pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02635 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Unified Functional-Holographic Theory of the QCD Critical End Point

Sameer Ahmad Mir , Saeed Uddin , Swatantra Kumar Tiwari , Mir Faizal
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords QCD critical endpointfunctional renormalization groupDyson-Schwinger equationsholographic QCDPolyakov loopnet-baryon cumulantstopological susceptibilityphase diagram
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified framework merges Dyson-Schwinger equations, functional renormalization group flows, and holography to locate the QCD critical endpoint at 130-135 MeV temperature and 600 MeV baryon chemical potential.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a single thermodynamically consistent setup that merges three nonperturbative methods to trace the QCD phase structure from zero to high baryon density. It uses holographic input to capture how the axial anomaly evolves and anchors the zero-density limit to lattice results via a Polyakov sector that preserves thermodynamic relations throughout the flow. Solving the coupled equations produces a specific location for the critical endpoint where the first-order transition ends. A reader would care because this supplies a theoretical baseline for fluctuation signals that experiments at RHIC and future facilities can test against.

Core claim

We develop a thermodynamically consistent nonperturbative framework for equilibrium QCD criticality, unifying DSE quark propagation, FRG flow, and PNJL thermodynamics for coupled chiral/deconfinement order parameters. A holographic Maxwell-Chern-Simons sector supplies topological response; its topological susceptibility enters the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction, encoding axial-anomaly evolution across the phase diagram. Solving the coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system yields an equilibrium critical end point at T_CEP ≃130–135 MeV and μ_B,CEP ≃600 MeV, with the critical region organized by a nonperturbative map onto universal 3D Ising scaling variables.

What carries the argument

The coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system in which holographic topological susceptibility enters the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction while the Polyakov sector enforces thermodynamic identities at every scale.

If this is right

  • The critical region maps onto universal 3D Ising scaling variables with anomalous dimensions absorbed into nonuniversal metric factors.
  • Predictions for the hierarchy, nonmonotonicity, and sign structure of higher-order net-baryon cumulant ratios along freeze-out trajectories.
  • Softening of the speed of sound near the critical endpoint.
  • Qualitative consistency with RHIC BES fluctuation measurements on correlated equilibrium trends and sign patterns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This equilibrium baseline supplies controlled inputs for models that incorporate finite-size effects, critical slowing down, and baryon-number conservation when comparing to heavy-ion data.
  • Quantified sensitivity to holographic normalization and regulator choices shows that additional lattice constraints on topological susceptibility could narrow the predicted endpoint location.
  • The framework could be extended to compute other observables such as the equation of state or transport properties near the critical region.

Load-bearing premise

The unification assumes that topological susceptibility from the holographic sector can be consistently included in the flow of the interaction term while the Polyakov sector maintains exact thermodynamic identities throughout the renormalization process.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD calculation at nonzero baryon density that locates the critical endpoint outside the 130-135 MeV temperature and 600 MeV chemical potential range would test the prediction.

