Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2510.11686 v2 pith:CJZXT6KR submitted 2025-10-13 cs.LG cs.AI

Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords explorationmodelmodelspasspost-trainingbehaviorsdiversityefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) promises to expand the capabilities of language models, but it is unclear if current RL techniques promote the discovery of novel behaviors, or simply sharpen those already present in the base model. In this paper, we investigate the value of deliberate exploration -- explicitly incentivizing the model to discover novel and diverse behaviors -- and aim to understand how the knowledge in pre-trained models can guide this search. Our main finding is that exploration with a simple, principled, representation-based bonus derived from the pre-trained language model's hidden states significantly improves diversity and pass@k rates -- both for post-training, and in a novel inference-time scaling setting we introduce. For inference-time, exploration with representation-based diversity improves efficiency, consistently improving pass@k rates across a variety of models and reasoning tasks. For example, for Qwen-2.5-14b-Instruct we obtain over 50% improvement in verifier efficiency on almost all tasks. For post-training, we show that integrating this exploration strategy into an RL pipeline improves reasoning performance over that of the initial model and over standard RL post-training. For example, on AIME 2024, our post-trained Qwen-2.5-7b-Instruct's pass@80 matches the pass@256 of GRPO on the same model, demonstrating a 3x improvement in test-time sample efficiency. Overall, our findings suggest that deliberate exploration -- with the right notion of diversity -- is a practical path toward discovery of new behaviors beyond sharpening.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OrderGrad: Optimizing Beyond the Mean with Order-Statistic Policy Gradient Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OrderGrad supplies unbiased likelihood-ratio and reparameterization gradient estimators for finite-sample L-statistics by applying a rank-based reward transformation usable in standard policy-gradient updates.

  2. The tractability landscape of diffusion alignment: regularization, rewards, and computational primitives

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The choice of closeness measure in diffusion reward alignment determines the computational primitives and tractable reward classes, with linear exponential tilts sufficing for KL with convex rewards and proximal oracl...

  3. On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradients

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes MaxPO using a Leave-Two-Out baseline for centered unbiased advantages in max@K policy gradients, with a unified derivation of finite-batch estimators.

  4. Data-dependent Exploration for Online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DEPO uses historical data to build a data-dependent uncertainty bonus for exploration in online RLHF, yielding an adaptive regret bound and stronger empirical performance than baselines.

  5. Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PEPO uses pessimistic ensembling of DPO policies on data subsets to achieve single-policy concentrability sample bounds and avoid over-optimization in tabular settings.

  6. Data-dependent Exploration for Online Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DEPO constructs uncertainty bonuses from historical data for exploration in online RLHF and provides a data-dependent regret bound that adapts to task hardness.

  7. The Role of Generator Access in Autoregressive Post-Training

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Limited generator access in autoregressive post-training confines learners to root-start rollouts whose value is bounded by on-policy prefix probabilities, while weak prefix control unlocks richer observations and pro...

  8. Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PEPO is a single-step pessimistic ensemble algorithm for direct preference optimization that provably avoids over-optimization by depending only on single-policy concentrability without knowing the data distribution o...