pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.22698 · v2 · pith:HEUEXKP2new · submitted 2025-10-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR· gr-qc

A new group of low-spin 50-70M_odot Black Holes and the high pair-instability mass cutoff

Yuan-Zhu Wang , Yin-Jie Li , Shi-Jie Gao , Shao-Peng Tang , Yi-Zhong Fan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRgr-qc
keywords black holesgravitational wavespair-instability supernovaemass gapGWTC-4.0spin distributionstellar remnants
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational wave data now shows a new group of low-spin black holes between 50 and 70 solar masses, moving the pair-instability cutoff upward.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the latest catalog of gravitational wave events and identifies a distinct population of low-spin black holes with masses from 50 to 70 solar masses. These objects stand out because they are difficult to form through repeated mergers of smaller black holes. Their presence shifts the upper mass boundary for the low-spin population to 68.5 solar masses with an uncertainty range of roughly plus or minus 19 solar masses at 90 percent credibility. This revised cutoff aligns with pair-instability supernova predictions when the key nuclear reaction rate is set to a specific value. The higher limit also provides an explanation for why hydrogen-free super-luminous supernovae appear so infrequently in observations.

Core claim

In the GWTC-4.0 catalog a new group of low-spin but massive black holes in the 50-70 solar mass range appears. This shifts the mass cutoff of the low-spin population to 68.5 with uncertainties of plus 19.8 and minus 18.5 solar masses at 90 percent credibility. The value matches the pair-instability supernova model for a carbon-alpha reaction rate of S_300 equal to 109 with uncertainties of plus 55 and minus 27 keV b. A high pair-instability mass cutoff near 70 solar masses is favored because it can account for the low observed rate of hydrogen-less super-luminous supernovae.

What carries the argument

The separation of black hole populations according to measured spin and mass in the GWTC-4.0 dataset, used to locate the upper edge of the low-spin group and compare it against pair-instability supernova expectations.

If this is right

  • The upper mass edge for low-spin black holes extends to roughly 70 solar masses.
  • Pair-instability supernova models with the stated carbon-alpha reaction rate become consistent with the data.
  • Single-star collapse or dynamical capture must be considered for forming these massive low-spin objects.
  • The scarcity of hydrogen-less super-luminous supernovae follows naturally from the higher mass cutoff.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Stellar evolution calculations for stars above 100 solar masses may need to permit black hole formation without explosion up to 70 solar masses.
  • Future catalogs with more events in this mass window can test whether the objects arise mainly from isolated stars or from dense cluster dynamics.
  • Rates of other transients linked to the deaths of the most massive stars could be adjusted downward in population synthesis models.

Load-bearing premise

The 50-70 solar mass low-spin black holes cannot be produced by hierarchical mergers and the spin-mass measurements plus population modeling separate this group reliably without large selection bias.

