arxiv: 2604.08700 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Axion Quality in Warped Extra-Dimension

Kiwoon Choi , Chang Hyeon Lee , Chang Sub Shin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th

keywords axion qualitywarped extra dimensionsPeccei-Quinn symmetryWilson linenonlocal effectsorbifold compactificationstrong CP problem

0 comments

The pith

Higher-dimensional gauge invariance in warped extra-dimensional models constrains non-QCD Peccei-Quinn breaking to nonlocal effects along the compact dimension, allowing parametric suppression of unwanted axion potential contributions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the axion quality problem for a QCD axion realized as the Wilson-line phase of a five-dimensional U(1) gauge field compactified on an orbifold. Higher-dimensional gauge invariance rules out most local sources of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking, so that any non-QCD contributions to the axion potential must arise from nonlocal propagation of U(1)-charged fields through the extra dimension. The authors compute these contributions explicitly and show how the warp factor and the locations of the orbifold fixed points (branes) control their size. This leads to a classification of possible suppression levels, identifying regimes in which the axion potential remains sufficiently dominated by the QCD term.

Core claim

In warped extra-dimensional models on an S¹/Z₂ orbifold, the QCD axion is the Wilson-line mode of a 5D U(1) gauge field. Five-dimensional gauge invariance forbids local Peccei-Quinn breaking operators, so non-QCD contributions to the axion potential are generated predominantly by nonlocal effects mediated by U(1)-charged fields that propagate along the compact dimension. The warped geometry and brane positions determine the magnitude of these contributions, which can be parametrically suppressed under suitable choices of the warp factor and brane separations.

What carries the argument

The Wilson-line mode of the 5D U(1) gauge field on the orbifold, whose effective potential receives non-QCD contributions only through nonlocal bulk propagators of charged matter fields.

If this is right

The QCD contribution dominates the axion potential when the warp factor is large and brane separations are chosen to enhance suppression of nonlocal terms.
Different orbifold fixed-point configurations produce distinct suppression hierarchies for the induced axion mass.
High axion quality is achievable without additional global symmetries provided the geometry parameters place the model in the appropriate suppression regime.
The effective axion potential can be calculated systematically from the five-dimensional propagators, yielding concrete predictions for the quality factor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar nonlocal protection mechanisms may apply to other global symmetries in warped geometries beyond the Peccei-Quinn case.
The resulting axion potential shape could affect the cosmology of axion dark matter, particularly the misalignment mechanism and isocurvature bounds.
Numerical evaluation of the nonlocal propagators in concrete five-dimensional field theories would provide quantitative benchmarks for the suppression factors.

Load-bearing premise

The only significant non-QCD sources of Peccei-Quinn breaking are the nonlocal effects from U(1)-charged fields, with no unaccounted local or brane-localized operators that would spoil the suppression.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the full axion potential in a specific warped model containing U(1)-charged bulk fields, showing that the size of the non-QCD term exceeds the parametrically suppressed value predicted by the nonlocal analysis.

read the original abstract

We investigate the axion quality problem in warped extra-dimensional models in which the QCD axion arises as the Wilson-line mode of a five-dimensional $U(1)$ gauge field compactified on an $S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold. Higher-dimensional gauge invariance severely constrains possible sources of Peccei--Quinn symmetry breaking, implying that non-QCD contributions to the axion potential are predominantly generated by nonlocal effects mediated by $U(1)$-charged fields propagating along the compact dimension. We systematically compute these contributions and examine how both the warped geometry and the orbifold fixed points (branes) affect the resulting axion quality. Finally, we classify the parametric suppression of the induced axion potential, thereby identifying the conditions under which warped extra-dimensional axions can achieve sufficiently high quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that gauge invariance in warped orbifolds pushes non-QCD axion breaking into nonlocal bulk effects that can be parametrically suppressed, with a useful classification of the resulting quality.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work takes the Wilson-line axion in a 5D warped orbifold and uses 5D gauge invariance plus the orbifold projection to argue that most Peccei-Quinn breaking must come from nonlocal propagation of charged fields. They then compute the size of those contributions and map out how the warp factor and brane locations control the suppression, giving a set of parametric regimes where the axion quality can be high enough to solve the strong CP problem without fine-tuning. That classification is the concrete new piece; earlier extra-dimensional axion papers looked at similar setups but did not organize the nonlocal terms this way for the warped case. The calculation itself looks grounded in the geometry and the requirement that operators respect the higher-dimensional gauge symmetry, which is a strength. The soft spot is the completeness of the brane analysis. The abstract says they examine the fixed points, but if any gauge-invariant local operator built from the boundary values of the charged fields survives at leading order, it would not be suppressed by the same factors and could dominate. The paper appears to claim the nonlocal pieces set the scale, yet an explicit list of forbidden versus allowed brane terms would make that firmer. Readers working on extra-dimensional solutions to the hierarchy problem who also want a viable axion will get the most out of the parametric maps. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve referee time, even if the final quality numbers depend on the details of the brane enumeration.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the axion quality problem in warped extra-dimensional models where the QCD axion arises as the Wilson-line mode of a five-dimensional U(1) gauge field compactified on an S¹/ℤ₂ orbifold. It argues that higher-dimensional gauge invariance severely constrains sources of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking, so that non-QCD contributions to the axion potential are generated predominantly by nonlocal effects mediated by U(1)-charged fields propagating in the bulk; the work systematically computes these contributions, examines the effects of the warped geometry and the orbifold fixed points (branes), and classifies the resulting parametric suppression to identify regimes of sufficiently high axion quality.

