Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 92 references

On the relative CNO underabundance in quasar absorption systems at $z \sim 3$ arising from Population III enrichment and attenuation by intermediate-mass black holes and primordial baryon accretion

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Intermediate-mass black holes act as permanent matter sinks that attenuate metallicity, reconciling Population III yields with the observed CNO underabundance in quasar absorption systems at z around 3-6.

desk verdict The paper adapts Corazza 2022 by adding IMBHs as permanent sinks and tweaking the CSFR to suppress CNO overproduction in high-z absorbers, but the abstract gives no fits or numbers so the fix is hard to judge. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.18150 v1 submitted 2026-04-20 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords PopulationIIIstarsintermediate-massblackholescosmicchemicalenrichmentquasarabsorptionsystemsCNOabundancesmetallicityattenuationstarformationratebaryonaccretion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper adapts a semi-analytical model of cosmic chemical enrichment to fix an overproduction of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in predictions for high-redshift quasar absorption systems. It updates the cosmic star formation rate and adds intermediate-mass black holes as sinks that permanently sequester enriched material. This sequestration works together with Population III star yields and primordial baryon accretion to bring metal levels down to observed values. A sympathetic reader cares because the result ties black hole processes directly to the regulation of chemical abundances in the early universe.

What carries the argument

Intermediate-mass black holes modeled as permanent matter sinks that sequester mass and thereby attenuate metallicity without a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate.

What would settle it

Finding CNO abundances in quasar absorption systems at z ~ 3 that match the higher levels predicted by Population III yields without any sequestration by intermediate-mass black holes would show the model fails to explain the data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the interplay between Population III yields, the cosmic baryon accretion rate from primordial nucleosynthesis, and mass sequestration by intermediate-mass black holes mitigates the CNO excess in absorption systems of quasar spectra at z ≳ 3-6, with IMBHs providing the physical regulation necessary to reconcile theoretical yields with observed data.

Load-bearing premise

That intermediate-mass black holes can be modeled as permanent matter sinks without a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate, and that the adapted cosmic star formation rate plus Population III yields plus cosmic baryon accretion are sufficient to produce the observed CNO underabundance once sequestration is added.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The updated model reproduces the relative underabundance of C, N, and O in quasar absorption systems at z ≳ 3-6.
  • Mass sequestration by IMBHs supplies the regulatory mechanism that brings theoretical metal yields in line with observations.
  • Black hole-driven processes are essential regulators in the chemical evolution of the early universe.
  • IMBH accretion rates emerge as the main parameter needing refinement in future versions of the model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of early galaxy formation may need to add similar sequestration terms to avoid overpredicting metals at high redshift.
  • If sequestration dominates, total baryon accounting at z > 3 could shift because some enriched material is locked away from observable gas.
  • The same mechanism might apply to other light elements or to absorption systems at slightly lower redshifts where data are denser.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper adapts the semi-analytical cosmic chemical enrichment model of Corazza et al. (2022) to explain the observed underabundance of C, N, and O in quasar absorption systems at z ≳ 3–6. It updates the cosmic star formation rate (CSFR) normalization and introduces intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) as permanent matter sinks that sequester mass without a dynamic accretion rate, claiming that the interplay of Population III yields, cosmic baryon accretion rate (CBAR), and this sequestration resolves the CNO overproduction discrepancy.

Significance. If the sequestration mechanism holds under more complete dynamics, the work would strengthen the case for black-hole-driven regulation of early-universe metallicity and provide a concrete physical process linking IMBHs to observed high-z abundance patterns. The explicit identification of IMBH accretion rates for future work is a positive acknowledgment of model limitations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Model setup] Abstract and model description: The central claim that IMBHs provide the necessary metallicity attenuation rests on modeling them as permanent sinks with a constant removal rate, explicitly 'without accounting for a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate.' This simplification is load-bearing because the quantitative reduction in CNO is not demonstrated to survive once time-evolving accretion and possible ejection are restored; the paper defers this to future refinement, leaving the reconciliation dependent on an untested assumption.
  2. [Results] Results section: No quantitative fit statistics, error bars, or comparison tables are presented to show how well the adapted CSFR + Pop III yields + CBAR + sequestration reproduces the observed ASQS abundances. The claim of successful reconciliation therefore lacks the statistical grounding needed to assess whether the match is robust or the result of parameter tuning.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'abovementioned' and 'abovementioned elements'; replace with 'C, N, and O' for precision.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the exact functional form of the IMBH sequestration term (e.g., is it a fixed fraction of baryonic mass or tied to a specific IMBH mass function?) in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important aspects of our model's assumptions and presentation. We respond point by point to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / Model setup] Abstract and model description: The central claim that IMBHs provide the necessary metallicity attenuation rests on modeling them as permanent sinks with a constant removal rate, explicitly 'without accounting for a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate.' This simplification is load-bearing because the quantitative reduction in CNO is not demonstrated to survive once time-evolving accretion and possible ejection are restored; the paper defers this to future refinement, leaving the reconciliation dependent on an untested assumption.