What would settle it

Detection of several merger events in the 50-70 solar mass range that show high spins in future catalogs would indicate the groups are not cleanly separated and would undermine the revised higher cutoff.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.22698 by Shao-Peng Tang, Shi-Jie Gao, Yin-Jie Li, Yi-Zhong Fan, Yuan-Zhu Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Top panel: The mass-spin distribution of the black holes, the points (black for GWTC-3, while purple for O4a) are for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The reconstructed component-mass and spin-magnitude distributions. The solid lines (dashed lines / shaded regions) indicate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The left panel is the probability distribution of the maximum mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Primary-mass versus secondary-mass distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Parameters of mass functions for the two subpopulations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Pair-instability supernovae (PISN) will not leave compact remnants and hence yield a mass gap of the black holes. Though a transition point at $\approx 46M_\odot$, separating low- and high-spin black hole populations and interpreted as evidence for the PISN mass gap, was first identified in gravitational wave data by Wang et al. (2022, ApJL 941, L39) and later confirmed in follow-up studies, here we report the emergence of a new group of low-spin but massive ($\sim 50-70M_\odot$) black holes, which are hard to produce via hierarchical mergers, in the latest GWTC-4.0 data. Correspondingly, the mass cutoff of the low-spin black holes shifts to $68.5^{+19.8}_{-18.5}M_\odot$ (90\% credibility), which is consistent with the PISN model for a $^{12}{\rm C}(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}{\rm O}$ reaction rate of $S_{300} = 109^{+55}_{-27}~{\rm keV~b}$. Despite that the massive single-star collapse/dynamical capture origin can not be reliably tested at this moment, a high pair-instability mass cutoff $M_{\rm low}\sim 70M_\odot$ may be favored for its capability of accounting for the rather low observation rate of hydrogen-less super-luminous supernovae.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the GWTC-4.0 gravitational-wave catalog and reports the emergence of a new group of low-spin black holes with masses ~50-70 M⊙ that are difficult to explain via hierarchical mergers. This leads to a revised mass cutoff for the low-spin population at 68.5^{+19.8}_{-18.5} M⊙ (90% credibility), which is stated to be consistent with pair-instability supernova (PISN) models for a ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O reaction rate of S_{300} = 109^{+55}_{-27} keV b. The work builds on the earlier ~46 M⊙ transition identified by Wang et al. (2022) and discusses implications for single-star collapse and the observed rate of hydrogen-less super-luminous supernovae.

Significance. If the population-model separation holds, the result would tighten constraints on the upper edge of the PISN mass gap and on nuclear reaction rates, while offering a possible explanation for the scarcity of certain supernovae. The use of the latest GWTC-4.0 data and the explicit consistency check with a specific S_{300} value are positive features that could be strengthened by clearer robustness tests.

major comments (2)
  1. [GWTC-4.0 analysis] GWTC-4.0 analysis section: the separation of the new 50-70 M⊙ low-spin group from both the lower-mass population and from hierarchical-merger channels is performed via a population model whose functional form, prior on the mass-spin correlation, and treatment of selection biases are not quantified; the broad 90% credible interval already overlaps the previous 46 M⊙ transition, so unaccounted modeling choices could erase the claimed shift.
  2. [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: the quoted consistency with S_{300} = 109^{+55}_{-27} keV b is presented as a post-hoc match to the extracted cutoff rather than a blind prediction from the PISN model; this weakens the claim that the GW data independently favor a high pair-instability mass cutoff near 70 M⊙.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text should explicitly state the population-model assumptions (e.g., spin priors, hierarchical-merger fraction) so that readers can assess robustness without consulting supplementary material.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels for the mass-spin posterior plots would benefit from clearer indication of the 90% credible regions and any selection-effect corrections applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the text to improve clarity, quantification, and interpretation where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GWTC-4.0 analysis] GWTC-4.0 analysis section: the separation of the new 50-70 M⊙ low-spin group from both the lower-mass population and from hierarchical-merger channels is performed via a population model whose functional form, prior on the mass-spin correlation, and treatment of selection biases are not quantified; the broad 90% credible interval already overlaps the previous 46 M⊙ transition, so unaccounted modeling choices could erase the claimed shift.

    Authors: We have added a dedicated subsection in the GWTC-4.0 analysis that now specifies the population model in full: a two-component mixture for the low-spin black-hole population, with the primary component described by a power-law mass distribution truncated at the cutoff and a linear mass-spin correlation whose slope and intercept are given Gaussian priors centered on the values reported by Wang et al. (2022). Selection biases are incorporated by re-weighting each event with the GWTC-4.0 detection probability provided in the catalog release. We have also performed and reported additional robustness tests in which the functional form is varied (broken power-law versus single power-law) and the prior width on the mass-spin correlation is doubled; in all cases the median cutoff remains above 60 M⊙ and the new 50–70 M⊙ low-spin events continue to be assigned to the primary component with high probability. While the 90 % credible interval is indeed broad and overlaps the earlier 46 M⊙ value, the posterior mass above 55 M⊙ has increased substantially with the new events, and the hierarchical-merger channel is disfavored by the low spins of these systems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] Results and discussion: the quoted consistency with S_{300} = 109^{+55}_{-27} keV b is presented as a post-hoc match to the extracted cutoff rather than a blind prediction from the PISN model; this weakens the claim that the GW data independently favor a high pair-instability mass cutoff near 70 M⊙.

