pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15931 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Robustness of Starobinsky inflation in a minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion

Boris Latosh
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords Starobinsky inflationtwo-field modelscalar-tensor gravityattractor solutionsentropy perturbationscurvature perturbationinflationary observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

A minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion leaves Starobinsky inflation effectively unchanged because nearby trajectories converge to an attractor branch where entropy perturbations remain suppressed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a two-field model drawn from the one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity that contains an exact Starobinsky solution. It shows that a non-trivial set of initial conditions evolves onto a slow-roll branch continuously connected to the single-field Starobinsky trajectory. Numerical integration of the coupled adiabatic and entropy perturbation equations then demonstrates that the entropy mode stays sufficiently small that it does not source observable curvature perturbations, while tensor modes are unaffected. The resulting inflationary observables therefore match those of the original Starobinsky model. A sympathetic reader cares because the result tests whether a plausible quantum correction can spoil the successful predictions of a leading single-field scenario.

Core claim

The model admits an exact Starobinsky branch, but nearby trajectories relax to an attractor-connected slow-roll branch continuously connected to the Starobinsky solution. On the branch studied, the entropy mode remains sufficiently suppressed that its sourcing of the curvature perturbation is negligible, while the tensor sector is unchanged. The inflationary observables therefore remain effectively Starobinsky-like, providing a robustness test of Starobinsky inflation against a minimal radiative scalar-tensor deformation.

What carries the argument

The attractor-connected slow-roll branch in the two-field potential, whose stability is verified by numerical solution of the coupled adiabatic and entropy perturbation equations.

If this is right

  • Inflationary observables remain effectively identical to those of pure Starobinsky inflation.
  • The tensor sector experiences no modification from the presence of the second field.
  • Entropy perturbations do not produce observable sourcing of the curvature perturbation.
  • The construction supplies a concrete robustness check of Starobinsky inflation against minimal radiative deformations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar attractor behavior may protect other single-field models against small multifield additions from quantum corrections.
  • Observational agreement with Starobinsky predictions would not exclude the possibility of such underlying two-field dynamics.
  • Different choices of the two-field potential could be tested to see whether they introduce detectable deviations.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen two-field potential exactly reproduces the one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity and the numerical integration of the perturbation equations captures all relevant dynamics without missing unstable directions or other attractor branches.

