pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14999 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A First-Order Eikonal Framework for Quasinormal Modes, Shadows, Strong Lensing, and Grey-Body Factors in a Scalarized Black-Hole Metric

Bekir Can L\"utf\"uo\u{g}lu , Javlon Rayimbaev , Sardor Murodov , Jakhongir Kurbanov , Muhammad Matyoqubov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords eikonal approximationquasinormal modesblack-hole shadowsstrong lensinggrey-body factorsscalarized black holesnull geodesicsweak-hair regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

A first-order eikonal expansion in the weak-hair regime supplies closed analytic expressions that map the scalarized metric function directly onto quasinormal frequencies, shadow radius, strong-deflection angles, and grey-body transmission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives first-order corrections to the photon-sphere radius, orbital frequency, and Lyapunov exponent for a static spherical black-hole metric that carries a scalar hair parameter. These geodesic invariants are inserted into the Schutz-Will WKB formula to produce eikonal quasinormal frequencies, into exact identities that convert them into shadow size and strong-lensing observables, and into an analytic expression for the grey-body transmission probability. At this leading order the relations depend only on null geodesics and therefore apply equally to scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational test fields, up to higher-order corrections. The construction therefore supplies a single-parameter analytic bridge from the metric function to ringdown, lensing, and scattering data.

Core claim

In the weak-hair regime the photon-sphere radius, orbital frequency, and Lyapunov exponent admit closed first-order expressions in the metric function. These invariants determine the eikonal quasinormal frequencies via the Schutz-Will WKB method, fix the shadow radius and strong-deflection angle through exact static-spherical identities, and yield a closed analytic form for the transmission probability that controls grey-body factors.

What carries the argument

The first-order eikonal mapping from the three null-geodesic invariants (photon-sphere radius, orbital frequency, Lyapunov exponent) to quasinormal modes, shadows, strong lensing, and grey-body factors.

If this is right

  • Eikonal quasinormal frequencies are fixed by the photon-sphere orbital frequency and Lyapunov exponent.
  • Shadow size and strong-deflection angles follow from the same invariants through exact identities for static spherical geometries.
  • Grey-body transmission probabilities admit closed analytic expressions at leading eikonal order.
  • The leading-order relations are spin-universal across scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational perturbations.
  • Damping ratios become nearly insensitive to the scalarized core in the limiting small-core-size expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same first-order geodesic invariants could be recomputed for other scalarized or hairy metrics to test whether the analytic bridge generalizes beyond the specific form studied here.
  • Numerical evolution of wave packets in the full metric would provide a direct check on the accuracy of the eikonal grey-body factors for moderate multipoles.
  • The quality-factor correction derived at this order suggests a simple diagnostic for distinguishing weak-hair black holes from Schwarzschild ones in ringdown data.

Load-bearing premise

The scalar hair remains weak enough that higher-order corrections to the photon-sphere location and to the WKB frequencies stay negligible for the observables considered.

