pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05031 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Geometry of Free Fermion Commutants

Marco Lastres , Sanjay Moudgalya
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords free fermionsk-commutantGrassmannian manifoldfermionic Gaussian statesreplica symmetryHeisenberg modelentanglement entropyunitary ensembles
0
0 comments X

The pith

The k-commutant of free-fermion unitaries is parametrized exactly by the Grassmannian manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a geometric description of the operators that commute with k identical copies of a free-fermion unitary. It maps the commutant to the ground state of an effective ferromagnetic Heisenberg model on k sites and solves the model using representation theory. The solution shows that the commutant is spanned by coherent states on a Grassmannian manifold. This manifold coincides with the space of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites, exposing a duality between physical space and replica space. The picture supplies an explicit projector onto the commutant that simplifies averages of nonlinear functions such as entanglement entropy.

Core claim

The k-commutant of free-fermion systems transforms irreducibly under a larger O(2k) replica symmetry (or SU(2k) when particle number is conserved). Mapping the commutant to the ground state of a ferromagnetic Heisenberg model and solving via representation theory parametrizes it by coherent states on a Grassmannian manifold. This manifold is identical to the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites, establishing a duality between real space and replica space. The geometry also yields a compact projection formula onto the k-commutant based on the resolution of the identity for these coherent states.

What carries the argument

The Grassmannian manifold of coherent states that parametrizes the k-commutant, obtained by mapping it to the ground state of a ferromagnetic Heisenberg model and solving with representation theory under the larger O(2k) or SU(2k) symmetry.

If this is right

  • A compact projection formula onto the k-commutant follows from the coherent-state resolution of the identity.
  • Analytical evaluation of averaged nonlinear functionals of Gaussian states, including entanglement entropies, becomes feasible.
  • The structure applies equally to systems without and with particle-number conservation through the O(2k) and SU(2k) groups.
  • The real-replica duality supplies a new route to late-time averages of correlation functions and entanglement under free-fermion evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric projector may simplify calculations of other averaged observables such as out-of-time-order correlators in free-fermion circuits.
  • The real-replica duality suggests that analogous manifold identifications could appear in other integrable or Gaussian models when replica symmetries are present.
  • Numerical checks on small lattices could test whether the projection formula reproduces known results for averaged entanglement growth.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping of the k-commutant to the ground state of the effective ferromagnetic Heisenberg model is exact and the larger O(2k) or SU(2k) symmetry acts irreducibly on the commutant for generic free-fermion unitaries.

What would settle it

Direct computation of the dimension of the k-commutant for small values such as k=2, followed by comparison to the dimension of the Grassmannian manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 4 sites, would confirm or refute the claimed identification.

