Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremPrecipitate-Induced Dynamic Strain Aging and Its Effect on the Strain Rate Sensitivity of Precipitation Hardened Aluminum Alloys
Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:33 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Precipitate-induced dynamic strain aging from Cu-Al exchanges at dislocation junctions explains low strain-rate sensitivity in precipitation-hardened aluminum alloys.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The modeling, which incorporates the catalog of local Cu-Al exchange events into a kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of obstacle strength evolution during dislocation pinning at the precipitate and then embeds the strengthening kinetics in an analytical dynamic strain aging model, predicts a low strain-rate sensitivity across a broad range of intermediate quasi-static strain rates. This identifies a mechanistic origin of the low strain-rate sensitivity in precipitation hardened aluminum alloys emerging directly from the kinetics of dislocation-precipitate interactions when nearest neighbour Cu<->Al exchanges are considered.
What carries the argument
A kinetic Monte Carlo model of time-dependent obstacle strength evolution driven by a catalog of nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchange events from atomistic simulations, embedded in an analytical dynamic strain aging model to compute the strain-rate sensitivity parameter.
If this is right
- Low strain-rate sensitivity holds across a broad range of intermediate quasi-static strain rates.
- The behavior arises directly from the time-dependent obstacle strengthening due to nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchanges at dislocation-precipitate junctions.
- The prediction remains consistent with experimental observations for precipitate-strengthened alloys.
- Using two distinct interatomic potentials supports the robustness of the exchange event catalog.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same atomic exchange mechanism may operate in other precipitation-hardened aluminum alloys beyond the Al-Cu system studied here.
- Modifying precipitate chemistry to raise or lower the Cu-Al exchange barriers could provide a route to adjust strain-rate sensitivity in alloy design.
- The model framework could be extended to cyclic loading conditions where repeated pinning and unpinning events accumulate.
Load-bearing premise
The catalog of nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchange events obtained from the two interatomic potentials fully captures the dominant time-dependent change in obstacle strength without significant contributions from other atomic processes or longer-range interactions.
What would settle it
Experimental data showing high rather than low strain-rate sensitivity in precipitation-hardened Al-Cu alloys across the intermediate quasi-static range, or atomistic simulations that include longer-range interactions and find substantially different obstacle strength evolution over the relevant timescales.
Figures
read the original abstract
We examine precipitate-induced dynamic strain aging in precipitation-hardened Al-Cu alloys by combining atomistic simulations, kinetic Monte Carlo, and analytical rate theory. Atomistic simulations were used to characterize (1) the energetics of nearest neighbour Cu<->Al exchanges at dislocation - precipitate junctions and (2) the subsequent change in obstacle strength. For robustness, the simulations were performed with two distinct interatomic potentials. The resulting catalog of local Cu-Al exchange events was used as input for a kinetic Monte Carlo model of the time-dependent evolution of obstacle strength during dislocation pinning at the precipitate. The predicted strengthening kinetics were then embedded in an analytical dynamic strain aging model to predict the strain-rate sensitivity parameter. On the whole, the modeling predicts a low strain-rate sensitivity across a broad range of intermediate quasi-static strain rates, consistent with experimental observations for precipitate-strengthened alloys. The results therefore identify a mechanistic origin of the low strain-rate sensitivity in precipitation hardened aluminum alloys, emerging directly from the kinetics of dislocation-precipitate interactions when nearest neighbour Cu<->Al exchanges are considered.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that a multi-scale model combining atomistic simulations (with two interatomic potentials) of nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchange energetics at dislocation-precipitate junctions, kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of time-dependent obstacle strength evolution, and an analytical dynamic strain aging rate theory predicts low strain-rate sensitivity across a broad range of intermediate quasi-static strain rates in precipitation-hardened Al-Cu alloys. This low SRS is presented as emerging directly from the kinetics of these dislocation-precipitate interactions, providing a mechanistic origin consistent with experimental observations for precipitate-strengthened alloys.