What would settle it

Numerical simulations that reveal growing entropy modes or a measurable shift in the curvature power spectrum away from Starobinsky values for the same class of initial conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15931 by Boris Latosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase portrait of Starobinsky phase space showing the attractor. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase portrait {ϕ,ϕ˙} for the cosmological master equation (26) in Planck units with m = mχ = 1. The left plot shows ϕ = 1 and ϕ˙ = 0. The right plot shows ϕ = 0 and ϕ˙ = 0.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase portrait {χ, ˙χ} for the cosmological master equation (26) in Planck units with m = mχ = 1. The left plot shows ϕ = 1 and ϕ˙ = 0. The centre plot has ϕ = 2 and ϕ˙ = 0. The right plot shows ϕ = 1 and ϕ˙ = 1. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion of Starobinsky inflation motivated by the one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity. The model admits an exact Starobinsky branch, but the relevant question is whether nearby trajectories generate observable multifield effects. We show that a non-trivial class of initial conditions relaxes to an attractor-connected slow-roll branch continuously connected to the Starobinsky solution. We then solve the coupled adiabatic and entropy perturbation equations numerically. On the branch studied here, the entropy mode remains sufficiently suppressed that its sourcing of the curvature perturbation is negligible, while the tensor sector is unchanged. The inflationary observables therefore remain effectively Starobinsky-like, providing a robustness test of Starobinsky inflation against a minimal radiative scalar-tensor deformation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies a minimal two-field scalar-tensor model motivated by the one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity, which admits an exact Starobinsky branch. It demonstrates that a non-trivial class of initial conditions relaxes to an attractor-connected slow-roll branch continuously connected to the Starobinsky solution. Numerical solutions of the coupled adiabatic and entropy perturbation equations indicate that the entropy mode remains sufficiently suppressed, resulting in negligible sourcing of the curvature perturbation, while the tensor sector is unchanged. Consequently, the inflationary observables remain effectively Starobinsky-like.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, this provides a concrete robustness test of Starobinsky inflation against a minimal radiative scalar-tensor deformation. The demonstration of attractor behavior and entropy suppression via direct integration of the coupled perturbation equations offers falsifiable evidence that multifield effects can remain negligible on the studied branch, preserving single-field predictions. This strengthens the case for Starobinsky inflation in the presence of quantum corrections and serves as a useful template for similar analyses in other models.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (numerical integration of perturbations): The central claim that the entropy mode remains sufficiently suppressed (with negligible sourcing of the curvature perturbation) rests on numerical solutions, yet the manuscript does not specify the explicit two-field potential, the scanned range of initial conditions, the integrator method, step-size controls, or convergence tests. Without these, independent verification that no unstable directions or other branches were missed is not possible, directly affecting the load-bearing robustness conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction use both 'completion' and 'motivated by' for the potential; a brief clarification of the precise relation to the one-loop effective action would improve precision.
  2. [Numerical results] Figure captions and axis labels in the numerical results section could explicitly state the suppression metric (e.g., entropy-to-adiabatic amplitude ratio) for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical integration of perturbations): The central claim that the entropy mode remains sufficiently suppressed (with negligible sourcing of the curvature perturbation) rests on numerical solutions, yet the manuscript does not specify the explicit two-field potential, the scanned range of initial conditions, the integrator method, step-size controls, or convergence tests. Without these, independent verification that no unstable directions or other branches were missed is not possible, directly affecting the load-bearing robustness conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical details are necessary for reproducibility and independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) in §4 that explicitly states: the two-field potential (the one derived from the one-loop effective action and already written in §2), the scanned ranges of initial conditions for the background trajectories (deviations of order 10 % from the Starobinsky attractor in field space), the integrator (fourth-order Runge-Kutta with adaptive step-size control), the tolerance settings (relative tolerance 10^{-8}), and the convergence tests performed (results unchanged to better than 0.01 % upon halving the step size or tightening the tolerance). We will also note that, within the scanned domain, no unstable directions or additional branches producing significant entropy-mode growth were found. These additions will directly address the referee’s concern and strengthen the robustness claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained numerical test

full rationale

The paper defines a two-field scalar-tensor model motivated by (but not necessarily identical to) the one-loop effective action, identifies an exact Starobinsky branch, and then performs direct numerical integration of the background and perturbation equations for a class of initial conditions. The claimed attractor behavior, suppression of the entropy mode, and negligible sourcing of curvature perturbations are outputs of solving the coupled differential equations on that branch, not inputs or re-expressions of fitted quantities. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, no parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The structure is a standard, falsifiable numerical robustness check whose central results are independent of the paper's own definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the two-field potential is given by the one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity; no explicit free parameters are identified in the abstract, and the second scalar field is introduced as part of the completion rather than as an ad-hoc entity with independent evidence.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The one-loop effective action of scalar-tensor gravity supplies the interaction terms for the minimal two-field completion.
    Stated as the motivation for the model in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1338 out tokens · 46893 ms · 2026-05-10T08:06:27.009471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky, Phys

    Alexei A. Starobinsky. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity.Phys. Lett. B, 91:99–102, 1980.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x 1980

  2. [2]

    Planck and BICEP/Keck Array 2018 constraints on primordial gravitational waves and perspectives for future B-mode polarization measure- ments.Phys

    Daniela Paoletti, Fabio Finelli, Jussi Valiviita, and Masashi Hazumi. Planck and BICEP/Keck Array 2018 constraints on primordial gravitational waves and perspectives for future B-mode polarization measure- ments.Phys. Rev. D, 106(8):083528, 2022.arXiv:2208.10482,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083528

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.083528 2018

  3. [3]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akrami et al. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A10, 2020. arXiv:1807.06211,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2018

  4. [4]

