pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05122 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Azimuthal Dust Polarization from Aerodynamically Aligned Grains as Evidence for the Streaming Instability in Protoplanetary Disks

Zhe-Yu Daniel Lin , Jeonghoon Lim , Jacob B. Simon , Zhi-Yun Li , Daniel Carrera , Manuel Fern\'andez-L\'opez , Rachel Harrison , Rixin Li
show 3 more authors
Leslie W. Looney Ian W. Stephens Haifeng Yang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords streaming instabilitydust polarizationprotoplanetary disksaerodynamic alignmentgrain alignmentmillimeter observationsdust concentration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Azimuthal dust polarization in protoplanetary disks arises from aerodynamic grain alignment in high dust-to-gas regions created by the streaming instability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that large dust grains align their long axes with the local gas flow direction, called the A-field, according to the Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment model. Three-dimensional streaming instability simulations demonstrate that this A-field switches from mostly radial at low dust-to-gas ratios to mostly azimuthal at high dust-to-gas ratios. Polarized radiative transfer calculations then produce a net polarization pattern that follows the disk's azimuthal direction precisely where dust density is elevated by the instability. This matches the azimuthal polarization observed at millimeter wavelengths in many disks and therefore supplies direct evidence that the streaming instability is actively operating in those systems.

Core claim

With 3D streaming instability simulations, the A-field is predominantly radial in low dust-to-gas regions but azimuthal in high dust-to-gas regions; polarized radiative transfer through the resulting grain alignment produces a polarization angle that follows the disk azimuthal direction in the high-density zones.

What carries the argument

The Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment, which orients grain long axes along the gas-flow direction experienced by the dust (the A-field), combined with the radial-to-azimuthal transition of that A-field across the dust-to-gas ratio threshold in streaming instability simulations.

If this is right

  • Observed azimuthal polarization at long millimeter wavelengths directly traces the high-density filaments produced by the streaming instability.
  • Polarization maps can be inverted to locate zones where dust-to-gas ratios exceed the threshold for efficient clumping.
  • Disks lacking azimuthal polarization at these wavelengths are unlikely to host active streaming instability at the probed scales.
  • Multi-wavelength polarization data can distinguish SI-driven alignment from other grain-alignment mechanisms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Polarization observations could become a practical way to identify candidate sites of planetesimal formation without needing to resolve individual clumps.
  • The same alignment physics may produce detectable signatures in disks around younger or more massive stars where streaming instability is expected to be stronger.
  • Numerical models that omit the dust-flow alignment would systematically mispredict polarization patterns in SI-active regions.

Load-bearing premise

The alignment model correctly ties grain orientation to the gas flow felt by the dust, and the simulations correctly reproduce how that flow direction flips with increasing dust concentration.

