Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

The paper establishes a flat-holography dictionary in which scattering data act as sources and the renormalized canonical momentum acts as the dual operator's expectation value, with Carrollian correlators computed from the renormalized bul

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 15:59 UTC pith:GQOJE2SZ

load-bearing objection The free-field flat-space holographic renormalization is genuinely new and carefully done; the interacting claims and the C=0 scheme choice keep the paper at conditional rather than established. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.14818 v3 pith:GQOJE2SZ submitted 2025-12-16 hep-th

Flat Holography & Holographic Renormalization: Scalar Field

Martin Ammon , Federico Capone , Christoph Sieling This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords flat holographyCarrollian holographyholographic renormalizationHamilton-Jacobi formalismscattering boundary conditionsnull infinityscalar fieldWitten diagrams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish a flat-holography dictionary in the spirit of the AdS/CFT correspondence: for a scalar field in Minkowski spacetime with scattering boundary conditions, the Carrollian generating functional equals the renormalized bulk on-shell action. The source is the scattering data, and the dual operator's expectation value is the renormalized canonical momentum. If correct, this gives a first-principles derivation of known Carrollian two- and three-point functions from a bulk action, and it extends Hamilton-Jacobi renormalization technology beyond asymptotically AdS spacetimes. A sympathetic reader would care because it provides a flat analog of the standard holographic dictionary that does not rely on taking flat limits of AdS/CFT and treats past and future null infinity simultaneously.

Core claim

The central claim is that the generating functional of the dual Carrollian theory equals the renormalized on-shell action of a scalar field in Minkowski space. For a free massless scalar with Feynman iε boundary conditions, the paper computes this action explicitly as S^ren_os = -(i/2π)∫dω dΩ |ω| φ^(II)(-ω) φ^(I)(ω), with the scattering mode φ^(II) as the source and the renormalized canonical momentum π as the vev. After imposing bulk regularity and an antipodal source map, this yields the conformal Carrollian two-point function (v1-v2)^(-2) δ(Ω1-Ω2) with scaling dimension (d+1)/2, matching existing results in the literature. The same construction reproduces the known Carrollian three-point

What carries the argument

The engine is Hamilton-Jacobi holographic renormalization: a radial timelike foliation is used as the flow direction, with a counterterm action S_ct = -(1/2)∫√γ Φ f Φ whose kernel f solves a Riccati equation derived from the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Because r=∞ is an irregular singular point, the asymptotic solutions are Thomé expansions (e^{βr} r^{-(d-1)/2} times a power series) rather than Frobenius series, and the on-shell action diverges exponentially; the Feynman iε prescription selects φ^(II) as the growing, source-carrying branch and φ^(I) as the suppressed branch. The renormalized momentum Π_sub = -√γ(∂_r - f)Φ projects onto φ^(I), and bulk regularity relation then connects φ^(I) to

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the counterterm ambiguity C can be set to zero with no loss of generality; if admissible nonzero C's exist, the identification of the vev with the renormalized momentum and the computed correlators become one scheme among many.

