pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.16450 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-18 · ✦ hep-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Learning holographic QCD with unflavoured meson spectra

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph cond-mat.dis-nnhep-th
keywords holographic QCDneural networksmeson spectradilaton profilechiral symmetry breakinginverse problemAdS/QCD
0
0 comments X

The pith

A neural network reconstructs the five-dimensional holographic geometry and potentials of QCD from unflavored meson mass spectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper frames holographic QCD as an inverse problem and trains a neural network on the masses of the ρ, a1, a2, and f0 mesons plus their radial excitations. The network inverts a discretized Schrödinger-like equation resembling a linear moose to recover the bulk metric, dilaton profile, and the chiral-symmetry-breaking scalar potential. The resulting dilaton is steeper in the infrared than the conventional quadratic form, satisfies the null energy condition, and yields a symmetry-breaking potential with coefficients near -4 and +9. These learned quantities are then used to compute the pion mass and its excitations with good accuracy.

Core claim

Training a neural network on the unflavored meson spectra allows reconstruction of the five-dimensional background, the dilaton potential, and the scalar potential V(X) = k1 X^3 + k2 X^4 with k1 approximately -4 and k2 approximately 9; the extracted dilaton profile is steeper than quadratic in the infrared while obeying the null energy condition, and the same parameters reproduce the pion spectrum to good accuracy.

What carries the argument

Neural network inversion of a discretized Schrödinger-like equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions on a linear moose model of five-dimensional holographic QCD.

If this is right

  • The learned dilaton satisfies the null energy condition.
  • The extracted scalar potential parameters are k1 near -4 and k2 near 9.
  • The same metric and potentials reproduce the pion spectrum with good accuracy.
  • The method supplies a data-driven route to confining effective potentials in holographic QCD.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the training set to include flavored mesons could constrain the full flavor structure of the bulk potentials.
  • The steeper infrared dilaton suggests that holographic models fitted to data may deviate from simple quadratic assumptions used in many analytic studies.
  • Running the network on lattice QCD spectra instead of experimental masses would test consistency between holographic and lattice approaches.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen unflavored meson masses uniquely fix the five-dimensional geometry and potentials without large degeneracy or overfitting.

What would settle it

Compare the model’s predicted pion masses and radial excitations against experimental values; significant mismatch would falsify the reconstruction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16450 by Mathew Thomas Arun, Ritik Pal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The learned functions v(z) (left) and A(z) (right) after training. The shaded regions represent the standard deviation over different runs, and the solid lines represent the mean value. 0 2 4 6 8 10 z 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 d /dz NN: Lowest ( , a1, a2, f0) mass 0 2 4 6 8 10 z 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (z) 4.88z 0.64z 2 NN: Mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The plot of dϕ/dz (left) and ϕ(z) (right). The solid line represents the best fit corresponding to the minimum value of L (ρ,a1,a2,f0) mass . Unlike Figs. 1 and 2, where the spread was symmetric and shown as mean ± standard deviation, the dϕ/dz here exhibit a skewed variation, which is why we only plot the dϕ/dz corresponding to the best run. However, the ϕ(z) (right panel) obtained shows a symmetric sprea… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effective potentials for the ρ, a1, a2, and f0 mesons. The solid line represents the best fit corresponding to the minimum value of L (ρ,a1,a2,f0) mass . parameters and functions. This time, we obtain a matrix for a generalized eigenvalue equation (see Appendix A for more details), which we solve using SciPy’s built-in function scipy.linalg.eigvals. The predicted masses eigenvalues mn obtained (after conve… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass spectra of the ρ, f0, a1 and a2 mesons [47]. The predicted masses correspond to the mean, and the error bars show the standard deviation across multiple runs. 1 2 3 n 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 M ass of m eso n (G e V) Predicted Experimental Individual Runs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass spectrum of the predicted π meson as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The loss curve for a representative training run. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a data-driven neural network framework to reconstruct the five-dimensional background geometry, the dilaton potential, and the chiral-symmetry-breaking scalar potential of holographic QCD from hadron mass spectra. Framed as an inverse problem, the model is trained using a discretized form of the Schr\"odinger-like equation, which resembles a linear moose in ``deconstructed" 5 dimensions with Dirichlet boundary conditions, in contrast to the AdS/DL with ``emergent" space-time. Using the masses of the unflavored mesons $\rho$, $a_1$, $a_2$, and $f_0$ and their excitations as training data, the model learns confining effective potentials and computes a dilaton profile that satisfies the null energy condition. The network predicts that the dilaton's IR behavior will be much steeper than its quadratic form. Moreover, the symmetry-breaking bulk potential of the scalar field, $V(X)= k_1 X^3+k_2 X^4$, was computed, and the parameters $k_1$ and $k_2$ predicted to be $\sim -4$ and $\sim 9$ respectively. The deep-learned parameters, metric, and the dilaton profile were then used to predict the pion mass and its spectrum with good accuracy. A Python code, along with the trained models, is provided to facilitate further studies\footnote{Available at Github, https://github.com/rp-winter/NN-AdS-QCD}.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a neural-network framework to solve an inverse problem in holographic QCD: training on the masses of unflavored mesons (ρ, a1, a2, f0 and their excitations) via a discretized Schrödinger-like equation (resembling a linear moose with Dirichlet boundary conditions) to reconstruct the 5D metric, dilaton profile, and the symmetry-breaking potential V(X)=k1 X^3 + k2 X^4. The learned quantities are then used to predict the pion mass and spectrum, with the dilaton reported to be steeper in the IR than quadratic and to satisfy the null energy condition; k1 ≈ −4 and k2 ≈ 9 are obtained, and Python code is provided.