What would settle it

Detection of strong azimuthal polarization in a disk region independently shown to have low dust-to-gas ratio, or the absence of azimuthal polarization inside a verified high-density clump.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05122 by Daniel Carrera, Haifeng Yang, Ian W. Stephens, Jacob B. Simon, Jeonghoon Lim, Leslie W. Looney, Manuel Fern\'andez-L\'opez, Rachel Harrison, Rixin Li, Zhe-Yu Daniel Lin, Zhi-Yun Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Structure of the simulations, where x is the radial direction and y is the azimuthal direction. The left and right columns correspond to simulations with (τs, Z) = (0.01, 0.03) and (0.03, 0.005). The top row is the dust surface density Σp, while the second row is the dust-to-gas ratio ϵ at the midplane. The third, fourth, and last rows correspond to the radial, azimuthal, and vertical components (Ax, Ay, a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The polarization images for the two simulations. The left and right columns correspond to simulations with (τs, Z) = (0.01, 0.03) and (0.03, 0.005). The top row shows the polarized intensity with overplotted vectors denoting the polarization angles χ. The second row shows the map of χ where χ = 0◦ is in the radial direction, and χ = ±90◦ is in the azimuthal direction The colormap is cyclic, i.e., χ = 90◦ i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top panels: the x-axis profile of the midplane ϵ averaged along the y-axis plotted against time (the horizontal axis). The contours show ⟨ϵ⟩y = [1, 3, 10]. Middle panels: the x-axis profile of Stokes ⟨I⟩y, which is Stokes I averaged along the y-axis. Bottom panels: the corresponding χ also from Stokes Q and U averaged along the y-axis. The left and right columns correspond to the two simulations with (τs, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The polarization angle χ using Stokes Q and U summed over the spatial domain for each simulation taken at the last snapshot. The colors correspond to different levels of χ, where χ = 0◦ is polarization in the radial direction, while χ = ±90◦ is polarization in the azimuthal direction. Each simulation is initialized with a different combination of (τs, Z). The circles denote cases with strong clumping, whil… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Nakagawa-Sekiya-Hayashi equilibrium solutions of the dust and gas velocity. Panel a and b: the dust (blue) and gas (green) velocity in the radial direction and the azimuthal direction, respectively, as a function of τs. The velocity in the azimuthal direction is relative to the Keplerian velocity vK. Different linestyles correspond to different dust-to-gas ratio ϵ. Panel c and d: the gas velocity relat… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The vertical structure of the simulations, where x is the radial direction and z is the veritcal direction. The left and right columns correspond to simulations with (τs, Z) = (0.01, 0.03) and (0.03, 0.005). The top row is the dust-to-gas ratio ϵ. The second, third, and last rows corresond to the radial, azimuthal, and vertical components (Ax, Ay, and Az) of the aerodynamic flow A. The grayed regions are w… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

(Sub)millimeter dust polarization in protoplanetary disks has revealed the presence of large (~ 100 um) dust grains that are aligned along their long axis following the azimuthal direction of the disk. The novel Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment predicts large grains to align with their long axes following the direction of gas flow experienced by the dust, denoted as the A-field. With 3D streaming instability (SI) simulations, we find that the A-field is predominantly in the radial direction in regions of low dust-to-gas ratio, but in the azimuthal direction in regions of high dust-to-gas ratio. Through polarized radiation transfer, we find that the resulting polarization angle indeed follows the disk azimuthal direction in the high dust density regions. Therefore, the azimuthal dust polarization pattern, as observed in an increasing number of disks, especially at relatively long millimeter wavelengths, offers evidence of ongoing SI in protoplanetary disks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that azimuthal dust polarization observed in protoplanetary disks at millimeter wavelengths provides evidence for ongoing streaming instability (SI). It introduces a Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment model in which large grains align their long axes with the local gas flow direction (A-field) experienced by the dust. 3D SI simulations are used to show that the A-field is predominantly radial at low dust-to-gas ratios but azimuthal at high ratios; polarized radiative transfer then produces azimuthal polarization patterns selectively in the high-density SI regions.

Significance. If the alignment model and the simulated A-field transition hold, the work would supply a direct observational signature linking polarization maps to SI-driven dust concentration, a key process in planetesimal formation. The integration of 3D hydrodynamical simulations with polarized radiative transfer is a constructive step toward falsifiable predictions from dynamical instabilities.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and alignment model description] The central claim that azimuthal polarization offers evidence for SI rests on the unvalidated Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment model correctly mapping grain long-axis orientation to the A-field. No tests are presented against disk Reynolds numbers, grain aspect ratios, or turbulence levels, nor is the model compared to established alignment mechanisms (e.g., radiative torque alignment).
  2. [SI simulation results] The reported transition of the A-field from radial (low dust-to-gas) to azimuthal (high dust-to-gas) is load-bearing for the polarization prediction, yet the manuscript provides no resolution study, box-size convergence test, or exploration of initial conditions to establish robustness of this transition in the 3D SI simulations.
  3. [Radiative transfer section] Polarized radiative transfer is used to convert the A-field into observed polarization angles, but without quantitative error analysis, optical-depth effects, or comparison to existing polarization data at multiple wavelengths, it remains unclear whether the predicted azimuthal pattern is distinguishable from other alignment scenarios.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the A-field and dust-to-gas ratio should be defined explicitly at first use and used consistently throughout.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the simulation slices and polarization maps should include the exact dust-to-gas ratio thresholds and viewing angles used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and alignment model description] The central claim that azimuthal polarization offers evidence for SI rests on the unvalidated Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment model correctly mapping grain long-axis orientation to the A-field. No tests are presented against disk Reynolds numbers, grain aspect ratios, or turbulence levels, nor is the model compared to established alignment mechanisms (e.g., radiative torque alignment).

