Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 7 cited by

Lorentz boosts stretch fluid relaxation spectra—yet the allowed range is pinned by rest-frame endpoints.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 12:23 UTC pith:ID2JLSZA

load-bearing objection A genuinely new spectral bound with a clean proof; the Onsager-type assumption is the only real caveat, and it's honestly flagged.

arxiv 2601.03081 v2 pith:ID2JLSZA submitted 2026-01-06 gr-qc hep-thnucl-th

How Lorentz boosts reshape relaxation spectra

Lorenzo Gavassino This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-thnucl-th
keywords relativistic kinetic theoryrelaxation spectraLorentz boostshydrodynamic modesOnsager symmetryspectral gaptime dilationcausality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that in a broad class of relativistic matter models, the relaxation spectrum measured by a moving observer is not merely time-dilated. A boost can split a single rest-frame decay mode into a continuum of rates, but the entire spread is confined between explicit bounds expressed only through the rest-frame spectral endpoints and the boost speed (or the maximal signal speed). Consequently, spectral gaps and fastest relaxation rates are Lorentz invariant, and in kinetic theory a rest-frame gap guarantees that hydrodynamic derivative expansions have a finite radius of convergence in every inertial frame. The common time-dilation intuition fails generically, but is recovered for non-relativistic media.

Core claim

The paper establishes Theorem 1: for any linearized relativistic theory whose equations take the form E^μ∂_μΨ = -σΨ with Hermitian matrices, σ non-negative definite, and E^0 positive definite in every frame, the nonhydrodynamic spectrum at zero wavenumber in one frame, confined between a and b, maps under a boost of speed v to an interval [a(1−v)/γ, b/(γ(1−v))] in the moving frame. Theorem 2 refines the bounds using the maximal rest-frame signal speed w, giving [a(1−vw)/γ, b/(γ(1−vw))]. The proofs rely on the timelike nature of the quadratic forms Ψ†E^μΨ and standard spectral theory. Direct consequences are that the existence of a fastest relaxation rate and of a spectral gap are boost-invar

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Onsager-type symmetric system E^μ∂_μΨ = -σΨ, with all matrices Hermitian, σ non-negative definite, and E^0 positive definite in every inertial frame. This structure turns the eigenvalue problem into a variational problem, letting spectral bounds transfer from the rest frame to a boosted frame via norm estimates on the projector onto ker σ and the operator bound ||E^1|| ≤ 1 (or ≤ w in Theorem 2).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the linearized equations can be written as E^μ∂_μΨ = -σΨ with Hermitian, positive-definite matrices in every inertial frame; if a physical system (such as an electric conductor or a holographic quasinormal-mode setup) violates this symmetry, the bounds do not follow.

