Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 60 references

The paper establishes that breather solutions of the Davey–Stewartson II equation generate planar Dirac Hamiltonians with super-Klein tunneling: perfect angle-independent transmission at a tuned energy, together with bound states embedded i

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 05:29 UTC pith:XMONC2QQ

load-bearing objection The DS II–SKT correspondence is a real and useful construction, but the paper's proof of nonsingularity fails for the explicit seed, and the three-parameter families contain parameter regimes with singular potentials. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.02073 v1 pith:XMONC2QQ submitted 2026-02-02 hep-th cond-mat.mes-hallmath-phmath.MPnlin.SIquant-ph

The soliton nature of the super-Klein tunneling effect

Francisco Correa , Luis Inzunza , Olaf Lechtenfeld This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.mes-hallmath-phmath.MPnlin.SIquant-ph MSC 35Q5135Q4137K1581Q0581U40
keywords Davey–Stewartson IIsuper-Klein tunnelingDarboux transformationDirac Hamiltonianbound states in the continuumPT symmetryintegrable systemssoliton breather
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the super-Klein tunneling effect—perfect transmission of Dirac fermions through a barrier, independent of the angle of incidence—has a hidden integrable-soliton origin. The authors show that if the electrostatic potential and mass term of a planar Dirac Hamiltonian are taken from the real and imaginary parts of a breather solution of the defocusing Davey–Stewartson II (DS II) equation, then at the energy matching the breather's constant background every incident plane wave is transmitted with probability one. The same construction yields Dirac Hamiltonians with four bound states embedded in the continuum, one appearing as the pole of the transmission amplitude at a complex angle. A three-parameter family is built this way, covering PT-symmetric Hamiltonians (real soliton time), Hermitian massless ones (zero time), and Hermitian time-reversal-breaking ones (imaginary soliton time), all sharing the same transparency and supporting a quasi-symmetry that preserves the exactly solvable subspace. If correct, this gives a systematic tool for designing transparent two-dimensional Dirac systems with tunable bound states.

Core claim

The central claim is that a planar Dirac Hamiltonian of the form H = −i(σ1∂x + σ2∂y) + V + imσ3 exhibits the super-Klein tunneling effect at energy E=1 whenever u = 1 − V + im is a breather solution of the DS II equations: every scattering state at that energy has transmission coefficient |t(θ)|² = 1 for all incidence angles θ, and the Hamiltonian simultaneously supports four normalizable bound states embedded in the continuum. The mapping is implemented via the asymmetric Darboux intertwining relation σ2Lσ2(H0+1) = (H−1)L, with L = ∂x − Σ built from a seed matrix Φ that solves the linear DS II system; by construction the intertwiner transfers only the E=−1 free solutions to E=1 interacting

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the soliton–Dirac dictionary built from the DS II Lax pair: the linear operators h = ∂y − iσ3∂x − U and M = −∂τ + 2iσ3∂x² + 2U∂x + W are covariant under a first-order Darboux transformation L = ∂x − Σ, with Σ = (∂xΦ)Φ⁻¹ for a seed spinor-matrix Φ annihilated by h and M. Multiplying h by −iσ2 turns hψ=0 into (H+1)ψ=0, so the transformed operator gives a planar Dirac Hamiltonian H = −i(σ1∂x+σ2∂y) + V + imσ3 whose potential and imaginary mass come from the real and imaginary parts of the DS II breather u = 1 − V + im. The key identity is the asymmetric intertwining relation σ2Lσ2(H0+1) = (H−1)L, which fixes the energy to E=1 and converts the trivial transparency of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Darboux transformation produces nonsingular potentials: this is automatic for the PT-symmetric real-time family because the seed is T-invariant and Det(Φ) = |f|² + |g|² > 0, but for the Hermitian imaginary-time family it holds only when the parameters satisfy inequality (5.42), and the claimed generality of the family assumes a reflectionless asymptotic ansatz (4.3) from the start.