What would settle it

Direct numerical computation of the quasinormal spectrum or the shadow radius for a chosen value of the core-size parameter, compared against the first-order analytic prediction; a discrepancy larger than the expected next-order term would falsify the leading-order relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14999 by Bekir Can L\"utf\"uo\u{g}lu, Jakhongir Kurbanov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Muhammad Matyoqubov, Sardor Murodov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Exact numerical data versus first-order analytic approximations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Analytic eikonal GBFs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Analytic first-order parameter response of key observables in the scalarized model. Top-left: response coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct an analytic geodesic-optics description of quasinormal ringing, black-hole shadows, strong lensing, and grey-body factors for the static spherical metric introduced in [Bakopoulos, et. al. arXiv:2310.11919]. Working in a weak-hair regime, we derive closed first-order formulas for the photon-sphere radius, orbital frequency, and Lyapunov exponent. These invariants are then employed within the Schutz--Will WKB approach to obtain eikonal quasinormal frequencies, mapped to shadow and strong-deflection observables through exact identities for static spherical geometries, and used to build a closed analytic form for the transmission probability. At leading eikonal order, these relations are controlled by null geodesics and are therefore spin-universal for test scalar/electromagnetic/gravitational sectors, up to subleading corrections. Besides the standard ringdown--shadow correspondence, we present three additional results: (i) an explicit quality-factor correction, (ii) limiting core-size expansions that show when damping ratios are nearly insensitive to the scalarized core, and (iii) a comparative study of grey-body factors for moderate multipoles and several core-size ratios. The resulting construction provides a concise one-parameter connection from the metric function to ringdown, lensing, and scattering observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an analytic first-order eikonal framework for quasinormal modes (via Schutz-Will WKB), shadows, strong lensing, and grey-body factors in the static spherical scalarized black-hole metric of Bakopoulos et al. (arXiv:2310.11919). Working in the weak-hair regime, it derives closed linear-order expressions for the photon-sphere radius, orbital frequency, and Lyapunov exponent, then maps these invariants to the observables using exact static-spherical identities and a closed transmission probability. It emphasizes spin-universality at leading eikonal order and supplies additional results on quality-factor corrections, core-size limits for damping ratios, and grey-body comparisons for moderate multipoles.

Significance. If the first-order expansions remain accurate in the intended regime, the construction supplies a compact one-parameter analytic link from the metric function to ringdown, lensing, and scattering observables. The spin-universal character at leading order (controlled by null geodesics) and the explicit limiting expansions for damping ratios insensitive to the scalarized core are useful features. The comparative grey-body study for moderate multipoles adds concrete value for applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and weak-hair expansion] Abstract and the weak-hair expansion section: the first-order formulas for photon-sphere radius r_ph, orbital frequency Ω, and Lyapunov exponent λ are derived by expanding the metric function to linear order in the hair parameter ε, but no a-priori bound, radius of convergence, or numerical comparison of the truncated versus exact geodesic invariants is provided to show that O(ε²) corrections remain negligible relative to the retained O(ε) shifts. This validation is load-bearing for the reliability of the subsequent WKB frequencies, shadow/deflection mappings, and transmission probabilities.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and figures] The notation for the hair strength parameter and the core-size ratio should be introduced once with a clear table or equation reference to avoid ambiguity when comparing different core-size ratios in the grey-body figures.
  2. [Discussion of QNMs] A short paragraph comparing the derived eikonal QNM quality-factor correction to existing numerical results for the same metric (even for a single moderate multipole) would strengthen the presentation without altering the analytic focus.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the paper's significance and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and weak-hair expansion] Abstract and the weak-hair expansion section: the first-order formulas for photon-sphere radius r_ph, orbital frequency Ω, and Lyapunov exponent λ are derived by expanding the metric function to linear order in the hair parameter ε, but no a-priori bound, radius of convergence, or numerical comparison of the truncated versus exact geodesic invariants is provided to show that O(ε²) corrections remain negligible relative to the retained O(ε) shifts. This validation is load-bearing for the reliability of the subsequent WKB frequencies, shadow/deflection mappings, and transmission probabilities.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit validation for the truncation error constitutes a genuine gap in the current manuscript. Although the weak-hair regime is introduced with the understanding that ε is small, no a-priori bound, radius of convergence, or direct numerical comparison between the first-order expressions and the exact geodesic invariants is supplied. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that (i) compares the analytic O(ε) results for r_ph, Ω and λ against numerically computed exact values over a representative interval of ε, (ii) quantifies the relative O(ε²) error, and (iii) discusses the practical radius of convergence inferred from the series expansion of the metric function. These additions will directly substantiate the reliability of the subsequent WKB, shadow, lensing and grey-body results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard first-order geodesic optics and WKB applied to an external metric

