arxiv: 2602.08605 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-09 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Holographic information measures for spin-3/2 Delta baryons in AdS/QCD

H. Almeida , R. da Rocha , P. H. O. Silva , B. Toniato

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph

keywords AdS/QCDDelta baryonsRarita-Schwinger fieldsconfigurational entropyconfigurational complexityRegge trajectoriesbaryon spectroscopyholographic QCD

0 comments

The pith

Differential configurational entropy and complexity for spin-3/2 Delta baryons in AdS/QCD produce Regge-like trajectories matching their mass spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models spin-3/2 Delta baryon resonances in an AdS/QCD setup with Rarita-Schwinger fields and extracts differential configurational entropy together with differential configurational complexity from the corresponding bulk energy densities. These information measures are shown to organize into straight-line Regge trajectories when plotted against radial excitation level, reproducing the known experimental masses of the Delta states. The same trajectories are then used to estimate masses for additional higher resonances that lie beyond the currently tabulated entries in the Particle Data Group. The results indicate that holographic bulk quantities can serve as practical organizers for baryon spectroscopy in the strongly coupled regime.

Core claim

The differential configurational entropy and differential configurational complexity associated with the bulk energy densities of Rarita-Schwinger fields for Delta baryons in AdS/QCD yield Regge-like trajectories relating these measures to the radial excitation number and the experimental mass spectrum, enabling extrapolation of the spectrum to heavier resonances beyond those in the PDG.

What carries the argument

Differential configurational entropy and complexity computed from the bulk energy densities of Rarita-Schwinger fields in the AdS/QCD background.

If this is right

Delta baryon masses organize along linear trajectories when measured by configurational entropy and complexity.
Masses of additional heavier Delta states can be estimated by extending the same trajectories.
The method permits direct comparison with Delta states omitted from the PDG summary tables.
Holographic bulk dynamics and configurational information measures together constrain baryon spectroscopy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same bulk-to-information mapping could be tested on other spin-3/2 or spin-1/2 baryon families to check whether the trajectories remain linear.
If the trajectories hold, they supply a simple predictive tool for estimating masses ahead of new collider runs.
The linear relation may ultimately trace to a symmetry of the five-dimensional geometry that survives the holographic dictionary.

Load-bearing premise

The differential configurational entropy and complexity derived from the bulk energy densities directly encode the physical mass spectrum of the Delta baryons without extra adjustments to the model parameters.

What would settle it

Future experimental measurements or lattice computations that place higher Delta resonance masses outside the extrapolated Regge trajectories would falsify the claimed direct correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.08605 by B. Toniato, H. Almeida, P. H. O. Silva, R. da Rocha.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: DCE of the ∆ baryon resonances as a function of the radial quantum number. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: DCE of the ∆ baryon resonances as a function of their squared mass, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: DCC of the ∆ baryon resonances as a function of the radial quantum number. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: DCC of the ∆ baryon resonances as a function of their squared mass, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Spin-$3/2$ $\Delta$ baryon resonances are investigated within AdS/QCD, using Rarita-Schwinger fields. The differential configurational entropy (DCE) and differential configurational complexity (DCC) associated with their bulk energy densities are computed. It yields Regge-like trajectories relating configurational information measures to the radial excitation number and the experimental mass spectrum of the $\Delta$ baryons. We then extrapolate the spectrum of heavier $\Delta$ baryon resonances beyond the currently established states in the PDG, also comparing them with states in the PDG that are omitted from the summary table. Our results support a relevant interplay among holographic QCD dynamics, configurational information entropy, and baryon spectroscopy in strongly coupled QCD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This extends configurational entropy calculations to Delta baryons in AdS/QCD and produces the expected Regge lines, but the extrapolations largely follow from the soft-wall setup rather than adding independent evidence.

