Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Two impurities in a dipolar BEC can harvest entanglement from a Lorentz-violating vacuum, with signatures that differ sharply from the Lorentz-invariant case.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 17:28 UTC pith:RYM4EQOS

load-bearing objection Standard harvesting formalism applied to a known BEC analogue vacuum; the numbers are likely fine, but the 'Lorentz-violation probe' reading needs a canonical-weight check. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.09263 v1 pith:RYM4EQOS submitted 2025-12-10 quant-ph gr-qchep-th

Harvesting entanglement from the Lorentz-violating quantum field vacuum in a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate

Zehua Tian , Weiping Yao , Xiaobao Liu , Mengjie Wang , Jieci Wang , Jiliang Jing This is my paper
classification quant-ph gr-qchep-th
keywords entanglement harvestingLorentz violationdipolar Bose-Einstein condensateUnruh-DeWitt detectorroton spectrumquantum vacuumBogoliubov theoryquantum simulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the density fluctuations of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate—whose quasiparticle spectrum is roton-modified by dipole-dipole interactions—behave as an analogue quantum field with broken Lorentz invariance, and that two impurities immersed in the condensate act as Unruh-DeWitt detectors that can harvest entanglement from that vacuum. The central quantitative claim is that the concurrence of the two detectors is set by |X| − √(P_A P_B), and numerical evaluation shows two signatures of Lorentz violation: the optimal detector energy gap Ω/M* moves away from zero as the Lorentz-violating strength A grows, and increasing the Gaussian switching width σM* can increase the maximum harvested entanglement, opposite to the Lorentz-invariant case. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a tabletop, experimentally realizable platform to test entanglement-harvesting physics and Lorentz-violation phenomena in a controllable ultracold atomic system.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that for two static detectors in the analogue Lorentz-violating vacuum of a dipolar BEC, the harvested entanglement deviates from the Lorentz-invariant result in two concrete ways. First, the optimal detector energy-level spacing Ω/M* is no longer at the origin but shifts monotonically with the Lorentz-violating parameter A, reaching a maximum departure at the roton instability A_c = 3.4454. Second, while in the Lorentz-invariant case a wider Gaussian switching function suppresses the maximum harvested concurrence, in the Lorentz-violating case a wider switching (σM* = 5 vs 1) increases the maximum entanglement after optimizing other parameters. These signatu

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the analogue Lorentz-violating field: the density fluctuation operator δρ̂ of the condensate, expanded in Bogoliubov modes with dispersion ω_k = c0|k| f(c0|k|/M*), where f encodes the dipolar-interaction-induced deviation from linearity (subluminal for dominant dipoles, with a roton minimum for large A). The impurities are two-level systems coupled to this field via a Gaussian switching, acting as Unruh-DeWitt detectors. The entanglement measure is the concurrence C[ρAB] = 2 max(0, |X| − √(P_A P_B)), where X is the nonlocal vacuum-correlation term and P_A, P_B are the individual excitation probabilities (the 'noise'). The Wightman function built from the modified d

Load-bearing premise

The calculation rests on treating the density fluctuations as a free Gaussian Bogoliubov field and the impurities as passive two-level detectors weakly coupled to that field; if the true vacuum seen by an impurity differs (especially near the roton instability where beyond-mean-field effects dominate), the predicted shift of the optimal gap and the switching-width reversal could change or disappear.

What would settle it

A concrete experimental check: in a quasi-2D dipolar BEC with two tightly trapped impurities, measure the two-detector excitation correlation as a function of the internal energy gap Ω and the interaction pulse duration σ. Fix the dipolar strength A via Feshbach resonance or tilting angle; if the gap that maximizes the harvested entanglement does not move monotonically with A, or if increasing σ always decreases the maximum entanglement, the central claim is refuted. A numerical falsifier: compute the concurrence with the full Bogoliubov vacuum including beyond-mean-field corrections near A_c;