    Authors: We agree that treating IMBHs as permanent sinks with a constant removal rate is a deliberate simplification that isolates the sequestration effect. This choice was made to demonstrate the potential regulatory role of mass removal in a semi-analytical framework without introducing additional free parameters for accretion dynamics at this stage. We will revise the abstract, model description, and discussion sections to more explicitly state the assumption, discuss its implications, and note that net mass sequestration (rather than the precise time dependence) is the key physical mechanism. While the full time-evolving case with possible ejection remains for future work, the current results show that even modest constant sequestration rates suffice to bring CNO abundances into agreement with observations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: No quantitative fit statistics, error bars, or comparison tables are presented to show how well the adapted CSFR + Pop III yields + CBAR + sequestration reproduces the observed ASQS abundances. The claim of successful reconciliation therefore lacks the statistical grounding needed to assess whether the match is robust or the result of parameter tuning.

    Authors: We accept that the absence of quantitative fit metrics weakens the presentation of the results. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the model predictions in the figures, include a comparison table of observed versus modeled median abundances (with 1-sigma ranges), and report a reduced chi-squared value for the CNO elements across the redshift range. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the goodness of fit and the degree to which the agreement depends on the specific parameter choices. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The quantitative demonstration that the CNO attenuation persists under fully time-dependent IMBH accretion and possible ejection requires dynamical modeling that lies outside the scope of the present semi-analytical study.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fitted IMBH sequestration presented as derived physical regulation for CNO underabundance

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We address this discrepancy by updating the cosmic star formation rate (CSFR) and introducing intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) as permanent matter sinks without accounting for a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate. Our results indicate that IMBHs act as essential metallicity attenuators through mass sequestration, providing the physical regulation necessary to reconcile theoretical yields with observed data."

    The paper introduces IMBHs as permanent sinks (a constant sequestration rate) specifically to address the discrepancy with observed abundances, without modeling dynamic accretion (explicitly deferred to future work). The conclusion that this provides the 'essential' regulation is therefore achieved by construction through this model adjustment to fit the data, rather than predicted independently from the yields or other first principles.

full rationale

The paper adapts an existing semi-analytical chemical enrichment model by modifying the CSFR and adding a tunable IMBH sink term to bring theoretical CNO yields into line with quasar absorption observations at high redshift. While the underlying framework is cited externally, the key innovation and claimed result—that IMBH sequestration supplies the missing attenuation—is directly the product of fitting this new parameter to the target data. This constitutes a fitted input presented as a prediction, though the overall model retains some independent structure from the base framework and Pop III yields.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on Pop III yields taken from prior literature, an updated but unspecified CSFR, and the assumption that IMBHs remove metals permanently without feedback or accretion dynamics. No independent evidence for the sequestration efficiency is supplied.

free parameters (2)
  • IMBH accretion rate
    Identified in the abstract as the primary parameter for future refinement; used to control the strength of the metallicity sink.
  • Updated cosmic star formation rate normalization
    Adjusted from the Corazza 2022 baseline to help match observed abundances.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Population III stellar yields produce excess CNO that must be attenuated by external sinks
    Invoked to justify the need for IMBH sequestration; taken as given from the discrepancy with observations.
  • ad hoc to paper Intermediate-mass black holes act as permanent matter sinks without dynamic accretion or feedback
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the modeling choice that enables the attenuation.
invented entities (1)
  • IMBHs as permanent metallicity sinks
    purpose: To sequester mass and metals and thereby lower CNO abundances to observed levels
    Postulated mechanism introduced to resolve the overproduction; no independent falsifiable prediction (e.g., specific IMBH mass function or accretion signature) is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the relative CNO underabundance in quasar absorption systems at $z \sim 3$ arising from Population III enrichment and attenuation by intermediate-mass black holes and primordial baryon accretion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.18150

