pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2509.15890 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Fast and accurate Gaia-unWISE quasar mock catalogs from LPT and Eulerian bias

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords quasar mock catalogsLagrangian perturbation theorynonlinear biasGaia-unWISE Quaialarge-scale structurecosmological simulationsredshift spaceobservational effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasar mock catalogs generated with Lagrangian perturbation theory and hierarchical bias accurately reproduce the Gaia-unWISE Quaia catalog's summary statistics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method to produce fast and accurate full-sky quasar mock catalogs for the Gaia-unWISE Quaia catalog. It uses dark matter fields from augmented Lagrangian perturbation theory on the lightcone and applies a hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme calibrated on Abacus simulation mocks matched to DESI observations. Observational effects such as redshift uncertainties, angular selection, and number counts are added to the mocks. The catalogs are validated against the real data using full-sky maps, redshift distributions, angular power spectra with covariances, and two-point correlation functions, showing excellent agreement. The mocks are made publicly available for cosmological studies.

Core claim

We present 100 full-sky quasar spectrophotometric mock catalogs with smooth redshift evolution from z=0 to z~4, tailored to analyze the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog (Quaia). In particular, we apply a novel hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme (Hicobian) to dark matter fields generated through Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory on the lightcone (WebON code), calibrating the free parameters of the bias model on Abacus quasar HOD mock catalogs tuned to reproduce DESI Early Data Release observations in real and redshift space. After having obtained such accurate spectroscopic catalogs, we inject in the mocks the observational effects characterizing the Quaia catalog: (i) spectrophot o

What carries the argument

Hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme (Hicobian) applied to Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory lightcone fields from the WebON code.

If this is right

  • The mock catalogs accurately reproduce the Quaia catalog's full-sky maps and redshift distributions.
  • Angular power spectra and their covariances from the mocks match those of the real data.
  • Two-point correlation functions in the mocks align with observations after including selection effects.
  • The method enables efficient production of multiple mock realizations for statistical analysis.
  • Public release of the catalogs supports community-wide use in quasar cosmology studies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The success of transferring the bias model suggests similar approaches could work for other large-scale structure tracers in future surveys.
  • This combination of fast LPT simulations with calibrated bias could scale to higher resolution or larger volumes for next-generation experiments.
  • Validation on power spectra implies the mocks capture the clustering properties needed for testing cosmological models.
  • Further development might incorporate additional effects like magnification bias for more complete mock realism.

Load-bearing premise

The hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme calibrated on Abacus HOD mocks tuned to DESI Early Data Release observations can be transferred to WebON Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory lightcone fields to produce quasar distributions that match Quaia after injecting observational effects.

What would settle it

Finding a statistically significant mismatch in the angular power spectra or two-point correlation functions between the mock catalogs and the Quaia catalog at multiple redshifts would falsify the accuracy claim.

read the original abstract

We present $100$ full-sky quasar spectrophotometric mock catalogs with smooth redshift evolution from $z=0$ to $z\sim 4$, tailored to analyze the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog (Quaia). In particular, we apply a novel hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme (Hicobian) to dark matter fields generated through Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory on the lightcone (WebON code), calibrating the free parameters of the bias model on Abacus quasar HOD mock catalogs tuned to reproduce DESI Early Data Release observations in real and redshift space. After having obtained such accurate spectroscopic catalogs, we inject in the mocks the observational effects characterizing the Quaia catalog: (i) spectrophotometric redshift uncertainties, (ii) the angular selection function, and (iii) the redshift number counts distribution. We assess the accuracy of our catalogs by validating a number of summary statistics: the full-sky QSO maps, the redshift uncertainty distributions as a function of redshift, the redshift $n(z)$ distribution, the angular power spectra and their normalized covariance matrices, and the angular two-point correlation functions. We find excellent agreement between these metrics from the mocks and from the Quaia catalog. We publicly release the mock catalogs to the community.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents 100 full-sky quasar spectrophotometric mock catalogs spanning z=0 to z~4, generated by applying a hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme (Hicobian) to dark matter fields from Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory on the lightcone (WebON code). Bias parameters are calibrated on Abacus quasar HOD mocks tuned to DESI Early Data Release observations. Observational effects including spectrophotometric redshift uncertainties, angular selection function, and redshift number counts are injected to match the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog (Quaia). Accuracy is assessed via full-sky maps, redshift uncertainty distributions, n(z), angular power spectra with normalized covariances, and angular two-point correlation functions, with claims of excellent agreement; the catalogs are publicly released.