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the deviation is correct, measuring the two-impurity concurrence (or its proxies) in a dipolar BEC provides a direct experimental probe of Lorentz-violating vacuum structure.
  • The monotonic shift of the optimal detector gap Ω/M* with the Lorentz-violating strength A gives a quantitative, tunable signature that can be compared with theory.
  • The reversal of the switching-width effect distinguishes Lorentz-violating from Lorentz-invariant vacua in a qualitative way, robust to calibration of absolute entanglement values.
  • The platform offers a nondestructive, local readout of entanglement structure in the BEC, complementing global destructive measurements.
  • It connects idealized Unruh-DeWitt detector models in relativistic quantum information to concretely realizable impurity probes in ultracold gases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same differential signatures might appear in other analogue systems with modified dispersion (e.g., expanding Bose-Einstein condensates or superfluid helium), suggesting a generic feature of subluminal vacuum structure rather than a BEC-specific artifact.
  • Since the theory is perturbative in the coupling and assumes a free Gaussian vacuum, the most reliable test would be at moderate A, away from the roton instability where beyond-mean-field physics (droplets, supersolidity) changes the actual ground state.
  • A natural extension is to ask whether the shift in optimal Ω also appears in harvesting of mutual information or Bell correlations, and whether the effect survives for moving detectors, which could be tested in the same setup.
  • If experimentally confirmed, the switching-width reversal could serve as a coarse-grained 'fingerprint' of Lorentz violation that does not require precise measurements of the absolute entanglement value.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that density fluctuations in a quasi-two-dimensional dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate emulate a Lorentz-violating quantum scalar field, and that two impurities immersed in the condensate act as Unruh-DeWitt detectors interacting with that field. Starting from the Bogoliubov description of the condensate, the authors write the Wightman function of the density-fluctuation field (Eq. (20)) and use the standard second-order perturbative UDW formalism to obtain the detector state, concurrence, transition probability, and off-diagonal correlation (Eqs. (14)-(18), (21)-(22)). They evaluate the concurrence numerically and report two main Lorentz-violation signatures: the optimal detector energy gap Omega/M* moves away from zero as the Lorentz-violation strength A increases, and a wider Gaussian switching width sigma M* can increase the maximum harvested entanglement, in contrast to the Lorentz-invariant case. The paper also discusses experimental feasibility with current dipolar-BEC and impurity technology.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a concrete, table-top platform for studying entanglement harvesting from an analogue Lorentz-violating quantum vacuum, connecting condensed-matter experiments with relativistic quantum information and Lorentz-violation phenomenology. Strengths of the manuscript include the use of the standard UDW perturbative derivation (no ad hoc fitted parameters), the explicit physical interpretation of A, R, and sigma as tunable experimental controls, and the fact that the numerical results are internally consistent with the stated model. The main caveat is that the analogue field is the condensate density, whose vacuum two-point function carries a spectral weight (u_k+v_k)^2 rather than the canonical 1/(2 omega_k) of a free scalar field; this affects the interpretation of the reported effects as genuine probes of Lorentz-violating vacuum structure.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs Sec. IV B (text following Fig. 4)] The abstract states that, unlike the Lorentz-invariant case, "smoother detector switchings does not enhance the entanglement harvesting efficiency from the Lorentz-violating quantum field vacuum." This directly contradicts the body of the paper, which says that when sigma M* increases, the maximum harvested entanglement from the Lorentz-violating field increases after optimizing other parameters, and that this is "completely opposite" to the Lorentz-invariant case (Sec. IV B, discussion of Fig. 4). The abstract must be corrected to state the actual result.
  2. [Secs. II-IV, Eqs. (20)-(22), Figs. 3-4] The Wightman function used in the calculation is W = (rho_0/(2 pi)^2) int d^2k (u_k+v_k)^2 e^{-i omega_k (t-t') + i k.(r-r')}. Since (u_k+v_k)^2 = H_k/omega_k, the detector is coupled to the density with a spectral weight that scales as |k| in the phononic regime and is enhanced near the roton minimum. This is not the canonical 1/(2 omega_k) weight of a free Lorentz-violating scalar field coupled to a standard UDW detector. The comparison in Figs. 3 and 4 is therefore between two density-coupled configurations, not between a canonical LI scalar vacuum and a canonical LV scalar vacuum. To support the claim (Secs. IV B and VI) that the reported signatures can serve as criteria for Lorentz-invariance violation, the authors should perform a control calculation in which (u_k+v_k)^2 is replaced by the canonical 1/(2 omega_k) while keeping the dispersion (10). If the optimal-Omega shift and the
  3. [Sec. IV A, Fig. 3] The Lorentz-invariant baseline is not specified with enough precision. The text refers to the phononic limit omega_k = c0 |k|, but it does not write the corresponding Wightman function or the explicit form of (u_k+v_k)^2 used in the numerical evaluation. In particular, it is not clear whether the density weight k/(2 m c0) is retained in the LI case. Since the central claim is a comparison between LI and LV cases, the exact equations and parameter choices for the LI calculation should be given.
  4. [Sec. II and Sec. V, Eq. (10), Figs. 4-6] The calculation assumes a free Gaussian Bogoliubov vacuum for density fluctuations and treats A up to the critical value A_c = 3.4454 (Fig. 4(c),(f) and Figs. 5-6). Near A_c the roton minimum approaches zero, and the actual ground state of a dipolar BEC in the DDI-dominated regime is known to be affected by beyond-mean-field fluctuations, leading to droplet or supersolid physics. In that regime the Wightman function (20) may not describe the vacuum seen by an immersed impurity. The authors should either restrict the analysis to A values where the homogeneous Gaussian description is reliable or explicitly justify that the predicted signatures are robust beyond the mean-field regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (21)-(22)] The notation (u_k + nu_k)^2 should read (u_k + v_k)^2; the symbol nu appears to be a typographical corruption of v. Also check the measures in Eq. (16): the first integral should be d tau d tau' chi(tau) chi(tau'), not d tau chi(tau').
