pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07390 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-08 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Heterotic Footprints in Classical Gravity: PM dynamics from On-Shell soft amplitudes at one loop

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords Einstein-Maxwell-DilatonPost-Minkowskiansoft amplitudeseikonalblack hole scatteringinfrared finiteconservative potential
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

One-loop soft amplitudes extract the conservative two-body dynamics of charged black holes in EMD theory after IR subtraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that the classical conservative scattering of charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton theory can be obtained by expanding one-loop amplitudes in the soft regime. It shows that these amplitudes are infrared finite when long-range interactions are treated with the Lippmann-Schwinger equation and IR subtraction. The scattering angle is derived from the eikonal exponentiation of the resulting amplitude. The approach separates the contributions from electromagnetic and dilatonic charges and recovers the general relativity results when those are turned off. This offers an amplitude-based method to study dynamics in modified gravity theories.

Core claim

We study classical scattering of charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton theory. Working in the classical Post-Minkowskian regime, we extract the conservative two-body potential by expanding the one loop amplitudes in the soft regime. We show explicitly that the relevant soft amplitudes are infrared finite once the long-range interactions are consistently treated via Lippmann-Schwinger equation and the associated IR subtraction. The scattering angle is then obtained from the eikonal exponentiation of the soft amplitude. Our results track the separate roles of electromagnetic and dilatonic charges in both the conservative dynamics and the eikonal phase, and they reduce smoothly to the

What carries the argument

The soft expansion of one-loop amplitudes with Lippmann-Schwinger IR subtraction, which allows extraction of the conservative potential from on-shell data.

If this is right

  • The scattering angle follows from eikonal exponentiation of the IR finite soft amplitude.
  • Separate contributions of electromagnetic and dilatonic charges appear in the dynamics and phase.
  • Results agree with prior calculations in the literature.
  • These serve as building blocks for waveform modeling in beyond-GR scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method may extend to higher post-Minkowskian orders or other scalar-tensor theories.
  • The dilaton's role here hints at possible classical limits of heterotic string compactifications.
  • Amplitude techniques like this could inform numerical simulations of binary systems in alternative gravities.

Load-bearing premise

That the one-loop soft amplitudes capture the full classical conservative dynamics without needing further subtractions for radiation or higher loops.

What would settle it

Calculating the two-body scattering angle independently from the classical EMD equations of motion at one-loop PM order and finding a mismatch with the amplitude-derived result.

read the original abstract

We study classical scattering of charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) theory. Working in the classical (Post-Minkowskian) regime, we extract the conservative two-body potential by expanding the one loop amplitudes in the soft regime. We show explicitly that, as in GR, the relevant soft amplitudes are infrared (IR) finite once the long-range interactions are consistently treated via Lippmann-Schwinger equation and the associated IR subtraction. The scattering angle is then obtained from the eikonal exponentiation of the soft amplitude. Our results track the separate roles of electromagnetic and dilatonic charges in both the conservative dynamics and the eikonal phase, and they reduce smoothly to the GR limit when the charges and dilaton coupling are switched off. Where applicable, we compare with existing results in the literature and find agreement. These findings provide amplitude-based benchmarks for compact-object dynamics in EMD and furnish building blocks for waveform modeling in beyond-GR scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the conservative Post-Minkowskian two-body dynamics of charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton theory by expanding one-loop on-shell amplitudes in the soft regime. It shows that the relevant soft amplitudes become infrared finite after consistent treatment of long-range interactions via the Lippmann-Schwinger equation and associated subtraction, then extracts the scattering angle through eikonal exponentiation. Separate contributions from electromagnetic and dilatonic charges are tracked, the results reduce to the GR limit when charges vanish, and comparisons with existing literature are reported where possible.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies amplitude-derived benchmarks for classical conservative dynamics in EMD theory, extending standard PM methods to include dilatonic and electromagnetic effects. This is useful for waveform modeling in beyond-GR scenarios and for isolating heterotic-inspired footprints in classical gravity. The explicit IR handling and charge separation constitute concrete strengths that align with existing eikonal and Lippmann-Schwinger techniques.