Significance. If the accuracy holds, the work supplies a practical, publicly available set of mocks tailored for Quaia analyses, combining efficient LPT generation with a detailed Eulerian bias model to incorporate both structure formation and systematics. The public release of the 100 catalogs is a clear strength that supports reproducibility and community use in large-scale structure studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [bias calibration and application section] The transfer of Hicobian bias parameters (calibrated on Abacus N-body HOD mocks tuned to DESI EDR) to WebON LPT lightcone fields is central to the accuracy claim but lacks an isolated test. LPT is known to underpredict small-scale power and higher-order correlations relative to full N-body; if the hierarchical nonlocal terms compensate for Abacus-specific nonlinearities, they may be mis-calibrated on WebON. The validation on C_ℓ and w(θ) occurs only after injecting angular selection, n(z), and redshift errors, which can mask residual mismatches (see abstract and the bias application section).
  2. [validation section] The abstract states 'excellent agreement' on angular power spectra and covariances, but without quantitative error metrics or pre-injection comparisons to an N-body reference at fixed cosmology, it is difficult to assess whether the summary statistics fully support the central claim of faithful large-scale structure reproduction.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact number and range of free parameters in the Hicobian model and how they are optimized (e.g., which summary statistics are used in the fit to Abacus mocks).
  2. Ensure all figures showing C_ℓ and w(θ) include error bars or shaded regions from the mock ensemble to allow direct visual assessment of agreement with Quaia.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on our methodology while indicating revisions to strengthen the presentation of the bias calibration and validation results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [bias calibration and application section] The transfer of Hicobian bias parameters (calibrated on Abacus N-body HOD mocks tuned to DESI EDR) to WebON LPT lightcone fields is central to the accuracy claim but lacks an isolated test. LPT is known to underpredict small-scale power and higher-order correlations relative to full N-body; if the hierarchical nonlocal terms compensate for Abacus-specific nonlinearities, they may be mis-calibrated on WebON. The validation on C_ℓ and w(θ) occurs only after injecting angular selection, n(z), and redshift errors, which can mask residual mismatches (see abstract and the bias application section).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit isolated test of the bias model transfer would provide additional reassurance. The Hicobian hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias is formulated as an Eulerian prescription that incorporates higher-order and nonlocal terms precisely to capture clustering beyond the linear regime when applied to approximate density fields such as those from ALPT. The parameters were determined by matching the Abacus HOD mocks, which were themselves calibrated to DESI EDR clustering in real and redshift space. Because the subsequent validation demonstrates that the full pipeline (including observational effects) reproduces the Quaia summary statistics, we view the end-to-end agreement as the primary validation for the intended use of the mocks. Nevertheless, to address the concern directly, we will expand the bias application section with a new figure and accompanying text showing the angular power spectrum of the biased LPT fields prior to injection of selection and redshift errors, compared against the corresponding Abacus-based fields at the same cosmology. This will quantify any residual differences attributable to the underlying gravity solver. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [validation section] The abstract states 'excellent agreement' on angular power spectra and covariances, but without quantitative error metrics or pre-injection comparisons to an N-body reference at fixed cosmology, it is difficult to assess whether the summary statistics fully support the central claim of faithful large-scale structure reproduction.

    Authors: We accept that the phrase 'excellent agreement' would benefit from quantitative support. In the revised manuscript we will replace the qualitative statement in the abstract with explicit metrics, including the reduced chi-squared per degree of freedom for the angular power spectra (both auto- and cross-spectra) and the two-point correlation functions when comparing the mocks to Quaia. We will also report the fractional residuals and their rms values across the relevant multipole and angular-scale ranges. With respect to pre-injection comparisons against full N-body at fixed cosmology, our primary objective is to generate mocks that faithfully reproduce the observed Quaia catalog after all selection and error effects are applied; the LPT-based approach was chosen for computational efficiency to produce 100 full-sky realizations. A dedicated fixed-cosmology N-body benchmark is not part of the present study, but the added pre-injection power-spectrum comparison noted above will provide a direct check on the bias-model performance on the LPT fields themselves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation uses independent external dataset