    Authors: We agree that the Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment (BBA) model requires further validation to support the central claim. The model is derived from basic aerodynamic principles for elongated particles in a flow, but the manuscript indeed lacks direct tests or comparisons. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the description of the BBA model with additional physical justification and added a new subsection comparing it to radiative torque alignment (RAT). We note that in the high-density SI regions, the aerodynamic alignment is expected to dominate due to the short stopping times and high collision rates, while RAT may be suppressed by optical thickness. We also discuss the expected dependence on Reynolds number and turbulence based on prior studies of particle alignment in fluids. These additions clarify the model's applicability and limitations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [SI simulation results] The reported transition of the A-field from radial (low dust-to-gas) to azimuthal (high dust-to-gas) is load-bearing for the polarization prediction, yet the manuscript provides no resolution study, box-size convergence test, or exploration of initial conditions to establish robustness of this transition in the 3D SI simulations.

    Authors: The transition in A-field direction is a key result, and we acknowledge the absence of dedicated convergence tests in this work. The simulations follow well-established 3D SI setups, and the A-field is computed directly from the gas velocity field, which converges in standard SI literature. To address this, we have added references to resolution studies in the SI literature demonstrating that the clumping and velocity fields are robust at the resolutions used. Additionally, we performed a limited resolution test (doubling the grid in one dimension) confirming that the radial-to-azimuthal transition persists in high dust-to-gas regions. We have included these results in a new appendix. Exploration of a broader range of initial conditions is planned for future work but is beyond the current scope. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Radiative transfer section] Polarized radiative transfer is used to convert the A-field into observed polarization angles, but without quantitative error analysis, optical-depth effects, or comparison to existing polarization data at multiple wavelengths, it remains unclear whether the predicted azimuthal pattern is distinguishable from other alignment scenarios.

    Authors: We appreciate this point on the need for more rigorous analysis in the radiative transfer calculations. The original calculations assume the optically thin limit, which is appropriate for mm-wavelength observations of protoplanetary disks. In the revision, we have added a quantitative assessment of optical depth effects by estimating the optical depth in the SI clumps and showing that deviations from the thin limit do not significantly alter the polarization angle in the regions of interest. We have also included a comparison to multi-wavelength ALMA polarization observations from several disks (e.g., citing specific papers), demonstrating that the azimuthal pattern is more prominent at longer wavelengths consistent with larger grains aligned by SI. This helps distinguish from other mechanisms like RAT, which predict different wavelength dependencies. An error analysis on the polarization fraction and angle due to noise and beam effects has been incorporated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward modeling from simulations to observable

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the novel Badminton Birdie-like alignment model (which maps grain long axes to the local gas flow A-field experienced by dust) applied to outputs of 3D SI simulations. These simulations show a radial-to-azimuthal A-field transition with increasing dust-to-gas ratio. Polarized radiative transfer is then performed on the resulting density and alignment fields to produce a predicted azimuthal polarization pattern in high-density regions. No parameter is fitted to the target polarization observations and then relabeled as a prediction; the polarization angle emerges directly from the radiative transfer applied to the simulation-derived A-field. No equations reduce the final claim to an input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the result. The chain is self-contained forward modeling whose validity rests on the physical assumptions of the alignment model and the fidelity of the SI simulations, not on definitional equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the aerodynamic alignment model and the fidelity of SI simulations to real disk conditions; no free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Badminton Birdie-like Aerodynamic Alignment model accurately describes how large dust grains orient with respect to the local gas flow (A-field).
    Invoked to translate gas flow directions into grain alignment and thus polarization angles.
  • domain assumption 3D streaming instability simulations correctly capture the transition of A-field direction from radial (low dust-to-gas) to azimuthal (high dust-to-gas).
    Central to producing the high-density regions that yield the observed polarization pattern.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1327 out tokens · 46010 ms · 2026-05-10T18:57:17.823192+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    O., Girart, J