What would settle it

Solve the Hamilton-Jacobi/Riccati equation for the counterterm kernel f with a nonzero ambiguity C(∂_t, Δ_ĝ) and check whether the subtracted action remains finite and the variation retains the Dirichlet form πδφ^(II); a single admissible nonzero C would break the claimed uniqueness. A second, independent check is to compute the order-λ counterterm for Φ³ and see whether free counterterms suffice to make the interacting action finite.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the dictionary (1.1) holds, any scalar bulk theory with these scattering boundary conditions has a well-defined dual Carrollian generating functional, computed from the renormalized on-shell action rather than by hand-built extrapolation.
  • The dictionary fixes the dual operator scaling dimension to (d+1)/2, reconciling the source identification with the known Carrollian correlators.
  • The same renormalized action emerges in (t,r) and (v,r) coordinates, showing coordinate independence and encoding both I⁺ and I⁻ scattering data in a single functional.
  • Massive scalars acquire a Carrollian imprint with √(ω²-m²) kinematics, suggesting a democratic treatment of massive and massless fields in flat holography.
  • For λΦ³, the tree-level three-point function naturally contains both 1→2 and 2→1 scattering configurations, matching kinematical expectations for Carrollian amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A nonzero admissible counterterm function C would shift the one-point function by a term C φ^(II); if such solutions of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation exist, the vev-as-momentum dictionary is scheme-dependent rather than unique.
  • The order-λ counterterm for Φ³ has not been computed; if it turns out to be necessary for finiteness, the three-point function (5.25) would receive corrections beyond the paper's free-counterterm assumption.
  • The abstract Carrollian manifold interpretation suggests the dual theory is fixed mainly by the isometry group of null infinity, not by the geometry of I⁺ or I⁻; this could help bridge Carrollian and celestial approaches to flat holography.
  • Applying the same renormalization scheme to linearized gravity would provide a sharp test, since the resulting conformal Carrollian operator dimensions would likely differ from standard constructions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Hamilton-Jacobi holographic renormalization scheme for real scalar fields in Minkowski spacetime and uses it to build a flat-space/Carrollian dictionary. The central relation is W_CarrCFT[phi_s] = S^ren_os (Eq. (1.1)); the source is the Thome branch phi^(II), and the renormalized radial canonical momentum pi is identified with the dual one-point function. For a free scalar the authors compute the renormalized on-shell action in (t,r) and (v,r) coordinates, obtain <O> and a two-point function after imposing interior regularity and an antipodal source map, and match existing Carrollian results. For lambda Phi^3 they present a tree-level three-point function using Witten diagrams, with explicit caveats about missing holographic renormalization in the interacting theory.

Significance. The free-field part is a clear technical advance: it shows how the Riccati/Hamilton-Jacobi equation resums the infinite tower of exponential counterterms required by the Thome asymptotics, and it gives a concrete prescription (renormalized momentum = vev) that is explicitly tracked from action to correlators. The two- and three-point results (4.44) and (5.25) agree with the existing Carrollian literature in the expected regime, which is a nontrivial consistency check. If the scheme ambiguity discussed below is resolved, the paper would provide a useful template for flat holography beyond extrapolations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.13)-(4.16); Sec. 4.3 after Eq. (4.38)] The counterterm ambiguity C is load-bearing. The Hamilton-Jacobi equation fixes f only up to C = C_0^(I)/C_0^(II); the divergence-cancellation argument only requires C_0^(II) != 0, not C = 0. Setting C = 0 is what produces S^ren_os in Eqs. (4.23)-(4.24) and the one-point function (4.38). Section 4.3 explicitly concedes that a nonzero C adds a finite term ~ C phi^(II) to <O>. Since Eq. (1.1) defines W_CarrCFT by S^ren_os, this is not a harmless contact-term ambiguity: the dictionary itself, and the matched two-point function (4.44), are contingent on C unless an independent principle fixes it. The 'canonical pair' argument is a symplectic normalization choice, not a derivation. Please either prove that admissible C != 0 solutions are excluded, or identify a physical criterion (e.g., Carrollian Ward identities, scheme independence of amplitudes) selecting C = 0.
  2. [Sec. 5.1, Eqs. (5.9)-(5.11); Sec. 5.3, Eq. (5.25)] The interacting three-point function is explicitly conditional. The paper states that holographic renormalization is not performed and assumes that the free counterterms suffice and that phi_bar^(II) = 0. The particular solution in (5.8) contains overleading e^{2 beta_- r} terms; whether these are cancelled by counterterms at order lambda is not checked. The bulk-to-boundary propagator K in (5.14)-(5.16) is built from the free f, and (5.24) therefore tests the interaction vertex only under the postulated dictionary. Thus (5.25) should be labelled a conditional prediction of the framework, not a derived consequence, until the lambda-order Hamilton-Jacobi equation is solved. This is a load-bearing limitation for the interaction section of the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.35)-(4.38)] The transition from W_CarrCFT as log <exp(int phi_s O)> to functional derivative of S_sub is standard, but the normalization of the path measure and the implicit source-dependence of O are not specified; a sentence clarifying the conventions would help.
  2. [Eq. (5.19)] The factor sign(omega)^ell is defined only through Eq. (4.42); state this before using it in K_s to avoid confusion with a naive spherical-harmonic sign.
  3. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.48)] The massive result is presented as an 'imprint' on I, while the Carrollian interpretation is deferred. A caveat at the first occurrence would help set expectations.
  4. [Eq. (4.16)] The notation f = d_r log(r^{-(d-1)/2} e^{beta_- r} + ...) is ambiguous at subleading order because the ellipsis is inside the logarithm; rewriting in terms of the explicit Thome series would improve readability.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The flat dictionary is definitional and the finite correlators depend on the manually imposed counterterm choice C=0; the central two-point result is not uniquely forced by the bulk equations.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Eq. (1.1); Sec. 4.3, eqs. (4.35)-(4.38)]
    "our scheme is similar to the logic of GKPW and holographic renormalization, as it can be expressed as W_CarrCFT[φ_s] = S^ren_os [φ_s] ... According to (1.1), we identify S^ren_os with the generating functional of connected diagrams, which can be used to compute Carrollian correlation functions."