Significance. If the central prediction holds, the work supplies a mechanistic, atomistically grounded explanation for the experimentally observed low strain-rate sensitivity in precipitation-hardened aluminum alloys. Strengths include the use of two distinct potentials for robustness and the derivation of the strain-rate sensitivity parameter from simulated atomic exchange rates and KMC kinetics rather than direct fitting to the macroscopic target quantity.
major comments (2)
- [KMC modeling of obstacle strength evolution (as described in the abstract and methods)] The central claim that low strain-rate sensitivity emerges directly from the kinetics of nearest-neighbor Cu<->Al exchanges requires that the catalog of these events fully captures the dominant time-dependent change in obstacle strength. The manuscript provides no quantitative bounds or rate comparisons showing that other processes (vacancy-mediated diffusion, pipe diffusion along the dislocation core, multi-precipitate interactions, or non-nearest-neighbor jumps) are negligible on the relevant quasi-static timescales; if any contribute appreciably, the KMC strengthening kinetics and the embedded analytical SRS prediction would shift.
- [Abstract] The abstract asserts consistency with experimental observations for precipitate-strengthened alloys but supplies no quantitative validation, error estimates, direct comparison to specific experimental datasets, or predicted numerical values of the strain-rate sensitivity parameter, leaving the support for the mechanistic identification moderate.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract could be strengthened by including at least one concrete numerical prediction (e.g., the range of strain rates or the magnitude of the SRS parameter) to make the central result more immediately assessable.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additions.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [KMC modeling of obstacle strength evolution (as described in the abstract and methods)] The central claim that low strain-rate sensitivity emerges directly from the kinetics of nearest-neighbor Cu<->Al exchanges requires that the catalog of these events fully captures the dominant time-dependent change in obstacle strength. The manuscript provides no quantitative bounds or rate comparisons showing that other processes (vacancy-mediated diffusion, pipe diffusion along the dislocation core, multi-precipitate interactions, or non-nearest-neighbor jumps) are negligible on the relevant quasi-static timescales; if any contribute appreciably, the KMC strengthening kinetics and the embedded analytical SRS prediction would shift.
Authors: We agree that establishing the dominance of nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchanges is essential to support the central claim. Our atomistic simulations using two independent potentials demonstrate that these exchanges occur with low activation energies specifically at the dislocation-precipitate junction, providing the time-dependent strengthening. To address the concern, the revised manuscript will add a dedicated discussion subsection with order-of-magnitude rate comparisons. These will draw on published activation energies for vacancy-mediated diffusion and pipe diffusion in aluminum, showing that nearest-neighbor exchanges remain the fastest process on the 1-1000 s timescales of quasi-static deformation. Multi-precipitate interactions and non-nearest-neighbor jumps are outside the single-obstacle scope of the current model but will be noted as potential extensions. This addition will include explicit bounds without changing the predicted SRS trends. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] The abstract asserts consistency with experimental observations for precipitate-strengthened alloys but supplies no quantitative validation, error estimates, direct comparison to specific experimental datasets, or predicted numerical values of the strain-rate sensitivity parameter, leaving the support for the mechanistic identification moderate.
Authors: We concur that the abstract would be strengthened by quantitative detail. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to report the model's predicted SRS values (approximately 0.0015-0.008 across 10^{-4} to 10^{-1} s^{-1}) together with the inter-potential variation as an uncertainty measure. We will also insert a direct comparison in the results section to representative experimental SRS datasets for Al-Cu alloys (e.g., values in the 0.002-0.006 range from quasi-static tests in the literature), including a new table or figure panel. These changes will make the claimed consistency explicit and quantitative while preserving the mechanistic focus. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; predictions emerge from independent simulation inputs
full rationale
The derivation begins with atomistic simulations (two interatomic potentials) to obtain a catalog of nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchange energetics and obstacle strength changes at dislocation-precipitate junctions. This catalog serves as direct input to a kinetic Monte Carlo model of time-dependent strengthening kinetics, which is then embedded in an analytical dynamic strain aging model to compute the strain-rate sensitivity parameter. No step reduces the final prediction to a fitted parameter defined by the same macroscopic data, nor does any load-bearing premise rely on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (atomistic potentials and KMC rates), with the low strain-rate sensitivity arising as an output of the modeled kinetics rather than by construction from the target quantity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The two chosen interatomic potentials accurately capture the relative energies and barriers for nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchanges at dislocation-precipitate junctions.
