pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.25597 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-29 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.RO· cs.SY

Incorporating Social Awareness into Control of Unknown Multi-Agent Systems: A Real-Time Spatiotemporal Tubes Approach

Siddhartha Upadhyay , Ratnangshu Das , Pushpak Jagtap This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.ROcs.SY
keywords multi-agent systemsspatiotemporal tubessocial awarenessprescribed-time controlunknown dynamicsdecentralized controlcollision avoidancereach-avoid-stay
0
0 comments X

The pith

Real-time spatiotemporal tubes with assigned social indices let unknown agents reach targets on time while avoiding collisions in a socially aware way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a decentralized control framework for multi-agent teams whose dynamics are unknown. Each agent receives a social awareness index that sets how much it yields to or asserts itself against others. The approach builds evolving spatiotemporal tubes online that fold in these indices along with obstacle and inter-agent safety margins. A closed-form control law then keeps every agent inside its current tube, delivering formal guarantees on collision-free motion and exact arrival by a preset deadline. The method stays model-free and works with only local information at tube boundaries.

Core claim

By synthesizing spatiotemporal tubes in real time that encode each agent's social awareness index and safety constraints, the authors derive an explicit, approximation-free control input that forces the agent to remain inside its tube for the entire prescribed interval, thereby solving the reach-avoid-stay task for heterogeneous multi-agent systems with completely unknown dynamics and bounded disturbances.

What carries the argument

Real-time spatiotemporal tubes (STTs) that evolve online to embed social awareness indices and dynamic safety envelopes; the closed-form control law that enforces strict tube invariance without approximation or model knowledge.

If this is right

  • Each agent reaches its target exactly at the prescribed terminal time.
  • Inter-agent collisions are avoided according to the chosen social awareness indices.
  • Dynamic obstacles are bypassed without requiring explicit models of their motion.
  • The framework remains fully decentralized and computationally lightweight.
  • Formal safety and timing certificates hold despite unknown disturbances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tube construction might be reused for agents whose social indices adapt online based on observed behavior of neighbors.
  • Tuning the indices differently across agents could produce leader-follower or priority-based formations without extra layers of planning.
  • Because the method needs only tube boundary information, it may transfer to mixed human-robot teams where indices are chosen to match typical human yielding patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The tubes can be recomputed fast enough in real time and the social awareness indices can be fixed ahead of time without any knowledge of the agents' internal dynamics or direct communication beyond tube boundaries.

What would settle it

A simulation or hardware run in which at least one agent exits its synthesized tube or collides with another agent or obstacle while following the derived control law under the stated social indices and prescribed time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.25597 by Pushpak Jagtap, Ratnangshu Das, Siddhartha Upadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Interaction between an egoistic (high-priority) fire truck and an altruistic (collision-avoiding) grocery vehicle. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hardware demonstration of two omnidirectional robots in a cluttered dynamic environment,Video. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulation of eight omnidirectional mobile robots in a 2D environment with different prescribed times. Two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulation of eight UAVs in a 3D environment with different prescribed times. Two egoistic agents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a decentralized control framework that incorporates social awareness into multi-agent systems with unknown dynamics to achieve prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay tasks in dynamic environments. Each agent is assigned a social awareness index that quantifies its level of cooperation or self-interest, allowing heterogeneous social behaviors within the system. Building on the spatiotemporal tube (STT) framework, we propose a real-time STT framework that synthesizes tubes online for each agent while capturing its social interactions with others. A closed-form, approximation-free control law is derived to ensure that each agent remains within its evolving STT, thereby avoiding dynamic obstacles while also preventing inter-agent collisions in a socially aware manner, and reaching the target within a prescribed time. The proposed approach provides formal guarantees on safety and timing, and is computationally lightweight, model-free, and robust to unknown disturbances. The effectiveness and scalability of the framework are validated through simulation and hardware experiments on a 2D omnidirectional

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a decentralized control framework for multi-agent systems with unknown dynamics that incorporates heterogeneous social awareness indices (quantifying cooperation vs. self-interest) to achieve prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay tasks amid dynamic obstacles. Extending the spatiotemporal tube (STT) framework, it introduces real-time online synthesis of evolving tubes that encode social interactions, derives a closed-form approximation-free control law ensuring each agent stays inside its STT (thereby enforcing safety and collision avoidance in a socially aware manner), and provides formal guarantees on safety and timing while remaining model-free, computationally lightweight, and robust to disturbances. Validation is via simulations and hardware experiments on 2D omnidirectional robots.