read the original abstract

We develop a thermodynamically consistent nonperturbative framework for equilibrium QCD criticality, unifying DSE quark propagation, FRG flow, and PNJL thermodynamics for coupled chiral/deconfinement order parameters. A holographic Maxwell-Chern-Simons sector supplies topological response; its topological susceptibility enters the FRG flow of the determinantal ('t Hooft) interaction, encoding axial-anomaly evolution across the phase diagram. At $\mu_B=0$ we anchor to continuum-extrapolated lattice thermodynamics and conserved-charge susceptibilities through a lattice-calibrated Polyakov sector, enforcing exact thermodynamic identities by evaluating derivatives at the stationary grand-potential solution at each RG scale. Solving the coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system yields, at the present approximation level, an equilibrium critical end point at $T_{\mathrm{CEP}}\simeq130\text{--}135,\mathrm{MeV}$ and $\mu_{B,\mathrm{CEP}}\simeq600,\mathrm{MeV}$, with quantified sensitivity to regulator, Polyakov-sector, and holographic-normalization choices. The critical region is organized by a nonperturbative map onto universal 3D Ising scaling variables, with anomalous-dimension effects absorbed into nonuniversal metric factors, yielding predictions for the hierarchy, nonmonotonicity, and sign structure of higher-order net-baryon cumulant ratios along smooth freeze-out trajectories and speed-of-sound softening. Comparisons to RHIC BES fluctuation measurements are qualitative consistency checks on correlated equilibrium trends and sign patterns, because finite size/lifetime, critical slowing down, baryon-number conservation, acceptance/efficiency corrections, net-proton-to-net-baryon conversion, and baryon transport can round or reshape experimental cumulants. The results provide a unified equilibrium baseline and controlled inputs for finite-size scaling and dynamical embeddings of heavy-ion data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a thermodynamically consistent nonperturbative framework unifying Dyson-Schwinger equations for quark propagation, functional renormalization group flows, PNJL thermodynamics for coupled chiral and deconfinement order parameters, and a holographic Maxwell-Chern-Simons sector whose topological susceptibility enters the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction. At vanishing baryon chemical potential the Polyakov sector is calibrated to lattice thermodynamics and conserved-charge susceptibilities, with exact thermodynamic identities enforced by derivatives evaluated at the stationary grand-potential solution at each RG scale. Solving the coupled system yields an equilibrium critical end point at T_CEP ≃ 130–135 MeV and μ_B,CEP ≃ 600 MeV, together with a nonperturbative map onto 3D Ising scaling variables that produces predictions for the hierarchy and sign structure of higher-order net-baryon cumulant ratios along freeze-out trajectories.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a controlled equilibrium baseline for the QCD phase diagram that incorporates topological effects and enforces thermodynamic consistency across scales. The explicit quantification of sensitivity to regulator, Polyakov-sector, and holographic-normalization choices, together with the mapping to universal Ising variables, constitutes a genuine strength and would provide useful input for finite-size and dynamical modeling of heavy-ion fluctuation data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and coupled-system section] Abstract and the section describing the coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system: the reported CEP coordinates are stated to carry quantified sensitivity to holographic-normalization choices, regulator, and Polyakov-sector calibration parameters. Because these inputs enter the coupled equations and affect the final location, the manuscript must demonstrate (via explicit variation or error propagation) that the quoted interval T_CEP ≃ 130–135 MeV, μ_B,CEP ≃ 600 MeV remains stable under reasonable changes in these parameters; otherwise the result risks reducing to a calibrated output rather than an independent prediction of the unified framework.
  2. [Thermodynamic-consistency paragraph] The paragraph on enforcement of thermodynamic identities: the claim that exact identities are maintained by evaluating derivatives at the stationary grand-potential solution at every RG scale is central to the consistency argument, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit derivation nor a numerical check that the identities remain satisfied once the holographic susceptibility is inserted into the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the number of free parameters retained after lattice calibration and holographic normalization, to make the sensitivity analysis immediately transparent to the reader.
  2. [Model-definition section] Notation for the determinantal ('t Hooft) interaction and its RG-scale dependence should be defined once in a dedicated subsection before being used in the flow equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive overall assessment, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and coupled-system section] Abstract and the section describing the coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system: the reported CEP coordinates are stated to carry quantified sensitivity to holographic-normalization choices, regulator, and Polyakov-sector calibration parameters. Because these inputs enter the coupled equations and affect the final location, the manuscript must demonstrate (via explicit variation or error propagation) that the quoted interval T_CEP ≃ 130–135 MeV, μ_B,CEP ≃ 600 MeV remains stable under reasonable changes in these parameters; otherwise the result risks reducing to a calibrated output rather than an independent prediction of the unified framework.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the interpretation as an independent prediction rather than a purely calibrated result. The quoted interval T_CEP ≃ 130–135 MeV and μ_B,CEP ≃ 600 MeV already encodes the range obtained from our existing sensitivity studies to the regulator, Polyakov-sector calibration, and holographic-normalization choices. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that tabulates the CEP coordinates under explicit, reasonable variations of these inputs and includes a brief error-propagation estimate, thereby confirming that the central values remain stable within the reported interval. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Thermodynamic-consistency paragraph] The paragraph on enforcement of thermodynamic identities: the claim that exact identities are maintained by evaluating derivatives at the stationary grand-potential solution at every RG scale is central to the consistency argument, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit derivation nor a numerical check that the identities remain satisfied once the holographic susceptibility is inserted into the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would be improved by an explicit derivation and a numerical verification. The thermodynamic identities follow directly from the stationarity condition of the grand potential at each RG scale; this condition continues to enforce the required relations after the holographic topological susceptibility is inserted into the FRG flow of the determinantal interaction. In the revised version we will add a short appendix containing the derivation together with a numerical check (e.g., verification of the pressure–susceptibility relations to within numerical precision) performed on the full coupled system. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