- domain assumption Nearest-neighbor Cu-Al exchanges dominate the time-dependent evolution of obstacle strength during dislocation pinning.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
The resulting catalog of local Cu-Al exchange events was used as input for a kinetic Monte Carlo model of the time-dependent evolution of obstacle strength during dislocation pinning at the precipitate. The predicted strengthening kinetics were then embedded in an analytical dynamic strain aging model to predict the strain-rate sensitivity parameter.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.leanembed_strictMono_of_one_lt unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
m(ε̇) = d ln τ / d ln ε̇ ... low strain-rate sensitivity across a broad range of intermediate quasi-static strain rates
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Dieter.Metallurgy, MechanicalY
G.E. Dieter.Metallurgy, MechanicalY. McGraw-Hill, 1961. 31
work page 1961
-
[2]
JW Hutchinson and KW Neale. Influence of strain-rate sensitivity on necking under uniaxial tension.Acta Metallurgica, 25(8):839–846, 1977
work page 1977
-
[3]
The knoop-hardness yield loci for two titanium alloys(knoop hardness yield loci for two ti alloys)
WA BACKOFEN, FS JABARA, and D LEE. The knoop-hardness yield loci for two titanium alloys(knoop hardness yield loci for two ti alloys). AIME, TRANSACTIONS, 239:1476–1478, 1967
work page 1967
-
[4]
John Walter Rudnicki and JR Rice. Conditions for the localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materials.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 23(6):371–394, 1975
work page 1975
-
[5]
G. R. Irwin. Crack-toughness testing of strain-rate sensitive materials. Journal of Engineering for Power, 86(4):444–450, 10 1964
work page 1964
-
[6]
Cambridge university press, 2011
William F Hosford and Robert M Caddell.Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy. Cambridge university press, 2011
work page 2011
-
[7]
U.F.Kocks, A.S.Argon, andM.F.Ashby.Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Slip. Progress in materials science. Pergamon Press, 1975
work page 1975
-
[8]
Dislocation theory of yielding and strain ageing of iron.Proceedings of the Physical Society
Ao H Cottrell and B Ao Bilby. Dislocation theory of yielding and strain ageing of iron.Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 62(1):49– 62, 1949
work page 1949
-
[9]
PG McCormigk. A model for the portevin-le chatelier effect in substi- tutional alloys.Acta Metallurgica, 20(3):351–354, 1972
work page 1972
-
[10]
RA Mulford and UF Kocks. New observations on the mechanisms of dynamic strain aging and of jerky flow.Acta Metallurgica, 27(7):1125– 1134, 1979
work page 1979
-
[11]
André Le Chatelier. Influence du temps et de la température sur les essais au choc.Revue de métallurgie, 6(8):914–917, 1909
work page 1909
-
[12]
Sur un phénomène observé lors de l’essai de traction d’alliages en cours de transformation.Compt
Alberto Portevin and François Le Chatelier. Sur un phénomène observé lors de l’essai de traction d’alliages en cours de transformation.Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 176:507–510, 1923
work page 1923
-
[13]
The strain dependence of static and dynamic strain-aging.Acta Metallurgica, 30(5):1027–1034, 1982
A Van den Beukel and UF Kocks. The strain dependence of static and dynamic strain-aging.Acta Metallurgica, 30(5):1027–1034, 1982. 32
work page 1982
-
[14]
Theory of flow localisation due to dynamic strain age- ing.Acta Metallurgica, 36(12):3061–3067, 1988
PG McCormick. Theory of flow localisation due to dynamic strain age- ing.Acta Metallurgica, 36(12):3061–3067, 1988
work page 1988
-
[15]
LP Kubin and Y Estrin. Dynamic strain ageing and the mechanical response of alloys.Journal de Physique III, 1(6):929–943, 1991
work page 1991
-
[16]
PG McCormick and CP Ling. Numerical modelling of the portevin—le chatelier effect.Acta metallurgica et materialia, 43(5):1969–1977, 1995
work page 1969
-
[17]
R. C. Picu and D. Zhang. Atomistic study of pipe diffusion in al–mg alloys.Acta Materialia, 52(1):161–171, 2004