What would settle it

Direct numerical scattering calculation: fix γ = 0.4 and τ = 0.5, choose φ near the singular limit of the denominator in (5.28)–(5.29) while still respecting (5.42), and propagate the plane-wave ansatz (3.28)–(3.29) to extract r(θ) and t(θ); finding any |r| > 0 at E=1 would falsify the correspondence, and a pole in the potential at finite (x, y) would show the family is not globally defined. Alternatively, add a nonzero localized wave-packet seed F(x, y) to (4.16)—the paper leaves this open—and check whether |t(θ)| remains 1; a nonzero reflection there would show the correspondence requires th

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every Hamiltonian in the three-parameter family has the same asymptotic scattering data: zero reflection coefficient and |t(θ)|² = 1 for all real incidence angles at E=1.
  • The same family carries four bound states embedded in the continuum; for real τ their probability densities coincide, while for imaginary τ the four split into two pairs localized in opposite half-planes.
  • The parameter space has nontrivial topology: the real-time (PT-symmetric) models live on a two-sphere, while the imaginary-time (Hermitian, time-reversal-breaking) models live on a one-sheeted hyperboloid, reflecting the loss of T-invariance.
  • At the two fixed points of the τ-translation the Hamiltonian becomes one-dimensional and time-independent, giving closed-form potentials that remain transparent at E=1.
  • A quasi-symmetry generator I = L I Y built from the reverse intertwiner Y acts on the SKT subspace like the free-particle Euclidean-group symmetries, which explains why infinitely many states at E=1 are exactly solvable even though the Hamiltonian itself is only quasi-exactly solvable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the DS II correspondence is robust, iterating the Darboux transformation should produce a hierarchy of SKT barriers corresponding to multi-soliton breathers of DS II, suggesting transparent Dirac potentials whose bound-state spectra can be engineered from soliton data.
  • Editorial inference: the energy tuning E=1 to the constant background is the two-dimensional analogue of the Klein-paradox resonance; the construction suggests that angle-independent transparency is not generic but requires the potential and mass to be in soliton-compatible balance—a property that could be tested experimentally by engineering V and m profiles in strained or doped Dirac materials.
  • Editorial inference: the fact that u tends to a constant (not zero) at y→±∞ is a distinctive marker of two-dimensional transparent potentials; finite-size systems approximating these V and m profiles should exhibit near-unit transmission over a wide angular window, which is the experimentally relevant statement.
  • Editorial inference: inequality (5.42) delimits a boundary where the DS II solution becomes singular; exploring parameters just beyond it may connect SKT to domain-wall or defect-like phenomena, since the Dirac problem there ceases to be well-defined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a correspondence between breather solutions of the defocusing Davey–Stewartson II (DS II) system and planar Dirac Hamiltonians exhibiting super-Klein tunneling (SKT). The authors construct a seed solution, apply a Darboux transformation, and derive explicit scalar and mass potentials from the transformed DS II field. They then verify, for a one-parameter example and a three-parameter family, that at energy E=1 the Dirac Hamiltonian admits scattering states with |t(θ)|=1 and four bound states embedded in the continuum. The paper also analyzes PT-symmetric real-τ, Hermitian massless τ=0, and Hermitian time-reversal-breaking imaginary-τ regimes, and identifies quasi-symmetry operators preserving the SKT subspace.

