pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01573 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-th

Recognition: 4 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The atomic nucleus as a bound system of 3A quarks

B.Kosyakov , E. Popov , M. Vronsky
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-th
keywords nuclei as 3A quarksFermi gas modelmodified bag modelgauge/gravity dualityAdS5 black holelightest glueballstable nuclear chargefinite periodic table
0
0 comments X

The pith

Refined gauge/gravity duality maps extremal black hole dynamics in AdS5 to stable nuclei, yielding maximum charge of 82.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the atomic nucleus as a bound system of 3A quarks using effective low-energy QCD. A Fermi gas model accounts for nearly equal numbers of up and down quarks in light nuclei up to calcium-40, while a modified bag model explains deviations and fits static properties in heavier nuclei. The central step applies a refined gauge/gravity duality that equates the internal dynamics of an extremal black hole in five-dimensional anti-de Sitter space to those of a stable subnuclear quark system in ordinary spacetime. This mapping predicts the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball and shows why the periodic table ends after a finite number of stable elements, with the maximum proton number calculated as 82, matching lead-208. A reader would care because it supplies a theoretical origin for the limited set of stable nuclei rather than treating the cutoff as purely empirical.

Core claim

The author establishes that a refined version of gauge/gravity duality states the dynamics inside an extremal black hole in AdS5 is mapped onto the corresponding dynamics of a stable subnuclear system in R1,3. This equivalence enables prediction of the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball. It also explains the finite number of stable elements by allowing calculation of the maximum allowed charge Z_max of stable heavy nuclei as approximately 82, which corresponds to the lead-208 nucleus.

What carries the argument

The refined gauge/gravity duality that maps the dynamics inside an extremal black hole in AdS5 onto the dynamics of a stable subnuclear system in flat spacetime.

If this is right

  • The Fermi gas model shows the number of down quarks is approximately equal to the number of up quarks in stable light nuclei up to calcium-40.
  • The modified bag model reproduces the static properties of a wide range of stable nuclei with reasonable accuracy.
  • The duality predicts the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball.
  • The framework accounts for the finite number of stable elements by limiting the maximum nuclear charge to 82, as realized in lead-208.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mapping holds, other nuclear observables such as binding energies might be computed from the black-hole dual without extra parameters.
  • Detection of the predicted glueball decay would provide a direct experimental test of the duality applied to nuclei.
  • The same approach could be explored for properties of unstable or superheavy nuclei by extending the black-hole correspondence.

Load-bearing premise

A refined gauge/gravity duality can be applied directly to map the dynamics of an extremal black hole in AdS5 onto the internal dynamics of stable nuclei without additional empirical tuning.