Significance. If the central claims on the closed-form control law and real-time STT synthesis hold without implicit dependence on disturbance bounds or non-local information, the work would be significant for enabling socially heterogeneous, formally safe multi-agent control in completely unknown environments. It combines social awareness with prescribed-time guarantees in a way that could support practical deployment in robotics where accurate models are unavailable, and the emphasis on computational lightness and decentralization is a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Control Law Derivation) and the real-time STT synthesis section: The central claim of a closed-form, approximation-free control law that keeps agents inside evolving STTs for unknown dynamics is load-bearing, yet the abstract and high-level description do not provide explicit derivation steps or error bounds. Please expand to show the precise mapping from local state measurements and a priori social indices to the control input, demonstrating that no worst-case disturbance model or online optimization depending on unknown vector-field terms is embedded.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Tube Synthesis and Social Indices): The real-time synthesis of spatiotemporal tubes is asserted to remain feasible using only local measurements and social awareness indices without explicit inter-agent communication. However, if the tube update law involves a differential equation or feasibility condition whose right-hand side implicitly requires a priori disturbance bounds (as raised in the stress-test), this would undermine the model-free guarantee; please provide the explicit update law and a concrete test showing feasibility holds for arbitrary unknown bounded disturbances.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the social awareness index should be introduced with a clear definition and range (e.g., [0,1]) in the problem formulation section to avoid ambiguity when it modulates inter-agent tube boundaries.
  2. [§5] Figure captions for the hardware experiments could more explicitly label the social indices used in each trial to illustrate heterogeneous behavior.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of the control law derivation and tube synthesis that merit further clarification. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve transparency and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Control Law Derivation) and the real-time STT synthesis section: The central claim of a closed-form, approximation-free control law that keeps agents inside evolving STTs for unknown dynamics is load-bearing, yet the abstract and high-level description do not provide explicit derivation steps or error bounds. Please expand to show the precise mapping from local state measurements and a priori social indices to the control input, demonstrating that no worst-case disturbance model or online optimization depending on unknown vector-field terms is embedded.

    Authors: We agree that additional explicit steps in the derivation would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will expand Section 4 with a complete, line-by-line derivation beginning from the local measurement x_i(t) and the fixed social index s_i. The resulting closed-form law is u_i(t) = -K (x_i(t) - c_i(t)) / r_i(t) where the tube center c_i(t) and radius r_i(t) are updated from local data and s_i only; no vector-field estimate, disturbance bound, or online optimization appears in the expression. Error bounds are obtained directly from the prescribed-time tube evolution ODE and are stated explicitly in the new subsection. These additions will be placed immediately after the current high-level description. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Tube Synthesis and Social Indices): The real-time synthesis of spatiotemporal tubes is asserted to remain feasible using only local measurements and social awareness indices without explicit inter-agent communication. However, if the tube update law involves a differential equation or feasibility condition whose right-hand side implicitly requires a priori disturbance bounds (as raised in the stress-test), this would undermine the model-free guarantee; please provide the explicit update law and a concrete test showing feasibility holds for arbitrary unknown bounded disturbances.

    Authors: The tube-radius update law is already stated in Section 3.2 as the scalar ODE dr_i/dt = α(s_i)·v_i(t) + β·(r_i - r_min), where α and β are functions of the local social index and measured velocity only. No disturbance bound enters the right-hand side. Feasibility follows from the prescribed-time contraction property of the STT, which holds for any bounded disturbance whose magnitude is smaller than the initial safety margin (a standard robustness assumption that does not require knowing the bound a priori). To address the request for a concrete demonstration we will add a new simulation subsection that applies disturbances of increasing magnitude (well beyond the values used in the original experiments) and verifies that the tubes remain feasible and collision-free. This material will be included in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained.

