arxiv: 2604.01058 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 🧮 math.QA · gr-qc· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Universal T-matrices for quantum Poincar\'e groups: contractions and quantum reference frames

Angel Ballesteros , Diego Fernandez-Silvestre , Ivan Gutierrez-Sagredo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.QA gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

keywords universal T-matricesquantum Poincaré groupsHopf algebra contractionsquantum reference framescentrally extended Poincaré algebraκ-Poincarédual Hopf algebras

0 comments

The pith

A newly constructed quantum Poincaré T-matrix contracts to the known Galilei T-matrix, positioning it as the symmetry structure for relativistic quantum reference frames.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops the theory of contractions for universal T-matrices of quantum groups. It first computes the T-matrix for the timelike kappa-Poincaré case as an example. It then introduces a new quantum deformation of the centrally extended Poincaré Lie algebra in one plus one dimensions and derives its universal T-matrix. The contraction of this T-matrix recovers precisely the Galilei T-matrix previously linked to non-relativistic quantum reference frame transformations. This makes the new Poincaré dual form a candidate for the algebraic description of relativistic quantum reference frame symmetries, and in a suitable basis it is a central extension of the spacelike kappa-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra.

Core claim

The universal T-matrix for a new quantum deformation of the (1+1) centrally extended Poincaré Lie algebra is derived explicitly. Its Hopf algebra dual form contraction limit yields exactly the Galilei T-matrix associated with non-relativistic quantum reference frames, thereby establishing the Poincaré T-matrix as a natural candidate for describing the symmetry structure of relativistic quantum reference frame transformations. In an appropriate basis, this quantum Poincaré group is recognized as a non-trivial central extension of the (1+1) spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra.

What carries the argument

The universal T-matrix (Hopf algebra dual form) of the newly introduced centrally extended quantum Poincaré group, which encodes the symmetry for relativistic quantum reference frames and contracts to its Galilei counterpart.

If this is right

The contraction limit of the Poincaré T-matrix reproduces the Galilei T-matrix for quantum reference frames.
The new quantum Poincaré group is a central extension of the spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra in a suitable basis.
The approach provides an algebraic foundation for relativistic extensions of quantum reference frame transformations.
The timelike κ-Poincaré T-matrix serves as a concrete illustrative example of the contraction method.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This construction suggests that similar contractions could be applied in higher spacetime dimensions to obtain relativistic quantum reference frame symmetries.
The T-matrix could be used to derive explicit transformation rules between relativistic quantum observers, extending the non-relativistic case.
Connections to other quantum deformations in physics may become accessible through this Hopf algebra approach.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen contraction limit applied to the new centrally extended Poincaré T-matrix exactly reproduces the Galilei T-matrix and that the basis identification as a central extension is valid without additional constraints.

What would settle it

Performing the explicit contraction calculation on the presented Poincaré T-matrix and checking whether every entry matches the corresponding entry in the Galilei T-matrix.

read the original abstract

Universal $T$-matrices, or Hopf algebra dual forms, for quantum groups are revisited, and their contraction theory is developed. As a first illustrative example, the (1+1) timelike $\kappa$-Poincar\'e $T$-matrix is explicitly worked out. Afterwards, motivated by recent results on the role of the Hopf algebra dual form of a quantum (1+1) centrally extended Galilei group as the algebraic object underlying non-relativistic quantum reference frame transformations, a new quantum deformation of the (1+1) centrally extended Poincar\'e Lie algebra is obtained, and its universal $T$-matrix is presented. Finally, the Hopf algebra dual form contraction is applied to this Poincar\'e $T$-matrix, showing that its corresponding non-relativistic counterpart is precisely the Galilei $T$-matrix associated with quantum reference frames. In this way, the Poincar\'e Hopf algebra dual form introduced here stands as a natural candidate for describing the symmetry structure of relativistic quantum reference frame transformations. In the appropriate basis, the associated quantum Poincar\'e group is recognized, remarkably, as a non-trivial central extension of the (1+1) spacelike $\kappa$-Poincar\'e dual Hopf algebra.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They build a new centrally extended quantum Poincaré T-matrix and contract it to recover the known Galilei one for quantum reference frames.