@misc{pith2026260418150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the relative CNO underabundance in quasar absorption systems at $z \sim 3$ arising from Population III enrichment and attenuation by intermediate-mass black holes and primordial baryon accretion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.18150}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.18150}
}
abstract

This article uses an adapted version of the semi-analytical model of cosmic chemical enrichment developed by \citet{Corazza_2022} to reproduce the observed abundances of C, N, and O in absorption systems of quasar spectra (ASQS) at $z \gtrsim 3-6$, addressing an overproduction issue of the abovementioned elements. We address this discrepancy by updating the cosmic star formation rate (CSFR) and introducing intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) as permanent matter sinks without accounting for a dynamic cosmic mass accretion rate. Our results indicate that IMBHs act as essential metallicity attenuators through mass sequestration, providing the physical regulation necessary to reconcile theoretical yields with observed data. We show that the interplay between Pop III yields, the cosmic baryon accretion rate (CBAR) from primordial nucleosynthesis, and mass sequestration by IMBHs mitigates the CNO excess. This work reinforces the role of black hole-driven processes in the chemical evolution of the Universe and identifies IMBH accretion rates as a primary area for future refinement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Corazza, L.C., Miranda, O.D., Wuensche, C.A.: Potential contributions of Pop III and intermediate-mass Pop II stars to cosmic chemical enrichment. Astron. Astrophys.668, 191 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244334

  2. [2]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group, Workman, R.L., et al.: Review of particle physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2022(8) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097 https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2022/8/083C01/49175539/ptac097.pdf. 083C01 11

  3. [3]

    al 47(10), 674–685 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063773721100054

    Kurichin, O.A., Kislitsyn, P.A., Ivanchik, A.V.: Determination of HII region metallicity in the context of estimating the primordial helium abundance. al 47(10), 674–685 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063773721100054

  4. [4]

    Kurichin, O.A.,et al.: A new determination of the primordial helium abundance using the analyses of HII region spectra from SDSS. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 502(2), 3045–3056 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab215

  5. [5]

    Academic Press, San Diego (2021)

    Dodelson, S., Schmidt, F.: Modern Cosmology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (2021)

  6. [6]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M.,et al.: Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters. Astron. Astrophys.641, 6 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201833910 arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Weinberg, S.: Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

  8. [8]

    Wolfe, A.M., Gawiser, E., Prochaska, J.X.: Damped Lyαsystems. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.43(1), 861–918 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro. 42.053102.133950

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    A study based on theE−XQR−30 spec- troscopic sample (2024)

    Sodini, A., D’Odorico, V., Salvadori, S., et al.: Evidence of Pop III stars chemical signature in neutral gas atz∼6. A study based on theE−XQR−30 spec- troscopic sample (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202349062 . https: //arxiv.org/abs/2404.10722

  2. [10]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07706

    Salvadori, S., D’Odorico, V., Saccardi, A., et al.: First stars signatures in high-z absorbers (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07706

  3. [11]

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., Fumagalli, M., Pettini, M.: Oxygen-enhanced extremely metal-poor damped ly-αsystems: A signpost of the first stars? Astrophys. J. 929(2), 158 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4503

  4. [12]

    Cooke, R., Pettini, M., Steidel, C.C., Rudie, G.C., Nissen, P.E.: The most metal- poor damped lyαsystems: insights into chemical evolution in the very metal-poor regime. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.417(2), 1534–1558 (2011) https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19365.x arXiv:1...

  5. [13]

    Cooke, R., Pettini, M., Steidel, C.C., Rudie, G.C., Jorgenson, R.A.: A carbon- enhanced metal-poor damped lyαsystem: probing gas from population III nucleosynthesis? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.412(2), 1047–1058 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17966.x arXiv:1011....