major comments (1)
  1. The claim that the soft expansion of the one-loop amplitude fully captures the conservative dynamics (without radiation contamination) is load-bearing for the final scattering angle. An explicit demonstration that higher-order or radiation-reaction terms do not enter at the considered order would strengthen the result; this is not immediately visible from the abstract-level argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation distinguishing the soft limit from the classical limit could be made more uniform across sections to aid readability.
  2. A short table summarizing the separate EM and dilaton contributions to the eikonal phase at each order would help readers track the results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of the work's utility for beyond-GR waveform modeling and the strengths noted in IR handling and charge separation. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The claim that the soft expansion of the one-loop amplitude fully captures the conservative dynamics (without radiation contamination) is load-bearing for the final scattering angle. An explicit demonstration that higher-order or radiation-reaction terms do not enter at the considered order would strengthen the result; this is not immediately visible from the abstract-level argument.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit clarification would strengthen the manuscript. The conservative dynamics are isolated because the real part of the eikonal phase extracted from the soft one-loop amplitude encodes the conservative potential, while radiation-reaction contributions (arising from energy loss) are either encoded in the imaginary part or enter only at higher orders in the PM expansion, as is standard in the GR literature and extends directly to EMD by the separate tracking of electromagnetic and dilatonic charges. To address the referee's point, we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) providing this order-counting argument and referencing the relevant separation in the eikonal and Lippmann-Schwinger framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on established external methods

full rationale

The paper extracts conservative two-body dynamics from one-loop soft amplitudes in EMD theory by applying Lippmann-Schwinger IR subtraction (standard for long-range interactions) followed by eikonal exponentiation to obtain the scattering angle. These techniques are invoked as in GR, with explicit reduction to the GR limit when charges vanish and direct comparisons to existing literature results showing agreement. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the paper's own fitted parameters, self-definitions, or unverified self-citations; the soft-regime focus and separate tracking of EM/dilaton roles remain independent of the target observables. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks in PM amplitude methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of quantum field theory and gravitational scattering amplitudes; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Validity of the eikonal approximation to extract classical scattering angles from quantum amplitudes
    Invoked to obtain the scattering angle from the soft amplitude.
  • standard math Standard infrared subtraction procedure using the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for long-range forces in gauge and gravity theories
    Used to establish IR finiteness of the soft amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5718 in / 1157 out tokens · 41910 ms · 2026-05-18T09:15:10.592581+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We study classical scattering of charged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton (EMD) theory. Working in the classical (Post-Minkowskian) regime, we extract the conservative two-body potential by expanding the one loop amplitudes in the soft regime... The scattering angle is then obtained from the eikonal exponentiation of the soft amplitude.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat recovery unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    After performing the appropriate EFT (Born) subtraction of long-range iterations, the momentum-space potential is infrared finite.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 147 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground- based detectors,

    M. P¨ urrer and C.-J. Haster,Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020), no. 2, 023151 [1912.10055]

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s Equations, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Photons and Gravitons in Perturbation Theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s Equations, Phys. Rev.138(May, 1965) B988–B1002

  3. [3]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese,Tensor multiscalar theories of gravitation, Class. Quant. Grav.9(1992) 2093–2176

  4. [4]

    Tensor-multi-scalar theories: relativistic stars and 3+1 decomposition

    M. Horbatsch, H. O. Silva, D. Gerosa, P. Pani, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri and U. Sperhake, Tensor-multi-scalar theories: relativistic stars and 3 + 1 decomposition, Class. Quant. Grav. 32(2015), no. 20, 204001 [1505.07462]

  5. [5]

    Sch¨ on and D

    O. Sch¨ on and D. D. Doneva,Tensor-multiscalar gravity: Equations of motion to 2.5 post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 6, 064034 [2112.07388]

  6. [6]

    Tensor-multi-scalar theories from multidimensional cosmology

    M. Rainer and A. Zhuk,Tensor - multi - scalar theories from multidimensional cosmology, Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6186–6192 [gr-qc/9608020]

  7. [7]

    Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most general scalar-tensor theories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most general scalar-tensor theories and their applications to extended Galileon dark energy models, JCAP 02(2012) 007 [1110.3878]

  8. [8]

    Alviani, A

    E. Alviani, A. Falkowski and P. Marinellis,UV completions of scalar-tensor EFTs, 2507.11426

  9. [9]

    S. F. Hassan and A. Sen,Twisting classical solutions in heterotic string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 375(1992) 103–118 [hep-th/9109038]

  10. [10]

    Gibbons and K

    G. Gibbons and K. ichi Maeda,Black holes and membranes in higher-dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nuclear Physics B298(1988), no. 4, 741–775