Significance. If the central computations and enumeration of breaking sources are complete, the paper supplies a concrete, geometrically motivated mechanism for achieving the required axion quality in warped models without additional fine-tuning. It leverages standard 5D gauge invariance and orbifold structure to derive parametric control over the potential, offering a systematic classification that could be useful for model-building in Randall-Sundrum-like scenarios and related extra-dimensional frameworks.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and sections discussing brane effects] The central claim that non-QCD PQ-breaking contributions are 'predominantly' nonlocal (and therefore parametrically suppressed by the warp factor and brane separation) rests on the completeness of the analysis of brane-localized operators. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate, via gauge invariance or explicit enumeration, that no gauge-invariant local operators built from the charged bulk fields or their boundary values at the fixed points can generate contributions to the Wilson-line potential that evade the claimed suppression; otherwise the quality classification is incomplete.
[Computation sections] The explicit derivations of the nonlocal contributions (including any error estimates or numerical evaluations of the induced potential) are not provided in sufficient detail to verify that the parametric suppression indeed follows from the 5D setup rather than from additional assumptions about field content or boundary conditions.

minor comments (2)

Clarify the precise definition of 'axion quality' used for the classification (e.g., the required suppression factor relative to the QCD scale) and ensure it is stated consistently throughout.
Add a brief comparison table or plot summarizing the suppression exponents or powers for different brane configurations and warp factors to make the classification more accessible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results on axion quality in warped extra dimensions. We address the major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additional details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and sections discussing brane effects] The central claim that non-QCD PQ-breaking contributions are 'predominantly' nonlocal (and therefore parametrically suppressed by the warp factor and brane separation) rests on the completeness of the analysis of brane-localized operators. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate, via gauge invariance or explicit enumeration, that no gauge-invariant local operators built from the charged bulk fields or their boundary values at the fixed points can generate contributions to the Wilson-line potential that evade the claimed suppression; otherwise the quality classification is incomplete.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration via gauge invariance and enumeration is required to fully substantiate that local operators do not evade the suppression. The manuscript already invokes five-dimensional gauge invariance to constrain local sources, showing that operators localized at the orbifold fixed points cannot generate a direct potential for the Wilson-line axion without violating the U(1) gauge symmetry or the orbifold parity assignments. To make this argument more rigorous and self-contained, we will add a dedicated subsection that systematically enumerates all gauge-invariant local operators constructed from the charged bulk fields and their boundary values. For each class of operator we will demonstrate either that it is forbidden by the orbifold structure or that its contribution to the effective four-dimensional potential vanishes upon integration over the extra dimension, thereby confirming that only nonlocal effects remain. This addition will be placed in the section discussing brane effects and will directly support the parametric classification of axion quality. revision: yes
Referee: [Computation sections] The explicit derivations of the nonlocal contributions (including any error estimates or numerical evaluations of the induced potential) are not provided in sufficient detail to verify that the parametric suppression indeed follows from the 5D setup rather than from additional assumptions about field content or boundary conditions.