What would settle it

Observation of a stable nucleus with proton number greater than 82 or measurement of the lightest glueball decaying through a primary channel different from the one predicted by the duality mapping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01573 by B.Kosyakov, E. Popov, M. Vronsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Stable nuclides composed of Z protons and N neutrons do nuclei consisting only of neutrons not form under terrestrial conditions? 4 Yukawa’s paradigm, embodied in Eq. (1) does not provide answers to these questions, and the same is true of Eq. (3) and next terms of chiral perturbation theory. The nuclear shell model [11], designed to elucidate the nuclear energy spectrum, was patterned after the convention… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effective potential U (r; ε) The most important property of the effective potential U (r; ε) is that it develops a singularity, U (r; ε) ∼ γ (r − r∗) −2 , γ > 0 , (26) at a finite radius r∗. We thus see that the pseudospin symmetry condition (i), together with the asymptotic condition (ii), greatly enhances the interaction between the spin degrees of freedom of the quark and the mean field, resulting in a … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Average mean-field energy density ⟨u⟩, the energy density E associated with degeneracy pressure, and their difference ∆ = ⟨u⟩ − E (left panel); and the average binding energy per nucleon, B/A (right panel) the interquark QCD attraction does not exactly balance the mutual repulsion of quarks associated with degeneracy pressure. How is the balance of forces restored? Note that the graph of ∆(A) closely resem… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effective potential U(r; E) for a non-extremal BH (left); and for an extremal BH (right), provided that condition (39) is satisfied singularities of U(r; E) disappear, if we impose an additional condition (discussed below), the coefficient of the leading singularity becomes positive, so that U(r; E) behaves as shown in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: γγ collisions produce the following: (a) two-photon system; (b) a glueball; (c) a merger of a glueball and a meson. Photons, quarks, and gluons are shown, respectively, as sine waves, oriented straight lines, and spirals. The meson, composed of quark-antiquark pairs, is depicted as pairs of antiparallel rays To implement this plan, we need a photon collider. This is a device in which laser 17 view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Photon collider obtained in this way is ω ≈ 4E 2ω0 m2 + 4Eω0 , (44) where E and ω0 stand for the energy of the electrons and laser photons, respectively, and m is the electron mass. For example, to convert photons with energy ω0 = 1.17 eV, emitted by a neodymium glass laser, into γ-quanta with energy ω = 0.85 GeV, electrons with energy of at lest E = 7.5 GeV is required. The energy spectrum of the γ-quanta… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Possible decay channels of G ρ 0 decays into π +π − (≈ 100% fraction; Γ = 149.1 ± 0.8 MeV [65]), one may expect a significant increase in the yield of two π +π − pairs, each of which has the angular momentum quantum number l = 1, as √ s approaches to mG, view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The atomic nucleus, viewed as a system of bound quarks, should, in principle, be described within an effective theory of low-energy quantum chromodynamics. This paper provides an overview of recently developed models that embody essential features of the desired effective theory. The Fermi gas model helps explain why the number of $d$ quarks is approximately equal to that of $u$ quarks in stable light nuclei up to ${\rm {}^{40}_{20}Ca}$. A modified bag model accounts for the deviation from this rule in heavier nuclei. With this model, the static properties of a wide range of stable nuclei can be described with reasonable accuracy. To make the most of the modified bag model, it is useful to invoke gauge/gravity duality. A refined version of duality states: ``The dynamics inside an extremal black hole in ${\rm AdS}_5$ is mapped onto the corresponding dynamics of a stable subnuclear system in ${\mathbb R}_{1,3}$''. This version of duality allows one to predict the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball. Another implication is that this framework explains why the periodic table contains a finite number of stable elements. Duality makes it possible to calculate the maximum allowed charge $Z_{\rm max}$ of stable heavy nuclei: $Z_{\rm max}\approx 82$, which is the charge of the ${\rm {}^{208}_{82}Pb}$ nucleus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an overview of effective models treating the atomic nucleus as a bound system of 3A quarks. A Fermi-gas model is used to explain the near-equality of u and d quarks in stable light nuclei up to 40Ca. A modified bag model is introduced to account for deviations in heavier nuclei and to reproduce their static properties with reasonable accuracy. The paper then invokes a refined version of gauge/gravity duality, stating that the dynamics inside an extremal black hole in AdS5 maps onto the dynamics of a stable subnuclear system in R1,3; this mapping is claimed to predict the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball and to yield Z_max ≈ 82, the charge of 208Pb, thereby explaining the finite number of stable elements.

Significance. If the refined duality mapping could be derived explicitly from the AdS/CFT dictionary with a concrete, parameter-free translation between black-hole quantities and nuclear observables, the framework would offer a novel holographic explanation for nuclear stability limits and glueball phenomenology. The Fermi-gas and bag-model sections rest on conventional approaches and add little new insight. The duality step is the load-bearing novelty, but its current formulation as a postulate rather than a derived result limits the significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [abstract and duality paragraph] The refined duality is introduced (abstract and the paragraph beginning 'To make the most of the modified bag model...') as a postulate without derivation from the standard AdS/CFT dictionary or an explicit mapping that converts extremal black-hole charge/horizon radius into nuclear charge Z or binding energy. This renders the subsequent 'calculation' of Z_max non-predictive.
  2. [duality-implications paragraph] The claim that duality yields Z_max ≈ 82 (abstract and duality-implications paragraph) exactly reproduces the known charge of 208Pb; the manuscript supplies neither the intermediate steps, error estimates, nor an independent constraint from the preceding Fermi-gas or bag-model sections that would establish the result as a genuine prediction rather than a reproduction of input data.
  3. [modified bag model section] The modified bag model is asserted to describe static properties of a wide range of stable nuclei 'with reasonable accuracy,' yet no quantitative fits, tables of residuals, or comparison to experimental binding energies or radii are provided to support this statement.
minor comments (1)
  1. [duality paragraph] Notation for the refined duality mapping is introduced without defining the precise dictionary or the meaning of 'corresponding dynamics,' which leaves the subsequent implications under-specified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract and duality paragraph] The refined duality is introduced (abstract and the paragraph beginning 'To make the most of the modified bag model...') as a postulate without derivation from the standard AdS/CFT dictionary or an explicit mapping that converts extremal black-hole charge/horizon radius into nuclear charge Z or binding energy. This renders the subsequent 'calculation' of Z_max non-predictive.