  11. [11]

    Garfinkle, G

    D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger,Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3140 [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 45, 3888 (1992)]

  12. [12]

    Rotating Charged Black Hole Solution in Heterotic String Theory

    A. Sen,Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 1006–1009 [hep-th/9204046]

  13. [13]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet,Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries, Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2 [1310.1528]

  14. [14]

    Sch¨ afer and P

    G. Sch¨ afer and P. Jaranowski,Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity and post-Newtonian dynamics of compact binaries, Living Rev. Rel.21(2018), no. 1, 7 [1805.07240]

  15. [15]

    Futamase and Y

    T. Futamase and Y. Itoh,The Post-Newtonian Approximation for Relativistic Compact Binaries, Living Reviews in Relativity10(2007), no. 1, 2

  16. [16]

    M. E. Pati and C. M. Will,PostNewtonian gravitational radiation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations. 1. Foundations, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 124015 [gr-qc/0007087]

  17. [17]

    Gravitational-Radiation Damping of Compact Binary Systems to Second Post-Newtonian order

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, C. M. Will and A. G. Wiseman,Gravitational radiation damping of compact binary systems to second postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 3515–3518 [gr-qc/9501027]. – 30 –

  18. [18]

    Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 post-Newtonian order

    H. Tagoshi, A. Ohashi and B. J. Owen,Gravitational field and equations of motion of spinning compact binaries to 2.5 postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 044006 [gr-qc/0010014]

  19. [19]

    Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries completed at the third post-Newtonian order

    L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese and B. R. Iyer,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact binaries completed at the third post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 091101 [gr-qc/0406012]

  20. [20]

    G. Faye, L. Blanchet and A. Buonanno,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. I. Equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 104033 [gr-qc/0605139]

  21. [21]

    Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries II. Radiation field

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno and G. Faye,Higher-order spin effects in the dynamics of compact binaries. II. Radiation field, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 104034 [gr-qc/0605140], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 049903 (2007), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 089901 (2010)]

  22. [22]

    Equivalence between the ADM-Hamiltonian and the harmonic-coordinates approaches to the third post-Newtonian dynamics of compact binaries

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski and G. Schaefer,Equivalence between the ADM-Hamiltonian and the harmonic coordinates approaches to the third postNewtonian dynamics of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 044021 [gr-qc/0010040], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 66, 029901 (2002)]

  23. [23]

    New derivation of a third post-Newtonian equation of motion for relativistic compact binaries without ambiguity

    Y. Itoh and T. Futamase,New derivation of a third postNewtonian equation of motion for relativistic compact binaries without ambiguity, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 121501 [gr-qc/0310028]

  24. [24]

    Gravitational-Wave Inspiral of Compact Binary Systems to 7/2 Post-Newtonian Order

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, B. R. Iyer and B. Joguet,Gravitational wave inspiral of compact binary systems to 7/2 postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 061501 [gr-qc/0105099], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 71, 129902 (2005)]

  25. [25]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini,Gravitational Wave Flux and Quadrupole Modes from Quasi-Circular Non-Spinning Compact Binaries to the Fourth Post-Newtonian Order,2304.11186

  26. [26]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini,Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Compact Binary Systems to the Fourth-and-a-Half post-Newtonian Order,2304.11185

  27. [27]

    B. M. Barker and R. F. O’Connell,Gravitational two-body problem with arbitrary masses, spins, and quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. D12(Jul, 1975) 329–335

  28. [28]

    L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will and A. G. Wiseman,Spin effects in the inspiral of coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D47(1993), no. 10, R4183–R4187 [gr-qc/9211025]

  29. [29]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto and Z. Yang,Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact objects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 10, L101501 [2201.05138]

  30. [30]

    The next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics in Hamiltonian form

    J. Steinhoff, S. Hergt and G. Schaefer,On the next-to-leading order gravitational spin(1)-spin(2) dynamics, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 081501 [0712.1716]

  31. [31]

    K. G. Arun, A. Buonanno, G. Faye and E. Ochsner,Higher-order spin effects in the amplitude and phase of gravitational waveforms emitted by inspiraling compact binaries: Ready-to-use gravitational waveforms, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 104023 [0810.5336], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 84, 049901 (2011)]

  32. [32]