read the letter

This paper takes the standard AdS/QCD soft-wall background with a Rarita-Schwinger field for spin-3/2 Deltas, computes the bulk energy densities for the radial modes, and derives differential configurational entropy and complexity from them. It then plots these quantities against radial number and experimental masses to get linear trajectories, and uses the fits to extrapolate heavier states beyond the current PDG entries while checking a few omitted ones. The concrete numbers for DCE and DCC in this sector are new and fill a gap left by earlier work on nucleons and other resonances. The calculations are presented clearly enough that someone familiar with the model can reproduce the steps. That is the useful part: a direct application that gives reference values for the Delta family. The soft spot is the built-in linearity. The soft-wall potential is chosen precisely so the mass-squared spectrum is linear in the radial quantum number. The energy density profiles are the corresponding eigenfunctions, and the configurational entropy is a functional of those same profiles. Once the background is fixed to match the known Regge slope, the entropy trajectories come out linear almost automatically. The extrapolations therefore inherit the same parameters fitted to the PDG states and do not supply an independent check on the spectrum. The circularity is real and limits how much weight the heavier-state predictions can carry. Readers working inside holographic QCD and baryon spectroscopy will find the numbers worth having as a benchmark. Someone outside that niche or looking for new mechanisms will not get much from it. The paper shows clear, honest engagement with the tools it uses, so it deserves a serious referee to verify the energy-density definitions and the fitting details.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates spin-3/2 Δ baryon resonances in AdS/QCD using Rarita-Schwinger fields. It computes the differential configurational entropy (DCE) and differential configurational complexity (DCC) from the bulk energy densities of the radial modes. Regge-like trajectories are derived relating these information measures to the radial excitation number and the experimental PDG mass spectrum, which are then used to extrapolate masses of heavier Δ resonances beyond currently established states.

Significance. If the results hold without circularity, the work extends holographic information measures to higher-spin baryons and supplies testable predictions for unobserved resonances that could be confronted with future experiments or lattice QCD. It illustrates a potential link between bulk AdS/QCD dynamics and configurational entropy in baryon spectroscopy, though the overall significance remains moderate pending clarification of the trajectory construction.

major comments (2)

[Section 3] The AdS/QCD background employs a soft-wall potential chosen to reproduce linear Regge trajectories m_n² ≈ a n + b via the Rarita-Schwinger equation. Because the bulk energy density ρ_n is obtained from the identical eigenfunctions, the DCE (typically -∫ ρ log ρ after normalization) is a direct functional of the same density profile. Consequently the reported linearity in DCE/DCC versus n follows by construction from the potential rather than supplying an independent relation, weakening the claim that the extrapolations constitute additional evidence beyond the fitted PDG masses.
[Section 5] The extrapolation of heavier Δ states rests on trajectories whose slopes and intercepts are determined by fitting to known PDG states. The manuscript should quantify the fit quality (e.g., R² or χ²) and propagate uncertainties to the predicted masses; without this, the extrapolated spectrum lacks statistical grounding and cannot be distinguished from a simple linear continuation of the input data.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that trajectories are 'obtained and used for extrapolation' but does not specify whether the functional forms are derived independently or fitted post-hoc to the spectrum.
Explicit definitions of DCE and DCC, including the precise normalization of the energy density and any integration limits, should be provided in the main text with equation numbers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 3] The AdS/QCD background employs a soft-wall potential chosen to reproduce linear Regge trajectories m_n² ≈ a n + b via the Rarita-Schwinger equation. Because the bulk energy density ρ_n is obtained from the identical eigenfunctions, the DCE (typically -∫ ρ log ρ after normalization) is a direct functional of the same density profile. Consequently the reported linearity in DCE/DCC versus n follows by construction from the potential rather than supplying an independent relation, weakening the claim that the extrapolations constitute additional evidence beyond the fitted PDG masses.

Authors: We acknowledge that the soft-wall potential is chosen to produce linear Regge trajectories in the mass spectrum m_n² ≈ a n + b, and that the bulk energy densities ρ_n are derived from the corresponding eigenfunctions of the Rarita-Schwinger equation. However, the linearity observed in DCE and DCC versus radial number n is not a direct algebraic consequence of the potential choice alone; it emerges from the specific functional form of the normalized energy density profiles in the holographic model. This provides an independent information-theoretic characterization that organizes the spectrum and enables extrapolation to higher states using the computed DCE/DCC values rather than the masses directly. We have revised Section 3 to clarify this distinction and to emphasize that the DCE trajectories supply a complementary relation to the experimental PDG masses. revision: partial
Referee: [Section 5] The extrapolation of heavier Δ states rests on trajectories whose slopes and intercepts are determined by fitting to known PDG states. The manuscript should quantify the fit quality (e.g., R² or χ²) and propagate uncertainties to the predicted masses; without this, the extrapolated spectrum lacks statistical grounding and cannot be distinguished from a simple linear continuation of the input data.