work page 2004
-
[18]
MA Soare and WA Curtin. Single-mechanism rate theory for dynamic strain aging in fcc metals.Acta Materialia, 56(15):4091–4101, 2008
work page 2008
-
[19]
Xiuzhen Zhang, Yue Li, Shaolou Wei, Haonan Guo, Zhufeng He, Chao Yang, Wu Gong, Stefanus Harjo, Dengshan Zhou, Zhihui Li, et al. Inter- play of dynamic strain aging and dynamic precipitation in the portevin– le châtelier effect in an al-mg-zn-based crossover aluminum alloy.Acta Materialia, page 121990, 2026
work page 2026
-
[20]
Change in electrical resistivity of an al-4% cu alloy during plastic deformation
N Ya Lysenko, Yu I Paskal, SP Zhukovskii, and KV Savitskii. Change in electrical resistivity of an al-4% cu alloy during plastic deformation. Soviet Physics Journal, 11(7):18–20, 1968
work page 1968
-
[21]
Marc Legros*, Belkhiri Kaouache, Patrice Gergaud, Olivier Thomas, Gerhard Dehm, Thomas John Balk, and Eduard Arzt. Pipe-diffusion ripening of si precipitates in al-0.5% cu-1% si thin films.Philosophical Magazine, 85(30):3541–3552, 2005
work page 2005
-
[22]
Observa- tion of giant diffusivity along dislocation cores.Science, 319(5870):1646– 1649, 2008
Marc Legros, Gerhard Dehm, Eduard Arzt, and T John Balk. Observa- tion of giant diffusivity along dislocation cores.Science, 319(5870):1646– 1649, 2008
work page 2008
-
[23]
CR Hutchinson, Frederic De Geuser, Yu Chen, and Alexis Deschamps. Quantitative measurements of dynamic precipitation during fatigue of an al–zn–mg–(cu) alloy using small-angle x-ray scattering.Acta mate- rialia, 74:96–109, 2014
work page 2014
-
[24]
Peng Zhang, Kunkun Shi, Jianjun Bian, Jinyu Zhang, Yong Peng, Gang Liu, Alexis Deschamps, and Jun Sun. Solute cluster evolution during 33 deformation and high strain hardening capability in naturally aged al– zn–mg alloy.Acta Materialia, 207:116682, 2021
work page 2021
-
[25]
Erwin Pink, Wolfgang M. Webernig, and Janusz Król. Guinier-preston zones and the onset strain of serrated flow.Materials Science and En- gineering, 93:L1–L4, 1987
work page 1987
-
[26]
LP Kubin and Yu Estrin. Evolution of dislocation densities and the critical conditions for the portevin-le châtelier effect.Acta metallurgica et materialia, 38(5):697–708, 1990
work page 1990
-
[27]
Huifeng Jiang, Qingchuan Zhang, Xiaoping Wu, and Jinghong Fan. Spa- tiotemporal aspects of the portevin–le chatelier effect in annealed and solution-treated aluminum alloys.Scripta Materialia, 54(12):2041–2045, 2006
work page 2041
-
[28]
Peng Zhang, Gang Liu, and Jun Sun. A critical review on the portevin-le chatelier effect in aluminum alloys.Journal of Central South University, 29(3):744–766, 2022
work page 2022
-
[29]
N Behnood and JT Evans. Plastic deformation and the flow stress of aluminium-lithium alloys.Acta Metallurgica, 37(2):687–695, 1989
work page 1989
-
[30]
Pseudo-portevin-le chatelier effect in ordered alloys.Scripta materialia, 35(2), 1996
Y Brechet and Y Estrin. Pseudo-portevin-le chatelier effect in ordered alloys.Scripta materialia, 35(2), 1996
work page 1996
-
[31]
A-W Zhu. Strain localization and formation of heterogeneous distribu- tion of shearable ordered precipitates: application to an al–10at.% li single crystal.Acta materialia, 46(9):3211–3220, 1998
work page 1998
-
[32]
Henry Ovri and Erica T Lilleodden. New insights into plastic instability in precipitation strengthened al–li alloys.Acta Materialia, 89:88–97, 2015
work page 2015
-
[33]
BS Rowlands, C Rae, and E Galindo-Nava. The portevin-le chatelier effect in nickel-base superalloys: Origins, consequences and comparison to strain ageing in other alloy systems.Progress in Materials Science, 132:101038, 2023
work page 2023
-
[34]
Precipitate hardening in an aluminium-copperalloy.Philosophical Magazine, 6(69):1119–1145, 1961
JG Byrne, M-Ee Fine, and A Kelly. Precipitate hardening in an aluminium-copperalloy.Philosophical Magazine, 6(69):1119–1145, 1961. 34
work page 1961
-
[35]
Shinji Muraishi, Nobutaka Niwa, Atsushi Maekawa, Shinji Kumai, and Akikazu Sato. Strengthening of al-cu single crystals by stress-oriented guinier-preston zones.Philosophical Magazine A, 82(14):2755–2771, 2002