    Henry, G

    Q. Henry, G. Faye and L. Blanchet,Tidal effects in the gravitational-wave phase evolution of compact binary systems to next-to-next-to-leading post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D102 – 31 – (2020), no. 4, 044033 [2005.13367], [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 089901 (2023), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 029901 (2025)]

  33. [33]

    Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in screened modified gravity

    X. Zhang, T. Liu and W. Zhao,Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in screened modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 10, 104027 [1702.08752]

  34. [34]

    Ma and N

    S. Ma and N. Yunes,Improved Constraints on Modified Gravity with Eccentric Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 12, 124032 [1908.07089]

  35. [35]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet and D. Trestini,Gravitational waves in scalar-tensor theory to one-and-a-half post-Newtonian order, JCAP08(2022), no. 08, 008 [2201.10924]

  36. [36]

    Chowdhuri and A

    A. Chowdhuri and A. Bhattacharyya,Study of eccentric binaries in Horndeski gravity, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 6, 064046 [2203.09917]

  37. [37]

    Higashino and S

    Y. Higashino and S. Tsujikawa,Inspiral gravitational waveforms from compact binary systems in Horndeski gravity, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 4, 044003 [2209.13749]

  38. [38]

    Angular momentum loss for eccentric compact binary in screened modified gravity

    X. Zhang, W. Zhao, T. Liu, K. Lin, C. Zhang, X. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Zhu and A. Wang, Angular momentum loss for eccentric compact binary in screened modified gravity, JCAP01 (2019) 019 [1811.00339]

  39. [39]

    Z. Li, J. Qiao, T. Liu, T. Zhu and W. Zhao,Gravitational waveform and polarization from binary black hole inspiral in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: from generation to propagation, JCAP04(2023) 006 [2211.12188]

  40. [40]

    Shiralilou, T

    B. Shiralilou, T. Hinderer, S. M. Nissanke, N. Ortiz and H. Witek,Post-Newtonian gravitational and scalar waves in scalar-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022), no. 3, 035002 [2105.13972]

  41. [41]

    Chowdhuri, A

    A. Chowdhuri, A. Bhattacharyya and S. Kumar,Prospects of detecting deviations to Kerr geometry with radiation reaction effects in EMRIs, JCAP04(2024) 001 [2311.05983]

  42. [42]

    Trestini, Gravitational waves from quasielliptic compact binaries in scalar-tensor theory to one-and-a-half post- Newtonian order, (2024), arXiv:2410.12898 [gr-qc]

    D. Trestini,Gravitational waves from quasielliptic compact binaries in scalar-tensor theory to one-and-a-half post-Newtonian order, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), no. 15, 155016 [2410.12898]

  43. [43]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

  44. [44]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross,Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124015 [0912.4254]

  45. [45]

    Non-Relativistic Gravitation: From Newton to Einstein and Back

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Non-Relativistic Gravitation: From Newton to Einstein and Back, Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 145011 [0712.4116]

  46. [46]

    W. D. Goldberger,Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation, inLes Houches Summer School - Session 86: Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Fabric of Spacetime. 1, 2007.hep-ph/0701129

  47. [47]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics, Phys. Rept.633 (2016) 1–104 [1601.04914]

  48. [48]

    Effective field theory methods to model compact binaries

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani,Effective field theory methods to model compact binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014), no. 4, 043001 [1309.3474]. – 32 –

  49. [49]

    I. Z. Rothstein,Progress in effective field theory approach to the binary inspiral problem, General Relativity and Gravitation46(2014), no. 6, 1726

  50. [50]

    Levi, Rep

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept. Prog. Phys.83(2020), no. 7, 075901 [1807.01699]

  51. [51]

    Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter

    A. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh and S. Pal,Worldline effective field theory of inspiralling black hole binaries in presence of dark photon and axionic dark matter, JHEP08(2023) 207 [2305.15473]

  52. [52]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    A. Bhattacharyya, S. Ghosh, N. Kumar, S. Kumar and S. Pal,Love beyond Einstein: Metric reconstruction and Love number in quadratic gravity using WEFT,2508.02785

  53. [53]

    Junker and G

    W. Junker and G. Sch¨ afer,Binary systems: higher order gravitational radiation damping and wave emission, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society254(1992) 146–164

  54. [54]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle,General relativistic celestial mechanics of binary systems. II. The post-newtonian timing formula, Annales De L Institut Henri Poincare-physique Theorique44 (1986) 263–292