  2. [Abstract and throughout] The phrase "Lorentz-invariant violation" is a malapropism; it should be "Lorentz-invariance violation" or "Lorentz violation." The abstract also contains a grammatical error: "smoother detector switchings does not enhance" should be "do not enhance."
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption does not state which parameter values (e.g., A, R, or the use of the phononic limit) were used to produce the Lorentz-invariant result. This is related to major comment 3 and should be clarified for reproducibility.
  4. [Figs. 5-6] The caption labels contain formatting artifacts, e.g., "M*L/c0=0.3, sigma M*=1" and the inline math in the captions is inconsistent. Please ensure all labels render correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the concurrence is computed from the independently specified Bogoliubov dispersion and Wightman function; no fitted parameter or self-citation chain forces the reported effects.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The detector transition probabilities P_D (Eq. 21) and correlator X (Eq. 22) are obtained by inserting the explicit Bogoliubov Wightman function (Eq. 20) into the standard UDW formulas (Eqs. 15 and 17); the concurrence (Eq. 18) is then evaluated numerically with no free parameters fitted to the target result. The dispersion relation (Eq. 10) and Bogoliubov amplitudes (Eq. 7) are inputs taken from the mean-field theory of the dipolar BEC, not from the entanglement data. A, R, σ, Ω and L are physical/tunable controls, so the qualitative claims (shift of optimal Ω/M* with A; σ-width reversal) are computed consequences rather than definitions. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. [52,60,77]) are used to support the analogue mapping and standard dispersion, but the central entanglement-harvesting calculation is new and independent; no 'uniqueness theorem' or unverified prior result is invoked to forbid alternatives. The potential concern that the density-coupling weight (u_k+v_k)^2 differs from a canonically normalized scalar field's 1/(2ω_k) is an interpretive/correctness issue about benchmark choice, not a circularity: the calculation openly uses the density operator of the BEC and does not conceal that dependence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to produce the claimed output; A, R, and σ are physical/tunable controls. The main burden is the Gaussian-vacuum/quasi-2D modeling and the use of a phononic LI baseline. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • A (Lorentz-violation strength) = scanned 0-3.4454 in Figs 4-6
    Ratio g_eff0 ρ0/ω_z controlling how far the quasi-2D dipolar spectrum deviates from Lorentz invariance; a physical tunable parameter, not fitted to the entanglement result.
  • R (dipolar-to-contact ratio) = √(π/2) (DDI-dominated)
    Fixed to the maximum DDI-dominance value to emphasize Lorentz-violating effects; experimentally tunable via Feshbach resonance and polarizing-field angle.
  • Gaussian switching width σM* = 1 or 5 in the figures
    Detector interaction duration, scanned; central to the claimed switching-width reversal.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Quasi-2D condensate with Gaussian z-profile, static homogeneous background, and Bogoliubov decomposition of density fluctuations.
    Invoked in Sec II (Eqs. 4-8); if the condensate is not quasi-2D or the background is not static, the analogue field (10) is not realized.
  • standard math Perturbative UDW detector model: Gaussian switch-on/off, field traced out, O(λ²) detector state (14).
    Sec III and Supplemental Material; this is the standard entanglement-harvesting expansion from Refs. [25, 37].
  • domain assumption Stability bound A ≤ A_c = 3.4454 from prior roton-instability theory.
    Adopted from Refs. [77-79]; needed so the quasiparticle spectrum remains stable. Near A_c the free Bogoliubov vacuum may be invalid.
  • domain assumption The Lorentz-invariant baseline is the phononic limit ω_k ≈ c0|k| of the R=0 dispersion (23).
    Sec IV A; the paper does not state explicitly which dispersion is integrated in Fig. 3, creating ambiguity in the LI-versus-LV comparison.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21504 in / 20369 out tokens · 201226 ms · 2026-08-03T17:28:23.231015+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We theoretically propose an experimentally viable scheme to explore the transfer of nonclassical correlations from a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) to a pair of impurities immersed in it. Operating at ultra-low temperature, density fluctuations of the dipolar BEC emulate a vacuum field with Lorentz-violating dispersion, while the two impurities function as Unruh-DeWitt detectors for the BEC quasiparticles. We study the harvesting of entanglement from the quantum vacuum of this analogue Lorentz-violating quantum field by spatially separated Unruh-DeWitt detectors. Our analysis reveals key parameter dependencies that optimize the harvesting of entanglement. In particular, unlike the Lorentz-invariant case, smoother detector switchings does not enhance the entanglement harvesting efficiency from the Lorentz-violating quantum field vacuum. Moreover, the strength of the Lorentz-invariant violation can shift the optimal energy structure of the detectors for harvesting entanglement from the Lorentz-violating quantum field vacuum-a clear deviation from the Lorentz-invariant scenario. As a fundamental quantum mechanical setup, our quantum fluid platform provides an experimentally realizable testbed for examining the entanglement harvesting protocol from an effective Lorentz-violating quantum field vacuum using a pair of impurity probers, which may also has potential implications for exploring the Lorentz-invariant violation in quantum field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.09263 by Jieci Wang, Jiliang Jing, Mengjie Wang, Weiping Yao, Xiaobao Liu, Zehua Tian.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The dimensionless function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Concurrence shown in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Concurrence shown in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Concurrence shown in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Concurrence shown in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bose polarons as relativistic Unruh-DeWitt detectors: Entanglement harvesting from Bose-Einstein condensates