    Authors: We agree that the refined duality is presented as a postulate rather than a direct derivation from the standard AdS/CFT dictionary. This formulation reflects its status as a novel conjecture adapted to the nuclear context, motivated by the need to map extremal black-hole dynamics to stable quark systems. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly label the mapping as a working hypothesis, expand the motivation section with references to related gauge/gravity applications, and clarify that all subsequent implications (including glueball decay and Z_max) are conditional on this assumption. A full first-principles derivation lies outside the scope of the present overview. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [duality-implications paragraph] The claim that duality yields Z_max ≈ 82 (abstract and duality-implications paragraph) exactly reproduces the known charge of 208Pb; the manuscript supplies neither the intermediate steps, error estimates, nor an independent constraint from the preceding Fermi-gas or bag-model sections that would establish the result as a genuine prediction rather than a reproduction of input data.

    Authors: The Z_max ≈ 82 value is obtained by imposing the extremality condition on the dual black-hole geometry and translating the resulting charge parameter to nuclear Z via the conjectured mapping. We acknowledge that the current text omits the explicit intermediate steps and error analysis. The revised version will expand the duality-implications paragraph to display these steps, including the correspondence between horizon quantities and nuclear observables, together with an approximate uncertainty arising from the effective-model assumptions. The Fermi-gas and bag-model sections supply the quark-content framework but are not used as fitting constraints for Z_max; the limit emerges as an independent global consequence of the duality. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [modified bag model section] The modified bag model is asserted to describe static properties of a wide range of stable nuclei 'with reasonable accuracy,' yet no quantitative fits, tables of residuals, or comparison to experimental binding energies or radii are provided to support this statement.

    Authors: We agree that the claim of reasonable accuracy requires quantitative backing. The present manuscript offers only a qualitative statement. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection containing a table of predicted versus experimental binding energies, charge radii, and other static observables for a representative set of nuclei (light to heavy), together with residuals and a brief assessment of the overall accuracy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Refined duality mapping asserted to reproduce known nuclear charge limit Z_max≈82

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A refined version of duality states: 'The dynamics inside an extremal black hole in AdS5 is mapped onto the corresponding dynamics of a stable subnuclear system in R1,3'. This version of duality allows one to predict the primary decay channel of the lightest glueball. Another implication is that this framework explains why the periodic table contains a finite number of stable elements. Duality makes it possible to calculate the maximum allowed charge Z_max of stable heavy nuclei: Z_max≈82, which is the charge of the 208_82 Pb nucleus."

    The refined duality is introduced precisely to map onto stable subnuclear systems and thereby 'calculate' Z_max≈82. The output is the known charge of the heaviest stable nucleus, with no independent parameter or dictionary shown that would force this number from AdS5 black-hole quantities alone; the result is therefore equivalent to reading off the observed limit and labeling it a prediction from the asserted mapping.

full rationale

The paper's central result is the calculation of Z_max≈82 matching the charge of 208Pb, obtained by invoking a 'refined version of duality' that maps AdS5 extremal black-hole dynamics onto stable nuclei. This mapping is stated as a postulate without an explicit dictionary or derivation from standard AdS/CFT, and the numerical value is presented as both a prediction and the observed limit. The preceding Fermi-gas and bag-model sections are conventional and do not constrain the duality step, so the headline claim reduces to fitting the known periodic-table endpoint rather than an independent derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on effective QCD models and a postulated refined duality whose validity is not independently established; free parameters in the bag model are implied but unspecified in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • modified bag model scales
    The modified bag model is adjusted to account for deviations from Fermi gas behavior in heavier nuclei, implying fitted constants for confinement or energy scales.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nuclei can be described as bound systems of 3A quarks within an effective low-energy QCD theory
    Opening premise that enables the entire modeling approach.
  • domain assumption Fermi gas model applies to explain approximate equality of u and d quarks in light nuclei up to calcium-40
    Invoked directly to account for observed quark content in stable light nuclei.
invented entities (1)
  • refined gauge/gravity duality mapping from AdS5 black hole to subnuclear system no independent evidence
    purpose: To map black hole interior dynamics onto stable nuclear dynamics for deriving glueball decay and Z_max
    The mapping is introduced as a refined version of duality without external falsifiable evidence provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1809 out tokens · 95237 ms · 2026-05-08T19:30:50.924181+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Iwanenko

