arxiv: 2012.01426 · v1 · submitted 2020-12-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Stellar Population Inference with Prospector

Benjamin D. Johnson , Joel Leja , Charlie Conroy , Joshua S. Speagle

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 22:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

keywords stellar populationsgalaxy evolutionphotometryspectroscopyMonte Carlo samplingstar formation historydust attenuationspectral energy distribution

0 comments

The pith

Prospector infers stellar population parameters from UV-to-IR photometry and spectroscopy by forward modeling and Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Prospector as a software tool that builds detailed physical models of stellar populations and compares them directly to observed data across a wide range of wavelengths. Instead of relying on fixed grids of precomputed models, it uses statistical sampling to explore the full range of possible parameter values, even when those parameters are correlated. This approach supports more realistic descriptions of star formation histories, dust, and nebular emission than earlier methods allowed. A sympathetic reader would care because improved parameter recovery from existing and future datasets can sharpen our picture of how galaxies assemble and evolve.

Core claim

We present prospector, a flexible code for inferring stellar population parameters from photometry and spectroscopy spanning UV through IR wavelengths. This code is based on forward modeling the data and Monte Carlo sampling the posterior parameter distribution, enabling complex models and exploration of moderate dimensional parameter spaces.

What carries the argument

The Prospector code, which forward-models galaxy spectral energy distributions and uses Monte Carlo sampling to draw from the posterior distribution over parameters such as star-formation history, dust attenuation, and metallicity.

If this is right

Stellar population models with many correlated parameters can be fit directly to multi-wavelength data without grid interpolation.
Complex star-formation histories, dust properties, and nebular emission can be included in the inference.
Both photometric and spectroscopic observations from UV through IR can be modeled in a single framework.
Moderate-dimensional parameter spaces become accessible for routine analysis of individual galaxies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If sampling remains efficient, the code could be applied to large surveys to map average star-formation histories across galaxy populations.
Future extensions might incorporate additional components such as active galactic nuclei or variable initial mass functions and test their impact on recovered parameters.
The same forward-modeling plus sampling strategy could be adapted to other wavelength regimes or to joint fits with dynamical or chemical data.

Load-bearing premise

That the underlying stellar population synthesis models are realistic enough to match real galaxies and that Monte Carlo sampling can explore the correlated parameter space without prohibitive cost or convergence failure.

What would settle it

A test case in which Prospector yields parameter posteriors that systematically disagree with independent constraints from other methods, or in which the sampler fails to converge for typical datasets within feasible compute time.

read the original abstract

Inference of the physical properties of stellar populations from observed photometry and spectroscopy is a key goal in the study of galaxy evolution. In recent years the quality and quantity of the available data has increased, and there have been corresponding efforts to increase the realism of the stellar population models used to interpret these observations. Describing the observed galaxy spectral energy distributions in detail now requires physical models with a large number of highly correlated parameters. These models do not fit easily on grids and necessitate a full exploration of the available parameter space. We present prospector, a flexible code for inferring stellar population parameters from photometry and spectroscopy spanning UV through IR wavelengths. This code is based on forward modeling the data and Monte Carlo sampling the posterior parameter distribution, enabling complex models and exploration of moderate dimensional parameter spaces. We describe the key ingredients of the code and discuss the general philosophy driving the design of these ingredients. We demonstrate some capabilities of the code on several datasets, including mock and real data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Prospector is a practical software package for Bayesian SED fitting that handles complex models via MCMC, but it is an implementation of established techniques rather than a new theoretical advance.

read the letter

The main thing here is that Prospector gives users a flexible Python tool to forward-model photometry and spectroscopy from UV through IR and sample the posterior with Monte Carlo methods. It targets the problem of fitting high-dimensional stellar population models that do not sit easily on grids. The design choices around star-formation histories, dust, and nebular emission are laid out clearly, and the code is structured to let people explore parameter correlations without custom scripting from scratch. The demonstrations on mock data and a few real galaxies show that it recovers inputs and produces reasonable uncertainties in the cases they test. That is useful engineering work for the subfield. The paper does a decent job of explaining why they made certain decisions about the likelihood and priors, which helps readers understand the trade-offs. Open release of the code is also a plus for anyone who wants to inspect or extend it. The soft spots are mostly inherited from the broader field rather than introduced by this work. Results still depend on how realistic the underlying stellar population synthesis models are, especially for dust geometry and late-stage stellar phases, and the paper does not claim to fix those. MCMC sampling in moderate dimensions can have convergence issues that need careful checking, and while the abstract mentions this capability, the strength of the validation rests on how thoroughly the full methods section tests recovery and diagnostics. No load-bearing contradictions appear in the description. This paper is for astronomers who already do or want to do detailed SED fitting and need a ready framework that scales beyond simple grids. Readers who care about reproducible inference pipelines or who are building their own tools will get the most out of it. It deserves a serious referee because the core claim is modest and grounded, and peer review can tighten the validation sections and documentation without requiring major changes. I would send it to review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Prospector, a flexible Python code for inferring stellar population parameters (e.g., star-formation histories, dust attenuation, nebular emission) from UV-to-IR photometry and spectroscopy. The approach relies on forward modeling of the observed spectral energy distributions followed by Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior parameter distribution, enabling exploration of moderate-dimensional, correlated parameter spaces that cannot be handled by grid-based methods. The paper outlines the code's key ingredients and design philosophy, then demonstrates its use on both mock and real datasets.