    The equality is the dictionary itself: the Carrollian generating functional is defined to be the renormalized bulk action, and the operator is then defined by functional differentiation with respect to the source. Hence the statement that the vev is the renormalized canonical momentum is a built-in identification rather than a derived consequence. The independent content is the explicit Hamilton-Jacobi computation of S^ren_os; if W_CarrCFT were treated as independently defined, the equality would be a conjecture, not a prediction.

  2. other [Sec. 4.1, eq. (4.13); Sec. 4.3 after eq. (4.38); Sec. 6]
    "Recall that for this result we have set the function C in (4.13) to zero. A non-vanishing C adds a finite term of the form ∼Cφ^(II) to the one-point function. The choice to set C=0 is unique in the sense that φ^(I) relates to the one-point function while φ^(II) relates to the source. ... The counterterms we construct to reach this result contain an ambiguity, indicated by the function C in (4.13), that we have set to zero motivated by the request that the source and the expectation value form a well-defined canonical pair in the asymptotic phase space."

    The general Riccati solution contains an unconstrained integration function C; divergence cancellation only requires C_0^(II)≠0. The central identification π∼⟨O⟩ and the value of the one- and two-point functions depend on setting C=0 by hand. The paper itself concedes that a non-zero C shifts the one-point function by ∼Cφ^(II). Thus the computed correlators are not uniquely forced by the bulk equations alone; they are fixed by an extra scheme/normalization input, so part of the 'prediction' is constructed by the choice of counterterm rather than derived.

full rationale

The paper's central dictionary is partly definitional: eq. (1.1) sets the Carrollian generating functional equal to the renormalized bulk on-shell action, and the dual operator is then defined via functional derivatives. That is the intended holographic dictionary, and the nontrivial content lies in the explicit Hamilton-Jacobi evaluation of S^ren_os. The larger concern is scheme dependence: the Riccati solution for the counterterm contains the arbitrary function C, which is set to zero by hand; the paper explicitly acknowledges that a non-zero C would change the one-point function and hence the finite correlators. This makes the specific two-point function (4.44) and the identification π∼⟨O⟩ contingent on the chosen normalization, although the authors invoke the canonical-pair condition as motivation. No load-bearing self-citation was found: the author self-citations in the reference list are contextual and do not carry the derivation. The interaction section explicitly assumes without proof that free counterterms suffice and that the source shift vanishes; this is an admitted limitation rather than a circular reduction. External checks against [32,73-76] provide independent support, so the result is not a pure tautology. Overall score 4: the central claim has independent computational content, but the dictionary is definitional and the finite predictions are partly determined by the manually chosen counterterm scheme.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction rests on one postulate (the dictionary, eq. 1.1), one physical input (Feynman iϵ and the scattering-data identification), one schematic geometric identification (Σ→I+∪I−), and two by-hand choices (C=0 and the antipodal source map). For interactions, an additional ad hoc assumption replaces the unperformed renormalization. No numbers are fitted to data; the free parameters are choices of quantization/scheme.