  6. [14]

    Astrophys

    Kobayashi, C., Tominaga, N., Nomoto, K.: Chemical enrichment in the carbon- enhanced damped Lyαsystems by population III supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 730(2), 14 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/L14 12

  7. [15]

    Pettini, M., Zych, B.J., Steidel, C.C., Chaffee, F.H.: C, N, O abundances in the most metal-poor damped Lyman alpha systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385(4), 2011–2024 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12951.x

  8. [17]

    Greene, J.E., Strader, J., Ho, L.C.: Intermediate-mass black holes. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.58, 257–312 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-032620-021835 arXiv:1911.09678 [astro-ph.GA]

  9. [18]

    Pereira, E.S., Miranda, O.D.: Supermassive black holes: connecting the growth to the cosmic star formation rate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.418(1), 30–34 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01137.x arXiv:1108.3745 [astro- ph.CO]

  10. [19]

    Astrophys

    Isobe, Y.,et al.: JWST Identification of Extremely Low C/N Galaxies with [N/O] ≳0.5 at z 6-10 Evidencing the Early CNO-cycle Enrichment and a Connection with Globular Cluster Formation. Astrophys. J.959(2), 100 (2023) https://doi. org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be arXiv:2307.00710 ...

  11. [20]

    Astrophys

    Zhu, Y., Egami, E., Fan, X.: Quasar radiative feedback may suppress galaxy growth on intergalactic scales at z = 6.3. Astrophys. J. Lett.995(1), 5 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae1f8e arXiv:2509.00153 [astro-ph.GA]

  12. [21]

    Mo, H., Bosch, F., White, S.: The Intergalactic Medium, pp. 689–740. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). Chap. 16. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511807244

  13. [22]

    Khare, P., Kulkarni, V.P., P´ eroux, C.,et al.: The nature of damped Lymanα and sub-damped Lymanαabsorbers. Astron. Astrophys.464(2), 487–493 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066186 arXiv:astro-ph/0608127 [astro-ph]

  14. [23]

    Astrophys

    Daigne, F., Olive, K.A., Silk, J., Stoehr, F., Vangioni, E.: Hierarchical growth and cosmic star formation: Enrichment, outflows, and supernova rates. Astrophys. J. 647(2), 773 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1086/503092

  15. [24]

    Astrophys

    Press, W.H., Schechter, P.: Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by self-similar gravitational condensation. Astrophys. J.187, 425–438 (1974) https: //doi.org/10.1086/152650

  16. [25]

    Pereira, E.S., Miranda, O.D.: Stochastic background of gravitational waves generated by pre-galactic black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401(3), 1924–1932 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15774.x 13 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/401/3/1924/383055...

  17. [26]

    Miranda, O.D.: The cosmological lithium problem. Astron. Astrophys.701, 164 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554482

  18. [27]

    Astrophys

    Gribel, C., Miranda, O.D., Vilas-Boas, J.W.: Connecting the cosmic star forma- tion rate with the local star formation. Astrophys. J.849(2), 108 (2017)

  19. [28]

    New Astron.41, 48–52 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Pereira, E.S., Miranda, O.D.: The role of the dark matter haloes on the cosmic star formation rate. New Astron.41, 48–52 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. newast.2015.06.001

  20. [29]

    Schneider, R., Hunt, L., Valiante, R.: The dust content of the most metal-poor star-forming galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.457(2), 1842–1850 (2016)

  21. [30]

    Madau, P., Dickinson, M.: Cosmic star-formation history. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52(1), 415–486 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-081811-125615

  22. [31]

    Robertson, B.E.: Galaxy formation and reionization: Key unknowns and expected breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.60(1), 121–158 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-120221-044656

  23. [32]

    Astrophys

    Robertson, B.,et al.: Earliest galaxies in the jades origins field: Luminos- ity function and cosmic star formation rate density 300 myr after the big bang. Astrophys. J.970(1), 31 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d arXiv:2312.10033 [astro-ph.GA]

  24. [33]

    Astrophys

    Johnson, B.D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., Speagle, J.S.: Stellar population inference with prospector. Astrophys. J. Suppl.254(2), 22 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4365/abef67 arXiv:2012.01426 [astro-ph.GA]

  25. [34]

    Eldridge, J.J., Stanway, E.R., Xiao, L., McClelland, L.A.S., Taylor, G., Ng, M., Greis, S.M.L., Bray, J.C.: Binary population and spectral synthesis version 2.1: Construction, observational verification, and new results. Publ. of the Astr. Soc. Aust.34, 58–61 (2017) https://do...

  26. [35]

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J.E., White, M.: The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evo- lution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J.699(1), 486–506...