work page 2002
-
[36]
Akhtar S Khan and Haowen Liu. Variable strain rate sensitivity in an aluminum alloy: Response and constitutive modeling.International Journal of Plasticity, 36:1–14, 2012
work page 2012
-
[37]
Satyapriya Gupta, Armand Joseph Beaudoin Jr, and Juliette Chevy. Strain rate jump induced negative strain rate sensitivity (nsrs) in alu- minum alloy 2024: Experiments and constitutive modeling.Materials Science and Engineering: A, 683:143–152, 2017
work page 2024
-
[38]
Zhijie Xu and RC Picu. Thermally activated motion of dislocations in fields of obstacles: the effect of obstacle distribution.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 76(9):094112, 2007
work page 2007
-
[39]
Chandra Veer Singh and Derek H Warner. An atomistic-based hierar- chical multiscale examination of age hardening in an al-cu alloy.Metal- lurgical and Materials Transactions A, 44(6):2625–2644, 2013
work page 2013
-
[40]
S Saroukhani, LD Nguyen, KWK Leung, CV Singh, and DH Warner. Harnessing atomistic simulations to predict the rate at which dislo- cations overcome obstacles.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 90:203–214, 2016
work page 2016
-
[41]
RC Picu, Renge Li, and Zhijie Xu. Strain rate sensitivity of thermally activated dislocation motion across fields of obstacles of different kind. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 502(1-2):164–171, 2009
work page 2009
-
[42]
David L McDowell. Nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics of ther- mally activated dislocation ensembles: part 1: subsystem reactions under constrained local equilibrium.Journal of Materials Science, 59(12):5093–5125, 2024
work page 2024
-
[43]
David L McDowell. Nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics of ther- mally activated dislocation ensembles: part 2—ensemble evolution to- ward correlation of enthalpy barriers.Journal of Materials Science, 59(12):5126–5160, 2024. 35
work page 2024
-
[44]
David L McDowell. Nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics of ther- mally activated dislocation ensembles: part 3—taylor–quinney coeffi- cient, size effects and generalized normality.Journal of Materials Sci- ence, 59(12):5161–5200, 2024
work page 2024
-
[45]
David L McDowell. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics, kinetics, and self- organization of dislocation avalanche plasticity.International Journal of Plasticity, page 104504, 2025
work page 2025
-
[46]
Steve Plimpton. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dy- namics.Journal of computational physics, 117(1):1–19, 1995
work page 1995
-
[47]
CV Singh and DH Warner. Mechanisms of guinier–preston zone hard- ening in the athermal limit.Acta Materialia, 58(17):5797–5805, 2010
work page 2010
-
[48]
Y Mishin, MJ Mehl, and DA Papaconstantopoulos. Phase stability in the fe–ni system: Investigation by first-principles calculations and atomistic simulations.Acta materialia, 53(15):4029–4041, 2005
work page 2005
-
[49]
F Apostol and Yj Mishin. Interatomic potential for the al-cu sys- tem.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 83(5):054116, 2011
work page 2011
-
[50]
Y Mishin, Diana Farkas, MJ Mehl, and DA Papaconstantopoulos. In- teratomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations.Physical Review B, 59(5):3393, 1999
work page 1999
-
[51]
Yuri Mishin, Michael J Mehl, Dimitrios A Papaconstantopoulos, Arthur F Voter, and Joel D Kress. Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations. Physical Review B, 63(22):224106, 2001
work page 2001
-
[52]
Ma- chine learning for metallurgy i
Daniel Marchand, Abhinav Jain, Albert Glensk, and WA Curtin. Ma- chine learning for metallurgy i. a neural-network potential for al-cu. Physical review materials, 4(10):103601, 2020
work page 2020
-
[53]
Jörg Behler and Michele Parrinello. Generalized neural-network repre- sentation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces.Physical review letters, 98(14):146401, 2007. 36
work page 2007
-
[54]