Authors: The derivations of the nonlocal contributions appear in the computation sections, where the effective potential is obtained by integrating the five-dimensional propagators of charged bulk fields around the compact dimension, with the warp factor entering through the metric and the orbifold fixed-point boundary conditions. The resulting exponential suppression is a direct geometric consequence of the warped background. To improve verifiability, we will expand these sections with additional intermediate steps in the mode expansion and integration, explicit expressions for the leading and sub-leading terms in the potential, and estimates of higher-order corrections arising from the finite brane separation. We will also include numerical evaluations of the induced potential for representative values of the warp parameter and bulk masses, confirming that the suppression scales as expected from the five-dimensional setup alone and does not rely on further assumptions about the field content beyond the minimal U(1)-charged bulk fields required by the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from gauge invariance is independent

full rationale

The paper starts from standard 5D U(1) gauge invariance on an S1/Z2 orbifold and derives constraints on PQ-breaking sources, with non-QCD contributions computed as nonlocal effects from charged fields propagating in the bulk. These contributions and their parametric suppression (via warp factor and brane positions) are obtained from the geometry and field equations rather than presupposed or fitted to the target axion quality. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or renamings of known results are present; the classification of suppression follows directly from the systematic computation of the Wilson-line potential.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption of five-dimensional gauge invariance and the chosen orbifold compactification; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Higher-dimensional gauge invariance constrains sources of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking
Invoked directly in the abstract as severely limiting possible breaking terms.
domain assumption The QCD axion arises as the Wilson-line mode of a 5D U(1) gauge field on S1/Z2 orbifold
This is the model setup stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1513 out tokens · 89817 ms · 2026-05-10T16:42:14.825933+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Axions and the Strong CP Problem,

J.E. Kim and G. Carosi,Axions and the strong cp problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 557 [0807.3125]

work page arXiv 2010
[2]

Di Luzio, M

L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]

work page arXiv 2020
[3]

Re- cent Progress in the Physics of Axions and Axion-Like Particles,

K. Choi, S.H. Im and C.S. Shin,Recent progress in the physics of axions and axion-like particles,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 225 [2012.05029]

work page arXiv 2021
[4]

Peccei and H.R

R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Cp conservation in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 1440

1977
[5]

Peccei and H.R

R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints imposed by cp conservation in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

1977
[6]

Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys

S. Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

1978
[7]

Wilczek,Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons,Phys

F. Wilczek,Problem of strongpandtinvariance in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

1978
[8]

Kim,Weak-interaction singlet and strong cp invariance,Phys

J.E. Kim,Weak-interaction singlet and strong cp invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

1979
[9]

Shifman, A.I

M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,Can confinement ensure natural cp invariance of strong interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493

1980
[10]

M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A simple solution to the strong cp problem with a harmless axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199

1981
[11]

Zhitnitsky,On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions,Sov

A.R. Zhitnitsky,On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

1980
[12]

Kim and K.-M

J.E. Kim and K.-M. Lee,The Scale Problem in Wormhole Physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.63 (1989) 20

1989
[13]

Rey,The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Background,Phys

S.-J. Rey,The Axion Dynamics in Wormhole Background,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 3185

1989
[14]

Barr and D

S.M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck-scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539

1992
[15]

Kamionkowski and J

M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck-scale physics and the peccei-quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137

1992
[16]

Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity

R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu, T.W. Kephart, E.W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong cp problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

work page Pith review arXiv 1992
[17]

Kallosh, A

R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

work page arXiv 1995
[18]

Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology

A. Hebecker, T. Mikhail and P. Soler,Euclidean wormholes, baby universes, and their impact on particle physics and cosmology,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2018) 35 [1807.00824]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[19]

Kim,A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION,Phys

J.E. Kim,A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1733

1985
[20]

Choi and J.E

K. Choi and J.E. Kim,DYNAMICAL AXION,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 1828

1985
[21]

Randall,Composite axion models and planck scale physics,Phys

L. Randall,Composite axion models and planck scale physics,Phys. Lett. B284(1992) 77

1992
[22]

Redi and R

M. Redi and R. Sato,Composite accidental axions,JHEP05(2016) 104 [1602.05427]. – 48 –

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

Lillard and T

B. Lillard and T.M.P. Tait,A composite axion from a supersymmetric product group,JHEP 11(2017) 005 [1707.04261]

work page arXiv 2017
[24]

Gavela, M

M.B. Gavela, M. Ibe, P. Quilez and T.T. Yanagida,Automatic peccei-quinn symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 542 [1812.08174]

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

M. Ardu, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, D. Teresi and J.-W. Wang,Axion quality from the (anti)symmetric of su(n),JHEP11(2020) 090 [2007.12663]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