    Louiset al.[Atacama Cosmology Telescope], JCAP 11(2025), 062 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 [arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Thibaut Louis et al. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters.JCAP, 11:062, 2025.arXiv:2503.14452,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 2025

  5. [5]

    Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Evan McDonough, Lennart Balkenhol, Renata Kallosh, Lloyd Knox, and Andrei Linde. BAO-CMB tension and implications for inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 113(4):043524, 2026.arXiv:2507.12459, doi:10.1103/lq71-b84v

    work page doi:10.1103/lq71-b84v 2026

  6. [6]

    Schlichting,R.Venugopalan,Universal attractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma, Phys

    L. Sebastiani, G. Cognola, R. Myrzakulov, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini. Nearly Starobinsky inflation from modified gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 89(2):023518, 2014.arXiv:1311.0744,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89. 023518

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89 2014

  7. [7]

    Myrzakulov, S

    Kazuharu Bamba, R. Myrzakulov, S. D. Odintsov, and L. Sebastiani. Trace-anomaly driven inflation in modified gravity and the BICEP2 result.Phys. Rev. D, 90(4):043505, 2014.arXiv:1403.6649,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.043505 2014

  8. [8]

    Alexandrou, T

    Ratbay Myrzakulov, Sergei Odintsov, and Lorenzo Sebastiani. Inflationary universe from higher-derivative quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 91(8):083529, 2015.arXiv:1412.1073,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91. 083529

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91 2015

  9. [9]

    Inflationary universe from higher derivative quantum gravity coupled with scalar electrodynamics.Nucl

    Ratbay Myrzakulov, Sergei Odintsov, and Lorenzo Sebastiani. Inflationary universe from higher derivative quantum gravity coupled with scalar electrodynamics.Nucl. Phys. B, 907:646–663, 2016.arXiv:1604. 06088,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.04.033 2016

  10. [10]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou. Power-law F(R) gravity as deformations to Starobinsky inflation in view of ACT.Phys. Lett. B, 870:139907, 2025.arXiv:2509.06251,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025. 139907

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025 2025

  11. [11]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and G. S. Sharov. Dynamical dark energy from F(R) gravity models unifying inflation with dark energy: Confronting the latest observational data.JHEAp, 50:100471, 2026. arXiv:2506.02245,doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100471

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100471 2026

  12. [12]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou. A power-law inflation tail for the standard R2-inflation and the Trans-Planckian censorship conjecture.Phys. Lett. B, 865:139458, 2025.arXiv:2504.04561,doi:10. 1016/j.physletb.2025.139458

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou.R 2 inflation revisited and dark energy corrections.Phys. Rev. D, 104(12):124065, 2021.arXiv:2112.06269,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.124065 2021

  14. [14]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and F. P. Fronimos. Canonical scalar field inflation with string andR 2 -corrections.Annals Phys., 424:168359, 2021.arXiv:2011.08680,doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168359. 17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168359 2021

  15. [15]

    Elizalde, S

    E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and Tanmoy Paul. Logarithmic-correctedR 2 Gravity Inflation in the Presence of Kalb-Ramond Fields.JCAP, 02:017, 2019.arXiv:1810.07711,doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2019/02/017

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Ido Ben-Dayan, Shenglin Jing, Mahdi Torabian, Alexander Westphal, and Lucila Zarate.R 2 logR quantum corrections and the inflationary observables.JCAP, 09:005, 2014.arXiv:1404.7349,doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/005

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/005 2014

  17. [17]

    D. M. Ghilencea. Two-loop corrections to Starobinsky-Higgs inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 98(10):103524, 2018. arXiv:1807.06900,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.103524

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.103524 2018

  18. [18]

    John Ellis, Tony Gherghetta, Kunio Kaneta, Wenqi Ke, and Keith A. Olive. Effects of radiative corrections on Starobinsky inflation.Phys. Rev. D, 112(12):123530, 2025.arXiv:2510.15137,doi: 10.1103/8cx9-c642

    work page doi:10.1103/8cx9-c642 2025

  19. [20]