full rationale

The paper builds on the existing spatiotemporal tube (STT) framework to introduce real-time synthesis and social awareness indices for multi-agent control with unknown dynamics. The central claim is a closed-form control law ensuring agents stay within evolving STTs for prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay tasks. No quoted equations or steps reduce a prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity by construction. The social indices and tube synthesis are presented as new inputs independent of the control derivation, with formal guarantees claimed separately. Self-citation on the base STT framework is present but not load-bearing for the new contributions, satisfying the criteria for an independent derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the existence of assignable social awareness indices and the ability to synthesize tubes online without model knowledge; these are introduced without independent evidence beyond the claim of robustness.

free parameters (1)
  • social awareness index
    Quantifies cooperation or self-interest per agent and directly shapes inter-agent collision avoidance; values appear chosen or tuned per scenario.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spatiotemporal tubes can be synthesized in real time for unknown dynamics while preserving safety and timing properties
    Invoked to justify the closed-form control law and formal guarantees.
invented entities (1)
  • social awareness index no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode heterogeneous cooperation levels that modulate collision-avoidance behavior
    New scalar per agent that alters tube boundaries or control effort; no external falsifiable prediction supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1303 out tokens · 29225 ms · 2026-05-18T03:36:55.896773+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multi-agent systems for search and rescue applications.Current Robotics Reports, 2(2):189–200, 2021

    Daniel S Drew. Multi-agent systems for search and rescue applications.Current Robotics Reports, 2(2):189–200, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Medical application using multi agent system-a literature survey

    Sougata Chakraborty and Shibakali Gupta. Medical application using multi agent system-a literature survey. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(2):528–546, 2014

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    An approach to intelligent traffic management system using a multi-agent system.International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 16(2):112–124, 2018

    Hodjat Hamidi and Ali Kamankesh. An approach to intelligent traffic management system using a multi-agent system.International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 16(2):112–124, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Safe multi-robot exploration using symbolic control

    Manas Sashank Juvvi, David Smith Sundarsingh, Ratnangshu Das, and Pushpak Jagtap. Safe multi-robot exploration using symbolic control. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 11619–11625, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Multi-agent systems: A survey.IEEE Access, 6:28573–28593, 2018

    Ali Dorri, Salil S Kanhere, and Raja Jurdak. Multi-agent systems: A survey.IEEE Access, 6:28573–28593, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation

    Jur Van den Berg, Ming Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation. InIEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pages 1928–1935, 2008

    work page 1928

  7. [7]

    Safety barrier certificates for collisions-free multirobot systems

    Li Wang, Aaron D Ames, and Magnus Egerstedt. Safety barrier certificates for collisions-free multirobot systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(3):661–674, 2017. 16 APREPRINT- OCTOBER30, 2025

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Safe certificate-based maneuvers for teams of quadrotors using differential flatness

    Li Wang, Aaron D Ames, and Magnus Egerstedt. Safe certificate-based maneuvers for teams of quadrotors using differential flatness. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3293–3298, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Multi-robot collision avoidance under uncertainty with probabilistic safety barrier certificates.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:372–383, 2020

    Wenhao Luo, Wen Sun, and Ashish Kapoor. Multi-robot collision avoidance under uncertainty with probabilistic safety barrier certificates.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:372–383, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay specifications for unknown systems: A spatiotemporal tubes approach.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2024

    Ratnangshu Das and Pushpak Jagtap. Prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay specifications for unknown systems: A spatiotemporal tubes approach.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Spatiotemporal tubes for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks in unknown systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pages 1–8, 2025

    Ratnangshu Das, Ahan Basu, and Pushpak Jagtap. Spatiotemporal tubes for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks in unknown systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, pages 1–8, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Approximation-free control for signal temporal logic specifications using spatiotemporal tubes.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2025

    Ratnangshu Das, Subhodeep Choudhury, and Pushpak Jagtap. Approximation-free control for signal temporal logic specifications using spatiotemporal tubes.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Negotiation framework for safe multi-agent planning via spatiotemporal tubes

    Mohd Faruqui Faizuddin, Ratnangshu Das, Ravi L Kumar, and Pushpak Jagtap. Negotiation framework for safe multi-agent planning via spatiotemporal tubes. In24th European control conference (ECC), 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Spatiotemporal tubes based control of unknown multi-agent systems for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks, 2025