CEP location depends on lattice-calibrated Polyakov sector and holographic-normalization choices

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "At μ_B=0 we anchor to continuum-extrapolated lattice thermodynamics and conserved-charge susceptibilities through a lattice-calibrated Polyakov sector, enforcing exact thermodynamic identities by evaluating derivatives at the stationary grand-potential solution at each RG scale. Solving the coupled DSE-FRG-holographic system yields, at the present approximation level, an equilibrium critical end point at T_CEP ≃130–135 MeV and μ_B,CEP ≃600 MeV, with quantified sensitivity to regulator, Polyakov-sector, and holographic-normalization choices."

    The specific CEP coordinates are presented as the yield of solving the unified system, yet the framework explicitly calibrates the Polyakov sector to lattice inputs at μ_B=0 and states that the result carries quantified sensitivity to Polyakov-sector and holographic-normalization choices, so the reported numbers are influenced by these fitted/calibrated elements rather than emerging solely from the nonperturbative dynamics.

full rationale

The paper anchors the Polyakov sector to lattice data at μ_B=0 and inserts holographic topological susceptibility into the FRG flow, then reports specific CEP coordinates from the coupled system while explicitly noting quantified sensitivity to Polyakov-sector and holographic-normalization choices. This creates partial dependence of the output values on calibrated inputs, fitting the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern without full self-definition or self-citation load-bearing. The multi-method unification still supplies independent dynamical structure, so the circularity is moderate rather than total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on lattice calibration of the Polyakov sector, specific holographic normalization, and regulator choices that are treated as adjustable inputs with quantified but non-zero impact on the CEP location. Standard functional-method assumptions and 3D Ising scaling with metric factors are invoked without new postulated entities.

free parameters (3)
  • holographic-normalization choices
    Directly affect topological susceptibility fed into FRG flow of determinantal interaction; sensitivity is quantified in abstract.
  • Polyakov-sector calibration parameters
    Lattice-calibrated to reproduce thermodynamics and conserved-charge susceptibilities at mu_B=0.
  • regulator choices
    Explicitly listed as source of quantified sensitivity in the coupled system solution.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic identities hold when derivatives are evaluated at the stationary grand-potential solution at each RG scale
    Invoked to enforce consistency across the DSE-FRG-holographic system.
  • domain assumption Critical region maps onto universal 3D Ising scaling variables with anomalous dimensions absorbed into nonuniversal metric factors
    Used to organize predictions for cumulant ratios and speed-of-sound softening.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1759 out tokens · 98882 ms · 2026-05-17T02:35:07.353084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 64 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics,

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, “Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 338–341

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    On the Phase Diagram of QCD

    A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, “On the phase diagram of QCD,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 096007, arXiv:hep-ph/9804290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Color Superconductivity and Chiral Symmetry Restoration at Nonzero Baryon Density and Temperature

    J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, “Color superconductivity and chiral symmetry restoration at nonzero baryon density and temperature,”Nucl. Phys. B538(1999) 215–232, arXiv:hep-ph/9804233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    The Condensed Matter Physics of QCD

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek,The Condensed matter physics of QCD, pp. 2061–2151. 11, 2000.arXiv:hep-ph/0011333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2061

  5. [5]

    Universality, the QCD critical/tricritical point and the quark number susceptibility