What would settle it

Construct a linearized model satisfying the Hermiticity and positivity hypotheses (as in the paper's random-matrix tests, with E^0=1, σ=diag(σ_i), ||E^1||≤1, and rest-frame spectrum within [a,b]) and search numerically for a boosted eigenvalue outside [a(1−v)/γ, b/(γ(1−v))] (or the w-sharpened interval); a single counterexample would refute the theorem, while none appears in the paper's tests.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the proof is correct, the nonhydrodynamic spectrum of any moving fluid in this class is fully constrained by rest-frame endpoints, making the existence of a fastest relaxation rate and of a spectral gap Lorentz-invariant facts.
  • Under a gapped rest-frame spectrum, the hydrodynamic dispersion relations have finite radius of convergence in every inertial frame, so density-frame hydrodynamics is well-defined to all derivative orders in any frame.
  • The naive time-dilation picture fails generically: for luminal signaling (w=1) the upper bound on boosted relaxation rates diverges as v→1, meaning some modes can relax arbitrarily fast in the ultra-relativistic limit; this divergence disappears for subluminal signaling speeds.
  • For non-relativistic rest-frame media (w≪1), the bounds collapse to the time-dilation law, recovering standard intuition as a limiting case.
  • The results apply to a wide range of theories—kinetic theory, radiation hydrodynamics, transient hydrodynamics (Israel–Stewart type), and even solids and supersolids—but explicitly not to electric conductors or holographic quasinormal modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bounds hold, the spectral gap at zero wavenumber becomes a frame-invariant fluid property, which could serve as a boost-invariant measure of 'hydrodynamization' in relativistic collisions, independent of the lab frame.
  • The Theorem 2 bounds imply that the maximal signal speed w is in principle extractable from the boosted spectrum: saturation at w<1, or violation of the w=1 bound, would directly fingerprint the underlying characteristic speed, offering a spectroscopic probe of transient hydrodynamic theories.
  • The supplementary breakdown of quasi-hydrodynamics at large boosts suggests that even a parametrically small coupling does not protect spectral separation once the observer velocity approaches the signal speed, so effective descriptions of dissipation may become observer-dependent in extreme relativistic settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies how the nonhydrodynamic part of the linear excitation spectrum of a relativistic fluid transforms under a Lorentz boost. Under a structural assumption — that the linearized equations can be written as E^μ∂_μΨ = -σΨ with E^μ and σ Hermitian, σ≥0, and E^0>0 in every frame (an "Onsager-type symmetry") — it proves Theorem 1: if the k=0 nonhydrodynamic frequencies measured by observer O lie in a≤iω≤b, then those measured by a relatively moving observer O' lie in [a(1-v)/γ, b/(γ(1-v))]. Theorem 2 sharpens these bounds when all rest-frame signal speeds are bounded by w≤1. The paper draws corollaries for the frame-independence of spectral gaps, fastest relaxation rates, and convergence radii of hydrodynamic dispersion relations, and explains why the naive time-dilation picture fails. The supplementary material contains a covariant derivation of the symmetry conditions from the Onsager-Casimir principle, a Hilbert-space proof for linearized kinetic theory, random numerical tests, and an example showing breakdown of quasi-hydrodynamic separation at large boosts.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a genuinely nontrivial Lorentz-covariant constraint on relaxation spectra: the boosted k=0 nonhydrodynamic spectrum is controlled entirely by the rest-frame endpoints a,b and the relative velocity, with no free parameters. The proof of Theorem 1 is transparent and the theorem is honestly conditional: the paper explicitly lists electric conductors and holographic quasi-normal modes as outside the assumed class. The extensions to kinetic theory (infinite-dimensional setting) and the numerical random-model tests strengthen the claim. The physical message — that time dilation is generically the wrong intuition, and that subluminal signal speeds restore it — is clearly explained and supported by the bounds. The main theorem is directly falsifiable within the stated model class, which is a strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary, Eq. (S18)] There is a sign inconsistency between (S16) and (S18). From (ψ_n,[I - iγω'(1+vw_1)]ψ_n)→0 and the definition of A=(ψ_n,w_1ψ_n), the limit is [(ψ_n,Iψ_n)/(1+vA)] - iγω'→0, i.e. the denominator should be 1+v(ψ_n,w_1ψ_n), not 1-v(...). The subsequent bounds in (S21)-(S22) are unaffected because 1±vA both lie in [1-v,1+v], and the final interval (13) is symmetric under v→-v, but the displayed algebra should be corrected.
  2. [Theorem 2 / proof] The statement "signal propagation ... bounded by a maximal speed w" is identified in the proof with the operator bound ||E^1||≤w, using the fact that characteristic speeds are eigenvalues of E^1 in the E^0=1 basis. This is correct for symmetric hyperbolic systems, but it should be stated explicitly in the theorem so that the reader does not confuse an assumption about actual front speeds with an assumption on the principal symbol.
  3. [Throughout] Minor typographical and notational issues: (i) in the Supplementary text, "the first square bracket is larger 1−v" should read "at least 1−v"; (ii) the row-vector notation A^μ∈(C^D)^† in the Conservation laws section is a little confusing on first reading; (iii) the introductory sentence claiming that a "wide variety of spectral properties becomes Lorentz invariant" is stronger than the results: the paper actually proves frame-independence of the existence of gaps and fastest rates, together with explicit v-dependent bounds. Consider rewording to "Lorentz-covariant constraints".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Theorem 1 is a self-contained conditional proof; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. Theorem 1 starts from the explicitly stated Onsager-type structural assumptions (Hermitian E^mu and sigma, sigma >= 0, E^0 > 0 in every frame) and derives the boosted spectral interval (13) via the Rayleigh-quotient bounds (15), the projection identity, and |Psi^dagger E^1 Psi| <= 1. The rest-frame endpoints a,b are inputs, not outputs; no parameter is fitted to the boosted quantities that are claimed to be constrained. The supplementary material derives the symmetry conditions from the Onsager-Casimir principle rather than assuming the theorem. Theorem 2 uses the independently meaningful physical assumption of a maximal signal speed w and proves its equivalence to ||E^1|| <= w; this is an identification, not a circular definition. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [55] in Corollary 3) support auxiliary or contextual claims; [55] is a published parameter-free kinetic-theory result, so citing it is not a reduction of the present argument to its own conclusion. The listed exceptions (electric conductors, holographic quasi-normal modes) are honest limitations. A minor sign inconsistency between Eqs. (S16) and (S18) in the supplementary kinetic proof is a presentation issue, not a circular step; the interval is unchanged under v -> -v. Overall, no load-bearing circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theorem is conditional on an explicit structural assumption—the Onsager-type symmetry. No free parameters are fitted; a and b are input rest-frame spectral data. The proof uses standard mathematical facts. No new particles, forces, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The linearized equations of motion can be written as E^μ∂_μΨ = -σΨ with E^μ and σ Hermitian, σ non-negative definite, and E^0 positive definite in every inertial frame.
    Defines the Onsager-type symmetry class studied in the paper; derived in the Supplementary Material from the Onsager-Casimir principle, but not universal (electric conductors and holographic QNMs are exceptions).
  • domain assumption For every physical state Ψ, the vector Ψ†E^μΨ is a future-directed timelike or null vector.
    Follows from the Hermitian structure and frame-independent positive definiteness of E^0; used to bound |Ψ†E^1Ψ|≤1 in the proof of Theorem 1.
  • domain assumption PT is a discrete symmetry of the microscopic theory that leaves the equilibrium state invariant (used in the Onsager-Casimir derivation in the Supplementary Material).
    Under PT, the chosen degrees of freedom are PT-even, leading to the symmetric/Hermitian structure of E^j and σ.
  • standard math Standard results in spectral theory and analytic perturbation theory (e.g., Teschl Th. 2.19; Kato perturbation series and convergence-radius bounds) apply to the operators at hand.
    Used for the Rayleigh-quotient characterization of eigenvalues and the lower bound on the hydrodynamic radius of convergence; these results are cited, not reproduced.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15342 in / 19141 out tokens · 173924 ms · 2026-08-03T12:23:01.793033+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In relativity, relaxation processes are often assumed to undergo time dilation under Lorentz boosts. We show that this intuition fails generically. Due to relativity of simultaneity, Lorentz boosts can split a single relaxation mode into a continuum of excitations, with a width set by the maximal signal propagation speed. Focusing on linearized relativistic (kinetic or rheological) theories with an Onsager-type symmetry, we derive rigorous bounds on relaxation spectra in arbitrary inertial frames, expressed solely in terms of rest-frame spectral data at zero wavenumber. As a consequence, non-hydrodynamic gaps, maximal relaxation rates, and the convergence radii of hydrodynamic modes obey nontrivial Lorentz-covariant constraints. These results provide a unified framework for understanding how relativity constrains relaxation dynamics in many-body systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03081 by Lorenzo Gavassino.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Splitting of a single non-hydrodynamic frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bounds (25) on the nonhydrodynamic spectrum of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Lorentzian geometry of relaxation