  27. [36]

    Possible Population III signatures at z = 10.6 in the halo of GN-z11

    Maiolino, R.,et al.: JADES. Possible Population III signatures at z = 10.6 in the halo of GN-z11. Astron. Astrophys.687, 67 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 14 0004-6361/202347087 arXiv:2306.00953 [astro-ph.GA]

  28. [37]

    Chantavat, T., Chongchitnan, S., Silk, J.: The most massive Population III stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.522(3), 3256–3262 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stad1196

  29. [38]

    Donnan, C.T.,et al.: The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z≈8 – 15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.518(4), 6011–6040 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3472 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article...

  30. [39]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics Library

    Matteucci, F.: Chemical Evolution of Galaxies, 1st edn. Astronomy and Astrophysics Library. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-22491-1

  31. [40]

    Hennebelle, P., Grudi´ c, M.Y.: The Physical Origin of the Stellar Initial Mass Function. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.62(1), 63–111 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-031748 arXiv:2404.07301 [astro-ph.GA]

  32. [41]

    Science295(5552), 82–91 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science

    Kroupa, P.: The Initial Mass Function of Stars: Evidence for Uniformity in Vari- able Systems. Science295(5552), 82–91 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1067524 arXiv:astro-ph/0201098 [astro-ph]

  33. [42]

    Astrophys

    Salpeter, E.E.: The rate of star formation in the galaxy. Astrophys. J.129, 608 (1959)

  34. [43]

    Vangioni, E.,et al.: Cosmological evolution of the nitrogen abundance. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.477(1), 56–66 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty559 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/477/1/56/24615170/sty559.pdf

  35. [44]

    Bouwens, R.J.,et al.: Evolution of the uv lf from z∼15 to z∼8 using new JWST NIRCam medium-band observations over the HUDF/XDF. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.523(1), 1036–1055 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1145

  36. [45]

    Astrophys

    Harikane, Y.,et al.: A comprehensive study of galaxies at z∼9–16 found in the early JWST data: Ultraviolet luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history at the pre-reionization epoch. Astrophys. J. Suppl.265(1), 5 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9

  37. [46]

    Astrophys

    Katsianis, A., Yang, X., Zheng, X.: The observed cosmic star formation rate density has an evolution that resembles aγ(a, bt) distribution and can be described successfully by only two parameters. Astrophys. J.919(2), 88 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac11f2 arXiv:21...

  38. [47]

    Gruppioni, C.,et al.: The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: The nature, luminos- ity function, and star formation history of dusty galaxies up to z=6. Astron. 15 Astrophys.643, 8 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038487

  39. [48]

    Astrophys

    Bouwens, R.,et al.: The ALMA spectroscopic survey large program: The infrared excess of z = 1.5-10 UV-selected galaxies and the implied high-redshift star formation history. Astrophys. J.902(2), 112 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/abb830 arXiv:2009.10727 [astro-ph.GA]

  40. [49]

    Driver, S.P.,et al.: GAMA/G10-COSMOS/3D-HST: the 0< z <5 cosmic star formation history, stellar-mass, and dust-mass densities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.475(3), 2891–2935 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2728

  41. [50]

    Rowan-Robinson, M., Oliver, S., Wang, L.,et al.: The star formation rate density fromz= 1 to 6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.461(1), 1100–1111 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1169 arXiv:1605.03937 [astro-ph.GA]

  42. [51]

    Astrophys

    Hopkins, A.M.: On the evolution of star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J.615(1), 209–221 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/424032 arXiv:astro-ph/0407170 [astro- ph]

  43. [52]

    IOP ebooks

    Rauscher, T.: Essentials of Nucleosynthesis and Theoretical Nuclear Astro- physics. IOP ebooks. IOP, Bristol, UK (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 978-0-7503-1335-3

  44. [53]

    Raiteri, C.M., Villata, M., Navarro, J.F.: Simulations of galactic chemical evolu- tion. i. o and fe abundances in a simple collapse model. Astron. Astrophys.315, 105–115 (1996)

  45. [54]

    Astrophys

    Copi, C.J.: A stochastic approach to chemical evolution. Astrophys. J.487(2), 704 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/304627

  46. [55]

    Scalo, J.M.: The stellar initial mass function. Fund. Cosmic Phys.11, 1–278 (1986)

  47. [56]

    Spera, M., Mapelli, M., Bressan, A.: The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.451(4), 4086–4103 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1161 arXiv:1505.05201 [astro-ph.SR]

  48. [57]