Significance. If correct, the DS II–SKT correspondence would be an interesting new bridge between integrable systems in 2+1 dimensions and exactly solvable Dirac models, and it would extend the known one-dimensional reflectionless-potential/soliton correspondence to a genuinely higher-dimensional setting. The paper is explicit: the intertwining operator is written in closed form, the scattering states are constructed, and the bound-state densities are given. The three-parameter family and the discussion of quasi-symmetries are also valuable. However, the central explicit computation contains a serious algebraic inconsistency: the displayed Σ formula does not match the stated seed, and the claimed nonsingularity is false at isolated points. These issues are load-bearing for the example, the family, and the bound-state claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.13) and §3, Eq. (3.7)] The assertion that Det(Φ)=|f|²+|g|²>0 is not sufficient to guarantee nonsingularity, because f and g can vanish simultaneously. For the explicit seed (3.7), take x=-π/(2coshγ), y=0, τ=π/(2sinh2γ). Direct evaluation of the four plane waves gives φ=0, hence Φ=0 and Det(Φ)=0. This is on the cylinder (at the identified seam), not an artificial point. Thus the stated T-invariance does not prevent singularities in Φ^{-1} and the Darboux potentials.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (3.9) and (3.12)–(3.14)] The formula for Σγ is inconsistent with the definition Σ=(∂xΦ)Φ^{-1}. Along the line x1=-π+ε, y=0, x0=π, the seed (3.7) gives φ1=φ2=-4i sinhγ sin(ε/2), and direct computation yields Σ = coshγ cot(ε/2) I, which diverges as 2coshγ/ε. In contrast, (3.9) yields a finite expression that vanishes as ε→0. Consequently the potentials Vγ,mγ in (3.13) and the Hamiltonian (3.20) are not correctly derived from the stated Darboux transformation. This invalidates the explicit verification of the SKT states in (3.25)–(3.32) and the bound states (3.33)–(3.37).
  3. [§5, Eqs. (5.28)–(5.35)] The same singularity issue propagates to the three-parameter family. The denominators in (5.28), (5.29), and (5.33) are not proven positive for real τ; the paper's reliance on (2.13) is unfounded because common zeros of the seed components can occur. For the τ=iz family, the authors themselves restrict parameters by (5.42), but the real-τ case is not similarly controlled. A complete characterization of the singularity-free parameter domain is needed before the family can be said to define Dirac Hamiltonians on the cylinder.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.13)] The displayed equality 'Det(Φ)=|f|²+|g|²' is at best an equality of absolute values; the determinant carries an additional phase. This should be stated precisely, and the positivity claim should be replaced by a proof that f and g have no common zeros, which is what actually controls nonsingularity.
  2. [§3, after Eq. (4.7)] The phrase 'after some algebraic manipulations' hides a nontrivial step in deriving the Riccati equation (4.7). Given the inconsistency found in (3.9), the authors should show this derivation explicitly.
  3. [§4, Eq. (4.3)] The no-reflection condition is imposed by hand as the SKT boundary condition rather than derived from the DS II dynamics. The paper should clarify that the resulting family is 'general' only within this imposed ansatz.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the SKT condition is imposed as a declared ansatz, and the DS II–Dirac correspondence is derived self-contained.

full rationale

The paper's construction is essentially self-contained. Starting from the constant DS II background (3.1)–(3.2), it performs a first-order Darboux transformation; the transformed operator is mapped to the Dirac Hamiltonian Hγ (3.20). The scattering states (3.25) are obtained from the intertwining relation (3.22), which is re-derived from (2.7) and does not rely on the cited asymmetric-Darboux papers [34,42,43] as black boxes. The transmission coefficient |t|=1 follows algebraically from the asymptotic L± in (3.31)–(3.32). The only 'built-in' ingredient is the no-reflection boundary condition (4.3), which the paper explicitly declares in the abstract and in Section 4 ('By imposing the SKT boundary conditions...'). Thus the omnidirectional transparency is a design input, not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. The inverse-problem step in Section 4 fixes Σ± via (4.3) and (4.11); the resulting 'uniqueness' is uniqueness within the imposed ansatz and is presented as such. The re-derivation of the τ=0 model of [34] in (3.21) is a special case, not a load-bearing self-citation; the asymmetric intertwining relation is re-derived in the paper. A separate mathematical concern is that Eq. (2.13) asserts Det(Φ)=|f|^2+|g|^2>0, but for the complex seed (3.7) the spinor can vanish at isolated points and the denominator d_γ (3.9) can vanish, making the Darboux-transformed potential singular; this is a correctness gap, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters γ, φ, τ label an exact family of models; λ is absorbed by scaling (3.3). The central construction rests on well-established DS II integrability and Darboux theory, with the SKT condition supplied through boundary conditions. The circularity burden is accordingly low.