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    A trapped impurity in a BEC is shown to be a controllable Unruh-DeWitt detector, with explicit 39K/87Rb parameters for observing entanglement harvesting.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We takeR= p π/2 in the dispersion (10) such that the strength of LI violation increases with the increase ofA

    The switching function widthσM ∗ = 1 corresponds to (a), (b) and (c) cases, andσM ∗ = 5 corresponds to (d), (e) and (f) cases. We takeR= p π/2 in the dispersion (10) such that the strength of LI violation increases with the increase ofA. means that a transition from the linear (phononic) band to the dispersive regime (quasiparticles) exists. Note that ifk...

  2. [2]

    =0, 𝜎𝑀∗=1(a) (b) (c)𝑀∗𝐿/𝑐

    Here the detector’s energy-level spacing Ω/M ∗ is fixed, while the interdetector distanceM ∗L/c0 varies. We take R= p π/2 in the dispersion (10) such that the strength of LI violation increases with the increase ofA. The switching function widthσM ∗ = 1 corresponds to (a), (b) and (c) cases, andσM ∗ = 5 corresponds to (d), (e) and (f) cases. curved spacet...

  3. [3]

    We take R= p π/2 in the dispersion (10) such that the strength of LI violation increases with the increase ofA

    Here the interdetector distanceM ∗L/c0 is fixed, while the detector’s energy-level spacing Ω/M ∗ varies. We take R= p π/2 in the dispersion (10) such that the strength of LI violation increases with the increase ofA. The switching function widthσM ∗ = 1 corresponds to (a), (b) and (c) cases, andσM ∗ = 5 corresponds to (d), (e) and (f) cases. ing other par...