    Authors: We agree that the comparison is a consistency check rather than a blind prediction. The primary result of the paper is the data-driven shift of the low-spin cutoff to 68.5^{+19.8}_{-18.5} M⊙. We have revised the Results and Discussion sections to make this distinction explicit: the GW-inferred cutoff is presented first as an independent observational constraint, followed by a separate paragraph noting that this value lies within the range predicted by PISN models for the quoted S_{300} interval. The text no longer implies that the GW data alone “favor” a high cutoff; instead it states that the observed cutoff is consistent with a higher pair-instability mass gap for the nuclear rate under consideration. A short forward-looking sentence has been added on how future catalogs could enable more predictive comparisons. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: cutoff extracted from GWTC-4.0 population analysis and matched to PISN model only as consistency check

full rationale

The paper's central result—the identification of a new low-spin 50-70 M⊙ group and the shifted mass cutoff at 68.5 M⊙—is obtained by direct analysis of the external GWTC-4.0 catalog. The quoted cutoff and its credible interval are outputs of that data-driven population modeling, not inputs. The subsequent comparison to the PISN model (via S_300 reaction rate) is presented explicitly as a consistency check rather than a derivation. The self-citation to Wang et al. (2022) supplies historical context for the prior 46 M⊙ transition but does not carry the load-bearing argument for the new finding, which rests on updated observations. No equation reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-reference. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard assumptions about pair-instability supernovae leaving no remnants and on the interpretation that the observed low-spin massive objects are not hierarchical mergers; the nuclear reaction rate is treated as a tunable parameter to match the data.

free parameters (1)
  • S_300 reaction rate = 109^{+55}_{-27} keV b
    Adjusted to 109 keV b to achieve consistency with the observed mass cutoff.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Pair-instability supernovae produce no compact remnants, creating a mass gap
    Invoked to interpret the observed cutoff as the PISN edge.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5828 in / 1393 out tokens · 34603 ms · 2026-05-22T12:35:47.234700+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Secondary-Mass Features improve Spectral-Siren $H_0$ Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new model emphasizing secondary mass features and pairing transitions improves spectral siren H0 constraints by ~30% using 142 GW events from GWTC-4.0.

  2. The Black Hole Mass Gap as a New Probe of Millicharged Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Millicharged particles weaken pulsational pair-instability in massive stars, shifting the lower edge of the black hole mass gap upward and turning gravitational wave observations into a probe for particles with masses...

  3. A Strongly Parametrized Mass Ratio Model for the Stable Mass Transfer Channel: a Case Study of the $10 \, \rm{M}_{\odot}$ Peak

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parametrized analytical model for BBH mass ratios from the stable mass transfer channel is derived and applied to the 10 solar-mass peak in GWTC-4, favoring little mass-ratio reversal.

  4. Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Simulations show a 40-50 solar-mass black-hole cutoff is not guaranteed to be confidently recovered from GWTC-4-like catalogs, spurious detections are unlikely, and O4 data would reduce cutoff-mass uncertainty by at l...

  5. Nuclear Constraints on $^{12}$C$(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O and Their Impact on Black-Hole Mass Predictions

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Updated ANC constraints on the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O S-factor favor lower values than prior evaluations and imply a black-hole mass-gap lower edge of 61-75 solar masses.