free parameters (3)
  • γ
    Real parameter parametrizing the seed wave numbers via k1=coshγ, k2=i sinhγ (Eq. 3.8); controls the potential's x-period and y-width. Chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
  • φ
    Angle on the equatorial circle S2(s3=0) in Eq. (5.16); labels inequivalent potential shapes. Chosen by hand.
  • τ (or z)
    Soliton time appearing in the DS II solution; for real τ the Hamiltonian is PT-symmetric, for τ=iz (real z) it is Hermitian with broken time-reversal. Extra continuous label of the three-parameter family; not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption DS II integrability and the Lax pair (2.1)–(2.6)
    The DS II system with its matrix potentials U and W is taken as given from Refs. [37,38]; the paper does not derive the Lax pair.
  • standard math Darboux transformation covariance (2.7)–(2.9)
    The first-order Darboux intertwining relation and the transformation laws for U and W are standard results from [5], used to generate new solutions.
  • ad hoc to paper T-invariance ansatz (2.10)–(2.13)
    The seed matrix is restricted to Φ=e^{iπ/4}(φ,Tφ) to guarantee T-invariance of Σ and nonsingularity via Det(Φ)>0; this is a construction choice.
  • ad hoc to paper No-reflection asymptotic boundary conditions (4.1)–(4.11)
    The SKT property is imposed by requiring Σ to tend to the specific constants Σ±=i(∓sinhγ σ3−σ1); the inverse problem is solved under this imposed ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper Wave-packet suppression F=0 (Sec. 5)
    The general seed (4.16) contains a localized wave packet F, set to zero to produce the explicit three-parameter family; the authors note this restriction in Sec. 7.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22592 in / 23303 out tokens · 202298 ms · 2026-08-03T05:29:10.355189+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We establish a relationship between the Davey--Stewartson II (DS II) integrable system in $(2{+}1)$ dimensions and quasi-exactly solvable planar interacting Dirac Hamiltonians that exhibit the super-Klein tunneling (SKT) effect. The Dirac interactions are constructed from the real and imaginary parts of breather solutions of the DS II system. In this framework, the SKT effect arises when the energy is tuned to match the constant background of the soliton, while the resulting Dirac Hamiltonians simultaneously support bound states embedded in the continuum. By imposing the SKT boundary conditions, we employ Darboux transformations to construct a general three-parameter family of DS II breather solutions that can be mapped to Dirac Hamiltonians. At the initial soliton time, the corresponding Dirac systems form a massless two-parameter family of Hermitian models with nontrivial electrostatic potentials. As the soliton time evolves, the systems become $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric and develop a nontrivial imaginary mass term. Finally, when the soliton time is taken to be imaginary, the construction yields Hermitian Dirac systems that lack time-reversal symmetry. In all cases, we identify the emergence of quasi-symmetry transformations that preserve the SKT subspace of states while not commuting with the full Hamiltonian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02073 by Francisco Correa, Luis Inzunza, Olaf Lechtenfeld.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plots for Vγ(x, y, τ ), mγ(x, y, τ ), for τ = 1, γ = 0.4. To relate this construction to Dirac-like operators, we must take a step back and focus on the first operator in (3.2). If we multiply the equation h0ψ = 0 by −iσ2 from the left then we find 0 = −iσ2h0ψ = (H0 + 1)ψ with H0 = −i(σ1∂x + σ2∂y). (3.17) The operator H0 is a massless free Dirac Hamiltonian in the Euclidean plane (here the Dirac gamma matr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Probability density current of the SKT states. The parameters are taken to be τ = 2 and γ = 0.4, while the incident angles are (from left to right) chosen as φ = {−21 40 π, π 2 , 18 40 π}. In each case, the current is affected only in the interaction zone, but it agrees in the two y-interacting regions. It is well known in quantum mechanics that poles in the transmission amplitude indicate the existence of… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Differences in the probability density for bound states in the PT -symmetric and the Hermitian cases. In the first panel, the density plot for (3.37) is shown. Subsequently, we display the probability density (3.47) with plus and minus signs (in that order) for the Hermitian case. Maximal (minimal) brightness corresponds to maximal (minimal) probability of finding the confined particle described by the bou… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The parameter space projected to the S 2 (s3) sphere with s3 = 0. The vector ˘n, as given in equation (5.7), defines the rotation axis of R(a). The orbits of R(a), shown in green, represent the equivalence classes of DS II solutions that are related by translations. Red points stand for two equivalent vectors under the action of R(a), corresponding to half the period of the rotation. The class representati… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Different plots of Vγ,ϕ(x, y, 0). From left to right the parameters are γ = 0.4 and ϕ = { 9 10 π, 99 100 π, 108 100 π}. Since at the two stability points the configuration is invariant under x-translations, the corresponding potential becomes one-dimensional, i.e., it depends only on y, Vγ,0(x, y, 0) = − 2 sinh2 γ 1 + cosh γ cosh(2y sinh γ) , Vγ, π 2 (x, y, 0) = − 2 sinh2 γ 1 − cosh γ cosh(2y sinh γ) . (5.… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plots of the probability density. From left to right the parameters are γ = 0.4 and ϕ = { 9 10 π, 99 100 π, 108 100 π}. 5.2 Three-parametric PT -symmetric family at τ 6= 0 In order to restore the τ-dependence we let the operator e 2τ ∂x∂y act on the general seed matrix. By using (2.12), one realizes that this action is equivalent to taking the seed matrix solution as Φ~s(x, y, τ) = e sinh γye Σ+xS(τ) + e −… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of potential Vγ,ϕ(x, y, τ ). From left to right the parameters are γ = 0.4, τ = 0.12, and ϕ = { 9 10 π, 99 100 π, 108 100 π} [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of mass term mγ,ϕ(x, y, τ ). From left to right the parameters are γ = 0.4, τ = 0.5, and ϕ = { 9 10 π, 99 100 π, 108 100 π}. The system is invariant under the T and PxPy transformation and share identical properties of the system discussed in Sec. 3. At the τ-translation invariant point ϕ = ± π 2 , the corresponding Hamiltonian is Hermitian, independent of τ, and takes the form Hγ,± π 2 (τ) = −i(σ1∂x… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plots of the probability density with parameters γ = 0.4, ϕ = 9 10 π and τ = −1.5, 0.1, 1.5 (from left to right). Changes in τ affect the dispersion. 5.3 Three-parametric Hermitian family for τ = iz When τ is imaginary, we obtain a parametric Hermitian but no longer T symmetric Dirac Hamiltonian Hγ,ϕ(iz) = −i(σ1∂x + σ2∂y) + Veγ,ϕ(x, y, z) + me γ,ϕ(x, y, z)σ3 =: Heγ,ϕ(z), (5.36) Veγ,ϕ(x, y, z) = 2 tanh γ (s… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plots of potential Veγ,ϕ(x, y, z) with parameters γ = 0.4, ϕ = 1.25 and z = 0.5 , 1.5 , 2.5, (from left to right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Plots of mass term me γ,ϕ(x, y, τ ). The parameters γ = 0.4, ϕ = 1.25 and z = 0.5 , 1.5 , 2.5, (from left to right). 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Plots of the bound states probability density. The parameters γ = 0.4, ϕ = 1.25 and z = −3 , 1.5 , 3, (from left to right). 6 Underlying supersymmetry In nonrelativistic one-dimensional quantum mechanics, reflectionless systems can be understood as super￾symmetric partners of the free particle. This structure makes it possible to construct higher-order analogs of the momentum operator through “Darboux dre… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 25 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Remoissent, Waves called solitons: Concepts and experiments , (Springer 1999)