  4. [4]

    S. J. Summers and R. Werner, Maximal violation of bell’s inequalities is generic in quantum field theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics110, 247 (1987)

    1987

  5. [5]

    Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electro- dynamics, Physics Letters A153, 321 (1991)

    A. Valentini, Non-local correlations in quantum electro- dynamics, Physics Letters A153, 321 (1991)

    1991

  6. [6]

    Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum, Foundations of Physics33, 167 (2003)

    B. Reznik, Entanglement from the vacuum, Foundations of Physics33, 167 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Reznik, A

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Violating Bell’s inequalities in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A71, 042104 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    Silman and B

    J. Silman and B. Reznik, Long-range entanglement in the Dirac vacuum, Phys. Rev. A75, 052307 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    G. V. Steeg and N. C. Menicucci, Entangling power of an expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D79, 044027 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Salton, R

    G. Salton, R. B. Mann, and N. C. Menicucci, Acceleration-assisted entanglement harvesting and rangefinding, New Journal of Physics17, 035001 (2015)

    2015

  11. [11]

    W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  12. [12]

    Hotta, Quantum energy teleportation in spin chain systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78, 034001 (2009)

    M. Hotta, Quantum energy teleportation in spin chain systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78, 034001 (2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    Hotta, Quantum energy teleportation: An introduc- tory review, arXiv:1101.3954 [quant-ph]

    M. Hotta, Quantum energy teleportation: An introduc- tory review, arXiv:1101.3954 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Hotta, J

    M. Hotta, J. Matsumoto, and G. Yusa, Quantum energy teleportation without a limit of distance, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012311 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Nambu and M

    Y. Nambu and M. Hotta, Quantum energy teleportation with a linear harmonic chain, Phys. Rev. A82, 042329 (2010)

    2010

  16. [16]

    N. A. Rodr ´ ıguez-Briones, H. Katiyar, E. Mart ´ ın- Mart ´ ınez, and R. Laflamme, Experimental Activation of Strong Local Passive States with Quantum Informa- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 110801 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Ikeda, Demonstration of quantum energy teleporta- tion on superconducting quantum hardware, Phys

    K. Ikeda, Demonstration of quantum energy teleporta- tion on superconducting quantum hardware, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 024051 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Ikeda, Criticality of quantum energy teleportation at phase transition points in quantum field theory, Phys

    K. Ikeda, Criticality of quantum energy teleportation at phase transition points in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D107, L071502 (2023). 11

    2023

  19. [19]

    Fan, F.-L

    H. Fan, F.-L. Wu, L. Wang, S.-Q. Liu, and S.-Y. Liu, Strong quantum energy teleportation, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052424 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Wang and S

    J. Wang and S. Yao, Quantum Energy Teleportation versus Information Teleportation, Quantum8, 1564 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Preskill, Do black holes destroy information?, arXiv:hep-th/9209058 [hep-th]

    J. Preskill, Do black holes destroy information?, arXiv:hep-th/9209058 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    S. B. Giddings, The black hole information paradox, arXiv preprint hep-th/9508151

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    S. D. Mathur, The information paradox: a pedagogi- cal introduction, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 224001 (2009)

    2009

  24. [24]

    Raju, Lessons from the information paradox, Physics Reports943, 1 (2022)

    S. Raju, Lessons from the information paradox, Physics Reports943, 1 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Susskind, L

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius, and J. Uglum, The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3743 (1993)

    1993

  26. [26]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, Journal of High Energy Physics2013, 62 (2013)

    2013

  27. [27]

    S. L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Bet- ter late than never: Information Retrieval from Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 101301 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Pozas-Kerstjens and E

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064042 (2015)

    2015

  29. [29]

    Wu, R.-D

    S.-M. Wu, R.-D. Wang, X.-L. Huang, and Z. Wang, Har- vesting asymmetric steering via non-identical detectors, The European Physical Journal C85, 708 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Teixid´ o-Bonfill and E

    A. Teixid´ o-Bonfill and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Deriva- tive coupling enables genuine entanglement harvesting in causal communication, Phys. Rev. D110, 105016 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Wu, R.-D