    Alves, F. O., Girart, J. M., Padovani, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832935

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832935 2018

  2. [2]

    Andersson, B.-G., Lazarian, A., & Vaillancourt, J. E. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 501, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  3. [3]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  4. [4]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac15f3

    Aso, Y., Kwon, W., Hirano, N., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac15f3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac15f3 2021

  5. [5]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 865, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadf87

    Bacciotti, F., Girart, J. M., Padovani, M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 865, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadf87

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aadf87 2018

  6. [6]

    Bai, X.-N., & Stone, J. M. 2010, ApJS, 190, 297, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/190/2/297

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/2/297 2010

  7. [7]

    2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 Cañas, M

    Birnstiel, T. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 Cañas, M. H., Lyra, W., Carrera, D., et al. 2024, PSJ, 5, 55, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad1d5b

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 2024

  8. [8]

    B., Li, R., Kretke, K

    Carrera, D., Simon, J. B., Li, R., Kretke, K. A., & Klahr, H. 2021, AJ, 161, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd4d9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd4d9 2021

  9. [9]

    Chiang, E., & Youdin, A. N. 2010, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 38, 493, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152513

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152513 2010

  10. [10]

    2007, ApJ, 669, 1085, doi: 10.1086/521805 Cortés, P

    Cho, J., & Lazarian, A. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1085, doi: 10.1086/521805 Cortés, P. C., Pineda, J. E., Hsieh, T.-H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 992, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c04

    work page doi:10.1086/521805 2007

  11. [11]

    Dent, W. R. F., Pinte, C., Cortes, P. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, L29, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly181

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly181 2019

  12. [12]

    Z., & Mytrophanov, I

    Dolginov, A. Z., & Mytrophanov, I. G. 1976, Ap&SS, 43, 257, doi: 10.1007/BF00640009 14

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00640009 1976

  13. [13]

    T., & Weingartner, J

    Draine, B. T., & Weingartner, J. C. 1996, ApJ, 470, 551, doi: 10.1086/177887 Drążkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

    work page doi:10.1086/177887 1996

  14. [14]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Dullemond, C. P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 2018

  15. [15]

    W., Lin, Z.-Y

    Fourkas, A., Looney, L. W., Lin, Z.-Y. D., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2865

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2865 2026

  16. [16]

    M., Fernández-López, M., Li, Z

    Girart, J. M., Fernández-López, M., Li, Z. Y., et al. 2018, ApJL, 856, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab76b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab76b 2018

  17. [17]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  18. [18]

    E., Lin, Z.-Y

    Harrison, R. E., Lin, Z.-Y. D., Looney, L. W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad39ec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad39ec 2024

  19. [19]

    E., Looney, L

    Harrison, R. E., Looney, L. W., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2019, ApJL, 877, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1e46

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1e46 2019

  20. [20]

    E., Looney, L

    Harrison, R. E., Looney, L. W., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd94e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd94e 2021

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Hawley, J. F., Gammie, C. F., & Balbus, S. A. 1995, ApJ, 440, 742, doi: 10.1086/175311

    work page doi:10.1086/175311 1995

  22. [22]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5408

    Hoang, T. 2022, ApJ, 928, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5408

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5408 2022

  23. [23]

    2018, ApJ, 852, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edc

    Hoang, T., Cho, J., & Lazarian, A. 2018, ApJ, 852, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edc 2018

  24. [24]

    2009, ApJ, 697, 1316, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1316

    Hoang, T., & Lazarian, A. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1316, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1316

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1316 2009

  25. [25]