Authors: We agree that quantifying the fit quality and uncertainties strengthens the presentation of the extrapolated masses. In the revised manuscript, we have added the R² values for the linear regressions of DCE and DCC versus n, along with a brief propagation of fit-parameter uncertainties to the predicted resonance masses in Section 5. This provides the requested statistical context for the extrapolations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

DCE/DCC trajectories inherit linearity from soft-wall potential enforcing Regge masses

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract and results section (Regge-like trajectories)]
"It yields Regge-like trajectories relating configurational information measures to the radial excitation number and the experimental mass spectrum of the Δ baryons. We then extrapolate the spectrum of heavier Δ baryon resonances beyond the currently established states in the PDG."

The background potential is chosen so the Rarita-Schwinger equation yields m_n² linear in n. Energy density ρ_n for each mode is fixed by the identical eigenfunctions. DCE = -∫ ρ log ρ (normalized) is then a direct functional of ρ_n; observed linearity in n or m therefore follows by construction from the same fit that reproduces the input PDG masses, rendering the extrapolation a reparametrization rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The AdS/QCD soft-wall background is fixed by the Rarita-Schwinger equation to produce linear Regge trajectories m_n² ≈ a n + b fitted to PDG masses. Bulk energy densities are obtained directly from the same eigenfunctions; DCE/DCC are functionals of those densities. Consequently the reported Regge-like DCE(n) and DCE(m) lines are not independent checks but re-expressions of the input spectrum fit, so the extrapolation of heavier states inherits the same parameters without new evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the AdS/QCD correspondence for baryons, the Rarita-Schwinger representation of spin-3/2 fields, and the definition of differential configurational entropy from the bulk energy density; several model parameters and the trajectory fit coefficients are expected to be adjusted to data.

free parameters (2)

AdS/QCD background parameters
Parameters such as the AdS radius or dilaton profile are typically tuned to reproduce meson or baryon spectra.
Regge trajectory slope and intercept
Linear fits to the computed DCE/DCC versus excitation number are matched to PDG masses.

axioms (2)

domain assumption AdS/QCD duality accurately describes Delta baryon resonances
The paper assumes the holographic model captures the relevant strong-coupling dynamics for these states.
standard math Rarita-Schwinger field equations in the chosen background
Standard formulation for massive spin-3/2 fields in curved spacetime is invoked without re-derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5437 in / 1510 out tokens · 44235 ms · 2026-05-16T05:49:41.183344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

[1]

and column four illustrates the mass spectrum (16) obtained from AdS/QCD. The linear Regge trajectory that interpolates the experimental values of the squared mass as a function of the radial quantum numberncan be written as m2 n(n) = 1.1111n+ 0.3161.(18) 8 and it is plotted in Fig. 1, together with the mass spectrum (16) obtained from AdS/QCD. Experiment...

work page 1920
[2]

J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998), hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[3]

Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), hep-th/9802150

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[4]

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998), hep-th/9802109. 21

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[5]

Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rept.323, 183 (2000), hep-th/9905111

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[6]

Erlich, E

J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 261602 (2005), hep- ph/0501128

work page arXiv 2005
[7]

Linear Confinement and AdS/QCD

A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D74, 015005 (2006), hep-ph/0602229

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[8]

Toward a Systematic Holographic QCD: A Braneless Approach

C. Csaki and M. Reece, JHEP05, 062 (2007), hep-ph/0608266

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[9]

Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces

L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B721, 79 (2005), hep-ph/0501218

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[10]

Scalar mesons within a dynamical holographic QCD model

W. de Paula and T. Frederico, Phys. Lett. B693, 287 (2010), 0908.4282

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[11]

Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I

U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, JHEP02, 032 (2008), 0707.1324

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[12]

Effective holographic models for QCD: glueball spectrum and trace anomaly

A. Ballon-Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, L. A. H. Mamani, A. S. Miranda, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D97, 046001 (2018), 1708.08968

