Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 99 references

The Thermodynamic and Kinematic Evolution of Circumgalactic Gas around $z=1$ in the IllustrisTNG model

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Circumgalactic gas evolves into distinct cold and warm-hot phases within 500 million years regardless of initial position.

desk verdict TNG tracer study gives 500 Myr CGM phase separation and 400 Myr kinematic decorrelation at z=1, but the numbers are set by the simulation's subgrid feedback and mixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.24836 v1 submitted 2026-04-27 astro-ph.GA

Daniel DeFelippis , Shy Genel , Greg L. Bryan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords circumgalacticmediumgalacticfeedbackmultiphasegasthermodynamicevolutionkinematictracerparticlescosmologicalsimulationionphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper follows individual gas parcels around galaxies at redshift one by tracing their paths forward in time. It shows that the gas mixes rapidly between different temperatures and densities. Within about 500 million years the gas settles into cold material close to the galaxy and warmer material farther out, no matter where it began. Feedback from the galaxy itself drives most of this change by heating and expelling gas that has cooled and fallen inward. The result implies that the region around galaxies is continually reset on short timescales.

What carries the argument

Monte Carlo tracer particles that follow the gas parcels in a Lagrangian manner to record changes in their temperature, density, and velocity over time.

What would settle it

Observations that find kinematic properties of circumgalactic gas remain correlated with their starting conditions for much longer than 400 million years, or that show no clear separation into cold inner and warm-hot outer phases, would falsify the central result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Gas in the circumgalactic medium mixes between different temperature and density phases quickly and within approximately 500 million years evolves into distinct cold (around 10,000 K) and warm-hot (around 300,000 K) phases at small and large distances from the galaxy, respectively, regardless of its initial distance from the galaxy center. This is largely driven by feedback from the galaxy, which heats and ejects cold gas that had previously cooled and accreted toward and occasionally into the galaxy from the outer regions.

Load-bearing premise

The simulation's treatment of gas cooling, mixing, and feedback from the galaxy accurately reflects real physical processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Autocorrelations of kinematic quantities take approximately 400 million years to fully decorrelate from initial values.
  • Gas associated with O VI remains in its narrow temperature-density range hundreds of millions of years longer than gas associated with Mg II or C IV.
  • Observations of different ions can therefore sample circumgalactic gas at different points in its evolutionary cycle even when the gas occupies the same location.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Surveys that measure multiple ions at once may be able to separate recently processed gas from older gas in the same halo.
  • Galaxy formation models will need to incorporate this rapid phase separation when calculating how much fresh gas reaches the central galaxy.
  • The fact that final phase depends little on starting radius suggests feedback mixes the entire circumgalactic region on timescales shorter than a typical orbital period.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the short-timescale thermodynamic and kinematic evolution of CGM gas at z=1 using Monte Carlo tracer particles in a high-cadence (~2 Myr) subregion of the TNG100 simulation. It follows gas around six galaxies in 10^{11.5}-10^{12} M_⊙ halos and reports that, independent of initial halo-centric radius, the gas mixes rapidly and separates within ~500 Myr into cold (T≈10^4 K) phases at small radii and warm-hot (T≈10^{5.5} K) phases at large radii, driven by galactic feedback that heats and ejects previously accreted cold gas. Kinematic autocorrelations decorrelate on ~400 Myr timescales, and ion-associated phases (O VI-like) persist longer than Mg II-like or C IV-like phases.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work is significant for constraining the multiphase structure and dynamical processing of the CGM on observationally relevant timescales. The Lagrangian high-cadence tracer approach is a strength, enabling direct measurement of mixing, ejection, and phase persistence without circularity in the reported quantities. The finding that different ions probe distinct evolutionary states even when cospatial has direct implications for absorption-line studies.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods and Results] The central claim that CGM gas reaches distinct cold/warm-hot phases within ≈500 Myr independent of initial radius rests on the specific subgrid cooling, star formation, wind, and AGN prescriptions plus the Monte Carlo tracer advection in TNG. No resolution variations, feedback-parameter sweeps, or tracer-convergence tests at the ~2 Myr cadence are reported, so it is unclear whether the decorrelation and phase-separation timescales are robust or set by numerical mixing and wind-launching efficiency.
  2. [Results] The sample comprises only six galaxies in a narrow halo-mass range (10^{11.5}-10^{12} M_⊙). The assertion that the radial phase separation occurs 'regardless of its initial (z=1) halo-centric radius' therefore lacks statistical power; a larger sample or explicit variation across halo mass and environment is needed to support the generality of the result within the model.
  3. [Results] The phase definitions (cold T≈10^4 K, warm-hot T≈10^{5.5} K, and narrow bins for O VI-, Mg II-, and C IV-like gas) are load-bearing for the ion-persistence and mixing claims, yet no sensitivity tests to bin boundaries or to the precise temperature-density cuts are provided.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that autocorrelations 'take ≈400 Myr to fully decorrelate,' but the precise definition of 'fully decorrelate' (e.g., dropping below a threshold or reaching noise level) and the exact kinematic quantities used should be stated explicitly in the main text.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for the autocorrelation functions and phase-evolution plots should include the number of tracer particles per galaxy and the precise time sampling to allow readers to assess numerical robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work's significance and the Lagrangian tracer approach. We address each major comment below with clarifications and indicate revisions to the manuscript where they strengthen the presentation without altering the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results] The central claim that CGM gas reaches distinct cold/warm-hot phases within ≈500 Myr independent of initial radius rests on the specific subgrid cooling, star formation, wind, and AGN prescriptions plus the Monte Carlo tracer advection in TNG. No resolution variations, feedback-parameter sweeps, or tracer-convergence tests at the ~2 Myr cadence are reported, so it is unclear whether the decorrelation and phase-separation timescales are robust or set by numerical mixing and wind-launching efficiency.