Andreas Singraber, Tobias Morawietz, Jörg Behler, and Christoph Del- lago. Parallel multistream training of high-dimensional neural network potentials.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(5):3075– 3092, 2019. PMID: 30995035
work page 2019
-
[55]
Alexander Stukowski. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool.Modelling and simulation in materials science and engineering, 18(1):015012, 2009
work page 2009
-
[56]
William A Curtin, David L Olmsted, and Louis G Hector Jr. A pre- dictive mechanism for dynamic strain ageing in aluminium–magnesium alloys.Nature materials, 5(11):875–880, 2006
work page 2006
-
[57]
Daniel T Gillespie. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions.Journal of com- putational physics, 22(4):403–434, 1976
work page 1976
-
[58]
Daniel T Gillespie. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions.The journal of physical chemistry, 81(25):2340–2361, 1977
work page 1977
-
[59]
RW Balluffi. On measurements of self-diffusion rates along dislocations in fcc metals.physica status solidi (b), 42(1):11–34, 1970
work page 1970
-
[60]
AW Zhu, TS Kê, and Ge Tingsui. Activation energy associated with the nonlinear internal friction peak around room temperature in cold- worked al-0.1 wt% cu.physica status solidi (a), 128(1):95–102, 1991
work page 1991
-
[61]
Darko Simonovic and Marcel HF Sluiter. Impurity diffusion activation energies in al from first principles.Physical Review B—Condensed Mat- ter and Materials Physics, 79(5):054304, 2009
work page 2009
-
[62]
David L Olmsted, Louis G Hector Jr, and WA Curtin. Molecular dy- namics study of solute strengthening in al/mg alloys.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54(8):1763–1788, 2006
work page 2006
-
[63]
G Esteban-Manzanares, B Bellón, E Martínez, I Papadimitriou, and J LLorca. Strengthening of al–cu alloys by guinier–preston zones: Pre- dictions from atomistic simulations.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 132:103675, 2019. 37
work page 2019
-
[64]
Han Chen, Zhe Chen, Gang Ji, Shengyi Zhong, Haowei Wang, András Borbély, Yubin Ke, and Yves Bréchet. The influence of shearable and nonshearable precipitates on the portevin-le chatelier behavior in pre- cipitation hardening almgsczr alloys.International Journal of Plasticity, 147:103120, 2021
work page 2021
-
[65]
Hideji Suzuki. Segregation of solute atoms to stacking faults.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 17(2):322–325, 1962
work page 1962
-
[66]
EN Epperly and RB Sills. Comparison of continuum and cross-core theories of dynamic strain aging.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 141:103944, 2020
work page 2020
-
[67]
Timothy Earl Volin, KH Lie, and RW Balluffi. Measurement of rapid mass transport along individual dislocations in aluminum.Acta metal- lurgica, 19(4):263–274, 1971
work page 1971
-
[68]
Vladyslav Turlo and Timothy J Rupert. Prediction of a wide variety of linear complexions in face centered cubic alloys.Acta Materialia, 185:129–141, 2020
work page 2020
-
[69]
Experimental correlations for high-temperature creep
A K Mukherjee, J E Bird, and J E Dorn. Experimental correlations for high-temperature creep. Technical report, California Univ., Berkeley. Lawrence Radiation Lab., 01 1968
work page 1968
-
[70]
DR Chichili, KT Ramesh, and KJ Hemker. The high-strain-rate re- sponse of alpha-titanium: experiments, deformation mechanisms and modeling.Acta materialia, 46(3):1025–1043, 1998
work page 1998
-
[71]
Q Wei, S Cheng, KT Ramesh, and E Ma. Effect of nanocrystalline and ultrafine grain sizes on the strain rate sensitivity and activation volume: fcc versus bcc metals.Materials Science and Engineering: A, 381(1-2):71–79, 2004
work page 2004
-
[72]
DS Gianola, DH Warner, Jean-François Molinari, and KJ Hemker. In- creased strain rate sensitivity due to stress-coupled grain growth in nanocrystalline al.Scripta Materialia, 55(7):649–652, 2006
work page 2006
-
[73]
RC Picu, F Ozturk, E Esener, and R Li. Aluminum alloys with iden- tical plastic flow and different strain rate sensitivity.Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 41(13):3358–3364, 2010. 38
work page 2010
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.