read the original abstract

Understanding the structure of operators that commute with $k$ identical replicas of unitary ensembles, also known as their $k$-commutants, is an important problem in quantum many-body physics with deep implications for the late-time behavior of physical quantities such as correlation functions and entanglement entropies under unitary evolution. In this work, we study the $k$-commutants of free-fermion unitary systems, which are heuristically known to contain $SO(k)$ and $SU(k)$ groups without and with particle number conservation respectively, with formal derivations of projectors onto these commutants appearing only very recently. We establish a complementary perspective by highlighting a larger $O(2k)$ replica symmetry (or $SU(2k)$ respectively) that the $k$-commutant transforms irreducibly under, which leads to a simple geometric understanding of the commutant in terms of coherent states parametrized by a Grassmannian manifold. We derive this structure by mapping the $k$-commutant to the ground state of effective ferromagnetic Heisenberg models, analogous to the ones that appear in the noisy circuit literature, which we solve exactly using standard representation theory methods. Further, we show that the Grassmannian manifold of the $k$-commutant is exactly the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on $2k$ sites, which reveals a duality between real space and replica space in free-fermion systems. This geometric understanding also provides a compact projection formula onto the $k$-commutant, based on the resolution of identity for coherent states, which can prove advantageous in analytical calculations of averaged non-linear functionals of Gaussian states, as we demonstrate using some examples for the entanglement entropies. In all, this work provides a geometric perspective on the $k$-commutant of free-fermions that naturally connects to problems in quantum many-body physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the k-commutants of free-fermion unitary systems admit a geometric description as coherent states on a Grassmannian manifold. This follows from an exact mapping of the commutant to the ground state of an effective ferromagnetic Heisenberg model (solved via standard representation theory of O(2k) or SU(2k)), which is shown to transform irreducibly under the larger replica symmetry. The resulting manifold is identified exactly with the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites, establishing a real-space/replica-space duality. A compact projection formula based on the coherent-state resolution of the identity is derived and applied to averaged entanglement entropies.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a clean geometric picture and duality that links free-fermion commutants to well-studied objects in quantum information. The exact solvability via representation theory and the coherent-state projection formula are concrete strengths that could simplify analytic calculations of replica-averaged nonlinear functionals. The duality itself is a potentially useful conceptual advance for understanding late-time behavior in free-fermion dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section deriving the effective Heisenberg model and its representation-theoretic solution] The central geometric claim rests on the assertion that the k-commutant transforms irreducibly under the O(2k) (or SU(2k)) action. While the mapping to the ferromagnetic Heisenberg ground state is presented as exact, the manuscript does not supply an explicit verification that the free-fermion CAR algebra introduces no additional invariants capable of splitting the representation. A dimension count or character computation for small k (e.g., k=2) comparing the commutant dimension to the Grassmannian dimension would directly test this load-bearing step.
  2. [Section on the duality between real space and replica space] The identification that the Grassmannian of the k-commutant is exactly the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites is stated as an exact equality. The manuscript should clarify whether this is a bijection of manifolds or merely a dimensional match, and whether the coherent-state parametrization preserves the symplectic structure required for Gaussian states.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and main text alternate between O(2k) and SO(2k) without explicit justification; a brief remark on the connected component would remove ambiguity.
  2. [Section containing the projection formula] The projection formula based on the coherent-state resolution of the identity is compact but its normalization constant is not written explicitly; adding the prefactor would aid reproducibility of the entanglement-entropy examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the significance of our results, and constructive suggestions. We address the major comments point by point below, providing additional justification where the manuscript already contains the necessary elements and agreeing to incorporate explicit verifications and clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section deriving the effective Heisenberg model and its representation-theoretic solution] The central geometric claim rests on the assertion that the k-commutant transforms irreducibly under the O(2k) (or SU(2k)) action. While the mapping to the ferromagnetic Heisenberg ground state is presented as exact, the manuscript does not supply an explicit verification that the free-fermion CAR algebra introduces no additional invariants capable of splitting the representation. A dimension count or character computation for small k (e.g., k=2) comparing the commutant dimension to the Grassmannian dimension would directly test this load-bearing step.

    Authors: The irreducibility under the O(2k) (or SU(2k)) action follows from the exact mapping of the k-commutant to the ground state of the ferromagnetic Heisenberg model, which is solved via standard representation theory and yields a unique highest-weight vector in the relevant irrep; the construction ensures that the CAR algebra does not introduce extra invariants that would split the representation. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit check strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dimension count for k=2, directly computing the dimension of the commutant from the free-fermion algebra and verifying that it equals the dimension of the corresponding Grassmannian, thereby confirming the absence of additional invariants. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on the duality between real space and replica space] The identification that the Grassmannian of the k-commutant is exactly the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites is stated as an exact equality. The manuscript should clarify whether this is a bijection of manifolds or merely a dimensional match, and whether the coherent-state parametrization preserves the symplectic structure required for Gaussian states.

    Authors: The identification is presented as an exact equality because the coherent-state parametrization establishes a bijection of manifolds between the Grassmannian of the k-commutant and the manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites; this is not merely a dimensional match. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state that the correspondence is bijective and clarify that the parametrization preserves the symplectic structure, as the natural Kähler/symplectic form on the Grassmannian coincides with the one induced on the space of Gaussian states by the CAR algebra. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external representation theory and known Heisenberg mappings

full rationale

The paper maps the k-commutant to the ground state of an effective ferromagnetic Heisenberg model (analogous to noisy-circuit literature) and solves it via standard representation theory of O(2k)/SU(2k) to obtain the Grassmannian geometry and coherent-state projector. These steps rely on external Lie-group representation theory and the established structure of free-fermion commutants rather than any self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The claimed duality to the manifold of Gaussian states on 2k sites is presented as an exact identification derived from the solved model, not an input assumption. No quoted equation reduces to its own premise by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard Lie-group representation theory to diagonalize the effective models and on the previously established containment of SO(k)/SU(k) inside the commutant; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Representation theory of O(2k) and SU(2k) yields the irreducible action on the commutant space
    Invoked to identify the commutant with the Grassmannian after mapping to the Heisenberg ground state.
  • domain assumption Free-fermion unitaries possess k-commutants containing at least the SO(k) or SU(k) subgroups
    Stated as heuristically known and recently formalized; used as starting point for the larger symmetry analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1552 out tokens · 64426 ms · 2026-05-10T19:56:25.489237+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Coherence dynamics in quantum many-body systems with conservation laws

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Conservation laws in quantum circuits and Hamiltonians replace logarithmic coherence saturation with slow hydrodynamic relaxation globally and produce algebraic peak-time growth locally, unlike ergodic cases.