Significance. If the implementation and validation hold, this is a useful contribution to galaxy evolution studies. It supplies an open, extensible tool that supports complex, physically motivated models and full posterior inference, addressing the growing need for flexible fitting of high-quality multi-wavelength data. The emphasis on forward modeling and reproducibility via shared code is a clear strength for the community.

major comments (2)

[Demonstrations] Demonstrations section: the recovery of input parameters from mock data is shown but lacks quantitative metrics (e.g., bias, scatter, or coverage of credible intervals) and explicit convergence diagnostics for the Monte Carlo chains; without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the claimed efficient exploration of parameter space is achieved in practice.
[Code ingredients] Code description: the treatment of nebular emission and dust models is summarized at a high level, but the paper does not specify how degeneracies between these components and star-formation history parameters are mitigated or propagated in the posterior; this is load-bearing for the central claim of reliable inference in complex models.

minor comments (3)

A table summarizing the free parameters, their priors, and default ranges would improve clarity and allow readers to reproduce the demonstrated fits.
Figure captions should explicitly state the wavelength coverage, number of data points, and any data exclusion rules applied to the real datasets.
The design philosophy discussion would benefit from a simple workflow diagram showing the forward-modeling and sampling steps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of the demonstrations and the description of the inference framework. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Demonstrations section: the recovery of input parameters from mock data is shown but lacks quantitative metrics (e.g., bias, scatter, or coverage of credible intervals) and explicit convergence diagnostics for the Monte Carlo chains; without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the claimed efficient exploration of parameter space is achieved in practice.

Authors: We agree that the addition of quantitative metrics and convergence diagnostics will strengthen the demonstrations. In the revised manuscript we have added bias, scatter, and credible-interval coverage statistics for the recovered parameters from the mock data. We have also included explicit MCMC convergence diagnostics (Gelman-Rubin statistics and autocorrelation times) to document the sampling efficiency. revision: yes
Referee: Code description: the treatment of nebular emission and dust models is summarized at a high level, but the paper does not specify how degeneracies between these components and star-formation history parameters are mitigated or propagated in the posterior; this is load-bearing for the central claim of reliable inference in complex models.

Authors: The Bayesian posterior sampling framework does not attempt to mitigate degeneracies but instead propagates them by exploring the full joint posterior. We have expanded the code-ingredients section to state this explicitly: the forward-modeling approach combined with MCMC sampling naturally marginalizes over correlations among star-formation history, dust, and nebular parameters, yielding properly calibrated uncertainties and covariances in the posterior. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; paper describes software tool

full rationale

The manuscript presents Prospector as a forward-modeling code using Monte Carlo sampling for stellar population inference from multi-wavelength data. No derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction, self-definition, or self-citation load-bearing. The contribution is the code architecture, parameter exploration philosophy, and demonstrations on mock/real data; these are self-contained tool descriptions without equations or results that loop back to fitted quantities. Central claims rest on the software design itself rather than any circular inference step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software-description paper; the central claim rests on the correctness of standard Bayesian inference and existing stellar population synthesis libraries rather than new axioms or entities introduced here.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Stellar population synthesis models accurately predict observed spectral energy distributions when supplied with parameters for age, metallicity, star-formation history, dust, and nebular emission.
Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for forward modeling.
domain assumption Monte Carlo sampling can efficiently explore the posterior in moderate-dimensional parameter spaces for these models.
Stated as the method enabling complex models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1371 out tokens · 38178 ms · 2026-05-10T22:08:08.265004+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Resolving the Unresolved Galactic Winds in Multi-phase Models. I. Methodology and Application
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