    nucl-th 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Causality forces purely relaxational dispersion relations to follow spacelike trajectories on the Lorentzian {iω,ik} plane, producing universal bounds on diffusivity, viscosity, time-dilation deviations, and hydrodyna...

  2. Relativistic transport near moving interfaces

    nucl-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Interface-localized linear solutions in relativistic media are superpositions of imaginary-frequency modes selected by intersecting the spectrum with the line iω = v ik.

  3. Near-Light-Cone Nonhydrodynamic Structure from Boosted Hydrodynamics

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Large boosts select near-light-cone nonhydrodynamic singularities that set the hydrodynamic radius of convergence, with RTA giving a finite offset and holography a vanishing one after Lorentz rescaling.

  4. Lorentz-boosted diffusion: initial value formulation and exact solutions

    math-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    Lorentz-boosted diffusion becomes a well-posed initial-value problem on a band-limited (Paley-Wiener) function space, with an exact closed-form Shannon-Whittaker Green function.

  5. Hydrodynamics without a relaxation gap: memory effects, nonlocality, and superdiffusion

    nucl-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A model with unbounded energy-dependent relaxation times shows divergent gradient expansion and nonlocal hydrodynamics, resulting in superdiffusion for singular spectra.

  6. The quasi-normal modes of relativistic Fokker-Planck kinetic theory

    nucl-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    The quasi-normal spectrum of ultrarelativistic Fokker-Planck kinetic theory consists of an exact diffusive hydrodynamic mode, continuous ballistic bands, and a hydrogenic discrete tower in three dimensions.