    Authors: We agree that the reported timescales are specific to the IllustrisTNG subgrid model and the Monte Carlo tracer implementation in the high-cadence TNG100 subregion. The ~2 Myr cadence was selected to resolve short-term evolution while the tracer particles minimize artificial mixing compared to Eulerian methods. Explicit resolution or feedback-parameter variations were not performed because the study utilizes an existing high-output-frequency subregion rather than new runs. In the revised manuscript we will add an expanded discussion of model limitations, potential numerical influences on mixing rates, and the fact that the results characterize behavior within this widely used simulation framework. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] The sample comprises only six galaxies in a narrow halo-mass range (10^{11.5}-10^{12} M_⊙). The assertion that the radial phase separation occurs 'regardless of its initial (z=1) halo-centric radius' therefore lacks statistical power; a larger sample or explicit variation across halo mass and environment is needed to support the generality of the result within the model.

    Authors: The sample of six galaxies in the stated mass range is indeed limited and was chosen to permit the computationally expensive high time cadence required for Lagrangian tracking of individual gas parcels. The statement that phase separation occurs independent of initial radius refers to the consistent behavior seen across the tracked particles in these systems. We will revise the text to qualify this claim explicitly as applying to the galaxies studied here, to avoid implying broader statistical generality, and to note that extending the sample would require additional high-cadence simulation outputs. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] The phase definitions (cold T≈10^4 K, warm-hot T≈10^{5.5} K, and narrow bins for O VI-, Mg II-, and C IV-like gas) are load-bearing for the ion-persistence and mixing claims, yet no sensitivity tests to bin boundaries or to the precise temperature-density cuts are provided.

    Authors: The temperature and density ranges follow standard literature conventions for multiphase CGM gas and common ions. While we did not include explicit sensitivity tests in the original analysis, the main conclusions on rapid mixing and differential ion-phase lifetimes arise from the overall thermodynamic trajectories rather than the precise edges of the bins. In the revised manuscript we will add a short justification of the adopted cuts together with a brief demonstration that the reported timescales are insensitive to modest shifts in the boundaries. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all results are direct measurements from simulation snapshots and tracer histories