Contino, A

R. Contino, A. Podo and F. Revello,Chiral models of composite axions and accidental peccei-quinn symmetry,JHEP04(2022) 180 [2112.09635]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and A. Paul,A common origin for the qcd axion and sterile neutrinos from su(5) strong dynamics,JHEP12(2023) 180 [2310.08557]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Gherghetta, H

T. Gherghetta, H. Murayama and P. Qu´ ılez,A high-quality composite pati-salam axion, 2505.08866

work page arXiv
[29]

Gherghetta, H

T. Gherghetta, H. Murayama, B. Noether and P. Qu´ ılez,A High-Quality Axion from Exact SUSY Chiral Dynamics,2508.21813

work page arXiv
[30]

Agrawal, A

P. Agrawal, A. Hook, V. Loladze and M. Reig,Axion quality problem: keep calm and baryon, JHEP03(2026) 041 [2510.07366]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Azatov, M

A. Azatov, M. Mahdi Khalil and M. Suzuki,Towards a post-inflationary composite axion model,JHEP03(2026) 143 [2510.18538]

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze and K. Wang,Stabilizing the axion by discrete gauge symmetries, Phys. Lett. B560(2003) 214 [hep-ph/0212339]

work page arXiv 2003
[33]

H.M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz, G.G. Ross, R. Schieren, K. Schmidt-Hoberg et al.,Discrete r symmetries for the mssm and its singlet extensions,Nucl. Phys. B850(2011) 1 [1102.3595]

work page arXiv 2011
[34]

Harigaya, M

K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, K. Schmitz and T.T. Yanagida,Peccei-quinn symmetry from a gauged discrete r symmetry,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 075022 [1308.1227]

work page arXiv 2013
[35]

Bhattiprolu and S.P

P.N. Bhattiprolu and S.P. Martin,High-quality axions in solutions to theµproblem,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 055014 [2106.14964]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Burgess, G

C.P. Burgess, G. Choi and F. Quevedo,Uv and ir effects in axion quality control,JHEP03 (2024) 051 [2301.00549]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

K.S. Babu, B. Dutta and R.N. Mohapatra,Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry from gauged U(1) and a high quality axion,JHEP03(2026) 084 [2412.21157]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

Babu, S.C

K.S. Babu, S.C. Chandrasekar and Z. Tavartkiladze,Fermion Mass Hierarchy and a High Quality Axion From Gauged U(1) Flavor Symmetry,2602.24253

work page arXiv
[39]

The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions

C. Cs´ aki, E. Kuflik, W. Xue and T. Youn,The Holographic QCD Axion in Five Dimensions, 2604.02411

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[40]

Witten,Some properties of o(32) superstrings,Phys

E. Witten,Some properties of o(32) superstrings,Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351

1984
[41]

Choi and J.E

K. Choi and J.E. Kim,Harmful axions in superstring models,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 393

1985
[42]

Barr,Harmless axions in superstring theories,Phys

S.M. Barr,Harmless axions in superstring theories,Phys. Lett. B158(1985) 397

1985
[43]

Choi,A qcd axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys

K. Choi,A qcd axion from higher dimensional gauge field,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101602 [hep-ph/0308024]

work page arXiv 2004
[44]

Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]

M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]. – 49 –

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Craig and M

N. Craig and M. Kongsore,High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015047 [2408.10295]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Axions In String Theory

P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions in string theory,JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[47]

Benabou, Q

J.N. Benabou, Q. Bonnefoy, M. Buschmann, S. Kumar and B.R. Safdi,Cosmological dynamics of string theory axion strings,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 035021 [2312.08425]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Axions and a Gauged Peccei-Quinn Symmetry

H.-C. Cheng and D.E. Kaplan,Axions and a gauged peccei-quinn symmetry, hep-ph/0103346

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[49]

Honecker and W

G. Honecker and W. Staessens,On axionic dark matter in Type IIA string theory,Fortsch. Phys.62(2014) 115 [1312.4517]

work page arXiv 2014
[50]

Choi, K.S

K. Choi, K.S. Jeong and M.-S. Seo,String theoretic QCD axions in the light of PLANCK and BICEP2,JHEP07(2014) 092 [1404.3880]

work page arXiv 2014
[51]

Buchbinder, A

E.I. Buchbinder, A. Constantin and A. Lukas,Heterotic QCD axion,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 046010 [1412.8696]

work page arXiv 2015
[52]

Petrossian-Byrne and G

R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse,JHEP07(2025) 049 [2503.16387]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Loladze, A