Significance. If the reconstruction is robust and not an artifact of discretization or overfitting, the approach could provide a practical data-driven route to determine holographic backgrounds directly from spectra, complementing analytic bottom-up models. The open release of code and trained models is a clear strength that supports reproducibility and further tests.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] The discretized linear-moose representation of the Schrödinger-like equation (Section 3) has far more degrees of freedom in the continuous metric, dilaton, and V(X) than the finite number of training masses; the manuscript does not demonstrate uniqueness or stability of the solution under changes in discretization or data selection, so the reported IR dilaton steepening and NEC compliance could be discretization artifacts rather than physical features.
  2. [Section 4] The learned metric, dilaton, and potentials are fitted only to the spectral data; the paper does not verify that they satisfy the five-dimensional Einstein-dilaton-scalar equations of motion or the full holographic dictionary outside the training set (Section 4), which is required to establish that the reconstruction corresponds to a consistent holographic QCD background rather than an effective fit.
  3. [Section 5] The pion-mass and spectrum predictions (Section 5) are obtained from the same learned parameters used to fit the vector/axial-vector and scalar training spectra; because the pion is not an independent observable but is generated within the identical framework, the reported accuracy may reflect interpolation within the model’s flexibility rather than genuine predictive power, and additional out-of-sample tests or cross-validation metrics are needed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the pion spectrum is predicted “with good accuracy” but provides no quantitative error measures, comparison tables, or baseline holographic-model results; these should be added for clarity.
  2. [Section 3] Details of the neural-network architecture (number of layers, neurons per layer, activation functions, regularization, optimizer, and cross-validation procedure) are not specified in the main text; these should be included to allow independent reproduction.
  3. [Section 4] The notation for the bulk potential parameters k1 and k2 is introduced without an explicit statement of the units or normalization convention used in the numerical implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our data-driven approach. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the analysis of stability, consistency, and predictive power.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section 3] The discretized linear-moose representation of the Schrödinger-like equation (Section 3) has far more degrees of freedom in the continuous metric, dilaton, and V(X) than the finite number of training masses; the manuscript does not demonstrate uniqueness or stability of the solution under changes in discretization or data selection, so the reported IR dilaton steepening and NEC compliance could be discretization artifacts rather than physical features.

    Authors: We agree that explicit stability tests are needed to rule out discretization artifacts. The current manuscript presents the primary reconstruction results but does not include systematic variations. In the revised version, we will add to Section 3 a robustness analysis by varying the number of discretization points (e.g., 20 to 60) and training on random subsets of the meson masses. We will demonstrate that the steeper IR dilaton behavior and NEC compliance persist across these variations, supporting that these features are robust rather than artifacts of the chosen discretization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] The learned metric, dilaton, and potentials are fitted only to the spectral data; the paper does not verify that they satisfy the five-dimensional Einstein-dilaton-scalar equations of motion or the full holographic dictionary outside the training set (Section 4), which is required to establish that the reconstruction corresponds to a consistent holographic QCD background rather than an effective fit.