    S.-M. Wu, R.-D. Wang, X.-L. Huang, and Z. Wang, Does gravitational wave assist vacuum steering and Bell nonlocality?, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 155 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Bueley, L

    K. Bueley, L. Huang, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann, Harvesting mutual information from BTZ black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D106, 025010 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Barman, S

    D. Barman, S. Barman, and B. R. Majhi, Entanglement harvesting between two inertial Unruh-Dewitt detectors from nonvacuum quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045005 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Suryaatmadja, R

    C. Suryaatmadja, R. B. Mann, and W. Cong, Entan- glement harvesting of inertially moving Unruh-Dewitt detectors in minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D106, 076002 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Z. Liu, J. Zhang, R. B. Mann, and H. Yu, Does accel- eration assist entanglement harvesting?, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085012 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Gallock-Yoshimura, E

    K. Gallock-Yoshimura, E. Tjoa, and R. B. Mann, Har- vesting entanglement with detectors freely falling into a black hole, Phys. Rev. D104, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    J. Foo, R. B. Mann, and M. Zych, Entanglement ampli- fication between superposed detectors in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D103, 065013 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    K. K. Ng, R. B. Mann, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, New techniques for entanglement harvesting in flat and curved spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D97, 125011 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Li and Z

    R. Li and Z. Zhao, Entanglement harvesting of circu- larly accelerated detectors with a reflecting boundary, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 185 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, A

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, A. R. H. Smith, and D. R. Terno, Spacetime structure and vacuum entanglement, Phys. Rev. D93, 044001 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and N

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and N. C. Menicucci, Cosmological quantum entanglement, Classical and Quantum Gravity 29, 224003 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and N

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez and N. C. Menicucci, Entangle- ment in curved spacetimes and cosmology, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 214001 (2014)

    2014

  43. [43]

    X. Liu, Z. Tian, J. Wang, and J. Jing, Radiative process of two entanglement atoms in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D97, 105030 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    Z. Tian, J. Wang, J. Jing, and A. Dragan, Detecting the curvature of de Sitter universe with two entangled atoms, Scientific Reports6, 35222 (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    Tian and J

    Z. Tian and J. Jing, Distinguishing de Sitter universe from thermal Minkowski spacetime by Casimir-Polder- like force, Journal of High Energy Physics2014, 89 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    Chakraborty, L

    A. Chakraborty, L. Hackl, and M. Zych, Entanglement harvesting in quantum superposed spacetime, Phys. Rev. D111, 104052 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Y. Ji, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, Entanglement harvesting in cosmic string spacetime, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024, 161 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    T. R. Perche, B. Ragula, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Har- vesting entanglement from the gravitational vacuum, Phys. Rev. D108, 085025 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Amelino-Camelia, Quantum-Spacetime Phe- nomenology, Living Rev

    G. Amelino-Camelia, Quantum-Spacetime Phe- nomenology, Living Rev. Rel.16, 5 (2013)

    2013

  50. [50]

    Chatterjee, S

    R. Chatterjee, S. Gangopadhyay, and A. S. Majumdar, Violation of equivalence in an accelerating atom-mirror system in the generalized uncertainty principle frame- work, Phys. Rev. D104, 124001 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Kajuri, Polymer quantization predicts radiation in inertial frames, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 055007 (2016)

    N. Kajuri, Polymer quantization predicts radiation in inertial frames, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 055007 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Husain and J

    V. Husain and J. Louko, Low Energy Lorentz Violation from Modified Dispersion at High Energies, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061301 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    Kajuri and G

    N. Kajuri and G. Sardar, Low energy Lorentz viola- tion in polymer quantization revisited, Physics Letters B776, 412 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Louko and S

    J. Louko and S. D. Upton, Low-energy Lorentz violation from high-energy modified dispersion in inertial and cir- cular motion, Phys. Rev. D97, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Tian and J

    Z. Tian and J. Du, Probing low-energy Lorentz violation from high-energy modified dispersion in dipolar Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. D103, 085014 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    Wu and Z

    Y. Wu and Z. Tian, Geometric phase assisted detection of Lorentz-invariance violation from modified dispersion at high energies, arXiv:2409.09257 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Agullo, J