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., Fumagalli, M.,et al.: A survey of extremely metal-poor gas at cosmic noon: Evidence of elevated [O/Fe]. Astron. Astrophys.691, 285 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451147

  49. [58]

    Klessen, R.S., Glover, S.C.O.: The first stars: Formation, properties, and impact. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.61(Volume 61, 2023), 65–130 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453 arXiv:2303.12500 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [59]

    Astrophys

    Heger, A., Woosley, S.E.: Nucleosynthesis and evolution of massive metal-free 16 stars. Astrophys. J.724(1), 341–373 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 724/1/341 arXiv:0803.3161 [astro-ph]

  51. [60]

    Astro- phys

    Heger, A., Woosley, S.E.: The nucleosynthetic signature of population III. Astro- phys. J.567(1), 532–543 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1086/338487 arXiv:astro- ph/0107037 [astro-ph]

  52. [61]

    Astrophys

    Tinsley, B.M.: Analytical approximations to the evolution of galaxies. Astrophys. J.186, 35–49 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1086/152476

  53. [62]

    Private communication (2026)

    Macedo, M., Souza, C.A.W., Miranda, O.D., Castro Milone, A.: Investigations into the potential contribution of Population III stars to the chemical enrichment of galaxies at high redshifts. Private communication (2026)

  54. [64]

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A.M., Grevesse, N.: The chemical make-up of the sun: A 2020 vision. Astron. Astrophys.653, 141 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202140445

  55. [65]

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A.J., Scott, P.: The chemical composition of the sun. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.47(1), 481–522 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 arXiv:0909.0948 [astro-ph.SR]

  56. [66]

    Campbell, S.W., Lattanzio, J.C.: Evolution and nucleosynthesis of extremely metal-poor and metal-free low- and intermediate-mass stars. i. stellar yield tables and the cemps. Astron. Astrophys.490(2), 769–776 (2008) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361:200809597 arXiv:0901.0799 ...

  57. [67]

    Astrophys

    Saccardi, A.,et al.: Evidence of first stars-enriched gas in high-redshift absorbers*. Astrophys. J.948(1), 35 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc39f

  58. [68]

    Poudel, S., Kulkarni, V.P., Som, D.,et al.: Metals and a search for molecules in the distant Universe: Magellan MIKE observations of sub-DLAs at 2< z <

  59. [69]

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.504(1), 731–743 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stab926

  60. [70]

    De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Mattsson, L., Petitjean, P., Srianand, R., Gavignaud, I., Jenkins, E.B.: Dust-depletion sequences in damped Lyman-αabsorbers: A unified picture from low-metallicity systems to the Galaxy. Astron. Astrophys.596, 97 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-636...

  61. [71]

    Dutta, R., Srianand, R., Rahmani, H., Petitjean, P., Noterdaeme, P., Ledoux, C.: A study of low-metallicity DLAs at high redshift and CII* as a probe of their 17 physical conditions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.440(1), 307–326 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu260

  62. [72]

    on the deficiency of argon in dla systems

    Zafar, T., Vladilo, G., P´ eroux, C., Molaro, P., Centuri´ on, M., D’Odorico, V., Abbas, K., Popping, A.: The eso uves advanced data products quasar sample – iv. on the deficiency of argon in dla systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.445(2), 2093–2105 (2014) https://doi.org/10.109...

  63. [73]

    Astrophys

    Kulkarni, V.P., Meiring, J., Som, D., P´ eroux, C., York, D.G., Khare, P., Lau- roesch, J.T.: A Super-damped LyαQuasi-stellar Object Absorber at z = 2.2. Astrophys. J.749(2), 176 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/176

  64. [74]

    Astrophys

    Penprase, B.E., Prochaska, J.X., Sargent, W.L.W., Toro-Martinez, I., Beeler, D.J.: Keck Echellette Spectrograph and Imager Observations of Metal-poor Damped LyαSystems. Astrophys. J.721(1), 1–25 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/721/1/1

  65. [75]

    Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., Srianand, R.: The nitrogen and oxygen abundances in the neutral gas at high redshift. Astron. Astrophys.480(2), 349–357 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078607

  66. [76]

    Construction of the sample and chemical abundance measurements

    Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., P´ eroux, C., Kim, T.-S., D’Odorico, S., McMahon, R.G.: A homogeneous sample of sub-damped Lymanαsystems - I. Construction of the sample and chemical abundance measurements. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.345(2), 447–479 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-...