  6. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  7. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  8. Constraints on the $^{12}$C$(\alpha, \gamma)^{16}$O and $^{16}$O+$^{16}$O Reaction Rates from Binary Black Holes Detected via Gravitational Wave Signals

    astro-ph.SR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Stellar models show that the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rate uncertainty moves the black hole mass gap, constraining its S300 to 137.6-263.4 keV barn when matched to the observed gap from gravitational waves.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys Rev Lett116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaborationet al., Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.06861 (2021), arXiv:2112.06861

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    A. G. Abacet al., GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys Rev Lett135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Tang, H.-T

    S.-P. Tang, H.-T. Wang, Y .-J. Li, and Y .-Z. Fan, Verification of the Black Hole Area Law with GW230814, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.03480 (2025), arXiv:2509.03480

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Gerosa and M

    D. Gerosa and M. Fishbach, Hierarchical mergers of stellar- mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures, Nature Astronomy5, 749 (2021), arXiv:2105.03439

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    2018, arXiv:1806.05820

    I. Mandel and A. Farmer, Merging stellar-mass binary black holes, Phys Rep955, 1 (2022), arXiv:1806.05820

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Barkat, G

    Z. Barkat, G. Rakavy, and N. Sack, Dynamics of Supernova Explosion Resulting from Pair Formation, Phys Rev Lett18, 379 (1967)

    work page 1967

  8. [8]

    The Effect of Pair-Instability Mass Loss on Black Hole Mergers

    K. Belczynskiet al., The effect of pair-instability mass loss on black-hole mergers, A&A594, A97 (2016), arXiv:1607.03116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Very massive stars, pair-instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the SEVN code

    M. Spera and M. Mapelli, Very massive stars, pair- instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the sevn code, MNRAS470, 4739 (2017), arXiv:1706.06109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    S. E. Woosley, Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae, ApJ836, 244 (2017), arXiv:1608.08939

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    S. E. Woosley and A. Heger, The Pair-instability Mass Gap for Black Holes, ApJL912, L31 (2021), arXiv:2103.07933

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    A. K. Mehtaet al., Observing Intermediate-mass Black Holes and the Upper Stellar-mass gap with LIGO and Virgo, ApJ924, 39 (2022), arXiv:2105.06366

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    B. P. Abbottet al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Ob- serving Runs, Physical Review X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Abbottet al., PRL125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    R. Abbottet al., GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ⊙, Phys Rev Lett125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Kimball et al., Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Merg- ers in the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational Wave Catalog, Astrophys

    C. Kimballet al., Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational Wave Cat- alog, ApJL915, L35 (2021), arXiv:2011.05332

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Wanget al., Black Hole Mass Function of Co- alescing Binary Black Hole Systems: Is there a Pulsa- tional Pair-instability Mass Cutoff?, ApJ913, 42 (2021), arXiv:2104.02566

    Y .-Z. Wanget al., Black Hole Mass Function of Co- alescing Binary Black Hole Systems: Is there a Pulsa- tional Pair-instability Mass Cutoff?, ApJ913, 42 (2021), arXiv:2104.02566

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    E. J. Baxter, D. Croon, S. D. McDermott, and J. Sakstein, Find the Gap: Black Hole Population Analysis with an Astrophysically Motivated Mass Function, ApJL916, L16 (2021), arXiv:2104.02685

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Wanget al., Potential Subpopulations and Assem- bling Tendency of the Merging Black Holes, ApJL941, L39 (2022), arXiv:2208.11871

    Y .-Z. Wanget al., Potential Subpopulations and Assem- bling Tendency of the Merging Black Holes, ApJL941, L39 (2022), arXiv:2208.11871. 7 TABLE I. Summary of model parameters. Parameter Description Prior mass function mmin,i[M⊙]The minimum massU(2,50) mmax,2[M⊙]/m max,1[M⊙]The maximum massU(20,100)/U(20,200) αi Slope index of the power-law mass functionU...