  2. Lecture Notes on Replica Tensor Networks for Random Quantum Circuits

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Lecture notes and accompanying library teach replica tensor network methods to compute circuit-averaged observables in random quantum circuits by mapping them to classical statistical mechanics models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Advances in Physics65, 239 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity, Sov. Phys. JETP28, 1200 (1969)

    1969

  3. [3]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 106 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator spreading in random unitary circuits, Physical Review X 8, 021014 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator hydrodynamics, otocs, and en- tanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 021013 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Ambainis and J

    A. Ambainis and J. Emerson, Quantum t-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world, Proc. IEEE CCC (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    A. W. Harrow and R. A. Low, Random quantum circuits are approximate 2-designs, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics291, 257 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    D.Gross, K.Audenaert,andJ.Eisert,Evenlydistributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs, Journal of Mathematical Physics48, 052104 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    Dankert, R

    C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Ex- act and approximate unitary 2-designs, Phys. Rev. A80, 012304 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    F. G. S. L. Brandão, A. W. Harrow, and M. Horodecki, Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs, Communications in Mathematical Physics346, 397 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen, Algebra of local symmetric operators and braided fusionn-category – symmetry is a shadow of topological order, Physical Review B107, 155136 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Lattice Models for Phases and Transi- tions with Non-Invertible Symmetries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05964 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Exhaustive Charac- terization of Quantum Many-Body Scars using Commu- tant Algebras, Physical Review X14, 041069 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Read and H

    N. Read and H. Saleur, Enlarged symmetry algebras of spinchains, loopmodels, andS-matrices,NuclearPhysics B777, 263 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Hilbert Space Frag- mentation and Commutant Algebras, Phys. Rev. X12, 011050 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Papić, Weak Ergodicity Breaking Through the Lens of Quantum Entanglement, inEntanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applica- tions, edited by A

    Z. Papić, Weak Ergodicity Breaking Through the Lens of Quantum Entanglement, inEntanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applica- tions, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (2022) pp. 341–395

    2022

  17. [17]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Zeier and T

    R. Zeier and T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, Symmetry princi- ples in quantum systems theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics52, 113510 (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    Zimborás, R

    Z. Zimborás, R. Zeier, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, and D. Burgarth, Symmetry criteria for quantum simulability of effective interactions, Phys. Rev. A92, 042309 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Lastres, F

    M. Lastres, F. Pollmann, and S. Moudgalya, Nonuniver- sality from conserved superoperators in unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B113, 014310 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Altafini, Controllability of quantum mechanical sys- tems by root space decomposition of su(n), Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 2051 (2002)

    C. Altafini, Controllability of quantum mechanical sys- tems by root space decomposition of su(n), Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 2051 (2002)

    2051

  22. [22]

    Schulte-Herbrüggen, A

    T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, A. Spörl, N. Khaneja, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of build- ing blocks of quantum algorithms, Phys. Rev. A72, 042331 (2005)

    2005

  23. [23]

    D’Alessandro,Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics,1sted.,Chapman&Hall/CRCAppliedMath- ematics & Nonlinear Science (CRC Press, 2007) pp

    D. D’Alessandro,Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics,1sted.,Chapman&Hall/CRCAppliedMath- ematics & Nonlinear Science (CRC Press, 2007) pp. 81– 82

    2007

  24. [24]

    Wiersema, E

    R. Wiersema, E. Kökcü, A. F. Kemper, and B. N. Bakalov, Classification of dynamical Lie algebras of 2- local spin systems on linear, circular and fully connected topologies, npj Quantum Information10, 110 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Marvian, Locality and Conservation Laws: How, in thepresenceofsymmetry, localityrestrictsrealizableuni- taries, Nature Physics18, 283 (2022)