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

Strong couplings and form factors of charmed mesons in holographic QCD

A. Ballon-Bayona, G. Krein, and C. Miller, Phys. Rev. D96, 014017 (2017), 1702.08417

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[14]

Folco Capossoli, M

E. Folco Capossoli, M. A. Mart´ ın Contreras, D. Li, A. Vega, and H. Boschi-Filho, Chin. Phys. C44, 064104 (2020), 1903.06269

work page arXiv 2020
[15]

Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Soft-Wall AdS/QCD

T. Gherghetta, J. I. Kapusta, and T. M. Kelley, Phys. Rev. D79, 076003 (2009), 0902.1998

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[16]

Dynamical holographic QCD with area-law confinement and linear Regge trajectories

W. de Paula, T. Frederico, H. Forkel, and M. Beyer, Phys. Rev. D79, 075019 (2009), 0806.3830

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[17]

Light scalar mesons in the soft-wall model of AdS/QCD

P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Giannuzzi, F. Jugeau, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D78, 055009 (2008), 0807.1054

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[18]

Rinaldi and V

M. Rinaldi and V. Vento, Phys. Rev. D109, 114030 (2024), 2402.11959

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D102, 046007 (2020), 2004.10286

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Gauge/string duality and scalar glueball mass ratios

H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, JHEP05, 009 (2003), hep-th/0212207

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[21]

N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, JHEP01, 082 (2019), 1810.11872

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[22]

Karapetyan and R

G. Karapetyan and R. da Rocha, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 993 (2021), 2103.10863

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

C. A. Ballon Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, N. R. F. Braga, and L. A. Pando Zayas, Phys. Rev. D77, 046002 (2008), 0705.1529

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[24]

Diles, M

S. Diles, M. A. Martin Contreras, and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D112, 056010 (2025), 2505.14324

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

S. S. Jena, J. Barman, B. Toniato, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, JHEP12, 096 (2024), 2408.14813

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

The melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model

D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D91, 086002 (2015), 1410.3297

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[27]

Holographic estimate of heavy quark diffusion in a magnetic field

D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Phys. Rev. D97, 054035 (2018), 1802.02805

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[28]

Rarita-Schwinger Field in the AdS/CFT Correspondence

A. Volovich, JHEP09, 022 (1998), hep-th/9809009

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[29]

A. S. Koshelev and O. A. Rytchkov, Phys. Lett. B450, 368 (1999), hep-th/9812238

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[30]

The AdS/CFT Correspondence for the Massive Rarita-Schwinger Field

P. Matlock and K. S. Viswanathan, Phys. Rev. D61, 026002 (2000), hep-th/9906077

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[31]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Comm. Math. Phys.98, 391 (1985)

work page 1985
[32]

D. M. Dantas, D. F. S. Veras, J. E. G. Silva, and C. A. S. Almeida, Phys. Rev. D92, 104007 (2015), 1506.07228

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[33]

Gomes, J

M. Gomes, J. G. Lima, T. Mariz, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Y. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B845, 138141 (2023), 2308.16308. 22

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Spectroscopy of fermionic operators in AdS/CFT

I. Kirsch, JHEP09, 052 (2006), hep-th/0607205

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[35]

Benakli, C

K. Benakli, C. A. Daniel, and W. Ke, JHEP03, 212 (2023), 2302.06630

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

L. G. C. Gentile, P. A. Grassi, and A. Mezzalira, JHEP10, 065 (2013), 1207.0686

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[37]

Weyl's Gauge Invariance: Conformal Geometry, Spinors, Supersymmetry, and Interactions

A. Shaukat and A. Waldron, Nucl. Phys. B829, 28 (2010), 0911.2477

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[38]

D. K. Hong, T. Inami, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Lett. B646, 165 (2007), hep-ph/0609270

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[39]

Z. Fang, D. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, Phys. Lett. B754, 343 (2016), 1602.00379

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[40]

Baryon Physics in Holographic QCD

A. Pomarol and A. Wulzer, Nucl. Phys. B809, 347 (2009), 0807.0316

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[41]

H. C. Ahn, D. K. Hong, C. Park, and S. Siwach, Phys. Rev. D80, 054001 (2009), 0904.3731

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[42]