free parameters (3)
  • Counterterm ambiguity function C(∂_t, Δ_ĝ) = 0
    Eq. (4.13): C = C0^(I)/C0^(II) is the ratio of the two integration functions of the Riccati solution; §4.3 states a non-vanishing C adds a finite term ~Cφ^(II) to the one-point function. Set to zero by hand on canonical-pairing grounds.
  • iϵ prescription (Feynman contour) = ω → ω + iϵ sgn(ω), eq. (3.16)
    Choice of analytic continuation; determines which branch (φ^(II)) diverges and therefore which mode is the source. Motivated by S-matrix physics (§3.2), but a different prescription would produce a different dictionary.
  • Antipodal source redefinition φ_s(ω,x̂) = φ^(II)(ω, sign(ω)x̂) = sign(ω) antipodal map, eq. (4.41)
    Introduced so that the two-point function takes the standard electric Carrollian form δ(Ω1-Ω2) rather than the antipodal form δ(Ω1-Ω2^AP); the correlator's angular structure depends on this choice.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Thomé solutions at the irregular singular point r=∞ are the complete set of asymptotic data for the scalar field in Minkowski space.
    Appendix A.2 and §2.2.1; the entire asymptotic analysis (branches (I)/(II)) rests on this ODE classification.
  • domain assumption With the Feynman iϵ prescription, the two asymptotic branches map onto scattering data: positive-frequency data on I− and negative-frequency data on I+.
    Table 1 and §3.2; this mapping is the physical input that connects the formalism to the AFS generating functional, but it is assumed rather than derived.
  • domain assumption Dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed on a radial timelike foliation, with the constant-r surface identified with I+ ∪ I− in the r→∞ limit.
    §3.3. Footnote 11 concedes this 'is only schematic'; the whole simultaneous treatment of I± rests on this identification.
  • domain assumption The renormalized bulk on-shell action equals the Carrollian generating functional (the dictionary postulate).
    Eq. (1.1); this is the central conjecture of the paper, not a theorem.
  • domain assumption Interior regularity in pure Minkowski spacetime imposes φ^(I) = e^{-i(νπ+π/2)}φ^(II).
    §4.3, eq. (4.39), following from regularity of Jν solutions. Required to compute the two-point function; changes for other backgrounds.
  • ad hoc to paper For λΦ³, the free counterterms suffice and the free asymptotic data retain their holographic interpretation (¯φ^(II)=0).
    §5.1: explicitly flagged by the authors as an assumption ('assuming that further divergences do not affect the free counterterm'); holographic renormalization is explicitly not carried out.
invented entities (1)
  • Dual Carrollian operator O on an abstract Carrollian manifold independent evidence
    purpose: The boundary operator whose vev is the renormalized canonical momentum and whose correlators are (4.44) and (5.25); the abstract manifold is deliberately not identified with either I+ or I−.
    The operator is defined through the dictionary, but its correlators are concrete quantitative claims and are checked against independent bulk computations in Refs. [32, 73–76]. The abstract-manifold interpretation itself has no independent handle beyond shared isometries with null infinity.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 42949 in / 23440 out tokens · 236547 ms · 2026-08-03T15:59:16.447145+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We adapt the Hamilton-Jacobi method of holographic renormalization to scalar field theories in Minkowski spacetime with scattering boundary conditions. The approach yields a flat-space holographic dictionary in which the expectation value of a dual operator is given by the renormalized canonical momentum. The source of the operator is imposed as a Dirichlet condition in a radial timelike foliation of the bulk theory and corresponds to the scattering data appearing in the Arefeva-Faddeev-Slavnov generating functional. We initiate a study of massive scalars and interacting fields within this formalism and we comment on extensions to different bulk theories and backgrounds.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Energy-Momentum-News Complex near Future Null Infinity

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5

    A Carroll-covariant energy-momentum-news complex at future null infinity yields Ward identities that generalise the Bondi loss equations, with an anomalous Carroll boost.

  2. Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Including the missing K0 descendant chain completes Carrollian conformal representations and produces C2>0 sectors and two-point correlators fixed only up to functions of Carrollian invariants.

  3. Asymptotically-FLRW$_3$ spacetimes

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces asymptotically-FLRW3 spacetimes whose asymptotic symmetry group is the one-parameter family BMS3^k, fully characterizes the scalar-field solution space, identifies covariant mass/angular-momentum aspects an...