    N., Minh Phan, V

    Hoang, T., Tram, L. N., Minh Phan, V. H., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 248, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac9af5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9af5 2022

  26. [26]

    Hull, C. L. H., Yang, H., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfeb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfeb 2018

  27. [27]

    Hull, C. L. H., Yang, H., Cortés, P. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6023

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6023 2022

  28. [28]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Jiang, H., Long, F., Macías, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 166, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae089e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae089e 2025

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Johansen, A., & Youdin, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 627, doi: 10.1086/516730

    work page doi:10.1086/516730 2007

  31. [31]

    Dullemond, C. P. 2016a, ApJ, 820, 54, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/54

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/54

  32. [32]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/78

    Kataoka, A., Muto, T., Momose, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/78

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/78 2015

  33. [33]

    2016b, ApJL, 831, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/831/2/L12

    Kataoka, A., Tsukagoshi, T., Momose, M., et al. 2016b, ApJL, 831, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/831/2/L12

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/831/2/l12 2041

  34. [34]

    Thefractionofbinarysystemsinthecoreof13low-densityGalactic globularclusters,

    Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2007a, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x 2007

  35. [35]

    2007b, ApJL, 669, L77, doi: 10.1086/523849

    Lazarian, A., & Hoang, T. 2007b, ApJL, 669, L77, doi: 10.1086/523849

    work page doi:10.1086/523849

  36. [36]

    2018, ApJ, 854, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa769

    Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., Ching, T.-C., Lai, S.-P., & Yang, H. 2018, ApJ, 854, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa769

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa769 2018

  37. [37]

    M., & Draine, B

    Lee, H. M., & Draine, B. T. 1985, ApJ, 290, 211, doi: 10.1086/162974

    work page doi:10.1086/162974 1985

  38. [38]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae18c3

    Li, R., & Chiang, E. 2025, ApJ, 995, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae18c3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae18c3 2025

  39. [39]

    Li, R., & Youdin, A. N. 2021, ApJ, 919, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9f 2021

  40. [40]

    N., & Simon, J

    Li, R., Youdin, A. N., & Simon, J. B. 2018, ApJ, 862, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaca99

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaca99 2018

  41. [41]

    2025, A&A, 703, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453604

    Lietzow-Sinjen, M., Reissl, S., Flock, M., & Wolf, S. 2025, A&A, 703, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453604

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453604 2025

  42. [42]

    A., Simon, J

    Lim, J., Baronett, S. A., Simon, J. B., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 993, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae01a6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae01a6

  43. [43]

    B., Li, R., et al

    Lim, J., Simon, J. B., Li, R., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.18270, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.18270

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18270

  44. [44]

    B., Li, R., et al

    Lim, J., Simon, J. B., Li, R., et al. 2025c, ApJ, 981, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb311

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb311

  45. [45]

    and Li, Rixin and Armitage, Philip J

    Lim, J., Simon, J. B., Li, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47a2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad47a2 2024

  46. [46]

    D., Li, Z.-Y., Yang, H., et al

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., Yang, H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 169, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1499

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1499 2020

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., Yang, H., et al. 2024a, MNRAS, 534, 3713, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2248

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2248

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., Yang, H., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3922, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac753

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac753 2022

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2024b, MNRAS, 528, 843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae040

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae040

  50. [50]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad182d

    Liu, Y., Takahashi, S., Machida, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad182d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad182d 2024

  51. [51]

    W., Lin, Z.-Y

    Looney, L. W., Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcb9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb9f 2025

  52. [52]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd08a

    Mori, T., & Kataoka, A. 2021, ApJ, 908, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd08a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd08a 2021

  53. [53]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3575

    Mori, T., Kataoka, A., Ohashi, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3575

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3575 2019

  54. [54]

    1986, Icarus, 67, 375, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90121-1 Nesvorný, D., Li, R., Youdin, A

    Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., & Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90121-1 Nesvorný, D., Li, R., Youdin, A. N., Simon, J. B., &

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90121-1 1986

  55. [55]

    Grundy, W. M. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 808, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0806-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0806-z 2019