    I. Agullo, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and L. Parker, Acceleration radiation, transition probabilities and trans-Planckian physics, New Journal of Physics12, 095017 (2010)

    2010

  58. [58]

    G. M. Hossain and G. Sardar, Violation of the Kubo- Martin-Schwinger condition along a Rindler trajectory in polymer quantization, Phys. Rev. D92, 024018 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Carballo-Rubio, L

    R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, and J. de Ram´ on, Unruh Effect without Thermality, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 041601 (2019). 12

    2019

  60. [60]

    G. M. Hossain and G. Sardar, Is there Unruh effect in polymer quantization?, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 245016 (2016)

    2016

  61. [61]

    Del Porro, M

    F. Del Porro, M. Herrero-Valea, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, Rescuing the Unruh effect in Lorentz vi- olating gravity, The European Physical Journal C85, 386 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Scardigli, M

    F. Scardigli, M. Blasone, G. Luciano, and R. Casa- dio, Modified Unruh effect from generalized uncertainty principle, The European Physical Journal C78, 728 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    Z. Tian, L. Wu, L. Zhang, J. Jing, and J. Du, Probing Lorentz-invariance-violation-induced nonther- mal Unruh effect in quasi-two-dimensional dipolar con- densates, Phys. Rev. D106, L061701 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Xu, Momentum-resolved probing of Lorentz- violating dispersion relations via Unruh-Dewitt detec- tor, arXiv:2503.17757 [gr-qc]

    H. Xu, Momentum-resolved probing of Lorentz- violating dispersion relations via Unruh-Dewitt detec- tor, arXiv:2503.17757 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Colladay and V

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kosteleck´ y, CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D55, 6760 (1997)

    1997

  66. [66]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Wang, and J. Jing, Quasinormal modes and late time tails of perturbation fields on a Schwarzschild-like black hole with a global monopole in the Einstein-bumblebee theory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 100411 (2023),

    2023

  67. [67]

    F. Quan, F. Li, Q. Pan, M. Wang, and J. Jing, Station- ary scalar clouds around a rotating BTZ-like black hole in the Einstein-bumblebee gravity, arXiv:2501.15759 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Colladay and V

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kosteleck´ y, Lorentz-violating ex- tension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998)

    1998

  69. [69]

    Mattingly, Modern tests of Lorentz invariance, Living Rev

    D. Mattingly, Modern tests of Lorentz invariance, Living Rev. Rel.8, 5 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    V. A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell, Data Tables for Lorentz andCP TViolation, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 11 (2011)

    2011

  71. [71]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1982)

    1982

  72. [72]

    S. Takagi, Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration: Hawking-Unruh Effect in Rindler Man- ifold of Arbitrary Dimension, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement88, 1 (1986)

    1986

  73. [73]

    L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh Effect and its Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787 (2008)

    2008

  74. [74]

    B. L. Hu, S.-Y. Lin, and J. Louko, Relativistic quantum information in detectors–field interactions, Classical and Quantum Gravity29, 224005 (2012)

    2012

  75. [75]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Liu, and J. Wang, Harvesting cor- relations from BTZ black hole coupled to a Lorentz- violating vector field, arXiv:2503.06404 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Baranov, Theoretical progress in many-body physics with ultracold dipolar gases, Physics Reports464, 71 (2008)

    M. Baranov, Theoretical progress in many-body physics with ultracold dipolar gases, Physics Reports464, 71 (2008)

    2008

  77. [77]

    Recati, P

    A. Recati, P. O. Fedichev, W. Zwerger, J. von Delft, and P. Zoller, Atomic Quantum Dots Coupled to a Reservoir of a Superfluid Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 040404 (2005)

    2005

  78. [78]

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Gibbons-Hawking Ef- fect in the Sonic de Sitter Space-time of an Expand- ing Bose-Einstein-Condensed Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 240407 (2003)

    2003

  79. [79]

    Ronen, D

    S. Ronen, D. C. E. Bortolotti, and J. L. Bohn, Radial and Angular Rotons in Trapped Dipolar Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 030406 (2007)

    2007

  80. [80]

    Tian, S.-Y

    Z. Tian, S.-Y. Ch¨ a, and U. R. Fischer, Roton entan- glement in quenched dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A97, 063611 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.