    M. Remoissent, Waves called solitons: Concepts and experiments , (Springer 1999)

    1999

  2. [2]

    Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitar y waves

    P. D. Lax, “Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitar y waves” , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21, 467 (1968)

    1968

  3. [3]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, “Integration of nonlinear equations of mathematical physi cs by the method of inverse scattering , Funct. Anal. Appl., 13, 13-22 (1979)

    1979

  4. [4]

    On the inverse scattering transform of multidimensional n onlinear equations related to first-order systems in the plane

    A. S. Fokas and M. J. Ablowitz, “On the inverse scattering transform of multidimensional n onlinear equations related to first-order systems in the plane” , J. Math. Phys. 25, 2494 (1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    V. B. Matveev and M. A. Sale, Darboux transformations and solitons , (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991)

    1991

  6. [6]

    Y. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical solitons: From fibers to photonic crystals , (Academic Press, San Diego, 2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Belinski and E

    V. Belinski and E. Verdaguer, Gravitational solitons, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng- land, 2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    J. V. Selinger, Introduction to topological defects and solitons in liquid crystals, magnets, and related materials, (Springer Cham 2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Reflectionless transmission through dielectrics and scat tering potentials

    I. Kay and H. E. Moses, “Reflectionless transmission through dielectrics and scat tering potentials” , J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1503 (1956)

    1956

  10. [10]

    Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Green, M. D. Kruskal and R. M. Miura, “Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967)

    1967

  11. [11]

    Fl¨ ugge,Practical quantum mechanics (Springer, 1998)

    S. Fl¨ ugge,Practical quantum mechanics (Springer, 1998)

    1998

  12. [12]