  4. Spinning bulk-to-boundary correlators in the massless theories with Poincar\'e symmetry

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bulk-to-boundary correlators for spin-s operators in Poincaré-invariant massless theories are linear superpositions of ISO(2)-fixed tensor structures mapped to non-crossing double-line diagrams that are tensor product...

  5. The gravitational S-matrix from the path integral: asymptotic symmetries and soft theorems

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A path integral with asymptotic boundary conditions produces the gravitational S-matrix and derives soft graviton theorems from extended BMS symmetry Ward identities.

  6. Massive fields in 3D Minkowski space and boundary correlators

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The work identifies a broader class of 2D Carrollian CFT correlators that encode massive 3D Minkowski S-matrices and constructs the corresponding bulk-to-boundary propagator.

  7. On bulk reconstruction in Lorentzian AdS and its flat space limit

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Constructs bulk scalar field representations in Lorentzian AdS4 from boundary primaries via time-ordered propagators and derives their flat-space limits to plane-wave or Carrollian bases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 93 linked inside Pith · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Banks, M.R

    T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec,AdS dynamics from conformal field theory,hep-th/9808016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Susskind and E

    L. Susskind and E. Witten,The Holographic bound in anti-de Sitter space,hep-th/9805114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Stanford,Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT,1104.2621

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Botta-Cantcheff, P.J

    M. Botta-Cantcheff, P.J. Mart ´ ınez and G.A. Silva,Holographic excited states in AdS Black Holes,JHEP04(2019) 028 [1901.00505]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time,hep-th/9901076

    J. Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time,hep-th/9901076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Arcioni and C

    G. Arcioni and C. Dappiaggi,Exploring the holographic principle in asymptotically flat space-times via the BMS group,Nucl. Phys. B674(2003) 553 [hep-th/0306142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    de Boer and S.N

    J. de Boer and S.N. Solodukhin,A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time,Nucl. Phys. B665(2003) 545 [hep-th/0303006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    Pasterski, M

    S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, inSnowmass 2021, 11, 2021 [2111.11392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    McLoughlin, A

    T. McLoughlin, A. Puhm and A.-M. Raclariu,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes chapter 11: soft theorems and celestial amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443012 [2203.13022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,Phys

    L. Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,Phys. Rept.1073 (2024) 1 [2310.12922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    A. Ball, E. Himwich, S.A. Narayanan, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger,Uplifting AdS3/CFT2 to flat space holography,JHEP08(2019) 168 [1905.09809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Sharma and A. Strominger,Celestial leaf amplitudes,JHEP07(2024) 132 [2312.07820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Iacobacci, C

    L. Iacobacci, C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From celestial correlators to AdS, and back,JHEP 06(2023) 053 [2208.01629]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Celestial Holography Revisited,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 241601 [2301.01810]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Gonzo, T

    R. Gonzo, T. McLoughlin and A. Puhm,Celestial holography on Kerr-Schild backgrounds, JHEP10(2022) 073 [2207.13719]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,2506.16164. – 49 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

    K. Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    E. Have, K. Nguyen, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer,Massive carrollian fields at timelike infinity, JHEP07(2024) 054 [2402.05190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Dappiaggi,Projecting massive scalar fields to null infinity,Annales Henri Poincare9 (2008) 35 [0705.0284]

    C. Dappiaggi,Projecting massive scalar fields to null infinity,Annales Henri Poincare9 (2008) 35 [0705.0284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    P.-X. Hao, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki, S. Takahashi and T. Takayanagi,Bulk reconstruction of scalar excitations in Flat 3/CCFT2 and the flat limit from (A)dS 3/CFT2,JHEP11 (2025) 054 [2505.20084]

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Bagchi, P

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators,JHEP 04(2023) 135 [2303.07388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Bagchi, P

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll, JHEP08(2024) 144 [2311.11246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Campoleoni, A

    A. Campoleoni, A. Delfante, S. Pekar, P.M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour and M. Vilatte,Flat from anti de Sitter,JHEP12(2023) 078 [2309.15182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Alday, M

    L.F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,JHEP03(2025) 158 [2406.19343]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Lipstein, R

    A. Lipstein, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS4/CFT3,JHEP06(2025) 073 [2504.10291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Fontanella and O