A new fitting methodology applied to UV absorption data recovers radial trends in galactic wind velocities and mass-loading factors by constraining initial hot and cool phase parameters in a multiphase model.
Resolved Maps of Gas and Dust in a Massive Quiescent Galaxy at z=2 from INQUEST-JWST: Evidence of Accretion and Rejuvenation
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Resolved gas and dust maps in a z=2 quiescent galaxy reveal accreted material from tidal interactions and a past star-formation rejuvenation, indicating that gas content variations are not solely due to consumption ti...
A Census of Na D-traced neutral ISM and outflows at $0.6<z<4$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A JWST census detects neutral ISM absorption in 76 of 309 galaxies at 0.6<z<4 and outflows in 26, indicating AGN-driven neutral outflows dominate in quiescent systems at cosmic noon.
A Multiwavelength Assessment Disfavoring the X-ray Binary Origin of He III Regions in Metal-Poor Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Accreting X-ray sources cannot supply enough EUV photons to account for He III regions in metal-poor star-forming dwarf galaxies.
Are Nucleosynthetic Yields Universal? Interpreting the Multi-Elemental Abundances of Quiescent Galaxies over Cosmic Time Using Milky Way Stars
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Milky Way abundance trends act as effective empirical proxies for nucleosynthetic yields, recovering alpha and Fe-peak abundances in quiescent galaxies with 0.05 dex median offset versus 0.23 dex for theory, indicatin...
SPURS: Bursty Star Formation in an Extremely Luminous Weak Emission Line Galaxy at $z=9.3$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A massive galaxy at z=9.3 shows bursty star formation with a recent downturn and sits in a small ionized bubble in a neutral IGM.
DeepDive: Simultaneous Formation of Massive Quiescent Galaxies in High-Redshift Galaxy Proto-clusters
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST data show massive quiescent galaxies in high-redshift proto-clusters formed and quenched simultaneously, with AGN signatures, indicating environmental triggering of quenching.
SAGUI: SED-based Segmentation of Multi-band Galaxy Images -- Application to JADES in GOODS-South
astro-ph.IM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

SAGUI introduces a two-stage segmentation framework for multi-band galaxy images that combines starlet decomposition, spectral similarity analysis, and copula statistics to identify structures and recover low-surface-...
GRB 210704A: A Luminous Fast Blue Transient in a GRB Afterglow at $z = 2.34$
astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

GRB 210704A at z=2.34 shows a luminous fast blue transient excess peaking at ~7 days, modeled as refreshed shock emission and linked to LFBOTs alongside a high-Lorentz-factor jet.
A Natural $\gtrsim 100\times$ Telescope: Discovery of the Strongly Lensed Type II SN 2025mkn at $z=1.37$
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Discovery of a gravitationally lensed Type II supernova at z=1.37 with magnification ≳100×, confirmed via multi-telescope spectra and imaging.
Electromagnetic Follow-up of the Sub-Solar Mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm: Kilonova Constraints and a Coincident IIb Supernova
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

No kilonova detected from sub-solar GW candidate S251112cm, but coincident IIb supernova SN 2025adtq yields suggestive evidence for the superkilonova channel, though inconclusive after accounting for chance coincidence.
The role of small-scale environments in the quenching of massive galaxies at $1<z<5$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Massive quiescent galaxies at high redshifts show elevated fractions in small-scale overdensities, indicating environmental quenching via galaxy interactions plays a major role.
The Eye of Sauron in SN 2025ngs: a Short-plateau Cousin of SN 1998S with Evidence for a Ring-like Circumstellar Medium
astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

SN 2025ngs is a short-plateau supernova resembling SN 1998S but fainter, with spectral evidence for interaction with a proximate ring-like circumstellar medium around a supergiant progenitor.
Sparks II: Panchromatic SED modeling and galaxy physical properties across the starburst to post-starburst sequence
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Panchromatic SED modeling yields SFRs with smaller offset and scatter than optical-only fits for starburst to post-starburst galaxies, while Prospector AGN torus models distinguish AGN but underpredict luminosities by...
Comparative Bayesian SED Fitting of PEARLSDG
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Revised distance and SED fitting demonstrate PEARLSDG is a typical quenched dwarf galaxy on the mass-metallicity relation rather than an exotic outlier.
Calibrating Photometric Mid-Infrared Star Formation Rates for JWST
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Rest-frame 6-8um MIRI luminosity provides broken power-law SFR calibrations with 0.2-0.3 dex scatter and UV+IR composites at 0.15 dex, supporting robust use above log M* ~9 up to z~3.
On the relative CNO underabundance in quasar absorption systems at $z \sim 3$ arising from Population III enrichment and attenuation by intermediate-mass black holes and primordial baryon accretion
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Intermediate-mass black holes acting as permanent matter sinks, combined with updated cosmic star formation rates and primordial baryon accretion, reduce the overpredicted CNO abundances from Population III stars to m...
Interpreting Galaxy Physical Properties Using Stellar Population Synthesis
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