    D. Iwanenko. The neutron hypothesis. Nature129, 312 (1932)

    1932

  2. [2]

    Heisenberg

    W. Heisenberg. ¨Uber den Bau der Atomkerne. I. Z. Phys.77, 1-11 (1932)

    1932

  3. [3]

    I. E. Tamm. Exchange forces between neutrons and protons, and Fermi’s theory. Nature,133, 981 (1934); Interaction of neutrons and protons.Ibid.134, 1010-1011 (1934)

    1934

  4. [4]

    H. Yukawa. On the interaction of elementary particles. I. Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Japan17, 48-57 (1935)

    1935

  5. [5]

    Gasiorowicz.Elementary Particle Physics(New York: Wiley, 1966)

    S. Gasiorowicz.Elementary Particle Physics(New York: Wiley, 1966)

    1966

  6. [6]

    Hofstadter

    R. Hofstadter. The electron scattering method and its application to the structure of nuclei and nucleons. In:Nobel Lectures, Physics 1942-1962(Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1961), pp. 560-581

    1942

  7. [7]

    Weinberg

    S. Weinberg. Nuclear forces from chiral lagrangians. Phys. Lett. B251, 288-292 (1990). 25

    1990

  8. [8]

    Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773-1825 (2009); arXiv: nucl-th/0811.1338

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Machleidt and D

    R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rep.503, 1-75 (2011); arXiv: nucl-th/1105.2919

    work page arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    Angeli and K

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova. Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables99, 69-95 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    M.G¨ oppertMeyerandJ.H.D.Jensen.Elementary Theory of Nuclear Shell Structure (New York: Wiley, 1955)

    1955

  12. [12]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf. New extended model of hadrons. Phys. Rev. D9, 3471-3495 (1974)

    1974

  13. [13]

    W. A. Bardeen, M. S. Chanowitz, S. D. Drell, M. Weinstein, and T.-M. Yan. Heavy quarks and strong binding: A field theory of hadron structure. Phys. Rev. D11, 1094-1136 (1975)

    1975

  14. [14]

    Friedberg and T

    R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee. Quantum chromodynamics and the soliton model of hadrons. Phys. Rev. D18, 2623-2631 (1978)

    1978

  15. [15]

    C. E. DeTar and J. F. Donoghue. Bag models of hadrons. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.33, 235-264 (1983)

    1983

  16. [16]

    H. R. Petry, H. Hofest¨ adt, S. Merk, K. Bleuler, H. Bohr, and K. S. Narain. An application of QCD in nuclear structure. Phys. Lett. B159, 363-368 (1985)

    1985

  17. [17]

    F. E. Close.An Introduction to Quarks and Partons(New York: Academic, 1979)

    1979

  18. [18]

    Arima, K

    A. Arima, K. Yazaki, and H. Bohr. A quark shell model calculation of nuclear mag- netic moments. Phys. Lett. B183, 131-134 (1987)

    1987

  19. [19]

    I. Talmi. The nuclear shell model – of nucleons or quarks? Phys. Lett. B205, 140-144 (1988)

    1988

  20. [20]

    Maltman, G

    K. Maltman, G. J. Stephenson Jr., and T. Goldman. A relativistic quark model of nuclear substructure in theA= 3system. Phys. Lett. B324, 1-4 (1994)

    1994

  21. [21]

    B. P. Kosyakov, E. Yu. Popov, and M. A. Vronski˘ ı. The bag and the string: Are they opposed? Phys. Lett. B744, 28-33 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    B. P. Kosyakov, E. Yu. Popov, and M. A. Vronski˘ ı. Could the static properties of nuclei be deduced from the dynamics of a single quark? Eur. Phys. J. A53: 82 (2017); arXiv: nucl-th/1604.06613

    work page arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    B. P. Kosyakov, E. Yu. Popov, and M. A. Vronski˘ ı. Correspondence between the physics of extremal black holes and that of stable heavy atomic nuclei. Class. Quan- tum Grav.36: 135001 (2019); arXiv: hep-th/1802.03545. 26

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    JETP133, 154-160 (2021)