full rationale

The paper analyzes CGM gas evolution by following Monte Carlo tracers forward in time within the existing TNG100 simulation at ~2 Myr cadence. Reported quantities (phase separation into cold/warm-hot components within ~500 Myr independent of initial radius, kinematic autocorrelation decorrelation on ~400 Myr, ion-specific phase persistence times) are computed directly from the snapshot data and tracer particle histories. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to define or predict these outputs in terms of themselves; the analysis contains no self-definitional steps, no 'predictions' that reduce to input fits, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The central claims are empirical measurements within the model, not tautological derivations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on the fidelity of the IllustrisTNG subgrid feedback and cooling modules plus the accuracy of Monte Carlo tracers for Lagrangian gas tracking; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • halo mass range
    Galaxies selected in 10^11.5-10^12 M_sun halos at z=1
  • time cadence = 2 Myr
    High-cadence output of approximately 2 Myr chosen for short-timescale tracking
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption IllustrisTNG subgrid physics and numerical resolution sufficiently capture CGM mixing, cooling, and feedback on Myr timescales
    Invoked implicitly when interpreting tracer evolution as physical rather than numerical.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Thermodynamic and Kinematic Evolution of Circumgalactic Gas around $z=1$ in the IllustrisTNG model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.24836

@misc{pith2026260424836,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Thermodynamic and Kinematic Evolution of Circumgalactic Gas around $z=1$ in the IllustrisTNG model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.24836}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.24836}
}
abstract

The circumgalactic medium (CGM) is known to contain multiphase gas in various stages of evolution and interaction with the galaxy. In order to characterize its detailed behavior on short timescales, we use a subregion of the TNG100 cosmological simulation to study the evolution of the $z=1$ CGM around six galaxies in $10^{11.5}-10^{12}$ $M_{\odot}$ halos at a high time cadence of $\approx2$ Myr. We use Monte Carlo tracer particles to follow this CGM gas forward in time in a Lagrangian way and determine how its thermodynamic and kinematic properties change. We find that CGM gas mixes between different temperature and density phases quickly and within $\approx500$ Myr evolves into distinct cold ($T\approx10^4$ $\rm{K}$) and warm-hot ($T\approx10^{5.5}$ $\rm{K}$) phases at small and large distances from the galaxy, respectively, regardless of its initial ($z=1$) halo-centric radius. This is largely driven by feedback from the galaxy, which heats and ejects cold gas that had previously cooled and accreted toward and occasionally into the galaxy from the outer CGM. We see signatures of this process in autocorrelations of kinematic quantities, which take $\approx400$ Myr to fully decorrelate from their initial values, suggesting a timescale over which feedback disrupts and reprocesses CGM gas. We also examine gas in narrow temperature and density ranges associated with commonly observed ions and find that gas that is O VI-like stays in its phase for hundreds of Myr longer than gas that is Mg II-like or C IV-like, suggesting that CGM observations of different species could probe gas in different evolutionary states, even if the gas is cospatial.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24836 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The instantaneous (top) and cumulative (bot￾tom) percentage of the z = 1 CGM that ever enters the galaxy as a function of time for all six halos in our sample. The thick purple line is halo5819 (see view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The temperature distribution of CGM gas in halo5819 with an initial radius between 27.5 and 32.5 kpc (left), between 67.5 and 72.5 kpc (middle), and between 107.5 and 112.5 kpc (right) at z = 1 as a function of time. All distances are in physical coordinates. In the top row, the color shows the number of tracers, which is proportional to the mass, in each temperature bin at any given time. The second, third, and fou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Entropy (left column), pressure (middle column), and density (right column) distributions of CGM gas from the same halo as view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature distributions of CGM gas at an initial radius of 30 ± 2.5 kpc as defined in
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The change in radius of tracers in the z = 1 CGM of halo5819 as a function of their initial radial velocities. Tracers are separated by whether their initial temperatures are above (top row) or below (bottom row) 3×104 K. Each column shows a different amount of time af…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The mean autocorrelations of the radial veloc￾ities and specific angular momenta of z = 1 CGM tracers from halo5819 starting at three different initial radii. Trac￾ers are separated by whether their initial temperatures are above (top panel) or below (bottom panel) 3 ×…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The fraction of all z = 1 CGM gas from halo5819 associated with three different ions as a function of time, separated by being initially associated with Mgii (left), Civ (middle), and Ovi (right). By construction, these fractions sum to 1 at the initial time because th…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A complement to
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The location of CGM gas from halo5819 with an initial radius of ≈ 30 kpc (top), ≈ 70 kpc (middle), and ≈ 110 kpc (bottom) at z = 1 as a function of time separated by the observed phase of that gas. The coldest and densest gas (Mgii–like; left panel) is always seen clos…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Median entropy radial profiles of the warm–hot (solid lines) and cold (dashed lines) phases of the CGM for our sample of six halos at z = 1. The 1σ spread for halo5819 is shown and is comparable to the other halos. The warm– hot phase has a relatively flat entropy pro…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Temperature (top) and entropy (bottom) evolution of three tracers from halo5819 colored by their radius and pressure, demonstrating the variability in the behavior of individual tracers compared to the population studied in the rest of the paper. REFERENCES Anand, A.,…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab871 blue , 504, 65 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504...65A