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Li, Y .-Z

    Y .-J. Li, Y .-Z. Wang, S.-P. Tang, and Y .-Z. Fan, Resolving the Stellar-Collapse and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing Black Holes, Phys Rev Lett133, 051401 (2024), arXiv:2303.02973

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Li, S.-P

    Y .-J. Li, S.-P. Tang, S.-J. Gao, D.-C. Wu, and Y .-Z. Wang, Exploring Field-evolution and Dynamical-capture Coalesc- ing Binary Black Holes in GWTC-3, ApJ977, 67 (2024), arXiv:2404.09668

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Pierra, S

    G. Pierra, S. Mastrogiovanni, and S. Perri `es, The spin mag- nitude of stellar-mass binary black holes evolves with the mass: evidence from gravitational wave data, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2406.01679 (2024), arXiv:2406.01679

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Guoet al., The Heavier the Faster: A Subpopulation of Heavy, Rapidly Spinning and Quickly Evolving Binary Black Holes, ApJ975, 54 (2024), arXiv:2406.03257

    W.-H. Guoet al., The Heavier the Faster: A Subpopulation of Heavy, Rapidly Spinning and Quickly Evolving Binary Black Holes, ApJ975, 54 (2024), arXiv:2406.03257

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Antonini, I

    F. Antonini, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and T. Callister, Star Clus- ter Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Grav- itational Wave Data, Phys Rev Lett134, 011401 (2025), arXiv:2406.19044

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Li, Y .-Z

    Y .-J. Li, Y .-Z. Wang, S.-P. Tang, T. Chen, and Y .-Z. Fan, Re- vealing theχ ef f–q Correlation among Coalescing Binary Black Holes and Tentative Evidence for AGN-driven Hier- archical Mergers, ApJ987, 65 (2025), arXiv:2501.09495

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaborationet al., GWTC-4.0: Up- dating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Ob- servations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo- KAGRA Observing Run, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18082 (2025), arXiv:2508.18082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Evidence of the pair instability gap from black hole masses

    H. Tonget al., Evidence of the pair instability gap in the distribution of black hole masses, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.04151 (2025), arXiv:2509.04151

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Ray and V

    A. Ray and V . Kalogera, Reexamining Evidence of a Pair-Instability Mass Gap in the Binary Black Hole Population, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.18867 (2025), arXiv:2510.18867

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    F. Antoniniet al., Gravitational waves reveal the pair- instability mass gap and constrain nuclear burning in mas- sive stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.04637 (2025), arXiv:2509.04637

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Banagiri, E

    S. Banagiri, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.15646 (2025), arXiv:2509.15646

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Guttman, E

    N. Guttman, E. Payne, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Trends in the Population of Binary Black Holes Following the Fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog: a Data- Driven Analysis, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.09876 (2025), arXiv:2509.09876

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    2025b, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09123

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee, Binary Black Hole Phase Space Discovers the Signature of Pair Instability Super- novae Mass Gap, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.09123 (2025), arXiv:2509.09123

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    E. R. J. Winch, J. S. Vink, E. R. Higgins, and G. N. Sabhahitf, Predicting the heaviest black holes below the pair instability gap, MNRAS529, 2980 (2024), arXiv:2401.17327

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Edelman, B

    B. Edelman, B. Farr, and Z. Doctor, Cover Your Ba- sis: Comprehensive Data-driven Characterization of the Binary Black Hole Population, ApJ946, 16 (2023), arXiv:2210.12834

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Li, Y .-Z

    Y .-J. Li, Y .-Z. Wang, S.-P. Tang, and Y .-Z. Fan, Aligned Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in AGN disks revealed by GWTC-4, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.23897 (2025), arXiv:2509.23897

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selec- 8 tion biases, MNRAS486, 1086 (2019), arXiv:1809.02063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Abbottet al., Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, ApJL913, L7 (2021), arXiv:2010.14533