  7. The diffusion equation is compatible with special relativity

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A relativistic kinetic theory (Vlasov–Fokker–Planck) has an exact subsector whose particle density evolves by Fick's law at all wavelengths, reconciling diffusion with causality and stability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 37 linked inside Pith · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D72, 086009 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    S. Pu, T. Koide, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D81, 114039 (2010), arXiv:0907.3906 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D83, 074019 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, M. Spali´ nski, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 261601 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Romatschke, Eur

    P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 352 (2016), arXiv:1512.02641 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Grozdanov, N

    S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP07, 151 (2016), arXiv:1605.02173 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Kurkela and U

    A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 776 (2019), arXiv:1712.04376 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    G. D. Moore, JHEP05, 084 (2018), arXiv:1803.00736 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Grozdanov, P

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadi´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 251601 (2019), arXiv:1904.01018 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Kovtun, Journal of High Energy Physics2019, 34 (2019), arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    P. Kovtun, Journal of High Energy Physics2019, 34 (2019), arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    D. Dash, S. Bhadury, S. Jaiswal, and A. Jaiswal, Phys. Lett. B831, 137202 (2022), arXiv:2112.14581 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D106, 056010 (2022), arXiv:2207.14778 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, Nature Phys.20, 1948 (2024), arXiv:2305.07703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1948

  14. [14]

    Brants, Phys

    R. Brants, Phys. Rev. D110, 116027 (2024), arXiv:2409.09022 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    G. S. Rocha, I. Danhoni, K. Ingles, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D110, 076003 (2024), arXiv:2404.04679 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L042043 (2024), arXiv:2404.12327 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Hu, (2024), arXiv:2409.05131 [hep-ph]

    J. Hu, (2024), arXiv:2409.05131 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Bajec, S

    M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, JHEP08, 065 (2024), arXiv:2403.17769 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Gavassino, (2025), arXiv:2511.14344 [physics.plasm- ph]

    L. Gavassino, (2025), arXiv:2511.14344 [physics.plasm- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Bajec and A

    M. Bajec and A. Soloviev, (2025), arXiv:2506.15531 [hep-th]. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Hiscock and L

    W. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Physical review D: Parti- cles and fields31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  22. [22]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. X12, 041001 (2022), arXiv:2111.05254 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Mitra, S. Roy, and R. Singh, (2025), arXiv:2512.12450 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    R. E. Hoult, (2025), arXiv:2512.24819 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Lett. B840, 137854 (2023), arXiv:2301.06651 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Huang,Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed

    K. Huang,Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, 1987)

    1987

  27. [27]

    Geroch and L

    R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D41, 1855 (1990)

    1990

  28. [28]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010606 (2022), arXiv:2105.14621 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Geroch and L

    R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Annals of Physics207, 394 (1991)

    1991

  30. [30]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D107, 065013 (2023), arXiv:2210.05067 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 222302 (2024), arXiv:2302.03478 [nucl- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Soares Rocha, L

    G. Soares Rocha, L. Gavassino, and N. Mullins, Phys. Rev. D110, 016020 (2024), arXiv:2405.10878 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Symmetry 12, 1543 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D111, 103011 (2025), arXiv:2502.08740 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. Stewart, Annals of Physics118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  36. [36]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Annals of Physics151, 466 (1983)

    1983

  37. [37]

    T. S. Olson, Annals of Physics199, 18 (1990)

    1990

  38. [38]

    I. S. Liu, I. M ¨uller, and T. Ruggeri, Annals of Physics 169, 191 (1986)

    1986

  39. [39]

    Stricker and H

    L. Stricker and H. C. ¨Ottinger, Phys. Rev. E99, 013105 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Gavassino and M

    L. Gavassino and M. Antonelli, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 075012 (2023), arXiv:2209.12865 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Carter, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A433, 45 (1991)

    B. Carter, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A433, 45 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Priou, Phys

    D. Priou, Phys. Rev. D43, 1223 (1991)

    1991

  43. [43]

    Gavassino, Class

    L. Gavassino, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 185008 (2022), arXiv:2202.06760 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D109, 096041 (2024), arXiv:2302.05332 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Onsager, Phys

    L. Onsager, Phys. Rev.37, 405 (1931)

    1931

  46. [46]