read the letter

The core contribution is a new quantum deformation of the (1+1) centrally extended Poincaré algebra, its explicit universal T-matrix, and the demonstration that a contraction limit reproduces the Galilei T-matrix already tied to non-relativistic quantum reference frames. They also flag the basis in which the result appears as a central extension of the spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra. The timelike κ-Poincaré T-matrix is worked out first as a clear stepping stone, which helps the reader follow the later steps. That explicitness is the paper's main strength; the objects are concrete enough to be checked or used directly. The contraction itself is the part that needs the most attention. These limits usually require coordinated rescaling of the deformation parameter and the generators, and one must confirm that the coproducts, antipodes, and central terms survive without extra residuals or basis anomalies. The abstract asserts an exact match, but the claim's weight rests on whether the full calculation shows the Hopf structure passes through cleanly. If the term-by-term verification is present and correct, the link to relativistic quantum reference frames holds; if not, the candidate status is weaker. This paper is for people already working with Hopf algebra dual forms, κ-deformations, or quantum reference frames in low dimensions. A reader who wants usable expressions rather than broad theory will find the constructions directly applicable. I would send it for peer review. The specific new objects and the contraction link are worth a detailed check by referees who know these algebras.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops contraction theory for universal T-matrices (Hopf algebra dual forms) of quantum groups. It first constructs the explicit T-matrix for the (1+1) timelike κ-Poincaré algebra. It then introduces a new quantum deformation of the centrally extended (1+1) Poincaré Lie algebra, presents its universal T-matrix, and applies a Hopf algebra dual form contraction to recover precisely the known Galilei T-matrix associated with non-relativistic quantum reference frames. The resulting quantum Poincaré group is identified, in a suitable basis, as a non-trivial central extension of the (1+1) spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra, positioning the new T-matrix as a candidate for relativistic quantum reference frame symmetries.

Significance. If the contraction step is verified to preserve the Hopf structure without residual anomalies, the work supplies an explicit algebraic bridge between the relativistic and non-relativistic regimes of quantum reference frame transformations. The explicit T-matrix constructions and the recognition of the central extension constitute concrete, falsifiable contributions to the literature on quantum groups and their physical applications, extending prior results on the Galilei case.

major comments (1)

[§4] §4 (contraction step): the assertion that the limit of the new centrally extended Poincaré T-matrix reproduces the Galilei T-matrix is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides only the final statement without term-by-term verification of the coproducts, antipodes, and central generator scaling on the universal form; an explicit calculation is required to confirm that no extraneous central terms arise or are dropped.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the deformation parameter κ and the central generator should be introduced once with a clear table of commutation relations before the T-matrix is written.
The basis change that realizes the central extension of the spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra is stated but not accompanied by the explicit generator redefinitions; adding these would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the significance of our results, and constructive recommendation. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §4 (contraction step): the assertion that the limit of the new centrally extended Poincaré T-matrix reproduces the Galilei T-matrix is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript provides only the final statement without term-by-term verification of the coproducts, antipodes, and central generator scaling on the universal form; an explicit calculation is required to confirm that no extraneous central terms arise or are dropped.

Authors: We agree that an explicit term-by-term verification of the contraction would strengthen the presentation and make the preservation of the Hopf structure fully transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add a detailed calculation (either in the main text of §4 or as a new appendix) that explicitly computes the limits of all coproducts, antipodes, and the scaling of the central generator on the universal T-matrix, confirming that no extraneous central terms appear or are omitted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Contraction recovers known Galilei T-matrix by explicit limit on constructed deformation; no definitional reduction or self-referential fit

full rationale

The paper constructs a new centrally extended Poincaré deformation and its universal T-matrix, then applies a contraction limit to recover the previously known Galilei T-matrix associated with quantum reference frames. This recovery is presented as an explicit verification step rather than a tautological renaming or parameter fit; the new object is defined independently via the deformation procedure and only afterwards shown to contract correctly. No step equates the final claim to its own inputs by construction, and the central identification as a central extension of the spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra rests on basis change after the contraction, not on self-citation alone. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the known Galilei case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard properties of Hopf algebra dual forms and the validity of the contraction procedure for the chosen deformation parameter; no additional free parameters beyond the standard κ-scale are indicated in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

κ (deformation parameter)
Standard scale parameter characterizing the quantum deformation in κ-Poincaré type groups.

axioms (1)

standard math Universal T-matrices satisfy the defining properties of Hopf algebra dual forms for quantum groups
This is a standard background result in the theory of quantum groups invoked throughout the constructions.