    I. Marvian, Locality and Conservation Laws: How, in thepresenceofsymmetry, localityrestrictsrealizableuni- taries, Nature Physics18, 283 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Collins and P

    B. Collins and P. Śniady, Integration with respect to the haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group, Communications in Mathematical Physics264, 773–795 (2006)

    2006

  27. [27]

    Collins and I

    B. Collins and I. Nechita, Random quantum channels i: Graphical calculus and the bell state phenomenon, Communications in Mathematical Physics297, 345–370 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 335 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Bittel, J

    L. Bittel, J. Eisert, L. Leone, A. A. Mele, and S. F. E. Oliviero, A complete theory of the clifford commutant, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12263 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Webb, The clifford group forms a unitary 3-design, Quantum Information and Computation16, 1379 (2016)

    Z. Webb, The clifford group forms a unitary 3-design, Quantum Information and Computation16, 1379 (2016). 13

    2016

  31. [31]

    Zhu, Multiqubit clifford groups are unitary 3-designs, Physical Review A96, 062336 (2017)

    H. Zhu, Multiqubit clifford groups are unitary 3-designs, Physical Review A96, 062336 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    D.Gross, S.Nezami, M.Walter,andJ.Eisert,Schur-weyl duality for the clifford group with applications: Property testing, a robust hudson theorem, and de finetti represen- tations, Communications in Mathematical Physics385, 1325 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    S. N. Hearth, M. O. Flynn, A. Chandran, and C. R. Laumann, Unitaryk-designs from random number- conserving quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X15, 021022 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    H. Liu, A. Hulse, and I. Marvian, Unitary Designs from Random Symmetric Quantum Circuits, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.14463 (2024), arXiv:2408.14463 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Mitsuhashi, R

    Y. Mitsuhashi, R. Suzuki, T. Soejima, and N. Yosh- ioka, Unitary designs of symmetric local random circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180404 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits, Annals of Physics435, 168618 (2021), special issue on Philip W. Anderson

    2021

  37. [37]

    Swann, D

    T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Spacetime pic- ture for entanglement generation in noisy fermion chains, Phys. Rev. B112, 064301 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. X13, 041045 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    M.Fava, L.Piroli, D.Bernard,andA.Nahum,Monitored fermions with conservedU(1)charge, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043246 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043246 2024

  40. [40]

    Sierant, X

    P. Sierant, X. Turkeshi, and P. S. Tarabunga, Theory of the matchgate commutant (2026), arXiv:2603.12392 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Braccia, N

    P. Braccia, N. L. Diaz, M. Larocca, M. Cerezo, and D. García-Martín, The commutant of fermionic gaussian unitaries (2026), arXiv:2603.19210 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    K. Wan, W. J. Huggins, J. Lee, and R. Babbush, Match- gate shadows for fermionic quantum simulation, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics404, 629 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Symmetries as Ground States of Local Superoperators: Hydrodynamic Implications, PRX Quantum5, 040330 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Ogunnaike, J

    O. Ogunnaike, J. Feldmeier, and J. Y. Lee, Unify- ing Emergent Hydrodynamics and Lindbladian Low- Energy Spectra across Symmetries, Constraints, and Long-Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 220403 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Sahu and S.-K

    S. Sahu and S.-K. Jian, Phase transitions in sampling and error correction in local brownian circuits, Physical Review A109, 10.1103/physreva.109.042414 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042414 2024

  46. [46]

    Agarwal and S

    L. Agarwal and S. Xu, Emergent symmetry in brownian syk models and charge dependent scrambling, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 10.1007/jhep02(2022)045 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)045 2022

  47. [47]

    Vardhan and S

    S. Vardhan and S. Moudgalya, Entanglement dynam- ics from universal low-lying modes, Phys. Rev. B113, 014308 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    A.M.Perelomov,Coherentstatesforarbitraryliegroups, Commun. Math. Phys.26, 222 (1972)

    1972

  49. [49]

    Molev, Gelfand–tsetlin bases for classical lie algebras (North-Holland, 2006) pp

    A. Molev, Gelfand–tsetlin bases for classical lie algebras (North-Holland, 2006) pp. 109–170

    2006

  50. [50]

    M.R.Zirnbauer,Riemanniansymmetricsuperspacesand their origin in random-matrix theory, Journal of Mathe- matical Physics37, 4986 (1996)

    1996

  51. [51]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures, Physical Review B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  52. [52]