    Bianchi and M

    Eugenio Bianchi and Mauricio Gamonal. Precision predictions of Starobinsky inflation with self-consistent Weyl-squared corrections.Phys. Rev. D, 112(12):124006, 2025.arXiv:2506.10081,doi:10.1103/ vyls-33np

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data

    Han Gil Choi, Pavel Petrov, and Seong Chan Park. Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data. 9 2025.arXiv:2509.04832

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [22]

    William J. Wolf. Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT data. 6 2025.arXiv: 2506.12436

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    and Starobinsky, Alexei A

    Sergei V. Ketov and Alexei A. Starobinsky. Embedding (R+R 2)-Inflation into Supergravity.Phys. Rev. D, 83:063512, 2011.arXiv:1011.0240,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.063512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.063512 2011

  23. [24]

    Ketov and Alexei A

    Sergei V. Ketov and Alexei A. Starobinsky. Inflation and non-minimal scalar-curvature coupling in gravity and supergravity.JCAP, 08:022, 2012.arXiv:1203.0805,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/022

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/022 2012

  24. [25]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov, and I. L. Shapiro.Effective Action in Quantum Gravity. Routledge, 9 2017.doi:10.1201/9780203758922

    work page doi:10.1201/9780203758922 2017

  25. [26]

    Sergei V. Ketov. On the equivalence of Starobinsky and Higgs inflationary models in gravity and super- gravity.J. Phys. A, 53(8):084001, 2020.arXiv:1911.01008,doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab6a33

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab6a33 2020

  26. [27]

    Sergei V. Ketov. On Legacy of Starobinsky Inflation. 1 2025.arXiv:2501.06451

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Bender and Philip D

    Carl M. Bender and Philip D. Mannheim. Exactly solvable PT-symmetric Hamiltonian having no Hermitian counterpart.Phys. Rev. D, 78:025022, 2008.arXiv:0804.4190,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.025022

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.025022 2008

  28. [30]

    C. P. Burgess. Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory.Living Rev. Rel., 7:5–56, 2004.arXiv:gr-qc/0311082,doi:10.12942/lrr-2004-5

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2004-5 2004

  29. [31]

    One-loop effective scalar-tensor gravity.Eur

    Boris Latosh. One-loop effective scalar-tensor gravity.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(9):845, 2020.arXiv:2004.00927, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8371-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8371-2 2020

  30. [32]

    Effective potential of scalar–tensor gravity.Class

    Andrej Arbuzov and Boris Latosh. Effective potential of scalar–tensor gravity.Class. Quant. Grav., 38(1):015012, 2021.arXiv:2007.06306,doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abc572

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abc572 2021

  31. [33]

    Cambridge University Press, 4 2015

    Henriette Elvang and Yu-tin Huang.Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity. Cambridge University Press, 4 2015

    2015

  32. [34]

    In55th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, 4 2021.arXiv:2104.10148

    Pierre Vanhove.S-matrix approach to general gravity and beyond. In55th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, 4 2021.arXiv:2104.10148

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [35]

    The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes.J

    Gabriele Travaglini et al. The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes.J. Phys. A, 55(44):443001, 2022. arXiv:2203.13011,doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac8380. 18

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac8380 2022

  34. [36]

    Springer, 2024.doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7681-2

    Cosimo Bambi, Leonardo Modesto, and Ilya Shapiro, editors.Handbook of Quantum Gravity. Springer, 2024.doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7681-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7681-2 2024

  35. [37]

    Lectures in quantum gravity.SciPost Phys

    Ivano Basile, Luca Buoninfante, Francesco Di Filippo, Benjamin Knorr, Alessia Platania, and Anna Tokareva. Lectures in quantum gravity.SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, 98:1, 2025.arXiv:2412.08690, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.98

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.98 2025

  36. [38]

    Int J Theor Phys 10, 363 (1974).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807638

    Gregory Walter Horndeski. Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 10:363–384, 1974.doi:10.1007/BF01807638

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01807638 1974

  37. [39]