V. Loladze, A. Platschorre and M. Reig,Higher axion strings,JHEP08(2025) 182 [2503.18707]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Arkani-Hamed, H.-C

N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli and L. Randall,Extranatural inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 221302 [hep-th/0301218]

work page arXiv 2003
[55]

Cheng,Introduction to Extra Dimensions, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, pp

H.-C. Cheng,Introduction to Extra Dimensions, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, pp. 125–162, 2011, DOI [1003.1162]

work page arXiv 2011
[56]

A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[57]

Flacke, B

T. Flacke, B. Gripaios, J. March-Russell and D. Maybury,Warped axions,JHEP01(2007) 061 [hep-ph/0611278]

work page arXiv 2007
[58]

P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and M.D. Nguyen,A holographic perspective on the axion quality problem,JHEP01(2020) 188 [1911.09385]

work page arXiv 2020
[59]

Adachi, C.S

Y. Adachi, C.S. Lim and N. Maru,The strong CP problem and higher-dimensional gauge theories,PTEP2022(2022) 053B06 [2108.07367]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Witten,Phase transitions in m-theory and f-theory,Nucl

E. Witten,Phase transitions in m-theory and f-theory,Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 195 [hep-th/9603150]

work page arXiv 1996
[61]

Arkani-Hamed, L

N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,JHEP06(2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001]

work page arXiv 2007
[62]

Bergshoeff, R

E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proeyen,Supersymmetry in singular spaces,JHEP10 (2000) 033 [hep-th/0007044]

work page arXiv 2000
[63]

Fujita, T

T. Fujita, T. Kugo and K. Ohashi,Off-shell formulation of supergravity on orbifold,Prog. Theor. Phys.106(2001) 671 [hep-th/0106051]

work page arXiv 2001
[64]

Y. Abe, Y. Goto, Y. Kawamura and Y. Nishikawa,Conjugate boundary condition, hidden particles, and gauge-Higgs inflation,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31(2016) 1650208 [1608.06393]. – 50 –

work page arXiv 2016
[65]

Grossman and M

Y. Grossman and M. Neubert,Neutrino masses and mixings in non-factorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B474(2000) 361 [hep-ph/9912408]

work page arXiv 2000
[66]

Bulk Fields and Supersymmetry in a Slice of AdS

T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol,Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of ads,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 141 [hep-ph/0003129]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[67]

Strassler,Field theory without feynman diagrams: One-loop effective actions, hep-ph/9205205

M.J. Strassler,Field theory without feynman diagrams: One-loop effective actions, hep-ph/9205205

work page arXiv
[68]

Perturbative Quantum Field Theory in the String-Inspired Formalism

C. Schubert,Perturbative quantum field theory in the string-inspired formalism,Phys. Rept. 355(2001) 73 [hep-th/0101036]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[69]

Bastianelli and A

F. Bastianelli and A. Zirotti,Worldline formalism in a gravitational background,Nucl. Phys. B642(2002) 372 [hep-th/0205182]

work page arXiv 2002
[70]

Hosotani,Dynamical Mass Generation by Compact Extra Dimensions,Phys

Y. Hosotani,Dynamical Mass Generation by Compact Extra Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B126 (1983) 309

1983
[71]

Forman,Functional determinants and geometry,Invent

R. Forman,Functional determinants and geometry,Invent. Math.88(1987) 447

1987
[72]

Kirsten and A.J

K. Kirsten and A.J. McKane,Functional determinants by contour integration methods, Annals Phys.308(2003) 502 [math-ph/0305010]

work page arXiv 2003
[73]

Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys

J.S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664

1951
[74]

Groot Nibbelink,Dimensional regularization of a compact dimension,Nucl

S. Groot Nibbelink,Dimensional regularization of a compact dimension,Nucl. Phys. B619 (2001) 373 [hep-th/0108185]

work page arXiv 2001
[75]

Choi and I.-W

K.-w. Choi and I.-W. Kim,One loop gauge couplings in AdS(5),Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 045005 [hep-th/0208071]

work page arXiv 2003
[76]

N. Haba, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada and T. Yamashita,Effective potential of higgs field in warped gauge-higgs unification,Prog. Theor. Phys.120(2008) 77 [0802.3431]

work page arXiv 2008
[77]

Choi, I.-W

K. Choi, I.-W. Kim and C.S. Shin,Gauge threshold corrections in warped geometry,New J. Phys.12(2010) 075014 [1001.1473]. – 51 –

work page arXiv 2010