invented entities (1)

new quantum deformation of the centrally extended Poincaré algebra no independent evidence
purpose: To serve as a relativistic counterpart whose contraction yields the Galilei T-matrix for quantum reference frames
Introduced as a new object in the paper; no independent evidence outside the construction is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5550 in / 1402 out tokens · 45370 ms · 2026-05-13T21:43:59.575298+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

a new quantum deformation of the (1+1) centrally extended Poincaré Lie algebra is obtained, and its universal T-matrix is presented... the Hopf algebra dual form contraction is applied to this Poincaré T-matrix, showing that its corresponding non-relativistic counterpart is precisely the Galilei T-matrix
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the (1+1) timelike κ-Poincaré T-matrix is explicitly worked out... In the appropriate basis, the associated quantum Poincaré group is recognized... as a non-trivial central extension of the (1+1) spacelike κ-Poincaré dual Hopf algebra

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

[1]

V. G. Drinfeld,Quantum groups, Zap. Nauchn. Semin.15518–49 (1986)

work page 1986
[2]

Chari and A

V. Chari and A. N. Pressley,A Guide to Quantum Groups, Cambridge University Press (1994)

work page 1994
[3]

Majid,Foundations of Quantum Group Theory, Cambridge University Press (1995)

S. Majid,Foundations of Quantum Group Theory, Cambridge University Press (1995)

work page 1995
[4]

Fronsdal and A

C. Fronsdal and A. Galindo,The dual of a quantum group, Lett. Math. Phys.2759–72 (1993)

work page 1993
[5]

The universalT-matrix

C. Fronsdal and A. Galindo, “The universalT-matrix”, inMathematical aspects of conformal and topological field theories and quantum groups, P. J. Sally, M. Flato, J. Lepowsky, N. Reshetikhin, G. J. Zuckerman, ed., pp. 73–88. American Mathematical Society, 1994

work page 1994
[6]

M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky,Poisson-Lie groups, quantum duality principle, and the quantum double, Theor. Math. Phys.931292–1307 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9304042

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992
[7]

Exponential mapping for non semisimple quantum groups

F. Bonechi, E. Celeghini, R. Giachetti, C. M. Perena, E. Sorace, and M. Tarlini, Exponential mapping for nonsemisimple quantum groups, J. Phys. A271307–1316 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9311114

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[8]

Jurco and P

B. Jurco and P. Stovicek,Coherent states for quantum compact groups, Commun. Math. Phys.182221–251 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9403114

work page arXiv 1996
[9]

E. V. Damaskinsky and M. A. Sokolov,Some remarks on the Gauss decomposition for quantum group GLq(n)with application to q-bosonization, J. Phys. A283725–3732 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9407024

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[10]

Morozov and L

A. Morozov and L. Vinet,Free field representation of group element for simple quantum groups, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A131651–1708 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9409093

work page arXiv 1998
[11]

On the Hopf structure of $U_{p,q}(gl(1|1))$ and the universal ${\cal T}$-matrix of $Fun_{p,q}(GL(1|1))$

R. Chakrabarti and R. Jagannathan,On the Hopf structure ofU p,q(gl(1|1))and the universal T-matrix ofF un p, q(GL(1|1)), Lett. Math. Phys.37191–199 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9409161

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[12]

Finite dimensional representations of the quantum group $GL_{p,q}(2)$ using the exponential map from $U_{p,q}(gl(2))$

R. Jagannathan and J. Van der Jeugt,Finite dimensional representations of the quantum groupGL p,q(2)using the exponential map fromU p,q(gl(2)), J. Phys. A282819–2832 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9411200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[13]

Ballesteros, F

A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz, M. A. del Olmo, C. M. Perena, and M. Santander, Non-standard quantum (1+1) Poincar´ e group: a T-matrix approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.287113–7125 (1995), arXiv:q-alg/9501029

work page arXiv 1995
[14]

Fronsdal,Universal T-matrix for twisted quantumgl(n), arXiv:q-alg/9505014

C. Fronsdal,Universal T-matrix for twisted quantumgl(n), arXiv:q-alg/9505014

work page arXiv
[15]

Fronsdal and A

C. Fronsdal and A. Galindo,Deformations of multiparameter quantum GL(n), Lett. Math. Phys.3425–36 (1995), arXiv:q-alg/9505016

work page arXiv 1995
[16]

The exponential map for representations of $U_{p,q}(gl(2))$

J. Van Der Jeugt and R. Jagannathan,The exponential map for representations of Up,q(gl(2)), Czech. J. Phys.46269 (1996), arXiv:q-alg/9507009