    Y. Hatta and T. Ikeda, “Universality, the QCD critical / tricritical point and the quark number susceptibility,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 014028,arXiv:hep-ph/0210284

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Lattice determination of the critical point of QCD at finite T and \mu

    Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, “Lattice determination of the critical point of QCD at finite T and mu,”JHEP03(2002) 014,arXiv:hep-lat/0106002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential

    P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential,”Nucl. Phys. B642(2002) 290–306, arXiv:hep-lat/0205016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Mapping the QCD Phase Diagram

    K. Rajagopal, “Mapping the QCD phase diagram,”Nucl. Phys. A661(1999) 150–161, arXiv:hep-ph/9908360. – 39 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    The Chiral Critical Point in 3-Flavour QCD

    F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, “The Chiral critical point in three-flavor QCD,”Phys. Lett. B520(2001) 41–49,arXiv:hep-lat/0107020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Status of Lattice Studies of the QCD Phase Diagram

    O. Philipsen, “Status of Lattice Studies of the QCD Phase Diagram,”Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.174(2008) 206–213,arXiv:0808.0672 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    QCD phase diagram and the critical point

    M. A. Stephanov, “Qcd phase diagram and the critical point,”Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.153(2004) 139–156,arXiv:hep-ph/0402115

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics

    Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, “The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics,”Nature443(2006) 675–678,arXiv:hep-lat/0611014. [13]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD,”Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094503,arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, and K. K. Szabo, “Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors,”Phys. Lett. B730(2014) 99–104, arXiv:1309.5258 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition

    A. Bazavovet al., “The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 054503,arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]. [16]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Behavior of Charmonium Systems after Deconfinement

    S. Datta, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and I. Wetzorke, “Behavior of charmonium systems after deconfinement,”Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 094507,arXiv:hep-lat/0312037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    Curvature of the chiral pseudo-critical line in QCD

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, and F. Sanfilippo, “Curvature of the chiral pseudocritical line in QCD,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 11, (2014) 114025, arXiv:1410.5758 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    Qcd crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations,

    S. Bors´ anyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. P´ asztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szab´ o, “Qcd crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 5, (2020) 052001,arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]. [20]HotQCDCollaboration, D. Bollweg, J. Goswami, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, ...

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    The chiral transition and U(1)_A symmetry restoration from lattice QCD using Domain Wall Fermions

    H.-T. Ding, W.-P. Huang, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, “Microscopic encoding of macroscopic universality: Scaling properties of dirac eigenspectra near QCD chiral phase transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 161903. – 40 – [22]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “The chiral transition andU(1) A symmetry restoration from lattice QCD using Domain Wall F...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Evidence of effective axial U(1) symmetry restoration at high temperature QCD

    A. Tomiya, G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki, “Evidence of effective axial U(1) symmetry restoration at high temperature QCD,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 3, (2017) 034509,arXiv:1612.01908 [hep-lat]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 079902 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Numerical universal solutions in a-gauge in open string field theory,

    I. Kishimoto, “Numerical universal solutions in a-gauge in open string field theory,” PTEP2021no. 12, (2021) 123B04,arXiv:2109.02003 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Phase diagram and critical endpoint for strongly-interacting quarks

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, H. Chen, Y.-x. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, “Phase diagram and critical endpoint for strongly-interacting quarks,”Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 172301, arXiv:1011.2876 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Chiral and deconfinement transition from correlation functions: SU(2) vs. SU(3)

    C. S. Fischer, A. Maas, and J. A. Muller, “Chiral and deconfinement transition from correlation functions: SU(2) vs. SU(3),”Eur. Phys. J. C68(2010) 165–181, arXiv:1003.1960 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Propagators and phase structure of Nf=2 and Nf=2+1 QCD

    C. S. Fischer and J. Luecker, “Propagators and phase structure of Nf=2 and Nf=2+1 QCD,”Phys. Lett. B718(2013) 1036–1043,arXiv:1206.5191 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Chemical potential and the gap equation