    A. Fontanella and O. Payne,A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?,2508.10085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    S. Kim, P. Kraus, R. Monten and R.M. Myers,S-matrix path integral approach to symmetries and soft theorems,JHEP10(2023) 036 [2307.12368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Kraus and R.M

    P. Kraus and R.M. Myers,Carrollian partition functions and the flat limit of AdS,JHEP 01(2025) 183 [2407.13668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Arefeva, L.D

    I.Y. Arefeva, L.D. Faddeev and A.A. Slavnov,Generating Functional for the s Matrix in Gauge Theories,Teor. Mat. Fiz.21(1974) 311

    1974

  34. [34]

    D. Jain, S. Kundu, S. Minwalla, O. Parrikar, S.G. Prabhu and P. Shrivastava,The S-matrix and boundary correlators in flat space,2311.03443

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis,AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73 [hep-th/0404176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Papadimitriou,Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT,JHEP05(2007) 075 [hep-th/0703152]

    I. Papadimitriou,Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT,JHEP05(2007) 075 [hep-th/0703152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Papadimitriou and K

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis,Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes,JHEP08(2005) 004 [hep-th/0505190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    Hollands, A

    S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi and D. Marolf,Comparison between various notions of conserved charges in asymptotically AdS-spacetimes,Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005) 2881 [hep-th/0503045]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    Hollands, A

    S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi and D. Marolf,Counter-term charges generate bulk symmetries, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 104025 [hep-th/0503105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    Solodukhin,Reconstructing Minkowski space-time,IRMA Lect

    S.N. Solodukhin,Reconstructing Minkowski space-time,IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8 (2005) 123 [hep-th/0405252]. – 50 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Costa,Holographic Reconstruction and Renormalization in Asymptotically Ricci-flat Spacetimes,JHEP11(2012) 046 [1206.3142]

    R.N.C. Costa,Holographic Reconstruction and Renormalization in Asymptotically Ricci-flat Spacetimes,JHEP11(2012) 046 [1206.3142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Hao and M

    Z. Hao and M. Taylor,Flat holography and celestial shockwaves,JHEP02(2024) 090 [2309.04307]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Kraus, F

    P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink,The gravitational action in asymptotically AdS and flat space-times,Nucl. Phys. B563(1999) 259 [hep-th/9906127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  44. [44]

    de Haro, K

    S. de Haro, K. Skenderis and S.N. Solodukhin,Gravity in warped compactifications and the holographic stress tensor,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3171 [hep-th/0011230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Mann and D

    R.B. Mann and D. Marolf,Holographic renormalization of asymptotically flat spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2927 [hep-th/0511096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [46]

    Marolf,Asymptotic flatness, little string theory, and holography,JHEP03(2007) 122 [hep-th/0612012]

    D. Marolf,Asymptotic flatness, little string theory, and holography,JHEP03(2007) 122 [hep-th/0612012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

    A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory, Princeton University Press (2018), [1703.05448]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Freidel, F

    L. Freidel, F. Hopfm¨ uller and A. Riello,Asymptotic Renormalization in Flat Space: Symplectic Potential and Charges of Electromagnetism,JHEP10(2019) 126 [1904.04384]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Chandrasekaran, E.E

    V. Chandrasekaran, E.E. Flanagan, I. Shehzad and A.J. Speranza,A general framework for gravitational charges and holographic renormalization,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37(2022) 2250105 [2111.11974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Capone, P

    F. Capone, P. Mitra, A. Poole and B. Tomova,Phase space renormalization and finite BMS charges in six dimensions,JHEP11(2023) 034 [2304.09330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    McNees and C

    R. McNees and C. Zwikel,Finite charges from the bulk action,JHEP08(2023) 154 [2306.16451]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Riello and L

    A. Riello and L. Freidel,Renormalization of conformal infinity as a stretched horizon, Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 175013 [2402.03097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Bagchi, D

    A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller and W. Merbis,Stress tensor correlators in three-dimensional gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 061502 [1507.05620]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Hartong, E

    J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,2505.05432

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Campoleoni, A

    A. Campoleoni, A. Delfante, D. Francia and C. Heissenberg,Finite actions and asymptotic charges at null infinity for any spin,Phys. Lett. B870(2025) 139908 [2507.19310]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Comp` ere, S.E