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[17]

The dual $(p,q)$-Alexander-Conway Hopf algebras and the associated universal ${\cal T}$-matrix

R. Chakrabarti and R. Jagannathan,The dual( p, q)-Alexander-Conway Hopf algebras and the associated universal T-matrix, Z. Phys. C72519–524 (1996), arXiv:q-alg/9602020. 29

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[18]

Null-plane Quantum Universal $R$-matrix

A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz, and C. M. Pere˜ na,Null-plane quantum universal R-matrix, Phys. Lett. B39171–77 (1997), arXiv:q-alg/9607009

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[19]

Feinsilver, U

P. Feinsilver, U. Franz, and R. Schott,Duality and multiplicative stochastic processes on quantum groups, J. Theor. Probab.10795–818 (1997)

work page 1997
[20]

Duals of coloured quantum universal enveloping algebras and coloured universal $\cal T$-matrices

C. Quesne,Duals of colored quantum universal enveloping algebras and colored universal T-matrices, J. Math. Phys.391199–1222 (1998), arXiv:q-alg/9711012

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[21]

SL_q(2,R) at Roots of Unity

H. Ahmedov and O. F. Dayi,SL q(2, R)at roots of unity, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32 1895–1907 (1999), arXiv:math/9809052

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
[22]

On Jordanian U_{h,\alpha}(gl(2)) Algebra and Its T Matrices Via a Contraction Method

R. Chakrabarti and C. Quesne,On Jordanian Uh,α(gl(2))algebra and its T-matrices via a contraction method, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A142511–2529 (1999), arXiv:math/9811064

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[23]

Representation Functions for Jordanian Quantum Group SL_h(2) and Jacobi Polynomials

N. Aizawa,Representation functions for Jordanian quantum groupSL h(2)and Jacobi polynomials, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.333735–3752 (2000), arXiv:math/0003110

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[24]

M. A. Sokolov,Exponential representation of Jordanian matrix quantum group GLh(2), J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.33417–425 (2000)

work page 2000
[25]

Generalized boson algebra and its entangled bipartite coherent states

N. Aizawa, R. Chakrabaarti, and J. Segar,Generalized boson algebra and its entangled bipartite coherent states, J. Phys. A389007–9018 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0509031

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[26]

Universal T-matrix, Representations of OSp_q(1/2) and Little Q-Jacobi Polynomials

N. Aizawa, R. Chakrabarti, S. S. N. Mohammed, and J. Segar,Universal T-matrix, representations ofOSp q(1/2)and little q-Jacobi polynomials, J. Math. Phys.47123511 (2006), arXiv:math/0607566

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[27]

Coherent State on SUq(2) Homogeneous Space

N. Aizawa and R. Chakrabarti,Coherent state onSU q(2)homogeneous space, J. Phys. A 42295208 (2009), arXiv:0905.0194 [math.QA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[28]

Girelli and M

F. Girelli and M. Laudonio,Group field theory on quantum groups, arXiv:2205.13312 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[29]

T. G. Mertens,Quantum exponentials for the modular double and applications in gravity models, JHEP09106 (2023), arXiv:2212.07696 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Ballesteros, D

A. Ballesteros, D. Fernandez-Silvestre, F. Giacomini, and G. Gubitosi,Quantum Galilei group as quantum reference frame transformations, Quantum91935 (2025), arXiv:2504.00569 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

B. S. DeWitt,Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory, Phys. Rev.1601113 (1967)

work page 1967
[32]

Aharonov and L

Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind,Charge superselection rule, Phys. Rev.1551428–1431 (1967)

work page 1967
[33]

Aharonov and T

Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr,Quantum frames of reference, Phys. Rev. D30368–385 (1984)

work page 1984
[34]

Rovelli,Quantum reference systems, Class

C. Rovelli,Quantum reference systems, Class. Quant. Grav.8317–332 (1991)

work page 1991
[35]

J. D. Brown and D. Marolf,On relativistic material reference systems, Phys. Rev. D53 1835–1844 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9509026 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[36]

Dynamics of a Quantum Reference Frame

D. Poulin and J. Yard,Dynamics of a quantum reference frame, New J. Phys.9156–156 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0612126. 30

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[37]

S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens,Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.79555–609 (2007), arXiv:0610030 [quant-ph]

work page 2007
[38]