full rationale

The paper imports the scalarized metric from Bakopoulos et al. (arXiv:2310.11919), expands the metric function to linear order in the hair parameter ε, derives closed expressions for r_ph, Ω and λ at that order, and inserts them into the Schutz-Will WKB formula plus exact static-spherical identities for shadow radius, deflection angle and transmission probability. These steps are direct applications of known geodesic and WKB machinery; no quantity is defined in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the sole citation is to an independent prior work whose authors do not overlap with the present team. The weak-hair truncation is an explicit approximation whose error term is not bounded inside the paper, but that omission is a limitation on validity rather than a circular reduction of the claimed derivations to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the previously published scalarized metric, the weak-hair expansion, and standard eikonal/WKB assumptions in black-hole perturbation theory.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar hair strength parameter
    Controls the deviation from Schwarzschild in the weak-hair regime and enters all first-order corrections.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Static, spherically symmetric background metric
    Inherited from the cited scalarized solution.
  • domain assumption Eikonal limit connects quasinormal modes to null geodesics
    Standard high-frequency approximation invoked for spin-universality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1370 out tokens · 60051 ms · 2026-05-12T01:46:23.882635+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive Scalar Quasinormal Modes, Greybody Factors, and Absorption Cross Section of a Parity-Symmetric Beyond-Horndeski Black Hole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Increasing the mass of a scalar field around a parity-symmetric beyond-Horndeski black hole strongly reduces the damping rate of quasinormal modes while suppressing low-frequency absorption and shifting efficient abso...

  2. Bardeen spacetime as quantum corrected black hole: Grey-body factors and quasinormal modes of gravitational perturbations

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Increasing the quantum-correction scale in Bardeen spacetime raises quasinormal frequencies, slows decay, suppresses low-frequency transmission, and reorganizes absorption cross-sections.

  3. Scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations of regular black holes constituting primordial dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Larger DBI regularity scale in an asymptotically flat regular black hole shifts quasinormal frequencies and damping rates downward with only weak change in quality factor, above numerical uncertainty.

  4. Scattering of scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac fields in an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by primordial dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Raising the regularity parameter in this regular black-hole spacetime lowers the single-barrier potentials for all three fields, shifts transmission to lower frequencies, increases absorption cross sections, and produ...

  5. Massive scalar quasinormal modes of an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom Dirac--Born--Infeld field

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Massive scalar quasinormal modes in this DBI-supported regular black hole show higher oscillation frequencies and lower damping as field mass increases, with larger regularity scales producing softer and longer-lived ringing.

  6. Scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations of regular black holes constituting primordial dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Larger DBI regularity in this regular black hole model reduces quasinormal frequencies and damping rates for scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations while the quality factor stays nearly constant, producing a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (36) Thus, the GBF has a Fermi-type profile centered at𝜔≃ 𝐿/𝑅sh, with width governed by the instability scale𝜆ph

    Here we used the eikonal identities Re(𝜔ℓ0) =𝐿Ω ph =𝐿/𝑅 sh +𝒪(𝐿 −1), Im(𝜔ℓ0) =−𝜆 ph/2 +𝒪(𝐿 −1). (36) Thus, the GBF has a Fermi-type profile centered at𝜔≃ 𝐿/𝑅sh, with width governed by the instability scale𝜆ph. Using Eqs. (26) and (14), 𝐿2 𝑅2 sh = 𝐿2 27𝑀 2 [1 + 3𝛽𝑆(𝑦)] +𝒪(𝛽 2), 𝑅sh 𝐿𝜆ph = 27𝑀 2 𝐿 [︀ 1 +𝛽 (︀3 2 𝑆(𝑦) +ℱ 𝜆(𝑦) )︀]︀−1 +𝒪(𝛽 2), (37) Substituting...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Black holes with primary scalar hair,

    A. Bakopoulos, C. Charmousis, P. Kanti, N. Lecoeur, and T. Nakas, Phys. Rev. D109, 024032 (2024), arXiv:2310.11919, arXiv:2310.11919 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Bakopoulos, C

    A. Bakopoulos, C. Chatzifotis, and T. Nakas, Phys. Rev. D110, 024044 (2024), arXiv:2312.17198, arXiv:2312.17198 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Bakopoulos, C