    Authors: Our method is formulated as a purely data-driven inverse problem to reconstruct effective backgrounds from spectra, without presupposing a specific bulk action that would enforce the EOM. The learned profiles therefore provide an effective description rather than an exact solution to the 5D equations. In the revision, we will add to Section 4 explicit calculations of the EOM residuals using the learned metric, dilaton, and V(X), quantify the deviations, and discuss their implications for the holographic dictionary. This will clarify the scope while addressing the consistency concern. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 5] The pion-mass and spectrum predictions (Section 5) are obtained from the same learned parameters used to fit the vector/axial-vector and scalar training spectra; because the pion is not an independent observable but is generated within the identical framework, the reported accuracy may reflect interpolation within the model’s flexibility rather than genuine predictive power, and additional out-of-sample tests or cross-validation metrics are needed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the pion predictions rely on the same learned parameters. To better demonstrate generalization, the revised manuscript will include cross-validation experiments in Section 5: holding out subsets of the training meson masses, retraining, and predicting the held-out values, along with quantitative metrics such as mean absolute error on out-of-sample data. We will also test predictions for additional observables (e.g., decay constants where data permits) not used in the original training to strengthen the evidence for predictive power beyond interpolation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted potentials from training spectra used to predict pion spectrum

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Using the masses of the unflavored mesons ρ, a1, a2, and f0 and their excitations as training data, the model learns confining effective potentials and computes a dilaton profile [...] The deep-learned parameters, metric, and the dilaton profile were then used to predict the pion mass and its spectrum with good accuracy."

    The confining effective potentials, metric, and dilaton are obtained by fitting the NN to reproduce the listed training masses inside the discretized Schrödinger-like equation. Inserting these fitted quantities into the same framework to compute the pion spectrum makes the reported pion prediction a direct consequence of the training fit rather than an independent first-principles result.

full rationale

The paper parametrizes the 5D geometry, dilaton, and V(X) via a neural network and trains it so that the eigenvalues of a discretized Schrödinger-like operator (linear moose with Dirichlet BCs) reproduce the input masses of ρ, a1, a2, f0 and excitations. The same learned functions are then inserted into the analogous operator for the pion channel to obtain the reported pion spectrum. This is a standard fit-then-predict procedure on spectral data; while the pion is withheld from training, the prediction remains statistically determined by the fit to the other masses rather than by an independent solution of the 5D Einstein-dilaton-scalar system. No self-citations, definitional loops, or uniqueness theorems appear in the text, so the circularity is moderate and localized to the prediction step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard holographic QCD assumptions plus two fitted coefficients in the scalar potential. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • k1 = -4
    Coefficient of the X^3 term in the symmetry-breaking scalar potential, fitted by the network to meson data.
  • k2 = 9
    Coefficient of the X^4 term in the symmetry-breaking scalar potential, fitted by the network to meson data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Meson spectra in holographic QCD obey a discretized Schrödinger-like equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions on a deconstructed five-dimensional space.
    This discretization is used to train the network and is stated as the forward model.
  • domain assumption The five-dimensional background, dilaton, and scalar field potentials can be reconstructed from unflavored meson masses alone.
    The inverse-problem framing assumes the chosen spectra suffice to determine the potentials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1536 out tokens · 47367 ms · 2026-05-16T21:16:24.705026+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]. 18

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

  4. [4]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys. 113(2005) 843–882, [hep-th/0412141]

  5. [5]

    More on a holographic dual of QCD

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,More on a holographic dual of QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.114(2005) 1083–1118, [hep-th/0507073]

  6. [6]

    Towards a holographic dual of large-N_c QCD

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers and D. J. Winters,Towards a holographic dual of large N(c) QCD,JHEP05(2004) 041, [hep-th/0311270]

  7. [7]

    Quark Mass Deformation of Holographic Massless QCD

    K. Hashimoto, T. Hirayama, F.-L. Lin and H.-U. Yee,Quark Mass Deformation of Holographic Massless QCD,JHEP07(2008) 089, [0803.4192]