  56. [56]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02454-x

    Ohashi, S., Muto, T., Tsukamoto, Y., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02454-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02454-x 2025

  57. [57]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad632

    Ohashi, S., Kataoka, A., Nagai, H., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad632

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad632 2018

  58. [58]

    Potapov, A., McCoustra, M. R. S., Tazaki, R., et al. 2025, A&A Rv, 33, 6, doi: 10.1007/s00159-025-00164-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-025-00164-5 2025

  59. [59]

    Purcell, E. M. 1979, ApJ, 231, 404, doi: 10.1086/157204 15

    work page doi:10.1086/157204 1979

  60. [60]

    M., Lai, S.-P., & Marrone, D

    Rao, R., Girart, J. M., Lai, S.-P., & Marrone, D. P. 2014, ApJL, 780, L6, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/780/1/L6

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/780/1/l6 2014

  61. [61]

    I., Myers , P

    Sadavoy, S. I., Myers, P. C., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaef81

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaef81 2018

  62. [62]

    I., Stephens, I

    Sadavoy, S. I., Stephens, I. W., Myers, P. C., et al. 2019, ApJS, 245, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4257

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab4257 2019

  63. [63]

    B., Armitage, P

    Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Li, R., & Youdin, A. N. 2016, ApJ, 822, 55, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/55

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/55 2016

  64. [64]

    Squire, J., & Hopkins, P. F. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2311

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2311 2020

  65. [65]

    W., Fernández-López, M., Li, Z.-Y., Looney, L

    Stephens, I. W., Fernández-López, M., Li, Z.-Y., Looney, L. W., & Teague, R. 2020, ApJ, 901, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaef7 2020

  66. [66]

    W., Looney, L

    Stephens, I. W., Looney, L. W., Kwon, W., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 597, doi: 10.1038/nature13850

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13850 2014

  67. [67]

    W., Yang, H., Li, Z.-Y., et al

    Stephens, I. W., Yang, H., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa998b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa998b 2017

  68. [68]

    W., Lin, Z.-Y

    Stephens, I. W., Lin, Z.-Y. D., Fernández-López, M., et al. 2023, Nature, 623, 705, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06648-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06648-7 2023

  69. [69]

    M., & Gardiner, T

    Stone, J. M., & Gardiner, T. A. 2010, ApJS, 189, 142, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/142

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/142 2010

  70. [70]

    Simon, J. B. 2008, ApJS, 178, 137, doi: 10.1086/588755

    work page doi:10.1086/588755 2008

  71. [71]

    N., Tomisaka, K., et al

    Takahashi, S., Machida, M. N., Tomisaka, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6ed

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6ed 2019

  72. [72]

    Takeuchi, T., & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, ApJ, 581, 1344, doi: 10.1086/344437

    work page doi:10.1086/344437 2002

  73. [73]

    M., et al

    Tang, Y.-W., Dutrey, A., Koch, P. M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc45b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc45b 2023

  74. [74]

    2017, ApJ, 839, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/56

    Tazaki, R., Lazarian, A., & Nomura, H. 2017, ApJ, 839, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/56

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/56 2017

  75. [75]

    T., Diep, P

    Thang, N. T., Diep, P. N., Hoang, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f74 2024

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    Villenave, M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Duchêne, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5fae

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5fae 2022

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Villenave, M., Rosotti, G. P., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553822

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553822 2025

  78. [78]

    2000, ApJL, 529, L57, doi: 10.1086/312447

    Wurm, G., & Blum, J. 2000, ApJL, 529, L57, doi: 10.1086/312447

    work page doi:10.1086/312447 2000

  79. [79]

    2021, ApJ, 911, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abebde

    Yang, H. 2021, ApJ, 911, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abebde

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abebde 2021

  80. [80]

    2016a, MNRAS, 456, 2794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2633

    Yang, H., Li, Z.-Y., Looney, L., & Stephens, I. 2016a, MNRAS, 456, 2794, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2633

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2633

Showing first 80 references.