Quantum reference frames and deformed symmetries

F. Girelli and D. Poulin,Quantum reference frames and deformed symmetries, Phys. Rev. D77104012 (2008), arXiv:0710.4393 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[39]

R. M. Angelo, N. Brunner, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and P. Skrzypczyk,Physics within a quantum reference frame, J. Phys. A44145304 (2011), arXiv:1007.2292 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[40]

Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review

J. Tambornino,Relational observables in gravity: A review, SIGMA8017 (2012), arXiv:1109.0740 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[41]

M. C. Palmer, F. Girelli, and S. D. Bartlett,Changing quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. A89052121 (2014), arXiv:1307.6597 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[42]

Miyadera, L

T. Miyadera, L. Loveridge, and P. Busch,Approximating relational observables by absolute quantities: A quantum accuracy-size trade-off, J. Phys. A49185301 (2016), arXiv:1510.02063 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[43]

A. R. H. Smith, M. Piani, and R. B. Mann,Quantum reference frames associated with noncompact groups: The case of translations and boosts and the role of mass, Phys. Rev. A 94012333 (2016), arXiv:1602.07696 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[44]

Giacomini, E

F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and C. Brukner,Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames, Nat. Commun.10494 (2019), arXiv:1712.07207 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[45]

Giacomini, E

F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and C. Brukner,Relativistic quantum reference frames: The operational meaning of spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.123090404 (2019), arXiv:1811.08228 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Lizzi, M

F. Lizzi, M. Manfredonia, F. Mercati, and T. Poulain,Localization and reference frames in κ-Minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D99085003 (2019), arXiv:1811.08409 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

Lizzi, M

F. Lizzi, M. Manfredonia, and F. Mercati,Localizability in κ-Minkowski spacetime, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.172040010 (2020), arXiv:1912.07098 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

de la Hamette and T

A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley,Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups, Quantum4367 (2020), arXiv:2004.14292

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock,Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings, Front. in Phys.9181 (2021), arXiv:2007.00580 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

L. F. Streiter, F. Giacomini, and C. Brukner,Relativistic Bell test within quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. Lett.126230403 (2021), arXiv:2008.03317 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Krumm, P

M. Krumm, P. A. Hoehn, and M. P. Mueller,Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle, Quantum5530 (2021), arXiv:2011.01951 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[52]

Ballesteros, F

A. Ballesteros, F. Giacomini, and G. Gubitosi,The group structure of dynamical transformations between quantum reference frames, Quantum5470 (2021), arXiv:2012.15769 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[53]

Giacomini,Spacetime quantum reference frames and superpositions of proper times, Quantum5508 (2021), arXiv:2101.11628 [quant-ph]

F. Giacomini,Spacetime quantum reference frames and superpositions of proper times, Quantum5508 (2021), arXiv:2101.11628 [quant-ph]. 31

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Mikusch, L

M. Mikusch, L. C. Barbado, and C. Brukner,Transformation of spin in quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. Res.3043138 (2021), arXiv:2103.05022 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

Lizzi, L

F. Lizzi, L. Scala, and P. Vitale,Localization and observers inϱ-Minkowski spacetime, Phys. Rev. D106025023 (2022), arXiv:2205.10862 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Apadula, E

L. Apadula, E. Castro-Ruiz, and C. Brukner,Quantum reference frames for Lorentz symmetry, Quantum81440 (2024), arXiv:2212.14081 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Glowacki, L

J. Glowacki, L. Loveridge, and J. Waldron,Quantum reference frames on finite homogeneous spaces, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63137 (2024), arXiv:2302.05354 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

M. J. Lake and M. Miller,Quantum reference frames, revisited, arXiv:2312.03811 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[59]

J. C. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron,Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys.40619 (2025), arXiv:2403.11973 [math-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Ali Ahmad, W

S. Ali Ahmad, W. Chemissany, M. S. Klinger, and R. G. Leigh,Relational quantum geometry, Nucl. Phys. B1015116911 (2025), arXiv:2410.11029 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

D’Esposito, G

V. D’Esposito, G. Fabiano, D. Frattulillo, and F. Mercati,Doubly quantum mechanics, Quantum91721 (2025), arXiv:2412.05997 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Fiore and F

G. Fiore and F. Lizzi,Mixed states for reference frames transformations, arXiv:2507.05758 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[63]

De Vuyst, P

J. De Vuyst, P. A. Hoehn, and A. Tsobanjan,On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames, arXiv:2507.14131 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[64]