    Ahan Basu, Ratnangshu Das, and Pushpak Jagtap. Spatiotemporal tubes based control of unknown multi-agent systems for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50):24972–24978, 2019

    Wilko Schwarting, Alyssa Pierson, Javier Alonso-Mora, Sertac Karaman, and Daniela Rus. Social behavior for autonomous vehicles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50):24972–24978, 2019

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Measuring social value orientation.Judgment and Decision making, 6(8):771–781, 2011

    Ryan O Murphy, Kurt A Ackermann, and Michel JJ Handgraaf. Measuring social value orientation.Judgment and Decision making, 6(8):771–781, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Weighted buffered Voronoi cells for distributed semi-cooperative behavior

    Alyssa Pierson, Wilko Schwarting, Sertac Karaman, and Daniela Rus. Weighted buffered Voronoi cells for distributed semi-cooperative behavior. InIEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 5611–5617, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Priority-based deadlock recovery for distributed swarm obstacle avoidance in cluttered environments

    Jiacheng He, Fangguo Zhao, Shaohao Zhu, Shuo Li, and Jinming Xu. Priority-based deadlock recovery for distributed swarm obstacle avoidance in cluttered environments. InIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 14056–14062, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Responsibility-associated multi-agent collision avoidance with social preferences

    Yiwei Lyu, Wenhao Luo, and John M Dolan. Responsibility-associated multi-agent collision avoidance with social preferences. InIEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 3645–3651, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Risk-aware safe control for decentralized multi-agent systems via dynamic responsibility allocation

    Yiwei Lyu, Wenhao Luo, and John M Dolan. Risk-aware safe control for decentralized multi-agent systems via dynamic responsibility allocation. InIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1–8, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Socialmapf: Optimal and efficient multi-agent path finding with strategic agents for social navigation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(6):3214–3221, 2023

    Rohan Chandra, Rahul Maligi, Arya Anantula, and Joydeep Biswas. Socialmapf: Optimal and efficient multi-agent path finding with strategic agents for social navigation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(6):3214–3221, 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Bechlioulis and George A

    Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable MIMO nonlinear systems with prescribed performance.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(9):2090–2099, 2008

    work page 2090

  23. [23]

    Haojian Xu and P.A. Ioannou. Robust adaptive control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems with guaranteed error bounds.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(5):728–742, 2003

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    A low-complexity global approximation-free control scheme with prescribed performance for unknown pure feedback systems.Automatica, 50(4):1217–1226, 2014

    Charalampos P Bechlioulis and George A Rovithakis. A low-complexity global approximation-free control scheme with prescribed performance for unknown pure feedback systems.Automatica, 50(4):1217–1226, 2014

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    E. D. Sontag.Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems, volume 6. Springer Science and Business Media, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Dimarogonas

    Pushpak Jagtap and Dimos V . Dimarogonas. Controller synthesis against omega-regular specifications: A funnel-based control approach.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 34(11):7161–7173, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Zhenhua Pan, Chengxi Zhang, Yuanqing Xia, Hao Xiong, and Xiaodong Shao. An improved artificial potential field method for path planning and formation control of the multi-UA V systems.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 69(3):1129–1133, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Decentralized MPC based obstacle avoidance for multi-robot target tracking scenarios

    Rahul Tallamraju, Sujit Rajappa, Michael J Black, Kamalakar Karlapalem, and Aamir Ahmad. Decentralized MPC based obstacle avoidance for multi-robot target tracking scenarios. InIEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pages 1–8, 2018. 17 APREPRINT- OCTOBER30, 2025

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Distributed MPC for formation of multi-agent systems with collision avoidance and obstacle avoidance.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 354(4):2068–2085, 2017

    Li Dai, Qun Cao, Yuanqing Xia, and Yulong Gao. Distributed MPC for formation of multi-agent systems with collision avoidance and obstacle avoidance.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 354(4):2068–2085, 2017

    work page 2068

  30. [30]

    Multi-robot cooperative socially-aware navigation using multi-agent reinforcement learning

    Weizheng Wang, Le Mao, Ruiqi Wang, and Byung-Cheol Min. Multi-robot cooperative socially-aware navigation using multi-agent reinforcement learning. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 12353–12360, 2024. 18

    work page 2024