    Hidden supersymmetry in quantum bosonic systems,

    F. Correa and M. S. Plyushchay, “Hidden supersymmetry in quantum bosonic systems,” Annals Phys. 322, 2493-2500 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0605104 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Effect of scalings and translations on the supersymmetric quantum mechanical structure of soliton sy stems,

    A. Arancibia, J. Mateos Guilarte and M. S. Plyushchay, “Effect of scalings and translations on the supersymmetric quantum mechanical structure of soliton sy stems,” Phys. Rev. D 87, 045009 (2013) [arXiv:1210.3666 [math-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Soliton solutions of multicomponent nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    Y. Nogami and C. S. Warke, “Soliton solutions of multicomponent nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”, Phys. Lett. A 59, 251 (1976)

    1976

  15. [15]

    Relativistic extension of the Kay–Moses method for con- structing transparent potentials in quantum mechanics

    F. M. Toyama, Y. Nogami and Z. Zhao, “Relativistic extension of the Kay–Moses method for con- structing transparent potentials in quantum mechanics”, Phys. Rev. A 47, 897 (1993)

    1993

  16. [16]

    Reflectionless potential for the one-dimensional Dirac eq uation: pseudoscalar potentials

    Y. Nogami and F. M. Toyama, “Reflectionless potential for the one-dimensional Dirac eq uation: pseudoscalar potentials”, Phys. Rev. A 57, 93 (1998)

    1998

  17. [17]

    Fermionic solutions of chiral Gross–Neveu and Bogoliubov–de Gennes systems in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger hi erarchy

    D. A. Takahashi, S. Tsuchiya, R. Yoshii and M. Nitta, “Fermionic solutions of chiral Gross–Neveu and Bogoliubov–de Gennes systems in nonlinear Schr¨ odinger hi erarchy”, Phys. Lett. B 718, 632 (2012) [arXiv:1205.3299 [cond-mat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Self-consistent multiple complex-kink solutions in Bogoliubov-de Gennes and chiral Gross–Neveu systems

    D. A. Takahashi and M. Nitta, “Self-consistent multiple complex-kink solutions in Bogoliubov-de Gennes and chiral Gross–Neveu systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 131601 (2013) [arXiv:1209.6206 [cond-mat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    On reflectionless nature of self-consistent multi-solito n solutions in Bogoliubov–de Gennes and chiral Gross–Neveu models

    D. A. Takahashi and M. Nitta, “On reflectionless nature of self-consistent multi-solito n solutions in Bogoliubov–de Gennes and chiral Gross–Neveu models”, J. Low Temp. Phys. 175, 250-257 (2014) [arXiv:1307.3897 [cond-mat]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field t heories,

    D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, “Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field t heories,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 3235 (1974)

    1974

  21. [21]

    Semiclassical bound states in an asymptotically free theory

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, “Semiclassical bound states in an asymptotically free theory”, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2443 (1975). 22

    1975

  22. [22]

    All about the static fermion bags in the Gross–Neveu model

    J. Feinberg, “All about the static fermion bags in the Gross–Neveu model” , Ann. Phys. 309, 166 (2004) [arXiv:0305240 [hep-th]]

    2004

  23. [23]

    Semiclassical bound states in a model with chiral symmetry

    S. -S. Shei, “Semiclassical bound states in a model with chiral symmetry ”, Phys. Rev. D 14, 535 (1976)

    1976

  24. [24]

    Transmutations of supersymmetry through soliton scatter ing, and self-consistent condensates

    A. Arancibia and M. S. Plyushchay, “Transmutations of supersymmetry through soliton scatter ing, and self-consistent condensates”, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025008 (2014) [arXiv:1401.6709 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Twisted kinks, Dirac transparent systems and Darboux tran sformations

    F. Correa and V. Jakubsky, “Twisted kinks, Dirac transparent systems and Darboux tran sformations”, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125003 (2014) [arXiv:1406.2997 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Time-dependent Hartree-Fock solution of Gross–Neveu mod - els: Twisted kink constituents of baryons and breathers

    G. V. Dunne and M. Thies, “Time-dependent Hartree-Fock solution of Gross–Neveu mod - els: Twisted kink constituents of baryons and breathers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 121602 (2013) [arXiv:1306.4007 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Transparent dirac potentials in one dimension: the time-d ependent case