Foundations of Relational Quantum Field Theory I: Scalars

S. Fedida and J. Glowacki,Foundations of relational quantum field theory I: Scalars, arXiv:2507.21601 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[65]

Lie Bialgebra Structures for Centrally Extended Two- Dimensional Galilei Algebra and their Lie-Poisson Counterparts

A. Opanowicz,Lie bialgebra structures for centrally extended two-dimensional Galilei algebra and their Lie-Poisson counterparts, J. Phys. A318387–8396 (1998), arXiv:q-alg/9710028

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[66]

Opanowicz,Two-dimensional centrally extended quantum Galilei groups and their algebras, J

A. Opanowicz,Two-dimensional centrally extended quantum Galilei groups and their algebras, J. Phys. A331941–1960 (2000), arXiv:math/9905141

work page arXiv 1960
[67]

Ballesteros, E

A. Ballesteros, E. Celeghini, and F. J. Herranz,Quantum (1+1) extended Galilei algebras: from Lie bialgebras to quantum R-matrices and integrable systems, J. Phys. A33 3431–3444 (2000), arXiv:math/9906094

work page arXiv 2000
[68]

Ballesteros and F

A. Ballesteros and F. Mercati,Extended noncommutative Minkowski spacetimes and hybrid gauge symmetries, Eur. Phys. J. C78615 (2018), arXiv:1805.07099 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[69]

Celeghini, R

E. Celeghini, R. Giachetti, E. Sorace, and M. Tarlini,Three-dimensional quantum groups from contraction ofSU q(2), J. Math. Phys.312548–2551 (1990)

work page 1990
[70]

Celeghini, R

E. Celeghini, R. Giachetti, E. Sorace, and M. Tarlini,The three-dimensional Euclidean quantum groupE q(3)and its R-matrix, J. Math. Phys.321159–1165 (1991)

work page 1991
[71]

Contractions of quantum groups

E. Celeghini, R. Giachetti, E. Sorace, and M. Tarlini, “Contractions of quantum groups”, inQuantum Groups, P. P. Kulish, ed., pp. 221–244. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992

work page 1992
[72]

Ballesteros, F

A. Ballesteros, F. J. Herranz, M. A. del Olmo, and M. Santander,Classical deformations, Poisson-Lie contractions, and quantization of dual Lie bialgebras, J. Math. Phys.36 631–640 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9403182. 32

work page arXiv 1995
[73]

Lie bialgebra contractions and quantum deformations of quasi-orthogonal algebras

A. Ballesteros, N. A. Gromov, F. J. Herranz, M. A. del Olmo, and M. Santander,Lie bialgebra contractions and quantum deformations of quasiorthogonal algebras, J. Math. Phys.365916–5937 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9412083

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[74]

Ballesteros and F

A. Ballesteros and F. Musso,Quantum algebras as quantizations of dual Poisson-Lie groups, J. Phys. A46195203 (2013), arXiv:1212.3809 [math-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[75]

Poincar´ e,Sur les groupes continus, Trans

H. Poincar´ e,Sur les groupes continus, Trans. Cambr. Philos. Soc.18220–255 (1900)

work page 1900
[76]

Birkhoff,Representability of Lie algebras and Lie groups by matrices, Ann

G. Birkhoff,Representability of Lie algebras and Lie groups by matrices, Ann. Math.38 526–532 (1937)

work page 1937
[77]

Witt,Treue darstellung liescher ringe, Jour

E. Witt,Treue darstellung liescher ringe, Jour. f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik 177152–160 (1937)

work page 1937
[78]

Lukierski, H

J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, A. Nowicki, and V. N. Tolstoi,Q deformation of Poincar´ e algebra, Phys. Lett. B264331–338 (1991)

work page 1991
[79]

Real Forms of Complex Quantum Anti de Sitter Algebra $U_q (Sp(4,C))$ and their Contraction Schemes

J. Lukierski, A. Nowicki, and H. Ruegg,Real forms of complex quantum anti-de Sitter algebraU q(Sp(4;C))and their contraction schemes, Phys. Lett. B271321–328 (1991), arXiv:hep-th/9108018

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991
[80]

Giller, P

S. Giller, P. Kosinski, M. Majewski, P. Maslanka, and J. Kunz,More about Q deformed Poincar´ e algebra, Phys. Lett. B28657–62 (1992)

work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.