The thesis assesses the reliability of stellar population synthesis modeling for galaxy physical properties using limited multi-band photometry rather than full spectra.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers

[1]

2011, ApJ, 737, 47

Acquaviva, V., Gawiser, E., & Guaita, L. 2011, ApJ, 737, 47

work page 2011
[2]

2020, ApJS, 249, 3

Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3

work page 2020
[3]

2020, ApJS, 249, 5 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

Alsing, J., Peiris, H., Leja, J., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 5 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123

work page 2020
[4]

C., Johnson, J

Becker, J. C., Johnson, J. A., Vand erburg, A., & Morton, T. D. 2015, ApJS, 217, 29

work page 2015
[5]

F., & de Jong, R

Bell, E. F., & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212

work page 2001
[6]

R., Bershady, M

Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28

work page 2017
[7]

S., & Schlegel, D

Bolton, A. S., & Schlegel, D. J. 2010, PASP, 122, 248

work page 2010
[8]

2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127

work page 2012
[9]

2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

work page 2003
[10]

2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413

Burgarella, D., Buat, V., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413

work page 2005
[11]

J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B

Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C., & Johnson, B. D. 2017, ApJ, 840, 44

work page 2017
[12]

C., et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

work page 2000
[13]

2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

work page 2017
[14]

2004, PASP, 116, 138

Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138

work page 2004
[15]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

work page 1989
[16]

C., McLure, R

Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

work page 2018
[17]

G., et al

Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R. G., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 117

work page 2009
[18]

Charlot, S., & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718

work page 2000
[19]

2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415

Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415

work page 2016
[20]

2016, ApJ, 823, 102 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodr´ e, L., Stasi´ nska, G., &

Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodr´ e, L., Stasi´ nska, G., &

work page 2016
[21]

Gomes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363

work page 2005
[22]

2013, ARA&A, 51, 393

Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393

work page 2013
[23]

Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833

work page 2010
[24]

E., & White, M

Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486

work page 2009
[25]

G., & Lind, K

Conroy, C., Villaume, A., van Dokkum, P. G., & Lind, K. 2018, ApJ, 854, 139

work page 2018
[26]

Conroy, C., White, M., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 708, 58

work page 2010
[27]

A., Conroy, C., van Dokkum, P., & Speagle, J

Cook, B. A., Conroy, C., van Dokkum, P., & Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 78

work page 2019
[28]

2007, AJ, 133, 468 da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D

Cordier, D., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., & Salaris, M. 2007, AJ, 133, 468 da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1595

work page 2007
[29]

E., & Torrey, P

Diemer, B., Sparre, M., Abramson, L. E., & Torrey, P. 2017, ApJ, 839, 26

work page 2017
[30]

1997, NewA, 2, 397

Dolphin, A. 1997, NewA, 2, 397

work page 1997
[31]

T., & Li, A

Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810

work page 2007
[32]

2018, ApJL, 852, L7

Ebeling, H., Stockmann, M., Richard, J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 852, L7

work page 2018
[33]

J., Stanway, E

Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058

work page 2017
[34]

Faber, S. M. 1977, in Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations, ed. B. M. Tinsley & D. C. Larson, Richard B. Gehret, 157

work page 1977
[35]

J., Porter, R

Ferland, G. J., Porter, R. L., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2013, RMxAA, 49, 137

work page 2013
[36]

P., & Bridges, M

Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., & Bridges, M. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1601

work page 2009
[37]

1997, A&A, 500, 507

Fioc, M., & Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1997, A&A, 500, 507

work page 1997
[38]

2014, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.12157

Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., & Johnson, B. 2014, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.12157

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.12157 2014
[39]

W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306

work page 2013
[40]

D., Yang, Y., Zabludoﬀ, A., et al

French, K. D., Yang, Y., Zabludoﬀ, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 1

work page 2015
[41]

S., I., Hunter, D

Gallagher, J. S., I., Hunter, D. A., & Tutukov, A. V. 1984, ApJ, 284, 544

work page 1984
[42]