    A. Bakopoulos, C. Chatzifotis, and E. Karakasis, Phys. Rev. D110, L101502 (2024), arXiv:2404.07522, arXiv:2404.07522 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Erices and M

    C. Erices and M. Fathi, JCAP01, 016, arXiv:2409.07312 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Baake, A

    C. Baake, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, G. Hernández, and M. A. Vera, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2312.05207, arXiv:2312.05207 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Axial perturbations of black holes with primary scalar hair,

    C. Charmousis, A.-M. Iteanu, D. Langlois, and K. Noui, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2503.22348, arXiv:2503.22348 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    A no-hair theorem for the galileon

    L. Hui and A. Nicolis, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 241104 (2013), arXiv:1202.1296, arXiv:1202.1296 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 10 251102 (2014), arXiv:1312.3622, arXiv:1312.3622 [gr- qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Dressing a black hole with a time-dependent Galileon

    E. Babichev and C. Charmousis, JHEP08, 106, arXiv:1312.3204, arXiv:1312.3204 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  11. [11]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and A. Lehébel, JCAP04, 027, arXiv:1702.01938, arXiv:1702.01938 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Saravani and T

    M. Saravani and T. P. Sotiriou, Phys. Rev. D99, 124004 (2019), arXiv:1903.02055, arXiv:1903.02055 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Creminelli, M

    P. Creminelli, M. Loayza, J. M. Serra, E. Trincherini, and G. Trombetta, JHEP08, 045, arXiv:2004.02893, arXiv:2004.02893 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    Nollert, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.31, 423 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes,

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D79, 064016 (2009), arXiv:0812.1806, arXiv:0812.1806

    work page arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 199 (2024), arXiv:2308.10412, arXiv:2308.10412 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Malik, Annals Phys

    Z. Malik, Annals Phys.479, 170046 (2025), arXiv:2409.01561, arXiv:2409.01561 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Malik, JCAP 04, 042 (2025), arXiv:2412.19443 [gr- qc]

    Z. Malik, JCAP04, 042, arXiv:2412.19443, arXiv:2412.19443 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Malik, Annals Phys

    Z. Malik, Annals Phys.482, 170238 (2025), arXiv:2504.12570, arXiv:2504.12570 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2603.18887, arXiv:2603.18887 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    A. M. Dubinsky and A. Zhidenko, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 420 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883, arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    A. M. Dubinsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A39, 2450108 (2024), arXiv:2404.18004, arXiv:2404.18004 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Dubinsky, Phys

    A. Dubinsky, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101657 (2024), arXiv:2405.08262 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    A. M. Dubinsky, Int. J. Theor. Phys64, 33 (2025), arXiv:2405.13552, arXiv:2405.13552 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    A. M. Dubinsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A40, 2550111 (2025), arXiv:2412.00625, arXiv:2412.00625 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    A. M. Dubinsky, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2505.08545, arXiv:2505.08545 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Bozza, Phys

    V. Bozza, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0208075, arXiv:gr-qc/0208075

    work page arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    I. Z. Stefanov, S. S. Yazadjiev, and G. G. Gyulchev, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 251103 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Phys. Rep.947, 1 (2022), arXiv:2105.07101, arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    R. A. Konoplya and Z. Stuchlík, Phys. Lett. B771, 597 (2017), arXiv:1705.05928, arXiv:1705.05928 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B838, 137674 (2023), arXiv:2210.08373, arXiv:2210.08373 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Lett. B856, 138879 (2024), arXiv:2310.12326, arXiv:2310.12326 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    A. M. Bonanno, R. A. Konoplya, G. Oglialoro, and A. Spina, JCAP12, 042, arXiv:2509.12469 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    R.A.Konoplya, A.Khrabustovskyi, J.Kříž,andA.Zhi- denko, JCAP04, 062, arXiv:2501.16134 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Phys. Rev. D111, 104055 (2025), arXiv:2408.02578 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Sekhmani, S

    Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov, and S. Muminov, Nucl. Phys. B1023, 117311 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1049 (2020), arXiv:2003.01188 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B804, 135363 (2020), arXiv:1912.10582 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    R. A. Konoplya, T. Pappas, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D101, 044054 (2020), arXiv:1907.10112 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D100, 044015 (2019), arXiv:1907.05551 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B795, 1 (2019), arXiv:1905.00064 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Rahmatov, S

    B. Rahmatov, S. Murodov, J. Rayimbaev, Y. Turaev, I. Egamberdiev, K. Badalov, S. Ahmedov, and S. Us- anov, Annals Phys.488, 170366 (2026)

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Asghar, M

    Z. Asghar, M. F. Shamir, F. Mofarreh, J. Rayimbaev, O. Sirajiddin, and F. Shayimov, Nucl. Phys. B1025, 117417 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Universality in chaos of particle motion near black hole horizons,

    K. Hashimoto and N. Tanahashi, Phys. Rev. D95, 024007 (2017), arXiv:1610.06070 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Atamurotov, S

    F. Atamurotov, S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, and S. Si- wach, JCAP08, 045, arXiv:2105.02214 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D97, 084044 (2018), arXiv:1801.07195 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243, arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Johannsen and D

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Astrophys. J.718, 446 (2010), arXiv:1005.1931, arXiv:1005.1931 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L13 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912263, arXiv:astro- ph/9912263 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2000

  54. [54]

    Hioki and K.-i

    K. Hioki and K.-i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D80, 024042 (2009), arXiv:0904.3575, arXiv:0904.3575 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D103, 104033 (2021), arXiv:2103.03855 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Younsi, A

    Z. Younsi, A. Zhidenko, L. Rezzolla, R. Konoplya, and Y. Mizuno, Phys. Rev. D94, 084025 (2016), arXiv:1607.05767 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya, and T. D. Pappas, Phys. Rev. D103, 124062 (2021), arXiv:2102.10679 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP10, 010, arXiv:2107.05977 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    R. A. Konoplya, J. Schee, and D. Ovchinnikov, arXiv preprint (2020), arXiv:2008.04118, arXiv:2008.04118 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Atamurotov and B

    F. Atamurotov and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D92, 084005 (2015), arXiv:1507.08131 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Atamurotov, S

    F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, and B. Ahmedov, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 273 (2016), arXiv:1506.03690 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Mirzaev, B

    T. Mirzaev, B. Ahmedov, and C. Bambi, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1194 (2025), arXiv:2507.02520 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    J. L. Synge, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.131, 463 (1966)

    work page 1966

  64. [64]

    Luminet, Astron

    J.-P. Luminet, Astron. Astrophys.75, 228 (1979)

    work page 1979

  65. [65]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Astrophys. J. Lett.291, L33 (1985)

    work page 1985

  66. [66]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  67. [67]

    R. A. Konoplya, J. Matyjasek, and A. Zhidenko, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.2, 5 (2026), arXiv:2603.12466 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052, arXiv:gr-qc/0303052 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  69. [69]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 11 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361, arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JHEP06, 037, arXiv:hep-th/0402080, arXiv:hep-th/0402080 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 634 (2024), arXiv:2404.09364 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Class. Quantum Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333, arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 648, 236 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611226, arXiv:hep- th/0611226 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  74. [74]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1166 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D110, 024010 (2024), arXiv:2311.05503, arXiv:2311.05503 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 634 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Moura and J

    F. Moura and J. Rodrigues, Phys. Lett. B819, 136407 (2021), arXiv:2103.09302 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Moura and J

    F. Moura and J. Rodrigues, JHEP08, 078, arXiv:2105.02616 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Moura and J

    F. Moura and J. Rodrigues, Nucl. Phys. B993, 116255 (2023), arXiv:2206.11377 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Skvortsova, EPL 149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    M. Skvortsova, EPL (Europhysics Letters)149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650, arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.