  8. [8]

    Holdom and M

    B. Holdom and M. E. Peskin,Raising the Axion Mass,Nucl. Phys. B208(1982) 397–412

  9. [9]

    Holdom,Strong QCD at High-energies and a Heavy Axion,Phys

    B. Holdom,Strong QCD at High-energies and a Heavy Axion,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 316. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 156, 452 (1985)]

  10. [10]

    Erlich, E

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,Qcd and a holographic model of hadrons, Physical Review Letters95(Dec., 2005)

  11. [11]

    J. Hirn, N. Rius and V. Sanz,Geometric approach to condensates in holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 085005, [hep-ph/0512240]

  12. [12]

    Linear Confinement and AdS/QCD

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005, [hep-ph/0602229]

  13. [13]

    Toward a Systematic Holographic QCD: A Braneless Approach

    C. Csaki and M. Reece,Toward a systematic holographic QCD: A Braneless approach,JHEP 05(2007) 062, [hep-ph/0608266]

  14. [14]

    Holography, Pade Approximants and Deconstruction

    A. Falkowski and M. Perez-Victoria,Holography, pade approximants and deconstruction,JHEP 02(2007) 086, [hep-ph/0610326]

  15. [15]

    J. P. Shock, F. Wu, Y.-L. Wu and Z.-F. Xie,AdS/QCD Phenomenological Models from a Back-Reacted Geometry,JHEP03(2007) 064, [hep-ph/0611227]

  16. [16]

    On the sign of the dilaton in the soft wall models

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,On the sign of the dilaton in the soft wall models,JHEP04(2011) 066, [1012.4813]

  17. [17]

    Gherghetta, J

    T. Gherghetta, J. I. Kapusta and T. M. Kelley,Chiral symmetry breaking in the soft-wall ads/qcd model,Physical Review D79(Apr., 2009)

  18. [18]

    Zhang,Mesons and nucleons in soft-wall ads/qcd,Physical Review D82(Nov., 2010)

    P. Zhang,Mesons and nucleons in soft-wall ads/qcd,Physical Review D82(Nov., 2010)

  19. [19]

    Sui, Y.-L

    Y.-Q. Sui, Y.-L. Wu, Z.-F. Xie and Y.-B. Yang,Prediction for the mass spectra of resonance mesons in the soft-wall ads/qcd model with a modified 5d metric,Phys. Rev. D81(Jan, 2010) 014024

  20. [20]

    Xie, J.-G

    H. Xie, J.-G. Liu and L. Wang,Automatic differentiation of dominant eigensolver and its applications in quantum physics,Phys. Rev. B101(Jun, 2020) 245139

  21. [21]

    de Paula, T

    W. de Paula, T. Frederico, H. Forkel and M. Beyer,Dynamical holographic qcd with area-law confinement and linear regge trajectories,Phys. Rev. D79(Apr, 2009) 075019. 19

  22. [22]

    Ballon-Bayona, T

    A. Ballon-Bayona, T. Frederico, L. A. H. Mamani and W. de Paula,Dynamical holographic qcd model for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and confinement,Phys. Rev. D108(Nov,

  23. [23]

    L. A. H. Mamani,Conformal symmetry breaking in holographic qcd,Phys. Rev. D100(Nov,

  24. [24]

    Hornik, M

    K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe and H. White,Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators,Neural Networks2(1989) 359–366

  25. [25]

    AdS/CFT as a deep Boltzmann machine

    K. Hashimoto,AdS/CFT correspondence as a deep Boltzmann machine,Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 106017, [1903.04951]

  26. [26]

    Hashimoto, S

    K. Hashimoto, S. Sugishita, A. Tanaka and A. Tomiya,Deep Learning and Holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 106014, [1809.10536]

  27. [27]

    Akutagawa, K

    T. Akutagawa, K. Hashimoto and T. Sumimoto,Deep learning and ads/qcd,Physical Review D 102(July, 2020)

  28. [28]

    Hashimoto, K

    K. Hashimoto, K. Ohashi and T. Sumimoto,Deriving the dilaton potential in improved holographic QCD from the meson spectrum,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 106008, [2108.08091]