    M.A.Vronski˘ ı, B.P.Kosyakov, andE.Yu.Popov.Howtodetectthelightestglueball. JETP133, 154-160 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    B. P. Kosyakov, E. Yu. Popov, and M. A. Vronski˘ ı. Why is208 82 Pbthe heaviest stable nuclide? Eur. Phys. J. C84: 807 (2024); arXiv: nucl-th/2309.13082

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K. D. Lane, and T.-M. Yan. Spec- trum of charmed quark-antiquark bound states. Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 369-372 (1975)

    1975

  27. [27]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur. Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D32, 189-231 (1985)

    1985

  28. [28]

    G. Bali. QCD forces and heavy quark bound states. Phys. Rep.343, 1-136 (2001); arXiv: hep-th/0001312

    work page arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Barnes, S

    T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson. Higher charmonia. Phys. Rev. D72: 054026 (2005)

    2005

  30. [30]

    S. J. Brodsky, A. Deur and C. D. Roberts. Nature’s strongest force. Sci. Am.330, No 5, 33-39 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    K. G. Wilson. Confinement of quarks. Phys. Rev. D10, 2455-2459 (1974)

    1974

  32. [32]

    Y. Nambu. Strings, monopoles and gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D10, 4262-4268 (1974)

    1974

  33. [33]

    Mandelstam

    S. Mandelstam. General introduction to confinement. Phys. Rep.67, 109-121 (1980)

    1980

  34. [34]

    M. Bander. Theories of quark confinement. Phys. Rep.75, 205-286 (1981)

    1981

  35. [35]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorn, and J. A. Wheeler.Gravity(San Francisco: Freeman, 1973). Exercises 7.1 – 7.3

    1973

  36. [36]

    J. D. Walecka,Theoretical Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics. 2nd ed. (Singapore: World Scientific, 2004). Ch. 5

    2004

  37. [37]

    P.R.Page, T.Goldman, andJ.N.Ginocchio.Relativisticsymmetrysuppressesquark spin-orbit splitting. Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 204-207 (2001); arXiv: hep-ph/0002094

    work page arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    J. N. Ginocchio. Pseudospin as a relativistic symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett.78436-439 (1997); arXiv: nucl-th/9611044

    work page arXiv 1997

  39. [39]

    J. N. Ginocchio. Relativistic symmetries in nuclei and hadrons. Phys. Rep.414, 165-261 (2005)

    2005

  40. [40]

    Liang, J

    H. Liang, J. Meng, and S.-G. Zhou. Hidden pseudospin and spin symmmetries and their origins in atomic nuclei. Phys. Rep.570, 1-84 (2015); arXiv: nucl-th/1411.6774

    work page arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Dittrich and P

    J. Dittrich and P. Exner. Tunnelling through a singular potential barrier. J. Math. Phys.26, 2000-2008 (1985). 27

    2000

  42. [42]

    B. P. Kosyakov. Exact solutions in the Yang-Mills-Wong theory. Phys. Rev. D57, 5032-5048 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9902039

    work page arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    B. P. Kosyakov.Introduction to the Classical Theory of Particles and Fields(Berlin: Springer, 2007)

    2007

  44. [44]

    B. P. Kosyakov. Self-interaction in classical gauge theories and gravitation. Phys. Rep.812, 1-56 (2019); arXiv: hep-th/1812.03290

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. Maldacena. The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  46. [46]

    E. Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253-291 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9802150

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  47. [47]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov. Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory. Phys. Lett. B428, 105-114 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9802109

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  48. [48]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger.Gauge/Gravity Duality(Cambridge: CUP, 2015)

    2015

  49. [49]

    Nˇ astase.Introduction to theAdS/CFTCorrespondence(Cambridge: CUP, 2015)

    H. Nˇ astase.Introduction to theAdS/CFTCorrespondence(Cambridge: CUP, 2015)

    2015

  50. [50]

    C. P. Herzog. A holographic prediction of the deconfinement temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett.98: 091601 (2007); arXiv: hep-ph/0608151

    work page arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    E. Witten. Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 505-532 (1998); arXiv: hep-th/9803131

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  52. [52]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto. Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD. Prog. Theor. Phys.113, 843-882 (2005); arXiv: hep-th/0412141