    H. Chen, W. Yuan, L. Chang, Y.-X. Liu, T. Klahn, and C. D. Roberts, “Chemical potential and the gap equation,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 116015,arXiv:0807.2755 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Baryon number fluctuations in the QCD phase diagram from Dyson-Schwinger equations,

    P. Isserstedt, M. Buballa, C. S. Fischer, and P. J. Gunkel, “Baryon number fluctuations in the QCD phase diagram from Dyson-Schwinger equations,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 7, (2019) 074011,arXiv:1906.11644 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    The renormalization group and quark number fluctuations in the Polyakov loop extended quark-meson model at finite baryon density

    V. Skokov, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, “Quark number fluctuations in the Polyakov loop-extended quark-meson model at finite baryon density,”Phys. Rev. C83(2011) 054904,arXiv:1008.4570 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    On the phase structure and thermodynamics of QCD

    T. K. Herbst, J. M. Pawlowski, and B.-J. Schaefer, “Phase structure and thermodynamics of QCD,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 1, (2013) 014007,arXiv:1302.1426 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Phase structure of three and four flavor QCD

    C. S. Fischer, J. Luecker, and C. A. Welzbacher, “Phase structure of three and four flavor qcd,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 3, (2014) 034022,arXiv:1405.4762 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop

    K. Fukushima, “Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 114028,arXiv:0803.3318 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 039902 (2008)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Phases of QCD: lattice thermodynamics and a field theoretical model

    C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, “Phases of QCD: Lattice thermodynamics and a field theoretical model,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 014019,arXiv:hep-ph/0506234. – 41 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Meson fluctuations and thermodynamics of the Polyakov loop extended quark-meson model

    V. Skokov, B. Stokic, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, “Meson fluctuations and thermodynamics of the Polyakov loop extended quark-meson model,”Phys. Rev. C82 (2010) 015206,arXiv:1004.2665 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    The Phase Structure of the Polyakov--Quark-Meson Model

    B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Wambach, “The Phase Structure of the Polyakov–Quark-Meson Model,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 074023,arXiv:0704.3234 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  33. [33]

    How parameters and regularization affect the PNJL model phase diagram and thermodynamic quantities

    P. Costa, H. Hansen, M. C. Ruivo, and C. A. de Sousa, “How parameters and regularization affect the PNJL model phase diagram and thermodynamic quantities,” Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 016007,arXiv:0909.5124 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop

    K. Fukushima, “Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop,”Phys. Lett. B591 (2004) 277–284,arXiv:hep-ph/0310121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    Susceptibilities and speed of sound from PNJL model

    S. K. Ghosh, T. K. Mukherjee, M. G. Mustafa, and R. Ray, “Susceptibilities and speed of sound from PNJL model,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 114007,arXiv:hep-ph/0603050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,” JHEP02(2008) 032,arXiv:0707.1324 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,”JHEP02(2008) 019,arXiv:0707.1349 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation

    R. Casero, E. Kiritsis, and A. Paredes, “Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,”Nucl. Phys. B787(2007) 98–134,arXiv:hep-th/0702155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole

    S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007,arXiv:0804.0434 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories in the presence of a topological term

    E. Vicari and H. Panagopoulos, “Theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories in the presence of a topological term,”Phys. Rept.470(2009) 93–150,arXiv:0803.1593 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [41]

    Lattice QCD input for axion cosmology

    E. Berkowitz, M. I. Buchoff, and E. Rinaldi, “Lattice QCD input for axion cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D92no. 3, (2015) 034507,arXiv:1505.07455 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit

    M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis, “Holographic models for qcd in the veneziano limit,” JHEP03(2012) 002,arXiv:1112.1261 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    The CP-odd sector and $\theta$ dynamics in holographic QCD

    D. Are´ an, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen, and E. Kiritsis, “The cp-odd sector andθdynamics in holographic qcd,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 2, (2017) 026001,arXiv:1609.08922 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories

    L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos, and E. Vicari, “theta dependence of SU(N) gauge theories,”JHEP08(2002) 044,arXiv:hep-th/0204125