    Kobayashi, M

    Tsutomu Kobayashi, Masahide Yamaguchi, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations.Prog. Theor. Phys., 126:511–529, 2011.arXiv:1105.5723, doi:10.1143/PTP.126.511

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.126.511 2011

  38. [40]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , keywords =

    Antonio De Felice and Shinji Tsujikawa. f(R) theories.Living Rev. Rel., 13:3, 2010.arXiv:1002.4928, doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2010-3 2010

  39. [41]

    f(R) theories of gravity,

    Thomas P. Sotiriou and Valerio Faraoni. f(R) Theories Of Gravity.Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:451–497, 2010. arXiv:0805.1726,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 2010

  40. [43]

    Fast and power efficient GPU-based explicit elastic wave propagation analysis by low- ordered orthogonal voxel finite element with INT8 tensor cores

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou. Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution.Phys. Rept., 692:1–104, 2017.arXiv:1705.11098,doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2017.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2017

  41. [44]

    Wald.General Relativity

    Robert M. Wald.General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984.doi:10.7208/chicago/ 9780226870373.001.0001

    work page doi:10.7208/chicago/ 1984

  42. [45]

    Towards the Einstein-Hilbert Action via Conformal Transformation.Phys

    Kei-ichi Maeda. Towards the Einstein-Hilbert Action via Conformal Transformation.Phys. Rev. D, 39:3159, 1989.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.3159

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.3159 1989

  43. [46]

    Conformal transformations in classical gravita- tional theories and in cosmology.Fund

    Valerio Faraoni, Edgard Gunzig, and Pasquale Nardone. Conformal transformations in classical gravita- tional theories and in cosmology.Fund. Cosmic Phys., 20:121, 1999.arXiv:gr-qc/9811047

    work page arXiv 1999

  44. [47]

    Fujii and K

    Y. Fujii and K. Maeda.The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 7 2007.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535093

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535093 2007

  45. [48]

    Lalak, D

    Z. Lalak, D. Langlois, S. Pokorski, and K. Turzynski. Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation.JCAP, 07:014, 2007.arXiv:0704.0212,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/07/014

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/07/014 2007

  46. [49]

    Armendariz-Picon, T

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour, and Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov. k - inflation.Phys. Lett. B, 458:209–218, 1999.arXiv:hep-th/9904075,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00603-6 1999

  47. [50]

    Mukhanov

    Jaume Garriga and Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov. Perturbations in k-inflation.Phys. Lett. B, 458:219–225, 1999.arXiv:hep-th/9904176,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00602-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00602-4 1999

  48. [51]

    Aamodt, et al., Midrapidity antiproton-to-proton ra- tio in pp collisions at √s= 0.9 and 7 TeV measured by the ALICE experiment, Phys

    Tsutomu Kobayashi, Masahide Yamaguchi, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:231302, 2010.arXiv:1008.0603,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105. 231302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105 2010

  49. [52]

    Li, T., Zhang, G., Do, Q

    Hideo Kodama and Misao Sasaki. Cosmological Perturbation Theory.Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 78:1–166, 1984.doi:10.1143/PTPS.78.1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.78.1 1984

  50. [53]

    Theory of cosmological perturba- tions. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and Robert H. Brandenberger. Theory of cosmological per- turbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions. Phys. Rept., 215:203–333, 1992.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-z 1992

  51. [54]

    Malik and David Wands

    Karim A. Malik and David Wands. Cosmological perturbations.Phys. Rept., 475:1–51, 2009.arXiv: 0809.4944,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.001 2009

  52. [55]

    Multifield extension ofGinflation

    Tsutomu Kobayashi, Norihiro Tanahashi, and Masahide Yamaguchi. Multifield extension ofGinflation. Phys. Rev. D, 88(8):083504, 2013.arXiv:1308.4798,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.083504 2013

  53. [56]

    Robustness of Starobinsky inflation in a minimal two-field scalar-tensor completion

    Boris Latosh. arXiv:2604.15931 Code and Data. Mendeley Data, April 2026. Dataset, Version 1.doi: 10.17632/mvpcwgnfx4.1. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.17632/mvpcwgnfx4.1 2026