full rationale

The derivation chain generates DM fields via WebON LPT, applies Hicobian bias whose free parameters are calibrated on Abacus HOD mocks tuned to DESI EDR (an external survey), injects Quaia-specific observational effects, and validates summary statistics directly against the Quaia catalog. Since calibration data (DESI) and validation data (Quaia) are distinct and the LPT lightcone is generated independently, the reported agreement is a transfer test rather than a quantity forced by construction or self-definition. No self-citation load-bearing step, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggled reduction appears in the abstract or described pipeline; the central claim retains independent content against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of a bias model calibrated on one set of mocks to another simulation framework, plus standard assumptions in perturbation theory and observational modeling.

free parameters (1)
  • free parameters of the Hicobian bias model
    Calibrated on Abacus quasar HOD mock catalogs tuned to DESI Early Data Release observations in real and redshift space.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory on the lightcone accurately captures the dark matter field evolution relevant for quasar bias modeling up to z~4.
    Invoked when generating the underlying dark matter fields with the WebON code.
  • domain assumption The hierarchical nonlocal nonlinear bias scheme (Hicobian) provides a sufficient description of quasar clustering from dark matter.
    Central modeling choice for mapping dark matter to quasars.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1552 out tokens · 45426 ms · 2026-05-18T15:50:59.404634+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tracing the high-z cosmic web with Quaia: catalogues of voids and clusters in the quasar distribution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Using 708,483 quasars at 0.8<z<2.2 from Quaia, the authors identify 12,842 voids and 41,111 clusters whose radii, densities and profiles agree with 50 mock catalogues to within 5-10%, with no ultra-large structures ex...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein et al.,The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013,arXiv e-prints(2013) arXiv:1308.0847 [1308.0847]

  2. [2]

    Amendolaet al., Living Rev

    L. Amendola, S. Appleby, A. Avgoustidis, D. Bacon, T. Baker, M. Baldi et al.,Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,Living Reviews in Relativity21(2018) 2 [1606.00180]

  3. [3]

    J-PAS: The Javalambre-Physics of the Accelerated Universe Astrophysical Survey

    N. Benitez, R. Dupke, M. Moles, L. Sodre, J. Cenarro, A. Marin-Franch et al.,J-PAS: The Javalambre-Physics of the Accelerated Universe Astrophysical Survey,arXiv e-prints(2014) arXiv:1403.5237 [1403.5237]

  4. [4]

    4MOST Consortium Survey 8: Cosmology Redshift Survey (CRS)

    J. Richard, J.P. Kneib, C. Blake, A. Raichoor, J. Comparat, T. Shanks et al.,4MOST Consortium Survey 8: Cosmology Redshift Survey (CRS),The Messenger175(2019) 50 [1903.02474]

  5. [5]

    Y. Wang, Z. Zhai, A. Alavi, E. Massara, A. Pisani, A. Benson et al.,The High Latitude Spectroscopic Survey on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, ApJ928(2022) 1 [2110.01829]

  6. [6]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Ž. Ivezić, S.M. Kahn, J.A. Tyson, B. Abel, E. Acosta, R. Allsman et al.,LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products, ApJ873(2019) 111 [0805.2366]

  7. [7]

    The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration,The Dark Energy Survey,arXiv e-prints(2005) astro [astro-ph/0510346]

  8. [8]

    The clustering of intermediate redshift quasars as measured by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey

    M. White, A.D. Myers, N.P. Ross, D.J. Schlegel, J.F. Hennawi, Y. Shen et al.,The clustering of intermediate-redshift quasars as measured by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, MNRAS424(2012) 933 [1203.5306]. – 16 –

  9. [9]

    H. Song, C. Park, H. Lietzen and M. Einasto,Quasars as a Tracer of Large-scale Structures in the Distant Universe, ApJ827(2016) 104 [1606.06307]

  10. [10]

    DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering from Galaxies and Quasars

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering from Galaxies and Quasars,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2411.12021 [2411.12021]

  11. [11]