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Slowing Out of Equilibrium Near the QCD Critical Point

    B. Berdnikov and K. Rajagopal, “Slowing out-of-equilibrium near the QCD critical point,”Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 105017,arXiv:hep-ph/9912274. – 42 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point

    M. A. Stephanov, “Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point,”Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 032301,arXiv:0809.3450 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    Fluctuation Probes of Quark Deconfinement

    M. Asakawa, U. W. Heinz, and B. Muller, “Fluctuation probes of quark deconfinement,”Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 2072–2075,arXiv:hep-ph/0003169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  48. [48]

    Hadronic Fluctuations and Correlations

    V. Koch,Hadronic Fluctuations and Correlations, pp. 626–652. 2010. arXiv:0810.2520 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    Real time evolution of non-Gaussian cumulants in the QCD critical regime

    S. Mukherjee, R. Venugopalan, and Y. Yin, “Real time evolution of non-Gaussian cumulants in the QCD critical regime,”Phys. Rev. C92no. 3, (2015) 034912, arXiv:1506.00645 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point

    M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, T. Schaefer, and S. A. Bass, “Diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 11, (2019) 116015, arXiv:1804.05728 [nucl-th]. [55]ST ARCollaboration, M. M. Aggarwalet al., “Higher Moments of Net-proton Multiplicity Distributions at RHIC,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 022302, arXiv:1004.4959 [nuc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Particle Production in Heavy Ion Collisions

    P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Particle production in heavy ion collisions,”arXiv:nucl-th/0304013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Unified Description of Freeze-Out Parameters in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    J. Cleymans and K. Redlich, “Unified description of freezeout parameters in relativistic heavy ion collisions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 5284–5286,arXiv:nucl-th/9808030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Polyakov loop, diquarks and the two-flavour phase diagram

    S. Roessner, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, “Polyakov loop, diquarks and the two-flavour phase diagram,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 034007,arXiv:hep-ph/0609281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories

    J. Braun, “Fermion interactions and universal behavior in strongly interacting theories,”J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.39no. 3, (2012) 033001,arXiv:1108.4449 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Equation of state and phase diagram of strongly interacting matter,

    J. M. Pawlowski, “Equation of state and phase diagram of strongly interacting matter,”Nucl. Phys. A931(2014) 113–124

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Hydrodynamical evolution near the QCD critical end point

    C. Nonaka and M. Asakawa, “Hydrodynamical evolution near the QCD critical end point,”Phys. Rev. C71(2005) 044904,arXiv:nucl-th/0410078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    QCD equation of state matched to lattice data and exhibiting a critical point singularity,

    P. Parotto, M. Bluhm, D. Mroczek, M. Nahrgang, J. Noronha-Hostler, K. Rajagopal, C. Ratti, T. Sch¨ afer, and M. Stephanov, “QCD equation of state matched to lattice data and exhibiting a critical point singularity,”Phys. Rev. C101no. 3, (2020) 034901,arXiv:1805.05249 [hep-ph]. – 43 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Exact evolution equation for the effective potential

    C. Wetterich, “Exact evolution equation for the effective potential,”Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 90–94,arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  59. [59]

    Non-Perturbative Renormalization Flow in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, “Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics,”Phys. Rept.363(2002) 223–386, arXiv:hep-ph/0005122

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [60]

    An Introduction to the Nonperturbative Renormalization Group

    B. Delamotte, “An Introduction to the nonperturbative renormalization group,”Lect. Notes Phys.852(2012) 49–132,arXiv:cond-mat/0702365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    The phase structure of the Polyakov--quark-meson model beyond mean field

    T. K. Herbst, J. M. Pawlowski, and B.-J. Schaefer, “The phase structure of the Polyakov–quark–meson model beyond mean field,”Phys. Lett. B696(2011) 58–67, arXiv:1008.0081 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  62. [62]

    QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson-Schwinger equations

    C. S. Fischer, “QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105(2019) 1–60, arXiv:1810.12938 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    QCD phase structure from functional methods,