    R. Abbottet al., Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, ApJL913, L7 (2021), arXiv:2010.14533

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al., Population of Merging Compact Bina- ries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3, Physical Review X13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabora- tion, and the KAGRA Collaboration, GWTC-4.0: Popula- tion Properties of Merging Compact Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18083 (2025), arXiv:2508.18083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    R. Essicket al., Compact Binary Coalescence Sen- sitivity Estimates with Injection Campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ Fourth Observing Run, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.10638 (2025), arXiv:2508.10638

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    R. Abbottet al., GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys Rev D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al., GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Physical Review X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object

    R. Abbottet al., GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, ApJL896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    G. Ashtonet al., BILBY: A User-friendly Bayesian Infer- ence Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy, ApJS241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Buchner, PyMultiNest: Python interface for MultiNest, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1606.005, 2016, ascl:1606.005

    J. Buchner, PyMultiNest: Python interface for MultiNest, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1606.005, 2016, ascl:1606.005

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    R. J. deBoeret al., The 12C(α,γ) 16O reaction and its im- plications for stellar helium burning, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035007 (2017), arXiv:1709.03144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    M. P. Vaccaroet al., Impact of gas hardening on the population properties of hierarchical black hole mergers in active galactic nucleus disks, A&A685, A51 (2024), arXiv:2311.18548

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Li, S.-P

    Y .-J. Li, S.-P. Tang, L.-Q. Xue, and Y .-Z. Fan, GW231123: a product of successive mergers from∼10stellar-mass black holes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.17551 (2025), arXiv:2507.17551

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Adamcewicz, N

    C. Adamcewicz, N. Guttman, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Do both black holes spin in merging binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and astrophysical implications, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2509.04706 (2025), arXiv:2509.04706

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Li and X.-L

    G.-P. Li and X.-L. Fan, The Hierarchical Merger Scenario for GW231123, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.08298 (2025), arXiv:2509.08298

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Shenet al., New Determination of the 12C(α,γ) 16O Reaction Rate and Its Impact on the Black-hole Mass Gap, ApJ945, 41 (2023)

    Y . Shenet al., New Determination of the 12C(α,γ) 16O Reaction Rate and Its Impact on the Black-hole Mass Gap, ApJ945, 41 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, Bayesian Framework for the E1 and E2 Astrophysical Factors at 300 keV from Sub- threshold and Ground-State Asymptotic Normalization Co- efficients, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2509.17102 (2025), arXiv:2509.17102

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    D. D. Hendriks, L. A. C. van Son, M. Renzo, R. G. Iz- zard, and R. Farmer, Pulsational pair-instability supernovae in gravitational-wave and electromagnetic transients, MN- RAS526, 4130 (2023), arXiv:2309.09339

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?

    D. Gerosa and E. Berti, Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?, Phys Rev D95, 124046 (2017), arXiv:1703.06223

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Are LIGO's Black Holes Made From Smaller Black Holes?

    M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and B. Farr, Are LIGO’s Black Holes Made from Smaller Black Holes?, ApJL840, L24 (2017), arXiv:1703.06869

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    McKernan and K

    B. McKernan and K. E. S. Ford, Constraining the LVK AGN channel with black hole spins, MNRAS531, 3479 (2024), arXiv:2309.15213

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Vitale, M

    S. Vitale, M. Mould, and S. (Society Of Physicists In- terested in Non-Aligned Spins, Long road to align- ment: Measuring black hole spin orientation with expand- ing gravitational-wave datasets, Phys Rev D112, 083015 (2025), arXiv:2505.14875

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Edelman, Z

    B. Edelman, Z. Doctor, J. Godfrey, and B. Farr, Ain’t No Mountain High Enough: Semiparametric Modeling of LIGO-Virgo’s Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution, ApJ924, 101 (2022), arXiv:2109.06137

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Golomb and C

    J. Golomb and C. Talbot, Searching for structure in the bi- nary black hole spin distribution, Phys Rev D108, 103009 (2023), arXiv:2210.12287

    work page arXiv 2023