    G. V. Dunne and M. Thies, “Transparent dirac potentials in one dimension: the time-d ependent case”, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062115 (2013) [arXiv:1308.5801 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Full time-dependent Hartree–Fock solution of large N Gros s–Neveu models

    G. V. Dunne and M. Thies, “Full time-dependent Hartree–Fock solution of large N Gros s–Neveu models”, Phys. Rev. D 89, 025008 (2014) [arXiv:1309.2443 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    History and physics of the Klein paradox

    A. Calogeracos and N. Dombey, “History and physics of the Klein paradox”, Contemp. Phys. 40, 313 (1999) [arXiv:quant-ph/9905076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  30. [30]

    Chiral tunneling and the Klein paradox in graphene

    M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov and A. K. Geim, “Chiral tunneling and the Klein paradox in graphene”, Nature Phys. 2, 620 (2006) [arXiv:cond-mat/0604323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Evidence for Klein tunneling in graphene p-n junctions

    N. Stander, B. Huard and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, “Evidence for Klein tunneling in graphene p-n junctions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026807 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Super-Klein tunneling of massive pseudospin-one particles

    Y. Betancur-Ocampo, G. Cordourier-Maruri, V. Gupta, and R . de Coss, “Super-Klein tunneling of massive pseudospin-one particles” , Phys. Rev. B 96, 024304 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    Experimental observation of super-Klein tunneling in pho nonic crystals

    Y. Zhu et al., “Experimental observation of super-Klein tunneling in pho nonic crystals” , Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 211701 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Super-Klein tunneling of Dirac fermions through electrostatic gratings in graphene

    A. Contreras-Astorga, F. Correa and V. Jakubsk´ y, “Super-Klein tunneling of Dirac fermions through electrostatic gratings in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 102, 115429 (2020) [arXiv:2006.08207 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Super-Klein tunneling of Klein-gordon particles

    K. Kim, “Super-Klein tunneling of Klein-gordon particles”, Results. Phys. 12, 1391 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Topical review: The rise of Klein tunneling in low-dimensional materials and superlattices

    Y. Betancur–Ocampo, G. Monsivais and V. Jakubsk´ y, “Topical review: The rise of Klein tunneling in low-dimensional materials and superlattices”, [arXiv:2512.18026 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    On three dimensional packets of surface waves

    A. Davey and K. Stewartson, “On three dimensional packets of surface waves”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 338, 101 (1974)

    1974

  38. [38]

    Multidimensional localized solitons

    M. Boiti, L. Martina and F. Pempinelli, “Multidimensional localized solitons”, Chaos Soliton Fract. 5, 2377 (1995) [arXiv:patt-sol/9311002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    PT -symmetric quantum mechanics

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher and P. Meisinger, “PT -symmetric quantum mechanics” , J. Math. Phys. 40, 2201 (1999) [arXiv:quant-ph/9809072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    Complex extension of quantum mechanics

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody and H. F. Jones, “Complex extension of quantum mechanics” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 270401 (2002) [Erratum: 92 (2004) 119902] [arXiv:quant-ph/0208076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  41. [41]

    PT -symmetric invisible de- fects and confluent Darboux-Crum transformations,

    F. Correa, V. Jakubsky and M. S. Plyushchay, “PT -symmetric invisible de- fects and confluent Darboux-Crum transformations,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 023839 (2015) [arXiv:1506.00991 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Lorentzian quantum wells in graphene: The role of shape invariance in zero-energy-statethe trapping

    F. Correa, L. Inzunza and V. Jakubsk´ y, “Lorentzian quantum wells in graphene: The role of shape invariance in zero-energy-statethe trapping ”, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075120 (2024) [arXiv:2401.13864 [cond-mat.mes-hall]] . 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    SUSY design of smooth quantum rings in graphene

    F. Correa, L. Inzunza and V. Jakubsk´ y, “SUSY design of smooth quantum rings in graphene” , Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033101 (2025) [arXiv:2501.08422 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Quasi-symmetry groups and many-body scar dynamics

    J. Ren, C. Liang and C. Fang, “Quasi-symmetry groups and many-body scar dynamics” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 120604 (2021) [arXiv:2007.10380 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Dynamic behaviors of the breather solutions for the AB syst em in fluid mechanics