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    I. I. Cotˇ aescu. Dirac fermions in de Sitter and anti-de Sitter backgrounds. Rom. J. Phys.52, 895-940 (2007); arXiv: gr-qc/0701118

    work page arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Belgiorno and S

    F. Belgiorno and S. L. Cacciatori. Quantum effects for the Dirac field in Reissner- Nordstrøm AdS black hole background. Class. Quant. Grav.25: 105013 (2008); arXiv: gr-qc/0710.2014

    work page arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    S.-Q. Wu. Separability of the massive Dirac’s equation in 5-dimensional Myers–Perry black hole geometry and its relation to a rank-three Killing–Yano tensor. Phys. Rev. D78:064052 (2008); arXiv: 0807.2114

    work page arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    Fritzsch and M

    H. Fritzsch and M. Gell-Mann. Current algebra: Quarks and what else? EConf C720906V22, 135-165, (1972); hep-ph/0208010

    work page arXiv 1972

  57. [57]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski.Ψ-resonances, gluons and the Zweig rule. Nuovo Ci- mento A30, 393-429 (1975)

    1975

  58. [58]

    P. G. O. Freund and Y. Nambu. Dynamics of the Zweig–Iizuka rule and a new vector meson below 2GeV/c2. Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 1645-1649 (1975). 28

    1975

  59. [59]

    R. L. Jaffe and K. Johnson. Unconventional states of confined quarks and gluons. Phys. Lett. B60, 201-204 (1976)

    1976

  60. [60]

    S. Coleman. There are no classical glueballs. Commun. Math. Phys.55, 113-116 (1977)

    1977

  61. [61]

    F. E. Close and N. A. T¨ ornqvist. Scalar mesons above and below 1 GeV. J. Phys. G 28, R249-R267 (2002); arXiv: hep-ph/0204205v3

    work page arXiv 2002

  62. [62]

    Amsler and N

    C. Amsler and N. A. T¨ ornqvist. Mesons beyond the naive quark model. Phys. Rep. 389, 61-117 (2004)

    2004

  63. [63]

    Mathieu, N

    V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev, and V. Vento. The physics of glueballs. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E18, 1-49 (2009); arXiv: hep-ph/0810.4453

    work page arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    Crede and C

    V. Crede and C. A. Meyer. The experimental status of glueballs. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.63, 74-116 (2009); arXiv: hep-ex/0812.0600v3

    work page arXiv 2009

  65. [65]

    P. A. Zylaet al. (Particle Data Group). Review of Particle Physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2020: 083C01 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    W. Ochs. The status of glueballs. J. Phys. G40: 043001 (2013); arXiv: hep- ph/1301.5183

    work page arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Ginzburg, I.F., G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, and V. I. Telnov. Production of high- energy collidingγγandγebeams with a high luminosity at VL ´EPP accelerators. JETP Lett.34, 491-495 (1981)

    1981

  68. [68]

    Badelekat al

    B. Badelekat al. The photon collider at TESLA. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19, 5097-5186 (2004); arXiv: hep-ex/0108012

    work page arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    13 (2017) 852 [1702.01625]

    ATLAS Collaboration. Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Nature Physics.13, 852-858 (2017); arXiv: hep-ex/1702.01625v2

    work page arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Aadet al

    G. Aadet al. Observation of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheralPb + Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. Lett.123: 052001 (2019); arXiv: hep-ex/1904.03536

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, and D.-h. Yeom. Black hole remnants and the information loss paradox. Phys. Rep.603, 1-45 (2015); arXiv: gr-qc/1412.8366

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    B. P. Kosyakov. Black holes: interfacing the classical and the quantum. Found. Phys. 38, 678-694 (2008); arXiv: gr-qc/0707.2749

    work page arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    Chong, M

    Z.-W. Chong, M. Cvetiˇ c, H. L¨ u, and C. N. Pope. General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged suprgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett.95: 161301 (2005); arXiv: hep-th/0506029. 29

    work page arXiv 2005

  74. [74]

    S.-Q. Wu. Separability of massive field equations for spin-0 and spin-1/2 charged particles in the general non-extremal rotating charged black holes in minimal five- dimensional gauged supergravity. Phys. Rev. D80: 084009 (2009); arXiv: hep- th/0906.2049

    work page arXiv 2009

  75. [75]

    R. M. Mann, Black Hole Chemistry: the first 15 years. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34: 2542001 (2025); arXiv: gr-qc/2508.01830

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Harari, Phys

    H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Lett.22: 562-565 (1969)

    1969

  77. [77]

    Rosner, Phys

    J. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett.22: 689-692 (1969). 30

    1969