    H. B. G. Casimir, Rev. Mod. Phys.17, 343 (1945)

    1945

  47. [47]

    J. A. Krommes and G. Hu, Physics of Fluids B5, 3908 (1993)

    1993

  48. [48]

    Gourgoulhon,Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics, 1st ed., Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    E. Gourgoulhon,Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics, 1st ed., Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    2013

  49. [49]

    Cercignani and G

    C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer,The relativistic Boltz- mann equation: theory and applications(2002)

    2002

  50. [50]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 162301 (2024), arXiv:2307.05987 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 261601 (2023), arXiv:2212.07434 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Teschl,Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics With Applications to Schr ¨odinger Operators”, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol

    G. Teschl,Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics With Applications to Schr ¨odinger Operators”, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 99 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009)

    2009

  53. [53]

    Bhatia,Notes on Functional Analysis, Texts and Readings in Mathematics, Vol

    R. Bhatia,Notes on Functional Analysis, Texts and Readings in Mathematics, Vol. 50 (Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon, India, 2009)

    2009

  54. [54]

    C. Cattaneo,Sur une forme de l’´ equation de la chaleur ´ eliminant le paradoxe d’une propagation instan- tan´ ee, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des s´ eances de l’Acad´ emie des sciences (Gauthier-Villars, 1958)

    1958

  55. [55]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. D110, 094012 (2024), arXiv:2408.14316 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, SciPost Phys.11, 054 (2021), arXiv:2010.15782 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Ba¸ sar, J

    G. Ba¸ sar, J. Bhambure, R. Singh, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C110, 044903 (2024), arXiv:2403.04185 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Bhambure, A

    J. Bhambure, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, R. Singh, M. Singh, D. Teaney, and F. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C111, 064910 (2025), arXiv:2412.10303 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, reprint of the 1980 edition ed., Classics in Mathematics (Springer, 1995)

    T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, reprint of the 1980 edition ed., Classics in Mathematics (Springer, 1995)

    1980

  60. [60]

    Kato, Progress of Theoretical Physics4, 514 (1949)

    T. Kato, Progress of Theoretical Physics4, 514 (1949)

    1949

  61. [61]

    Stephanov and Y

    M. Stephanov and Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. D98, 036006 (2018), arXiv:1712.10305 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, and N. Poovuttikul, Phys. Rev. D99, 086012 (2019), arXiv:1810.10016 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 075001 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    Gavassino and J

    L. Gavassino and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D109, 096040 (2024), arXiv:2305.04119 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Y. Ahn, M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, M. Matsumoto, and X. Sun, Phys. Rev. D112, 086013 (2025), arXiv:2506.00926 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, v. 5 (El- sevier Science, 2013)

    2013

  67. [67]

    Pei, J.-F

    J.-H. Pei, J.-F. Chen, and H. T. Quan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 237102 (2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, (2023), arXiv:2312.17386 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Cavagli` a,Nonsemilinear one-dimensional PDEs: analysis of PT deformed models and numerical study of compactons, Doctoral thesis, City University London (2015)

    A. Cavagli` a,Nonsemilinear one-dimensional PDEs: analysis of PT deformed models and numerical study of compactons, Doctoral thesis, City University London (2015)

    2015

  70. [70]

    1− X I |(ϕI , ψn)|2 # = a 1 +v

    J. D. Jackson,Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, NY, 1999). 1 Disturbing moving fluids Supplementary Material L. Gavassino Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom DERIV ATION OF THE SYMMETRY CONDITIONS FROM THE ONSAGER-CASIMIR PRINCIPLE Fix a ...

    1999

  71. [71]

    Since one may always choose a basis in Ψ–space such thatE 0 = 1 andσ= diag(σ n), we impose these conditions from the outset

    Without rotational symmetry in the rest frame We generate random models according to the following procedure. Since one may always choose a basis in Ψ–space such thatE 0 = 1 andσ= diag(σ n), we impose these conditions from the outset. The non-zero diagonal entriesσ n are then sampled as independent random variables uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 (i...

  72. [72]

    With rotational symmetry in the rest frame Assume that the medium is isotropic in its rest frame. Then, if Ψ(t, x 1) is a solution of the equation of motion (∂t +E 1∂1 +σ σ)Ψ = 0, it follows thatLΨ(t,−x1) is also a solution, whereLis aD×Dmatrix implementing a 180 ◦ rotation about thex 3 axis in Ψ–space (withL 2 = 1). This symmetry implies the matrix relat...