X. Guo, M. A. Martin Contreras, X. Chen, and D. Xiang, Chin. Phys. C49, 013104 (2025), 2404.16608

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

da Rocha and P

R. da Rocha and P. H. O. Silva, Phys. Lett. B870, 139917 (2025), 2510.05369

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Baryons in a soft-wall AdS-Schwarzschild approach at low temperature

T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, I. Schmidt, and A. Y. Trifonov, Phys. Rev. D99, 114023 (2019), 1905.02577

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[45]

A unified approach to hadron phenomenology at zero and finite temperatures in a hard-wall AdS/QCD model

Z. Wang and B.-Q. Ma, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 122 (2016), 1512.01957

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[46]

Capstick and N

S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)

work page 1986
[47]

C. H. Coronado Villalobos, J. M. Hoff da Silva, and R. da Rocha, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 266 (2015), 1504.06763

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[48]

The emergence of flagpole and flag-dipole fermions in fluid/gravity correspondence

P. Meert and R. da Rocha, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 1012 (2018), 1809.01104

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[49]

K. D. Marquez, D. P. Menezes, H. Pais, and C. Providˆ encia, Phys. Rev. C106, 055801 (2022), 2206.02935

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

Parmar, V

V. Parmar, V. B. Thapa, M. Sinha, and I. Bombaci, Phys. Rev. D112, 023016 (2025), 2503.07256

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Gleiser and N

M. Gleiser and N. Sowinski, Phys. Lett. B747, 125 (2015), 1501.06800

work page arXiv 2015
[52]

Information Content of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

M. Gleiser and N. Stamatopoulos, Phys. Rev. D86, 045004 (2012), 1205.3061

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[53]

A. E. Bernardini, N. R. F. Braga, and R. da Rocha, Phys. Lett. B765, 81 (2017), 1609.01258

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[54]

Shape Is Destiny II: Configurational Information Approach to Instantons and False Vacuum Decay in D-dimensional Spacetime

M. Gleiser and D. Sowinski, Phys. Rev. D98, 056026 (2018), 1807.07588

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[55]

A. E. Bernardini and R. da Rocha, Phys. Rev. D98, 126011 (2018), 1809.10055

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[56]

Configurational entropy and $\rho$ and $\phi$ mesons production in QCD

G. Karapetyan, Phys. Lett. B781, 201 (2018), 1802.09105

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[57]

Configurational Entropy can disentangle conventional hadrons from exotica

P. Colangelo and F. Loparco, Phys. Lett. B788, 500 (2019), 1811.05272

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[58]

N. R. F. Braga, L. F. Ferreira, and O. C. Junqueira, Phys. Lett. B847, 138265 (2023), 2301.01322

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

M. A. Martin Contreras, A. Vega, and S. Diles, Phys. Lett. B835, 137551 (2022), 2206.01834

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

N. R. F. Braga and O. C. Junqueira, Phys. Lett. B814, 136082 (2021), 2010.00714

work page arXiv 2021
[61]

M. A. Martin Contreras, A. Vega, and S. Diles, Phys. Lett. B854, 138723 (2024), 2308.16007

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, Phys. Rev. D108, 126024 (2023), 2309.02905

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

Interplay between the holographic QCD phase diagram and entanglement entropy

D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, JHEP07, 120 (2018), 1805.02938

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[64]

da Rocha, Phys

R. da Rocha, Phys. Rev. D105, 026014 (2022), 2111.01244

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

P. D. Group et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2024, 083C01 (2024)

work page 2024
[66]

Suppression of baryon diffusion and transport in a baryon rich strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma

R. Rougemont, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha-Hostler, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 202301 (2015), 1507.06972

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[67]

Andronic, P

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Nature561, 321 (2018). 23

work page 2018
[68]

L. F. Ferreira and R. da Rocha, Phys. Rev. D101, 106002 (2020), 2004.04551

work page arXiv 2020
[69]

H. J. Pirner and B. Galow, Phys. Lett. B679, 51 (2009), 0903.2701

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[70]

Toniato, D

B. Toniato, D. Dudal, S. Mahapatra, R. da Rocha, and S. S. Jena, Phys. Rev. D111, 126021 (2025), 2502.12694

work page arXiv 2025