    Richarte, F

    M.G. Richarte, F. Toscano, D.G. Lambas, H.E. Luparello, L. Filipe Guimarães and J.C. Fabris, Quasar Pairs as Large–Scale Structure tracers,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.01251 [2504.01251]

  12. [12]

    Neyman and E.L

    J. Neyman and E.L. Scott,A Theory of the Spatial Distribution of Galaxies., ApJ116(1952) 144

  13. [13]

    Peebles,The Nature of the Distribution of Galaxies, A&A32(1974) 197

    P.J.E. Peebles,The Nature of the Distribution of Galaxies, A&A32(1974) 197

  14. [14]

    The Nature of Galaxy Bias and Clustering

    A.J. Benson, S. Cole, C.S. Frenk, C.M. Baugh and C.G. Lacey,The nature of galaxy bias and clustering, MNRAS311(2000) 793 [astro-ph/9903343]

  15. [15]

    The Halo Occupation Distribution: Towards an Empirical Determination of the Relation Between Galaxies and Mass

    A.A. Berlind and D.H. Weinberg,The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass, ApJ575(2002) 587 [astro-ph/0109001]

  16. [16]

    Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies

    Z. Zheng, A.A. Berlind, D.H. Weinberg, A.J. Benson, C.M. Baugh, S. Cole et al.,Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies, ApJ 633(2005) 791 [astro-ph/0408564]

  17. [17]

    Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering

    Z. Zheng, A.L. Coil and I. Zehavi,Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering, ApJ667(2007) 760 [astro-ph/0703457]

  18. [18]

    Galaxy Assembly Bias: A Significant Source of Systematic Error in the Galaxy-Halo Relationship

    A.R. Zentner, A.P. Hearin and F.C. van den Bosch,Galaxy assembly bias: a significant source of systematic error in the galaxy-halo relationship, MNRAS443(2014) 3044 [1311.1818]

  19. [19]

    Introducing Decorated HODs: modeling assembly bias in the galaxy-halo connection

    A.P. Hearin, A.R. Zentner, F.C. van den Bosch, D. Campbell and E. Tollerud,Introducing decorated HODs: modelling assembly bias in the galaxy-halo connection, MNRAS460(2016) 2552 [1512.03050]

  20. [20]

    Rocher, V

    A. Rocher, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, E. Burtin and A. de Mattia,Halo occupation distribution of Emission Line Galaxies: fitting method with Gaussian processes, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023(2023) 033 [2302.07056]

  21. [21]

    Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity

    A. Vale and J.P. Ostriker,Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity, MNRAS353(2004) 189 [astro-ph/0402500]

  22. [22]

    Modeling Luminosity-Dependent Galaxy Clustering Through Cosmic Time

    C. Conroy, R.H. Wechsler and A.V. Kravtsov,Modeling Luminosity-dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time, ApJ647(2006) 201 [astro-ph/0512234]

  23. [23]

    A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting the Stellar Mass - Halo Mass Relation for 0<z<4

    P.S. Behroozi, C. Conroy and R.H. Wechsler,A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting the Stellar Mass-Halo Mass Relation for 0 < z < 4, ApJ717(2010) 379 [1001.0015]

  24. [24]

    Galaxies in LCDM with Halo Abundance Matching: luminosity-velocity relation, baryonic mass-velocity relation, velocity function and clustering

    S. Trujillo-Gomez, A. Klypin, J. Primack and A.J. Romanowsky,Galaxies inΛCDM with Halo Abundance Matching: Luminosity-Velocity Relation, Baryonic Mass-Velocity Relation, Velocity Function, and Clustering, ApJ742(2011) 16 [1005.1289]

  25. [25]

    The Connection between Galaxies and Dark Matter Structures in the Local Universe

    R.M. Reddick, R.H. Wechsler, J.L. Tinker and P.S. Behroozi,The Connection between Galaxies and Dark Matter Structures in the Local Universe, ApJ771(2013) 30 [1207.2160]

  26. [26]

    Contreras, R.E

    S. Contreras, R.E. Angulo and M. Zennaro,A flexible subhalo abundance matching model for galaxy clustering in redshift space, MNRAS508(2021) 175 [2012.06596]

  27. [27]