D., Oemler, A., Dressler, A., et al

Gladders, M. D., Oemler, A., Dressler, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 64

work page 2013
[43]

2010, Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 5, 65

Goodman, J., & Weare, J. 2010, Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 5, 65

work page 2010
[44]

D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., et al

Gordon, K. D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 85

work page 2014
[45]

2007, MNRAS, 381, 187

Goto, T. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 187

work page 2007
[46]

P., Goulding, A

Greco, J. P., Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 112

work page 2018
[47]

E., Siegmund, W

Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332 26 Johnson et al

work page 2006
[48]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357–362

work page 2020
[49]

2001, ApJS, 136, 25

Harris, J., & Zaritsky, D. 2001, ApJS, 136, 25

work page 2001
[50]

Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487

work page 1996
[51]

F., Jimenez, R., & Lahav, O

Heavens, A. F., Jimenez, R., & Lahav, O. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 965

work page 2000
[52]

2019, Statistics and Computing, 29, 891

Higson, E., Handley, W., Hobson, M., & Lasenby, A. 2019, Statistics and Computing, 29, 891

work page 2019
[53]

Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data

Hogg, D. W., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1008.4686

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[54]

2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

Hunter, J. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

work page 2007
[55]

2017, ApJ, 838, 127

Iyer, K., & Gawiser, E. 2017, ApJ, 838, 127

work page 2017
[56]

G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S

Iyer, K. G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 116

work page 2019
[57]

Johnson, B. D. 2019, SEDPY: Modules for storing and operating on astronomical source spectral energy distribution, , , ascl:1905.026 Kauﬀmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33

work page 2019
[58]

D., Benson, A

Kelson, D. D., Benson, A. J., & Abramson, L. E. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1610.06566

work page arXiv 2016
[59]

J., Groves, B., Kauﬀmann, G., & Heckman, T

Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauﬀmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961

work page 2006
[60]

2009, A&A, 501, 1269

Koleva, M., Prugniel, P., Bouchard, A., & Wu, Y. 2009, A&A, 501, 1269

work page 2009
[61]

2008, MNRAS, 385, 1998

Soubiran, C. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1998

work page 2008
[62]

2013, ApJL, 775, L16 Lan¸ con, A., & Wood, P

Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16 Lan¸ con, A., & Wood, P. R. 2000, A&AS, 146, 217 Le Borgne, D., Rocca-Volmerange, B., Prugniel, P., et al. 2004, A&A, 425, 881

work page 2013
[63]

L., van Dyk, D

Lee, H., Kashyap, V. L., van Dyk, D. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 126

work page 2011
[64]

C., et al

Lee, S.-K., Idzi, R., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 100

work page 2009
[65]

Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 3

work page 2019
[66]

D., Conroy, C., & van Dokkum, P

Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & van Dokkum, P. 2018, ApJ, 854, 62

work page 2018
[67]

2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2006.03599

Lower, S., Narayanan, D., Leja, J., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2006.03599

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

work page 2005
[69]

2008, A&A, 482, 883

Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 883

work page 2008
[70]

1994, A&AS, 103, 97

Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&AS, 103, 97

work page 1994
[71]

2017, ApJL, 845, L8

Nicholl, M., Berger, E., Margutti, R., et al. 2017, ApJL, 845, L8

work page 2017
[72]

2009, A&A, 507, 1793

Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793

work page 2009
[73]

2006, MNRAS, 365, 46

Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lan¸ con, A., & Thi´ ebaut, E. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 46

work page 2006
[74]

A., Brammer, G., van Dokkum, P

Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 129 Oyarz´ un, G. A., Bundy, K., Westfall, K. B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 111 Paciﬁci, C., Kassin, S. A., Weiner, B., Charlot, S., &

work page 2016
[75]

Gardner, J. P. 2013, ApJL, 762, L15 Paciﬁci, C., da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 786

work page 2013
[76]

J., Laine, S., et al

Pandya, V., Romanowsky, A. J., Laine, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 29 Patr´ ıcio, V., Richard, J., Carton, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 18

work page 2018
[77]

Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 21

work page 2007
[78]

2009, International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 4, 296

Peterson, P. 2009, International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 4, 296

work page 2009
[79]

2012, MNRAS, 422, 3285

Pforr, J., Maraston, C., & Tonini, C. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3285

work page 2012
[80]

M., Charlot, S., et al

Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 267 S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Peletier, R. F., Jim´ enez-Vicente, J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 703

work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.