  29. [29]

    Pal,Github,https://github.com/rp-winter/NN-AdS-QCD(2025)

    R. Pal,Github,https://github.com/rp-winter/NN-AdS-QCD(2025)

  30. [30]

    (De)Constructing Dimensions

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,(De)constructing dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(2001) 4757–4761, [hep-th/0104005]

  31. [31]

    Dynamical Electroweak Breaking and Latticized Extra Dimensions

    H.-C. Cheng, C. T. Hill and J. Wang,Dynamical Electroweak Breaking and Latticized Extra Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 095003, [hep-ph/0105323]

  32. [32]

    H. Abe, T. Kobayashi, N. Maru and K. Yoshioka,Field localization in warped gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 045019, [hep-ph/0205344]

  33. [33]

    Deconstruction and Gauge Theories in AdS_5

    L. Randall, Y. Shadmi and N. Weiner,Deconstruction and gauge theories in AdS(5),JHEP01 (2003) 055, [hep-th/0208120]

  34. [34]

    Running of Gauge Couplings in AdS5 via Deconstruction

    A. Falkowski and H. D. Kim,Running of gauge couplings in AdS(5) via deconstruction,JHEP 08(2002) 052, [hep-ph/0208058]

  35. [35]

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,QCD and dimensional deconstruction,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 065020, [hep-ph/0304182]

  36. [36]

    Tools for Deconstructing Gauge Theories in AdS5

    J. de Blas, A. Falkowski, M. Perez-Victoria and S. Pokorski,Tools for deconstructing gauge theories in AdS(5),JHEP08(2006) 061, [hep-th/0605150]

  37. [37]

    Emerging Holography

    J. Erlich, G. D. Kribs and I. Low,Emerging holography,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 096001, [hep-th/0602110]

  38. [38]

    Deconstruction, Holography and Emergent Supersymmetry

    Y. Nakai,Deconstruction, Holography and Emergent Supersymmetry,JHEP03(2015) 101, [1412.3486]

  39. [39]

    Kiritsis and F

    E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti,On massless 4d gravitons from asymptotically ads5 space–times,Nuclear Physics B772(2007) 67–102

  40. [40]

    Chelabi, Z

    K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li and Y.-L. Wu,Chiral phase transition in the soft-wall model of ads/qcd,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(Apr., 2016) 1–30. 20

  41. [41]

    G¨ ursoy and E

    U. G¨ ursoy and E. Kiritsis,Exploring improved holographic theories for qcd: part i,Journal of High Energy Physics2008(feb, 2008) 032

  42. [42]

    Cherman, T

    A. Cherman, T. D. Cohen and E. S. Werbos,Chiral condensate in holographic models of qcd, Phys. Rev. C79(Apr, 2009) 045203

  43. [43]

    T. M. Kelley, S. P. Bartz and J. I. Kapusta,Pseudoscalar mass spectrum in a soft-wall model of ads/qcd,Phys. Rev. D83(Jan, 2011) 016002

  44. [44]

    Ballon-Bayona and L

    A. Ballon-Bayona and L. A. H. Mamani,Nonlinear realization of chiral symmetry breaking in holographic soft wall models,Phys. Rev. D102(Jul, 2020) 026013

  45. [45]

    Ozaki, Y

    Y. Ozaki, Y. Tanigaki, S. Watanabe and M. Onishi,Multiobjective tree-structured parzen estimator for computationally expensive optimization problems, inProceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO ’20, (New York, NY, USA), p. 533–541, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. DOI

  46. [46]

    Akiba, S

    T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta and M. Koyama,Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework, inProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019. [47]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 030001

  47. [47]

    Hashimoto, S

    K. Hashimoto, S. Sugishita, A. Tanaka and A. Tomiya,Deep learning and theAdS/CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D98(Aug, 2018) 046019

  48. [48]

    R. P. Feynman,Forces in molecules,Phys. Rev.56(Aug, 1939) 340–343

  49. [49]

    Ramachandran, B

    P. Ramachandran, B. Zoph and Q. V. Le,Searching for activation functions, 2017

  50. [50]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren and J. Sun,Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification, 2015

  51. [51]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba,Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2017. 21