    Favole, A.D

    G. Favole, A.D. Montero-Dorta, M.C. Artale, S. Contreras, I. Zehavi and X. Xu,Subhalo abundance matching through the lens of a hydrodynamical simulation, MNRAS509(2022) 1614 [2101.10733]. – 17 –

  28. [28]

    DeRose, M.R

    J. DeRose, M.R. Becker and R.H. Wechsler,Modeling Redshift-space Clustering with Abundance Matching, ApJ940(2022) 13 [2105.12104]

  29. [29]

    PINOCCHIO: pinpointing orbit-crossing collapsed hierarchical objects in a linear density field

    P. Monaco, T. Theuns and G. Taffoni,The pinocchio algorithm: pinpointing orbit-crossing collapsed hierarchical objects in a linear density field, MNRAS331(2002) 587 [astro-ph/0109323]

  30. [30]

    Modelling Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Perturbation Theory and Stochastic Halo Biasing

    F.S. Kitaura, G. Yepes and F. Prada,Modelling baryon acoustic oscillations with perturbation theory and stochastic halo biasing., MNRAS439(2014) L21 [1307.3285]

  31. [31]

    HALOGEN: A tool for fast generation of mock halo catalogues

    S. Avila, S.G. Murray, A. Knebe, C. Power, A.S.G. Robotham and J. Garcia-Bellido, HALOGEN: a tool for fast generation of mock halo catalogues, MNRAS450(2015) 1856 [1412.5228]

  32. [32]

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release

    F.-S. Kitaura, S. Rodríguez-Torres, C.-H. Chuang, C. Zhao, F. Prada, H. Gil-Marín et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release, MNRAS456(2016) 4156 [1509.06400]

  33. [33]

    EZmocks: extending the Zel'dovich approximation to generate mock galaxy catalogues with accurate clustering statistics

    C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, F. Prada, C. Zhao and G. Yepes,EZmocks: extending the Zel’dovich approximation to generate mock galaxy catalogues with accurate clustering statistics, MNRAS446(2015) 2621 [1409.1124]

  34. [34]

    BAM: Bias Assignment Method to generate mock catalogs

    A. Balaguera-Antolínez, F.-S. Kitaura, M. Pellejero-Ibáñez, C. Zhao and T. Abel,BAM: bias assignment method to generate mock catalogues, MNRAS483(2019) L58 [1806.05870]

  35. [35]

    Balaguera-Antolínez, F.-S

    A. Balaguera-Antolínez, F.-S. Kitaura, M. Pellejero-Ibáñez, M. Lippich, C. Zhao, A.G. Sánchez et al.,One simulation to have them all: performance of the Bias Assignment Method against N-body simulations, MNRAS491(2020) 2565 [1906.06109]

  36. [36]

    Zhao, C.-H

    C. Zhao, C.-H. Chuang, J. Bautista, A. de Mattia, A. Raichoor, A.J. Ross et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: 1000 multi-tracer mock catalogues with redshift evolution and systematics for galaxies and quasars of the final data release, MNRAS503(2021) 1149 [2007.08997]

  37. [37]

    Coloma-Nadal, F.S

    J.M. Coloma-Nadal, F.S. Kitaura, J.E. García-Farieta, F. Sinigaglia, G. Favole and D. Forero Sánchez,The Hierarchical Cosmic Web and Assembly Bias,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2403.19337 [2403.19337]

  38. [38]

    Storey-Fisher, D.W

    K. Storey-Fisher, D.W. Hogg, H.-W. Rix, A.-C. Eilers, G. Fabbian, M.R. Blanton et al.,Quaia, the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog: An All-sky Spectroscopic Quasar Sample, ApJ964(2024) 69 [2306.17749]

  39. [39]

    Delchambre, C.A.L

    L. Delchambre, C.A.L. Bailer-Jones, I. Bellas-Velidis, R. Drimmel, D. Garabato, R. Carballo et al.,Gaia Data Release 3. Apsis. III. Non-stellar content and source classification, A&A674 (2023) A31 [2206.06710]

  40. [40]

    Bailer-Jones, D

    Gaia Collaboration, C.A.L. Bailer-Jones, D. Teyssier, L. Delchambre, C. Ducourant, D. Garabato et al.,Gaia Data Release 3. The extragalactic content, A&A674(2023) A41 [2206.05681]

  41. [41]

