from discrete updates, producing a discrete Fokker-Planck equation that predicts non-stationary variance growth proportional to learning rate in flat Hessian directions.

  10. LionMuon: Alternating Spectral and Sign Descent for Efficient Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LionMuon alternates Lion and Muon steps with shared dual-EMA buffer to Pareto-dominate existing optimizers in loss and compute on models up to 720M parameters.

  11. LionMuon: Alternating Spectral and Sign Descent for Efficient Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LionMuon alternates Lion sign steps and Muon spectral steps with shared dual-EMA momentum to match Lion memory while outperforming both at P=2 on 124M-720M models, backed by heavy-tailed complexity bounds that predict...

  12. Symmetry-Compatible Principle for Optimizer Design: Embeddings, LM Heads, SwiGLU MLPs, and MoE Routers

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes equivariant optimizer updates matched to layer symmetries for embeddings, SwiGLU MLPs, and MoE routers, with reported gains in validation loss and training stability on several language model architectures.

  13. Rescaled Asynchronous SGD: Optimal Distributed Optimization under Data and System Heterogeneity

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rescaled ASGD recovers convergence to the true global objective by rescaling worker stepsizes proportional to computation times, matching the known time lower bound in the leading term under non-convex smoothness and ...

  14. Optimizer-Model Consistency: Full Finetuning with the Same Optimizer as Pretraining Forgets Less

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Full finetuning with the pretraining optimizer reduces forgetting compared to other optimizers or LoRA while achieving comparable new-task performance.

  15. Benchmarking Optimizers for MLPs in Tabular Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Muon optimizer outperforms AdamW across 17 tabular datasets when training MLPs under a shared protocol.

  16. StoSignSGD: Unbiased Structural Stochasticity Fixes SignSGD for Training Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    StoSignSGD resolves SignSGD divergence on non-smooth objectives via structural stochasticity, matching optimal convex rates and improving non-convex bounds while delivering 1.44-2.14x speedups in FP8 LLM pretraining.

  17. Nexus: Same Pretraining Loss, Better Downstream Generalization via Common Minima

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nexus optimizer improves LLM downstream performance by converging to common minima across data sources despite identical pretraining loss.

  18. Nexus: Same Pretraining Loss, Better Downstream Generalization via Common Minima

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nexus matches standard pretraining loss while improving downstream and OOD performance by maximizing gradient similarity so task-specific minima stay close.

  19. LoRDO: Distributed Low-Rank Optimization with Infrequent Communication

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    LoRDO combines global low-rank projections with full-rank quasi-hyperbolic momentum to let infrequent-synchronization distributed training match low-rank DDP at roughly 10x less communication.

  20. Preconditioned Norms: A Unified Framework for Steepest Descent, Quasi-Newton and Adaptive Methods

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Preconditioned matrix norms unify steepest descent, quasi-Newton, and adaptive optimizers, revealing SGD, Adam, Muon, KL-Shampoo, SOAP, and SPlus as special cases and enabling new methods MuAdam and MuAdam-SANIA that ...

  21. Scale Weight Decay and Train Better

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Muon with weight decay scaled by η/η_max reaches the same MoE validation loss ~30% faster than constant-decay Muon while preserving asymptotic stationarity of the unregularized objective.

  22. Open Problem: Is AdamW Effective Under Heavy-Tailed Noise?

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper poses whether AdamW converges under heavy-tailed stochastic gradient noise and supplies a weighted-metric benchmark plus a corridor lower-bound showing how denominator memory can obscure large gradients.

  23. Softsign: Smooth Sign in Your Optimizer For Better Parameter Heterogeneity Handling

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SoftSignum replaces hard sign with soft-sign in optimizers via temperature control and quantile scheduling, extends to SoftMuon, provides a convergence proof for stochastic non-convex settings, and reports better perf...

  24. HTMuon: Improving Muon via Heavy-Tailed Spectral Correction

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    HTMuon modifies Muon to produce heavier-tailed updates and weight spectra via HT-SR theory, yielding up to 0.98 lower perplexity on LLaMA pretraining and serving as a plug-in for other Muon variants.

  25. Reparametrizing Shampoo and SOAP for Subspace Basis Updates and BFloat16 Storage

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reparametrization of Shampoo/SOAP preconditioners enables BFP16 storage and partial subspace basis updates, reducing compute and memory while improving low-precision performance.

  26. Navigating LLM Valley: From AdamW to Memory-Efficient and Matrix-Based Optimizers

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This survey organizes LLM optimizer literature into categories and argues the field is shifting toward rigorous, multi-factor comparisons of convergence, memory, stability, and complexity.

  27. Evolution of Optimization Methods: Algorithms, Scenarios, and Evaluations

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A retrospective survey and empirical evaluation of deep learning optimization algorithms that identifies trends, design trade-offs, and future directions.