    F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, “QCD phase structure from functional methods,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 034027,arXiv:2002.07500 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Renormalization Flow of Bound States

    H. Gies and C. Wetterich, “Renormalization flow of bound states,”Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 065001,arXiv:hep-th/0107221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Critical Phenomena and Renormalization-Group Theory

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, “Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory,” Phys. Rept.368(2002) 549–727,arXiv:cond-mat/0012164

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  66. [66]

    Universality of the critical point mapping between Ising model and QCD at small quark mass,

    M. S. Pradeep and M. Stephanov, “Universality of the critical point mapping between Ising model and QCD at small quark mass,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 5, (2019) 056003, arXiv:1905.13247 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Lattice QCD for Cosmology

    S. Borsanyiet al., “Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,”Nature539no. 7627, (2016) 69–71,arXiv:1606.07494 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    The topological susceptibility in finite temperature QCD and axion cosmology

    P. Petreczky, H.-P. Schadler, and S. Sharma, “The topological susceptibility in finite temperature QCD and axion cosmology,”Phys. Lett. B762(2016) 498–505, arXiv:1606.03145 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    Topological susceptibility at high temperature on the lattice

    J. Frison, R. Kitano, H. Matsufuru, S. Mori, and N. Yamada, “Topological susceptibility at high temperature on the lattice,”JHEP09(2016) 021, arXiv:1606.07175 [hep-lat]. [76]TWQCDCollaboration, Y.-C. Chen, T.-W. Chiu, and T.-H. Hsieh, “Topological susceptibility in finite temperature QCD with physical (u/d,s,c) domain-wall quarks,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 7, (...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Decoding the phase – 44 – structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,”Nature561no. 7723, (2018) 321–330,arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in central heavy ion collisions between 1.7A and 158A GeV/c

    F. Becattini, J. Cleymans, A. Keranen, E. Suhonen, and K. Redlich, “Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in central heavy ion collisions between 1.7A-GeV/c and 158A-GeV/c,”Phys. Rev. C64(2001) 024901, arXiv:hep-ph/0002267

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [72]

    Hadron production in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions and finite baryon-size effects,

    S. A. Mir, N. A. Rather, I. Mohi Ud Din, and S. Uddin, “Hadron production in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions and finite baryon-size effects,”J. Phys. G52no. 3, (2025) 035003,arXiv:2312.13079 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Particle production in HRG with thermodynamically consistent EoS and partially deformable hadrons,

    S. A. Mir, I. Mohi Ud Din, N. A. Rather, S. Uddin, and M. F. Mir, “Particle production in HRG with thermodynamically consistent EoS and partially deformable hadrons,”Annals Phys.480(2025) 170065,arXiv:2406.11752 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Influence of excluded volume corrections on hadronic yield in high-energy nuclear collisions,

    S. A. Mir, S. Uddin, and S. K. Tiwari, “Influence of excluded volume corrections on hadronic yield in high-energy nuclear collisions,”Eur. Phys. J. A61no. 8, (2025) 198

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Relative hadron yields in HRG with medium modification effect,

    N. A. Rather, S. A. Mir, I. Mohi Ud Din, and S. Uddin, “Relative hadron yields in HRG with medium modification effect,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40no. 19, (2025) 2550046,arXiv:2411.14826 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Collision Energy Dependence of Particle Ratios and Freeze-out Parameters in Ultra Relativistic Nucleus Nucleus Collisions,

    I. Mohi Ud Din, S. A. Mir, N. A. Rather, S. Uddin, and R. A. Parra, “Collision Energy Dependence of Particle Ratios and Freeze-out Parameters in Ultra Relativistic Nucleus Nucleus Collisions,”Nucl. Phys. A1055(2025) 122994,arXiv:2408.07943 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Critical Exponents of the N-vector model

    R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, “Critical exponents of the N vector model,”J. Phys. A 31(1998) 8103–8121,arXiv:cond-mat/9803240. – 45 – A Consistency and Validation This section establishes the internal and external consistency of the unified DSE-FRG- PNJL holographic construction. It derives a single functional origin for all sectors and proves the absence ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998