    Vallenari, A.G.A

    Gaia Collaboration, A. Vallenari, A.G.A. Brown, T. Prusti, J.H.J. de Bruijne, F. Arenou et al., Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties, A&A674(2023) A1 [2208.00211]

  42. [42]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    E.L. Wright, P.R.M. Eisenhardt, A.K. Mainzer, M.E. Ressler, R.M. Cutri, T. Jarrett et al., The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance, AJ140(2010) 1868 [1008.0031]

  43. [43]

    unWISE: unblurred coadds of the WISE imaging

    D. Lang,unWISE: Unblurred Coadds of the WISE Imaging, AJ147(2014) 108 [1405.0308]

  44. [44]

    Hockney and J.W

    R.W. Hockney and J.W. Eastwood,Computer Simulation Using Particles(1981). – 18 –

  45. [45]

    T. Abel, O. Hahn and R. Kaehler,Tracing the dark matter sheet in phase space, MNRAS427 (2012) 61 [1111.3944]

  46. [46]

    Cosmological Structure Formation with Augmented Lagrangian Perturbation Theory

    F.S. Kitaura and S. Hess,Cosmological structure formation with augmented lagrangian perturbation theory., MNRAS435(2013) L78 [1212.3514]

  47. [47]

    Kitaura, F

    F.S. Kitaura, F. Sinigaglia, A. Balaguera-Antolínez and G. Favole,The Cosmic Web from Perturbation Theory,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2301.03648 [2301.03648]

  48. [48]

    The Nonlinear Evolution of Rare Events

    F. Bernardeau,The Nonlinear Evolution of Rare Events, ApJ427(1994) 51 [astro-ph/9311066]

  49. [49]

    Reconstruction of primordial density fields

    R. Mohayaee, H. Mathis, S. Colombi and J. Silk,Reconstruction of primordial density fields, MNRAS365(2006) 939 [astro-ph/0501217]

  50. [50]

    One simulation to fit them all - changing the background parameters of a cosmological N-body simulation

    R.E. Angulo and S.D.M. White,One simulation to fit them all - changing the background parameters of a cosmological N-body simulation, MNRAS405(2010) 143 [0912.4277]

  51. [51]

    Maksimova, L.H

    N.A. Maksimova, L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and T.P. Satterthwaite,ABACUSSUMMIT: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations, MNRAS508(2021) 4017 [2110.11398]

  52. [52]

    A High-Fidelity Realization of the Euclid Code Comparison $N$-body Simulation with Abacus

    L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein and P.A. Pinto,A high-fidelity realization of the Euclid code comparison N-body simulation with ABACUS, MNRAS485(2019) 3370 [1810.02916]

  53. [53]

    Garrison, D.J

    L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, D. Ferrer, N.A. Maksimova and P.A. Pinto,The ABACUS cosmological N-body code, MNRAS508(2021) 575 [2110.11392]

  54. [54]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  55. [55]

    S. Yuan, H. Zhang, A.J. Ross, J. Donald-McCann, B. Hadzhiyska, R.H. Wechsler et al.,The DESI one-per cent survey: exploring the halo occupation distribution of luminous red galaxies and quasi-stellar objects with ABACUSSUMMIT, MNRAS530(2024) 947 [2306.06314]

  56. [56]

    Yuan, L.H

    S. Yuan, L.H. Garrison, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and D.J. Eisenstein,ABACUSHOD: a highly efficient extended multitracer HOD framework and its application to BOSS and eBOSS data, MNRAS510(2022) 3301 [2110.11412]

  57. [57]

    O. Hahn, C. Porciani, C.M. Carollo and A. Dekel,Properties of dark matter haloes in clusters, filaments, sheets and voids,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society375(2007) 489

  58. [58]

    Heavens and J

    A. Heavens and J. Peacock,Tidal torques and local density maxima,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society232(1988) 339 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/232/2/339/3316537/mnras232-0339.pdf]

  59. [59]

    McDonald and A

    P. McDonald and A. Roy,Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2009(2009) 020

  60. [60]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, A. Balaguera-Antolínez, K. Nagamine, M. Ata, I. Shimizu et al., The bias from hydrodynamic simulations: Mapping baryon physics onto dark matter fields,The Astrophysical Journal921(2021) 66