    Anand, A., Nelson, D., & Kauffmann, G. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 65, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab871

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab871 2021

  2. [2]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1930 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Armillotta, L., Fraternali, F., & Marinacci, F. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1930

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1930 2016

  3. [3]

    V., Vogelsberger M., Torrey P., Li H., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.4091B 524, 4091

    Barbani, F., Pascale, R., Marinacci, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 4091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2152

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2152 2023

  4. [4]

    S., Sharma P., Dutta A., Nath B

    Bisht, M. S., Sharma, P., Dutta, A., & Nath, B. B. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 1573, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1319 Bouch´ e, N., Hohensee, W., Vargas, R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 801, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21114.x Bouch´ e, N. F., Wendt, M., Zabl, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451093

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1319 2025

  5. [5]

    Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons

    Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 495, 80, doi: 10.1086/305262

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/305262 1998

  6. [6]

    Wind from a starburst galaxy nucleus

    Chevalier, R. A., & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44, doi: 10.1038/317044a0

    work page doi:10.1038/317044a0 1985

  7. [7]

    P., Sharma , P., & Quataert , E

    Choudhury, P. P., Sharma, P., & Quataert, E. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3195, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1857

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1857 2019

  8. [8]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4359C 508, 4359

    Cooper, T. J., Rudie, G. C., Chen, H.-W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4359, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2869

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2869 2021

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    2021, ApJ, 918, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e8e

    Das, S., Mathur, S., Gupta, A., & Krongold, Y. 2021, ApJ, 918, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e8e

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2019, ApJL, 882, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3b09 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al

    Das, S., Mathur, S., Nicastro, F., & Krongold, Y. 2019, ApJL, 882, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3b09 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2827, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz937

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    F., Genel, S., et al

    DeFelippis, D., Bouch´ e, N. F., Genel, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2cbf

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    L., & Fall, S

    DeFelippis, D., Genel, S., Bryan, G. L., & Fall, S. M. 2017, ApJ, 841, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6dfc

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    L., et al

    DeFelippis, D., Genel, S., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8a4a 20

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    S., Sharma, P., et al

    Dutta, A., Bisht, M. S., Sharma, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 5117, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae977

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 3561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3653

    Dutta, A., Sharma, P., & Nelson, D. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3653

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 5022, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3147

    Dutta, R., Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5022, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3147

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Faerman, Y., Sternberg, A., & McKee, C. F. 2017, ApJ, 835, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/52 —. 2020, ApJ, 893, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ffc Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., & Oh, S. P. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 131, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125203

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    2017a, MNRAS, 470, L39, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx072

    Fielding, D., Quataert, E., Martizzi, D., & Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A. 2017a, MNRAS, 470, L39, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx072

    doi

  11. [19]

    Fielding, D., Quataert, E., McCourt, M., & Thompson, T. A. 2017b, MNRAS, 466, 3810, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3326

    doi

  12. [20]

    B., & Bryan, G

    Fielding, D. B., & Bryan, G. L. 2022, ApJ, 924, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f41