    R. Guo, H. Q. Hao and L. L. Zhang, “Dynamic behaviors of the breather solutions for the AB syst em in fluid mechanics” , Nonlinear Dyn. 74, 701 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    One-dimensional quasi-exactly solvable Schr¨ odinger eq uations

    A. V. Turbiner, “One-dimensional quasi-exactly solvable Schr¨ odinger eq uations”, Phys. Rept. 642, 1 (2016) [arXiv:1603.02992 [quant-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Bound states in the continuum and long-lived electronic resonances in mesoscopic struct ures

    L. Dobrzy´ nski, H. Al-Wahsh, A. Akjouj and E. A. Abdel-Ghaffa r, “Bound states in the continuum and long-lived electronic resonances in mesoscopic struct ures”, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035428 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Inverse scattering transformation method and soliton solutions for Davey–Stewartson II equation

    V. A. Arkadiev, A. K. Pogrebkov, and M. C. Polivanov , “Inverse scattering transformation method and soliton solutions for Davey–Stewartson II equation” , Physica D 36, 189 (1989)

    1989

  49. [49]

    On the propagation of Dirac fermions in graphene with strain-induced inhomogeneous Fermi velocity

    A. Contreras-Astorga, V. Jakubsk´ y and A. Raya, “On the propagation of Dirac fermions in graphene with strain-induced inhomogeneous Fermi velocity” , J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 295301 (2020) [arXiv:1912.00675 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    The first integral method and traveling wave solutions to Da vey–Stewartson equa- tion

    A. Jafarian, et al. “The first integral method and traveling wave solutions to Da vey–Stewartson equa- tion”, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control. 17.2, 182 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    Solitons, B¨ acklund transformation and Lax pair for a (2+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson system on surface waves of fi nite depth

    X H. Zhao, et al. “Solitons, B¨ acklund transformation and Lax pair for a (2+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson system on surface waves of fi nite depth” , Waves in Random and Complex Media 28, 356 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Novel periodic and optical soliton solutions for Davey–St ewartson system by generalized Jacobi elliptic expansion method

    M. Gaballah et al. “Novel periodic and optical soliton solutions for Davey–St ewartson system by generalized Jacobi elliptic expansion method” , Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 24, 2889 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Multiple-soliton solutions for the KP equation by Hirota’ s bilinear method and by the tanh-coth method

    A. M. Wazwaz, “Multiple-soliton solutions for the KP equation by Hirota’ s bilinear method and by the tanh-coth method” , Appl. Math. Comput. 190, 633 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Finite-zone, two-dimensional, potential Schr¨ odinger o perators. Explicit formula and evolutions equations

    S. P. Novikov and A. P. Veselov, “Finite-zone, two-dimensional, potential Schr¨ odinger o perators. Explicit formula and evolutions equations” , Sov. Math. Dokl. 30, 588 (1984)

    1984

  55. [55]

    Multi-soliton solutions of two-dimensional matrix Davey – Stewartson equation

    A. N. Leznov and E. A. Yuzbashyan, “Multi-soliton solutions of two-dimensional matrix Davey – Stewartson equation”, Nucl. Phys. B 496, 643 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9612107 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  56. [56]

    Burgers and KP hierarchies: A functional representation a p- proach

    A. Dimakis and F. M¨ uller-Hoissen, “Burgers and KP hierarchies: A functional representation a p- proach”, Theor. Math. Phys. 152, 933 (2007)

    2007

  57. [57]

    Dirac materials

    T. O. Wehling, A. M. Black-Schaffer and A. V. Balatsky, “Dirac materials”, Adv. Phys. 76, 1 (2014) [arXiv:1405.5774 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Graphene-based quantum electronics

    M. Dragomana and D. Dragoman, “Graphene-based quantum electronics” , Prog. Quantum Electron 33, 165 (2009)

    2009

  59. [59]

    Revisiting the gauge fields of strained graphene

    A. Iorio and P. Pais, “Revisiting the gauge fields of strained graphene” , Phys. Rev. D 92, 125005 (2015) [arXiv:1508.00926 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Introduction to graphene electronics – a new era of digital transistors and devices

    K. C. Yung, W. M. Wu, M. P. Pierpoint and F. V. Kusmartsev, “Introduction to graphene electronics – a new era of digital transistors and devices” , Contemp. Phys. 54, 233 (2013) [arXiv:1309.0205[cond-mat.mtrl-sci]]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013