  67. [77]

    Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Prochaska, J.X., D’Odorico, S.: New detections of Mn, Ti and Mg in damped Lyαsystems: Toward reconciling the dust/nucleosynthesis degeneracy. Astron. Astrophys.391(3), 801–807 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:20020843

  68. [78]

    Astrophys

    Prochaska, J.X., Wolfe, A.M.: Chemical abundances of the damped Lyαsystems atz >1.5. Astrophys. J. Suppl.121(2), 369–415 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 313200 arXiv:astro-ph/9810381 [astro-ph]

  69. [79]

    Astrophys

    Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A.I., Lugaro, M.: The origin of elements from carbon to uranium. Astrophys. J.900(2), 179 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ abae65

  70. [80]

    Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., Tominaga, N.: Nucleosynthesis in stars and the chem- ical enrichment of galaxies. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.51(1), 457–509 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956

  71. [81]

    (eds.) Chemo- dynamical Evolution of Galaxies, pp

    Kobayashi, C., Taylor, P.: In: Tanihata, I., Toki, H., Kajino, T. (eds.) Chemo- dynamical Evolution of Galaxies, pp. 3211–3259. Springer, Singapore (2023) 18

  72. [82]

    Pettini, M., Ellison, S.L., Bergeron, J., Petitjean, P.: The abundances of nitrogen and oxygen in damped Lyman-αsystems. Astron. Astrophys. (2002)

  73. [83]

    Astrophys

    Rafelski, M., Neeleman, M., Fumagalli, M.,et al.: The rapid decline in metallicity of damped ly-αsystems at z∼5. Astrophys. J. Lett.782(2), 29 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L29

  74. [84]

    Astrophys

    Rafelski, M., Wolfe, A.M., Prochaska, J.X.,et al.: Metallicity evolution of damped lyαsystems out toz∼5. Astrophys. J.755(2), 89 (2012) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/755/2/89

  75. [85]

    Calura, F., Matteucci, F., Vladilo, G.: Chemical evolution and nature of damped lymanαsystems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.340(1), 59–72 (2003) https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06197.x

  76. [86]

    Vanni, I., Salvadori, S., Sk´ ulad´ ottir: Are all metal-poor stars of second- generation? arXiv reprint:astro-ph (2023) arXiv:2305.02358 [astro-ph.GA]

  77. [87]

    Nandal, D., Farrell, E., Buldgen, G., Meynet, G., Ekstr¨ om, S.: The evolution and impact of∼3000M ⊙ stars in the early universe. Astron. Astrophys.685, 159 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202345997

  78. [88]

    Nandal, D., Regan, J.A., Woods, T.E.,et al.: Explaining the high nitrogen abun- dances observed in high-zgalaxies via Population III stars of a few thousand solar masses. Astron. Astrophys.683, 156 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202348035 arXiv:2402.03428 [astro-ph.GA]

  79. [89]

    Astrophys

    Woods, T.E., Patrick, S., Elford, J.S., Whalen, D.J., Heger, A.: On the evolution of supermassive primordial stars in cosmological flows. Astrophys. J.915(2), 110 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abfaf9

  80. [90]

    Liu, B., Bromm, V.: When did population III star formation end? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.497(3), 2839–2854 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/staa2143 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/497/3/2839/33638808/staa2143.pdf

  81. [91]

    Astrophys

    Nandal, D., Loeb, A.: Supermassive Stars Match the Spectral Signatures of JWST’s Little Red Dots. Astrophys. J.998(1), 124 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ae32f3

  82. [92]

    Astrophys

    Nandal, D., Whalen, D.J., Latif, M.A., Heger, A.: 1000–10,000M ⊙ Primordial Stars Created the Nitrogen Excess in GS 3073 atz= 5.55. Astrophys. J. Lett. 994(1), 11 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae1a63 arXiv:2502.04435 [astro-ph.GA]

  83. [93]

    19 Astrophys

    Obuchi, S., Ichikawa, K., Yamada, S.,et al.: Discovery of an X-Ray luminous radio-loud quasar atz= 3.4: A possible transitional Super-Eddington phase. 19 Astrophys. J.997(2), 156 (2026) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d6d

  84. [94]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025(10), 094 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/094 20

    Luberto, J., Furlanetto, S.R.: The implications of overmassive black holes atz >5 for quasar and black hole growth. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025(10), 094 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/094 20

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.