    Zhang, C

    P. Zhang, C. Liu, S.-K. Jian, and X. Chen, Universal Entanglement Transitions of Free Fermions with Long- range Non-unitary Dynamics, Quantum6, 723 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    C. Y. Leung, D. Meidan, and A. Romito, Theory of free fermions dynamics under partial postselected monitor- ing, Phys. Rev. X15, 021020 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Swann and A

    T. Swann and A. Nahum, Continuum mechanics of en- tanglement in noisy interacting fermion chains (2026), arXiv:2601.21134 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Bernard and T

    D. Bernard and T. Jin, Solution to the quantum symmet- ric simple exclusion process: The continuous case, Com- munications in Mathematical Physics384, 1141–1185 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    Bernard and L

    D. Bernard and L. Hruza, Exact entanglement in the driven quantum symmetric simple exclusion process, Sci- Post Phys.15, 175 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, From symmetries to commutant algebras in standard Hamiltonians, Annals of Physics455, 169384 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 031016 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    Hunter-Jones, Unitary designs from statistical mechanics in random quantum circuits (2019), arXiv:1905.12053 [quant- ph]

    N. Hunter-Jones, Unitary designs from statistical me- chanics in random quantum circuits, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1905.12053 (2019), arXiv:1905.12053 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 1905

  60. [60]

    Lastres, O

    M. Lastres, O. Motrunich, and S. Moudgalya, (2026), in preparation

    2026

  61. [61]

    Fukutome, The group theoretical structure of fermion many-body systems arising from the canonical an- ticommutation relation

    H. Fukutome, The group theoretical structure of fermion many-body systems arising from the canonical an- ticommutation relation. i: Lie algebras of fermion operators and exact generator coordinate representa- tions of state vectors, Progress of Theoretical Physics 65, 809 (1981), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/65/3/809/5327088/65-3-809.pdf

    1981

  62. [62]

    B. M. Terhal and D. P. DiVincenzo, Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. A65, 032325 (2002)

    2002

  63. [63]

    I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin, F. Popov, and G. Tarnopol- sky, Spectra of eigenstates in fermionic tensor quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D97, 106023 (2018)

    2018

  64. [64]

    Pakrouski, P

    K. Pakrouski, P. N. Pallegar, F. K. Popov, and I. R. Klebanov, Many-Body Scars as a Group Invariant Sector of Hilbert Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230602 (2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    Bravyi, Lagrangian representation for fermionic linear optics, Quantum Info

    S. Bravyi, Lagrangian representation for fermionic linear optics, Quantum Info. Comput.5, 216–238 (2005)

    2005

  66. [66]

    Windt, A

    B. Windt, A. Jahn, J. Eisert, and L. Hackl, Local opti- mizationonpureGaussianstatemanifolds,SciPostPhys. 10, 066 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Maciążek and V

    T. Maciążek and V. Tsanov, Quantum marginals from pure doubly excited states, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical50, 465304 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    A.A.Mele,IntroductiontoHaarMeasureToolsinQuan- tum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

    2024

  69. [69]

    P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum8, 1413 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and nonstabi- lizerness monotones, Quantum7, 1092 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    Chan and A

    A. Chan and A. De Luca, Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 405001 (2024). 14

    2024

  72. [72]

    N. D. Varikuti and S. Bandyopadhyay, Unraveling the emergence of quantum state designs in systems with sym- metry, Quantum8, 1456 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Braccia, P

    P. Braccia, P. Bermejo, L. Cincio, and M. Cerezo, Com- puting exact moments of local random quantum circuits via tensor networks, Quantum Machine Intelligence6, 10.1007/s42484-024-00187-8 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1007/s42484-024-00187-8 2024

  74. [74]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechan- ics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Physical Review B99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.174205 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.174205 2019

  75. [75]

    Hall,Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (Springer International Publishing, 2015)

    B. Hall,Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (Springer International Publishing, 2015)

    2015

  76. [76]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris,Representation Theory: A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer New York, 2011)

    2011

  77. [77]

    A. W. Knapp,Representation Theory of Semisimple Groups: An Overview Based on Examples (PMS-36), re- vised ed. (Princeton University Press, 1986)

    1986

  78. [78]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, and M. Kieburg, Page curve for fermionic gaussian states, Phys. Rev. B103, L241118 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Bhattacharjee, P

    B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Eigenstate capacity and page curve in fermionic gaussian states, Phys. Rev. B104, 214306 (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vid- mar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum3, 030201 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.