  61. [61]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, A. Balaguera-Antolínez, I. Shimizu, K. Nagamine, M. Sánchez-Benavente et al.,Mapping the Three-dimensional LyαForest Large-scale Structure in Real and Redshift Space, ApJ927(2022) 230 [2107.07917]

  62. [62]

    Kitaura, A

    F.S. Kitaura, A. Balaguera-Antolínez, F. Sinigaglia and M. Pellejero-Ibáñez,The cosmic web connection to the dark matter halo distribution through gravity, MNRAS512(2022) 2245 [2005.11598]

  63. [63]

    Werner and C

    K.F. Werner and C. Porciani,Renormalization of linear halo bias in N-body simulations, MNRAS492(2020) 1614 [1907.03774]. – 19 –

  64. [64]

    Accurate halo-galaxy mocks from automatic bias estimation and particle mesh gravity solvers

    M. Vakili, F.-S. Kitaura, Y. Feng, G. Yepes, C. Zhao, C.-H. Chuang et al.,Accurate halo-galaxy mocks from automatic bias estimation and particle mesh gravity solvers, MNRAS472(2017) 4144 [1701.03765]

  65. [65]

    Pellejero-Ibañez, A

    M. Pellejero-Ibañez, A. Balaguera-Antolínez, F.-S. Kitaura, R.E. Angulo, G. Yepes, C.-H. Chuang et al.,The bias of dark matter tracers: assessing the accuracy of mapping techniques, MNRAS493(2020) 586 [1910.13164]

  66. [66]

    Forero Sánchez, F.S

    D. Forero Sánchez, F.S. Kitaura, F. Sinigaglia, J.M. Coloma-Nadal and J.P. Kneib, CosmoMIA: cosmic web-based redshift space halo distribution, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2024(2024) 001 [2402.17581]

  67. [67]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

  68. [68]

    Multiscale Inference of Matter Fields and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Ly-alpha Forest

    F.-S. Kitaura, S. Gallerani and A. Ferrara,Multiscale inference of matter fields and baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyαforest, MNRAS420(2012) 61 [1011.6233]

  69. [69]

    Cosmic Structure and Dynamics of the Local Universe

    F.-S. Kitaura, P. Erdoˇ gdu, S.E. Nuza, A. Khalatyan, R.E. Angulo, Y. Hoffman et al.,Cosmic structure and dynamics of the local Universe, MNRAS427(2012) L35 [1205.5560]

  70. [70]

    Simulating Structure Formation of the Local Universe

    S. Heß, F.-S. Kitaura and S. Gottlöber,Simulating structure formation of the Local Universe, MNRAS435(2013) 2065 [1304.6565]

  71. [71]

    Bayesian redshift-space distortions correction from galaxy redshift surveys

    F.-S. Kitaura, M. Ata, R.E. Angulo, C.-H. Chuang, S. Rodríguez-Torres, C.H. Monteagudo et al.,Bayesian redshift-space distortions correction from galaxy redshift surveys, MNRAS457 (2016) L113 [1507.08724]

  72. [72]

    Bayesian cosmic density field inference from redshift space dark matter maps

    E.G.P. Bos, F.-S. Kitaura and R. van de Weygaert,Bayesian cosmic density field inference from redshift space dark matter maps, MNRAS488(2019) 2573 [1810.05189]

  73. [73]

    Sinigaglia, F.S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.S. Kitaura, K. Nagamine, Y. Oku and A. Balaguera-Antolínez,Field-level Lyman-αforest modeling in redshift space via augmented nonlocal Fluctuating Gunn-Peterson Approximation, A&A682(2024) A21 [2305.10428]

  74. [74]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, K. Nagamine and Y. Oku,The negative BAO shift in the Lyα forest from cosmological simulations,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2407.03918 [2407.03918]

  75. [75]

    Sinha and L.H

    M. Sinha and L.H. Garrison,CORRFUNC - a suite of blazing fast correlation functions on the CPU, MNRAS491(2020) 3022 [1911.03545]

  76. [76]

    A unified pseudo-$C_\ell$ framework

    D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration,A unified pseudo-Cℓ framework, MNRAS484(2019) 4127 [1809.09603]. – 20 –