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    B., Tonnesen, S., DeFelippis, D., et al

    Fielding, D. B., Tonnesen, S., DeFelippis, D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc6d

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    C., Emami, R., Somerville, R

    Forbes, J. C., Emami, R., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb53e

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1383

    Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., Nelson, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1383

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 3445, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1345

    Ghosh, R., Dutta, A., & Sharma, P. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 3445, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1345

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Grand, R. J. J., van de Voort, F., Zjupa, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4786, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2928

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    Gronke, M., & Oh, S. P. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L111, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly131

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 3581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa902

    Hafen, Z., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa902

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., Kacprzak, G. G., & Churchill, C. W. 2017, ApJ, 835, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/267

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., & Turner, M. L. 2019, ApJ, 875, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ec2

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Miller, M

    Hodges-Kluck, E. J., Miller, M. J., & Bregman, J. N. 2016, ApJ, 822, 21, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/21

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    2022, MNRAS, 509, 6091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3363

    Huang, S., Katz, N., Cottle, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 6091, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3363

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Fielding, D. B. 2024, ApJ, 972, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5965

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    B., Smith, B

    Hummels, C. B., Smith, B. D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab378f

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    P., & Masterson, P

    Ji, S., Oh, S. P., & Masterson, P. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 737, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1248

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    W., Kruijssen, J

    Keller, B. W., Kruijssen, J. M. D., & Wadsley, J. W. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 2149, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa380

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    J., Jenkins, A., Deason, A., et al

    Kelly, A. J., Jenkins, A., Deason, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3113, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1019

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Kim, C.-G., Kim, J.-G., Gong, M., & Ostriker, E. C. 2023, ApJ, 946, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbd3a

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Kwak, K., & Shelton, R. L. 2010, ApJ, 719, 523, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/523

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    2020, ApJ, 897, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab989a

    Lan, T.-W. 2020, ApJ, 897, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab989a

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    J., & Remming, I

    Liang, C. J., & Remming, I. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3403

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    L., Li, Y., Li, M., & Fielding, D

    Lochhaas, C., Bryan, G. L., Li, Y., Li, M., & Fielding, D. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 1461, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa358

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    S., et al

    Lochhaas, C., Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb06

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    2010, MNRAS, 404, 1464, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16352.x

    Marinacci, F., Binney, J., Fraternali, F., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1464, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16352.x

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    2011, MNRAS, 415, 1534, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18810.x

    Marinacci, F., Fraternali, F., Nipoti, C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1534, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18810.x

    2011 doi

  38. [46]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2391

    Springel, V. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2391

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 5113, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

    Marinacci, F., Vogelsberger, M., Pakmor, R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5113, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 5093, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3497

    Gupta, A. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5093, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3497

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    McCourt, M., Sharma, P., Quataert, E., & Parrish, I. J. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 3319, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19972.x

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    P., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al

    Naiman, J. P., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1206, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty618

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 —

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 —. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 2391, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2419

    Nelson, D., Sharma, P., Pillepich, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2391, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2419

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Churchill, C

    Nielsen, N. M., Churchill, C. W., & Kacprzak, G. G. 2013a, ApJ, 776, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/115

    doi

  46. [54]

    Murphy, M. T. 2013b, ApJ, 776, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/114

    doi

  47. [55]

    M., Churchill, C

    Nielsen, N. M., Churchill, C. W., Kacprzak, G. G., Murphy, M. T., & Evans, J. L. 2015, ApJ, 812, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/83 21

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    Oppenheimer, B. D. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2963, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1918

    2018 doi

  49. [57]

    D., Segers, M., Schaye, J., Richings, A

    Oppenheimer, B. D., Segers, M., Schaye, J., Richings, A. J., & Crain, R. A. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2967

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    B., Bryan, G

    Pandya, V., Fielding, D. B., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf3ea

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al

    Peeples, M. S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0654

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science Engineering, 9, 21, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 P´ eroux, C., Nelson, D., van de Voort, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2462, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2888

    2007 doi

  53. [61]