  55. [55]

    Gravitational wave energy spectrum of hyperbolic encounters

    L. De Vittori, P. Jetzer and A. Klein,Gravitational wave energy spectrum of hyperbolic encounters, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 044017 [1207.5359]

  56. [56]

    Gravitational wave energy emission and detection rates of Primordial Black Hole hyperbolic encounters

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and S. Nesseris,Gravitational wave energy emission and detection rates of Primordial Black Hole hyperbolic encounters, Phys. Dark Univ.21(2018) 61–69 [1711.09702]

  57. [57]

    Gr¨ obner, P

    M. Gr¨ obner, P. Jetzer, M. Haney, S. Tiwari and W. Ishibashi,A note on the gravitational wave energy spectrum of parabolic and hyperbolic encounters, Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020), no. 6, 067002 [2001.05187]

  58. [58]

    Gravitational waves from binaries on unbound orbits

    J. Majar, P. Forgacs and M. Vasuth,Gravitational waves from binaries on unbound orbits, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 064041 [1009.5042]

  59. [59]

    Gravitational waves from spinning compact binaries in hyperbolic orbits

    L. De Vittori, A. Gopakumar, A. Gupta and P. Jetzer,Gravitational waves from spinning compact binaries in hyperbolic orbits, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 12, 124066 [1410.6311]

  60. [60]

    G. Cho, A. Gopakumar, M. Haney and H. M. Lee,Gravitational waves from compact binaries in post-Newtonian accurate hyperbolic orbits, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 2, 024039 [1807.02380]

  61. [61]

    C. P. L. Berry and J. R. Gair,Expectations for extreme-mass-ratio bursts from the Galactic Centre, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.435(2013) 3521–3540 [1307.7276]

  62. [62]

    Chowdhuri, R

    A. Chowdhuri, R. K. Singh, K. Kangsabanik and A. Bhattacharyya,Gravitational radiation from hyperbolic encounters in the presence of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 12, 124056 [2306.11787]

  63. [63]

    Caldarola, S

    M. Caldarola, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Nesseris and J. Garcia-Bellido,Effects of orbital precession on hyperbolic encounters, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 6, 064001 [2307.00915]

  64. [64]

    Usseglio, D

    D. Usseglio, D. Trestini and A. Chowdhuri,Quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries on hyperbolic orbits in scalar-tensor theories at second post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 4, 044048 [2504.13829]

  65. [65]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

    T. Damour,Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 10, 104015 [1609.00354]. – 33 –

  66. [66]

    Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 6, 064021 [1706.06877]

  67. [67]

    Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 10, 104038 [1709.00590]

  68. [68]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem, Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 4, 044038 [1710.10599]

  69. [69]

    Damour,Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys

    T. Damour,Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 2, 024060 [1912.02139]

  70. [70]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Scattering of tidally interacting bodies in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 4, 044039 [2001.00352]

  71. [71]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Laporta and P. Mastrolia,Gravitational dynamics at O(G6): perturbative gravitational scattering meets experimental mathematics,2008.09389

  72. [72]

    Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG, Phys

    T. Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 12, 124008 [2010.01641]

  73. [73]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, A. Geralico, S. Laporta and P. Mastrolia,Gravitational scattering at the seventh order inG: nonlocal contribution at the sixth post-Newtonian accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 103(2021), no. 4, 044038 [2012.12918]

  74. [74]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Radiative contributions to gravitational scattering, Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 8, 084031 [2107.08896]

  75. [75]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Radiated momentum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 2, 024012 [2210.07165]

  76. [76]

    Damour and P

    T. Damour and P. Rettegno,Strong-field scattering of two black holes: Numerical relativity meets post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 6, 064051 [2211.01399]

  77. [77]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour,Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at the second post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 12, 124049 [2211.06340]

  78. [78]

    Rettegno, G

    P. Rettegno, G. Pratten, L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt and T. Damour,Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerical relativity versus post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108(2023), no. 12, 124016 [2307.06999]

  79. [79]

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico,Comparing one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung amplitudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian waveform, Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 12, 124052 [2309.14925]

  80. [80]

    Brandhuber, J

    A. Brandhuber, J. Plefka and G. Travaglini,Chapter 1: Modern fundamentals of amplitudes, J. Phys. A55(2022), no. 44, 443002 [2203.13012]

Showing first 80 references.