    G. Comp` ere, S.E. Gralla and H. Wei,An asymptotic framework for gravitational scattering, Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 205018 [2303.17124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    de Boer, E.P

    J. de Boer, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde,On the holographic renormalization group, JHEP08(2000) 003 [hep-th/9912012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  58. [58]

    de Boer,The Holographic renormalization group,Fortsch

    J. de Boer,The Holographic renormalization group,Fortsch. Phys.49(2001) 339 [hep-th/0101026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  59. [59]

    Kalkkinen, D

    J. Kalkkinen, D. Martelli and W. Mueck,Holographic renormalization and anomalies, JHEP04(2001) 036 [hep-th/0103111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  60. [60]

    Martelli and W

    D. Martelli and W. Mueck,Holographic renormalization and Ward identities with the Hamilton-Jacobi method,Nucl. Phys. B654(2003) 248 [hep-th/0205061]. – 51 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  61. [61]

    Bergamin, D

    L. Bergamin, D. Grumiller, R. McNees and R. Meyer,Black Hole Thermodynamics and Hamilton-Jacobi Counterterm,J. Phys. A41(2008) 164068 [0710.4140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    Papadimitriou,Holographic renormalization as a canonical transformation,JHEP11 (2010) 014 [1007.4592]

    I. Papadimitriou,Holographic renormalization as a canonical transformation,JHEP11 (2010) 014 [1007.4592]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Elvang and M

    H. Elvang and M. Hadjiantonis,A Practical Approach to the Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of Holographic Renormalization,JHEP06(2016) 046 [1603.04485]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Freedman, S.D

    D.Z. Freedman, S.D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli,Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 96 [hep-th/9804058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  66. [66]

    Klebanov and E

    I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking,Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    van Rees,Holographic renormalization for irrelevant operators and multi-trace counterterms,JHEP08(2011) 093 [1102.2239]

    B.C. van Rees,Holographic renormalization for irrelevant operators and multi-trace counterterms,JHEP08(2011) 093 [1102.2239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    van Rees,Irrelevant deformations and the holographic Callan-Symanzik equation, JHEP10(2011) 067 [1105.5396]

    B.C. van Rees,Irrelevant deformations and the holographic Callan-Symanzik equation, JHEP10(2011) 067 [1105.5396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    Castro and P.J

    A. Castro and P.J. Martinez,Revisiting extremal couplings in AdS/CFT,JHEP12(2024) 157 [2409.15410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Papadimitriou,Holographic renormalization made simple: An example,Subnucl

    I. Papadimitriou,Holographic renormalization made simple: An example,Subnucl. Ser.41 (2005) 508

    2005

  71. [71]

    Papadimitriou and A

    I. Papadimitriou and A. Taliotis,Riccati equations for holographic 2-point functions,JHEP 04(2014) 194 [1312.7876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Kraus and R.M

    P. Kraus and R.M. Myers,Carrollian partition function for bulk Yang-Mills theory,JHEP 08(2025) 180 [2503.00916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Kulkarni, R

    H. Kulkarni, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,On Carrollian and Celestial Correlators in General Dimensions,2508.06602

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes,JHEP01 (2024) 076 [2311.09869]

    K. Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes,JHEP01 (2024) 076 [2311.09869]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Donnay, A

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027 [2212.12553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Mason, R

    L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes and celestial symmetries,JHEP05(2024) 012 [2312.10138]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Mueck and K.S

    W. Mueck and K.S. Viswanathan,Conformal field theory correlators from classical scalar field theory on AdS(d+1),Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 041901 [hep-th/9804035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  78. [78]

    Federer,Curvature measures,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society93 (1959) 418

    H. Federer,Curvature measures,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society93 (1959) 418

    1959

  79. [79]

    Giaquinta and G

    M. Giaquinta and G. Modica,Mathematical Analysis, Birkh¨ auser, Boston (2009)

    2009

  80. [80]

    Bekaert and B

    X. Bekaert and B. Oblak,Massless scalars and higher-spin BMS in any dimension,JHEP 11(2022) 022 [2209.02253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.