    2018a, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al. 2018a, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    doi

  54. [62]

    2018b, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P

    Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., et al. 2018b, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    2015, ApJ, 811, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/108

    Prasad, D., Sharma, P., & Babul, A. 2015, ApJ, 811, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/108

    2015 doi

  56. [64]

    C., et al

    Qu, Z., Chen, H.-W., Rudie, G. C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4882, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2528 —. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 512, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1886

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    Ramesh, R., & Nelson, D. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae237

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.23416, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23416

    Ramesh, R., Nelson, D., Fielding, D., & Br¨ uggen, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.23416, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23416

    2026 doi

  59. [67]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 1843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1104

    Rathjen, T.-E., Naab, T., Walch, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1104

    2023 doi

  60. [68]

    C., Steidel, C

    Rudie, G. C., Steidel, C. C., Trainor, R. F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/67

    2012 doi

  61. [69]

    C., Nath, B

    Sarkar, K. C., Nath, B. B., Sharma, P., & Shchekinov, Y. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 328, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2760

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    A., Bower, R

    Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    E., & Mao, S

    Schneider, E. E., & Mao, S. A. 2024, ApJ, 966, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e8a

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    E., & Robertson, B

    Schneider, E. E., & Robertson, B. E. 2018, ApJ, 860, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac329

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    F., Zabl, J., et al

    Schroetter, I., Bouch´ e, N. F., Zabl, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1355, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1447

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    2025, MNRAS, 541, 2471, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1066

    Shah, H., van de Voort, F., Seta, A., & Federrath, C. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 2471, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1066

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    J., & Quataert, E

    Sharma, P., McCourt, M., Parrish, I. J., & Quataert, E. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1219, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22050.x

    2012 doi

  68. [76]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 2632, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz098

    Shimizu, I., Todoroki, K., Yajima, H., & Nagamine, K. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2632, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz098

    2019 doi

  69. [77]

    C., Fielding, D

    Smith, M. C., Fielding, D. B., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1216, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3168

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    Sobacchi, E., & Sormani, M. C. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 205, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz792

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    Klessen, R. S. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3370, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2500

    2018 doi

  72. [80]

    2024, A&A, 691, A259, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450544

    Sparre, M., Pfrommer, C., & Puchwein, E. 2024, A&A, 691, A259, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450544

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    2010 doi

  74. [82]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 289, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 289, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    2003 doi

  75. [83]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 1711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae824

    Stern, J., Fielding, D., Hafen, Z., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1711, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae824

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    R., et al

    Strawn, C., Roca-F` abrega, S., Primack, J. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12cb

    2024 doi

  78. [86]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3402

    Hernquist, L. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3402

    2019 doi

  79. [87]

    K., Wilde, M

    Tchernyshyov, K., Werk, J. K., Wilde, M. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc86a

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    A., Bell, E

    Terrazas, B. A., Bell, E. F., Pillepich, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 1888, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa374

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    A., Quataert, E., Zhang, D., & Weinberg, D

    Thompson, T. A., Quataert, E., Zhang, D., & Weinberg, D. H. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2428

    2016 doi

  82. [90]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 ¨Ubler, H., Naab, T., Oser, L., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2092, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1275 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science En...

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    R., & Wibking, B

    Vijayan, A., Krumholz, M. R., & Wibking, B. D. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10095, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3816 —. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 1706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf136

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    M., Meece, G., Li, Y., et al

    Voit, G. M., Meece, G., Li, Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7d04

    2017 doi

  85. [93]

    M., Pandya, V., Fielding, D

    Voit, G. M., Pandya, V., Fielding, D. B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad81d6

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 238, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1975

    Walch, S., Girichidis, P., Naab, T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 238, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1975

    2015 doi

  87. [95]

    2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., & Pakmor, R. 2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944 22

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944 22

    2017 doi

  89. [97]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/8

    2014 doi

  90. [98]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Cantalupo, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/54

    2016 doi

  91. [99]

    F., Schroetter, I., et al

    Zabl, J., Bouch´ e, N. F., Schroetter, I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz392

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.